Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 4975097, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4975097
Research Article

Cyclic and Explosive Evaluation of New Proposed Steel Joint

1UTM Construction Research Centre (CRC), Institute of Smart Infrastructures and Innovative Construction, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81300 Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
2Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor, Malaysia

Received 2 August 2015; Revised 23 October 2015; Accepted 1 November 2015

Academic Editor: John Mander

Copyright © 2016 Iman Faridmehr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S.-J. Chen, C. H. Yeh, and J. M. Chu, “Ductile steel beam-to-column connections for seismic resistance,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 122, no. 11, pp. 1292–1299, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Zhang and P. Dong, “Residual stresses in welded moment frames and implications for structural performance,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 306–315, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C.-M. Uang, Q.-S. Yu Kent, S. Noel, and J. Gross, “Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 57–68, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. D. Engelhardt and A. S. Husain, “Cyclic-loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 3537–3550, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. L. Houghton, “Steel moment resisting frame beam-to-column connections,” Google Patents, 1997.
  6. S. Marjanishvili and E. Agnew, “Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 20, no. 4, Article ID 010604QCF, pp. 365–374, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. E. Karns, D. L. Houghton, B. E. Hall, J. Kim, and K. Lee, “Blast testing of steel frame assemblies to assess the implications of connection behavior on progressive collapse,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Structures Congress, St. Louis, Mo, USA, May 2006.
  8. A. S. Usmani, Y. C. Chung, and J. L. Torero, “How did the WTC towers collapse: a new theory,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 501–533, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Yang and K. H. Tan, “Numerical analyses of steel beam–column joints subjected to catenary action,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 70, pp. 1–11, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Xu and B. R. Ellingwood, “Disproportionate collapse performance of partially restrained steel frames with bolted T-stub connections,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. P. Timoshenko, J. M. Gere, and W. Prager, “Theory of elastic stability,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 29, p. 220, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  12. American Institute of Steel Construction, Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, AISC Connection Prequalification Review Panel, 2010.
  13. Department of Defense, “Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse,” UFC 4-023-03, Department of Defense, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. AISC, Plastic Design Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1989.
  15. ASTM, “Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials,” ASTM Standard E8-04, 2004, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 3. View at Google Scholar