Research Article
GIS-Enabled Culvert Design: A Case Study in Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Table 5
Results of culvert designs for Tuscaloosa locations.
| | Culvert ID | C | I (mm/hr) | A (m2) | Q (m3/s) | Diametermodel, m (ft) | Diameterexisting, m (ft) |
| | CI51 | 0.8 | 0.183 | 0.125 | 5.31 | 1.219 (4.0) | 0.457 (1.5) | | CI64 | 0.5 | 0.205 | 0.137 | 4.10 | 1.067 (3.5) | 0.457 (1.5) | | CI190 | 0.6 | 0.226 | 0.059 | 2.08 | 0.762 (2.5) | 0.610 (2.0) | | CI56 | 0.3 | 0.168 | 0.169 | 2.58 | 0.914 (3.0) | 0.457 (1.5) | | CI62 | 0.7 | 0.213 | 0.067 | 2.69 | 0.914 (3.0) | 0.610 (2.0) | | CI188 | 0.7 | 0.204 | 0.089 | 3.66 | 1.067 (3.5) | 0.610 (2.0) | | CI189 | 0.5 | 0.169 | 0.136 | 3.44 | 1.067 (3.5) | 0.610 (2.0) | | CI191 | 0.8 | 0.232 | 0.025 | 1.31 | 0.610 (2.0) | 0.305 (1.0) | | CI183 | 0.8 | 0.218 | 0.065 | 3.05 | 0.914 (3.0) | 0.457 (1.5) | | CI182 | 0.7 | 0.240 | 0.028 | 1.28 | 0.762 (2.5) | 0.457 (1.5) |
|
|
