Research Article
Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Uncertainty in and Cost of Using Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges
Table 4
True response stability results from the accuracy subsection from round two through round four.
| | Rounds 2 to 3 stability | Rounds 3 to 4 stability |
| Concrete NDE methods | | Electrical potential | −4.93 | 0.04 | Mechanical sounding | −2.83 | −1.69 | Thermal | −3.23 | −0.14 | Visual inspection | −11.98 | −1.77 | Steel NDE methods | | Acoustic emission | 1.00 | −0.41 | Liquid penetrant | −4.93 | −2.75 | Magnetic particle-crack | −1.18 | 0.10 | Magnetic particle-weld | −0.95 | −0.03 | Radiography | −3.45 | −0.42 | Ultrasonic-crack | −8.46 | 1.00 | Ultrasonic-pin | −6.58 | −0.17 | Ultrasonic-weld | 0.22 | 1.00 | Visual inspection | −4.15 | −5.38 |
|
|
Note. Critical Value = 0.6 (values above critical value are considered stable).
|