Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 7925193, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7925193
Research Article

Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Uncertainty in and Cost of Using Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80253, USA
2Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80253, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Mehmet E. Ozbek; ude.etatsoloc@kebzo.temhem

Received 28 March 2017; Accepted 11 May 2017; Published 19 July 2017

Academic Editor: Deodato Tapete

Copyright © 2017 Alex A. Hesse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. USGPO, Code of Federal Regulations (annual edition) 23 CFR 650 - Bridges, Structures, and Hydraulics, 2009.
  2. “White Paper on Bridge Inspection and Rating,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2009, ASCE/SEI-AASHTO Ad-Hoc Group On Bridge Inspection, Rating, Rehabilitation, and Replacement. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Hesse, Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Accuracy and Reliability of Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo, USA, 2013.
  4. A. A. Hesse, R. A. Atadero, and M. E. Ozbek, “Uncertainty in common NDE techniques for use in risk-based bridge inspection planning: Existing data,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 20, no. 11, Article ID 04015004, pp. 1–8, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Hatami and G. Morcous, “Developing Deterioration Models for Nebraska Bridges,” 2011, Nebraska Department of Roads Final Report.
  6. M. I. Yousuf, “Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 12, no. 4, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. A. Linstone and M. Turoff, The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Advanced Book Program, Boston, Mass, USA, 2002.
  8. C. Okoli and S. D. Pawlowski, “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications,” Information and Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C.-C. Hsu and B. A. Sandford, “The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–8, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. English and G. L. Kernan, “The prediction of air travel and aircraft technology to the year 2000 using the Delphi method,” Transportation Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. A. Kalaian and R. M. Kasim, “Termination sequential Delphi survey data collection,” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. J. Sheskin, Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 3rd edition, 2004. View at MathSciNet
  13. K. L. Rens, T. J. Wipf, and F. W. Klaiber, “Review of nondestructive evaluation techniques of civil infrastructure,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 152–160, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Moore, D. Rolander, B. Graybeal, B. Phares, and G. Washer, “Highway Bridge Inspection: State-of-the-Practice Study,” 2001, Prepared by the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Final Report.
  15. B. Ludwig, “Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology?” Journal of Extension, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 93–96, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. M. Phares, D. D. Rolander, B. A. Graybeal, and G. A. Washer, “Reliability of visual bridge inspection,” Public Roads (Publication of the Federal Highway Administration), vol. 64, no. 5, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. L. Barnes and J.-F. Trottier, “Ground-penetrating radar for network-level concrete deck repair management,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 257–262, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. Gucunski, A. Imani, F. Romero et al., Nondestructive Testing to Identify Concrete Bridge Deck Deterioration, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Yehia, O. Abudayyeh, S. Nabulsi, and I. Abdelqader, “Detection of common defects in concrete bridge decks using nondestructive evaluation techniques,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 215–225, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. L. Rens, C. L. Nogueira, and D. J. Transue, “Bridge management and nondestructive evaluation,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. C. Wood and K. L. Rens, “Nondestructive testing of the Lawrence street bridge,” Structures, pp. 1–15, 2006. View at Google Scholar