Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Road Pavement Maintenance Prioritization: Methodological Exposition and Case Study

<table class="table-group" id="tab10"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Road maintenance objectives</td><td align="center">Road safety</td><td align="center">Pavement surface preservation</td><td align="center">Operational status and standards</td><td align="center">Road aesthetics</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Mean relative maintenance objective weights</td><td align="center">0.37</td><td align="center">0.31</td><td align="center">0.22</td><td align="center">0.10</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="5"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Average maintenance objectives weighting vector (<svg height="8.8423pt" id="M194" style="vertical-align:-0.2064009pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 12.8091 8.8423" width="12.8091pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M962 650H739L732 622L760 619C812 613 819 604 798 552C760 457 671 267 606 131H604L511 638H480L237 131H233L183 554C177 607 183 614 226 619L248 622L257 650H24L17 622C88 615 92 611 103 524L173 -11H203L450 491H453L543 -11H575L839 529C882 609 886 613 953 622L962 650Z" id="g113-88"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="974" vert-adv-y="974"></glyph.data></g></svg>) for the case study.

Advances in Civil Engineering

tab10

Table 10

Table 10: Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Road Pavement Maintenance Prioritization: Methodological Exposition and Case Study 