Review Article
2 + 1 Highways: Overview and Future Directions
Table 4
Comparison of international transition zone design.
| Country | Transition zone length (m) | Critical transition | Noncritical transition | Taper | Buffer | Total | Taper | Buffer | Total |
| Sweden [2] | 150 | 0 | 300 | 50 | 0 | 100 | Germany [14] | 3 | 174 | 180 | 30 | 0 | 60 | Denmark [27] | 140 | 0–300 | 280 | 25 | 0 | 50 | Finland [21] | 200 | 100 | 500 | 25 | 0 | 50 | Ireland [8] | 150 | 0 | 300 | 25 | 0 | 50 | United Kingdom [32] | 130 | 40 | 300 | 25 | 0 | 50 | Texas, US [41] | WS/3.28 | 15 | Variable | WS/2/3.28 | 0 | Variable |
|
|
Note. W is the lane width in ft; S is the posted speed limit in mph.
|