Research Article

Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Uncertainty in and Cost of Using Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges

Table 4

True response stability results from the accuracy subsection from round two through round four.

Rounds 2 to 3 stabilityRounds 3 to 4 stability

Concrete NDE methods
Electrical potential−4.930.04
Mechanical sounding−2.83−1.69
Thermal−3.23−0.14
Visual inspection−11.98−1.77
Steel NDE methods
Acoustic emission1.00−0.41
Liquid penetrant−4.93−2.75
Magnetic particle-crack−1.180.10
Magnetic particle-weld−0.95−0.03
Radiography−3.45−0.42
Ultrasonic-crack−8.461.00
Ultrasonic-pin−6.58−0.17
Ultrasonic-weld0.221.00
Visual inspection−4.15−5.38

Note. Critical Value = 0.6 (values above critical value are considered stable).