Research Article
Pseudodynamic Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Strip Footing Using the Advanced Optimization Technique “Hybrid Symbiosis Organisms Search Algorithm” with Numerical Validation
Table 4
Comparison of seismic bearing capacity coefficient (Nγe) obtained by different standard algorithms.
| Φ | kh | DE | PSO | ABC | HS | BSA | ABSA | SOS | HSOS |
| (a) 2c/γB0 = 0.25, Df/B0 = 0.5, and k = kh/2 | 20° | 0.1 | 11.54 | 11.771 | 11.255 | 11.62 | 11.25 | 11.284 | 11.248 | 11.247 | 0.2 | 8.714 | 8.524 | 8.11 | 8.73 | 8.1 | 8.51 | 8.02 | 8.01 |
| 30° | 0.1 | 34.681 | 34.854 | 34.535 | 34.942 | 34.53 | 34.591 | 34.53 | 34.529 | 0.2 | 24.514 | 24.641 | 24.319 | 24.43 | 24.319 | 24.361 | 24.32 | 24.314 |
| 40° | 0.1 | 138.90 | 139.12 | 138.85 | 139.54 | 138.83 | 138.99 | 138.9 | 138.82 | 0.2 | 94.768 | 95.546 | 94.78 | 94.89 | 94.77 | 94.82 | 94.77 | 94.766 |
| (b) 2c/γB0 = 0.5, Df/B0 = 0.75, and k = kh/2 | 20° | 0.1 | 16.46 | 16.363 | 16.359 | 16.512 | 16.37 | 16.45 | 16.361 | 16.359 | 0.2 | 12.53 | 12.325 | 12.581 | 12.524 | 12.33 | 12.812 | 12.324 | 12.321 |
| 30° | 0.1 | 46.91 | 46.579 | 46.942 | 46.76 | 46.59 | 46.751 | 46.575 | 46.573 | 0.2 | 33.931 | 33.823 | 34.15 | 33.99 | 33.83 | 33.97 | 33.816 | 33.811 |
| 40° | 0.1 | 174.76 | 174.68 | 174.691 | 174.93 | 174.67 | 174.81 | 174.69 | 174.65 | 0.2 | 121.69 | 121.59 | 121.61 | 121.59 | 121.58 | 121.561 | 121.58 | 121.54 |
|
|