Research Article

Development of Ideal Hump Geometric Characteristics for Different Vehicle Types “Case Study” Urban Roads in Kafr El-Sheikh City (Egypt)

Table 5

Results of the best achieved model for speed hump characteristics on hump-crossing speed.

ModelVariableConstantLHSR2ANOVA (F)

MicrobusesA1Coefficient−0.7604.4460.0120.87976.032 (0)
t ( value)−0.62410.4622.038
A2Coefficient5.0274.857−26.6530.87948.272 (0)
t ( value)1.55811.954−0.804
A3Coefficient0.9734.491−14.8800.0100.88048.720 (0)
t ( value)0.21910.029−0.4071.446

Passenger carsB1Coefficient−2.0265.4570.0180.90599.898 (0)
t ( value)−1.51311.6912.878
B2Coefficient10.0855.978−93.2560.90498.577 (0)
t ( value)2.90913.773−2.816
B3Coefficient4.855.638−59.0400.0120.91571.826 (0)
t ( value)1.04812.078−1.5481.633

MotorcyclesC1Coefficient−0.5075.7780.0250.85669.499 (0)
t ( value)−0.2879.3913.001
C2Coefficient15.746.511−121.0510.86542.666 (0)
t ( value)3.32010.909−2.486
C3Coefficient8.4456.013−76.8660.0170.88250.048 (0)
t ( value)1.3839.760−1.5271.746

Note.t” means the t-test statistic; the best model; H is the height of speed hump in meter, L is the length of speed hump in meter, and S is the spacing between two consecutive speed humps.