Research Article

Development of Regression Models considering Time-Lag and Aerosols for Predicting Heating Loads in Buildings

Table 24

Residual statistics for a DOE large office building depending on different models.

Residual statisticsa
MinimumMaximumMeanStd. DeviationN

Modified modelbPredicted value−47685040.0048544072.005299326.208881896.17120,350
Residual−35572376.000136128544.0000.00012515413.33620,350
Std. predicted value−5.9654.8690.0001.00020,350
Std. residual−2.84210.8740.0001.00020,350

New modelcPredicted value−5426438.0019135408.001919966.693352476.3564807
Residual−19135408.00073064632.0000.0006504633.2714807
Std. predicted value−2.1915.1350.0001.0004807
Std. residual−2.93911.2230.0000.9994807

Limited modeldPredicted value−198986816.00346896704.0063958680.4493151196.75920,350
Residual−280478208.0002066232704.0000.000178671928.27020,350
Std. predicted value−2.8233.0370.0001.00020,350
Std. residual−1.57011.5620.0001.00020,350

aDependent variable: heating load of a DOE large office building. bpredictors: (constant), visibility, diffuse radiation, atmospheric station pressure, wind speed, total sky cover, dry bulb temperatures, direct normal radiation, relative humidity, global horizontal radiation, and horizontal infrared radiation, and dew point temperatures; cpredictors: (constant), precipitable water, direct normal radiation, total sky cover, AOD, relative humidity, atmospheric station pressure, diffuse radiation, dew point temperatures, global horizantal radiation, and horizantal infrared radiation; dpredictors: (constant), wind speed, dry bulb temperatures, relative humidity, global horizontal radiation, atmospheric station pressure, and dew point temperatures.