Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 808561, 7 pages
Research Article

Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Conjunction with Ground Improvement: A Case History

CTI and Associates Inc., 51331 W. Pontiac Trail, Wixom, MI 48393, USA

Received 2 February 2011; Accepted 17 May 2011

Academic Editor: Paola Bandini

Copyright © 2011 Kevin C. Foye. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Standard Specifications for Construction, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2005.
  2. A. J. Puppala, Estimating Stiffness of Subgrade and Unbound Materials for Pavement Design, NCHRP Synthesis 382, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  3. AASHTO, Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  4. M. Attia and M. Abdelrahman, “Sensitivity of untreated reclaimed asphalt pavement to moisture, density, and freeze thaw,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1260–1269, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. L. Mokwa and C. S. Peebles, “Strength, stiffness, and compressibility of RAP/aggregate blends,” Pavement Mechanics and Performance, no. 154, pp. 247–255, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. Locander, “Analysis of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) as a Base Course Material,” Colorado Department of Transportation—Research Report CDOT-2009-5, p. 66, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2003, D6951-03.
  8. R. M. Koerner, Designing with Geosynthetics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 5th edition, 2005.
  9. J. A. Siekmeier, D. Young, and D. Beberg, “Comparison of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer with Other Tests During Subgrade and Granular Base Characterization in Minnesota,” in Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli: Third Volume, S. D. Tayabji and E. O. Likanen, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 1999, ASTM STP 1375. View at Google Scholar
  10. “1852: Quantitative Extraction of Bituminous Mixtures (Centrifuge),” Lab Manual, p. 7, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2010.
  11. AASHTO, Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA), Washington, DC, USA, 2010, T 164.