Research Article

Development of Regression Models considering Time-Lag and Aerosols for Predicting Heating Loads in Buildings

Table 8

Residual statistics for a DOE small office building depending on different models.

Residual statisticsa
MinimumMaximumMeanStd. deviationN

Modified modelbPredicted value−16410367.0028590780.003786390.105224087.11820,350
Residual−20649606.00064699612.0000.0007114276.78520,350
Std. predicted value−3.8664.7480.0001.00020,350
Std. residual−2.9029.0920.0001.00020,350

New modelcPredicted value−2313629.0013152829.001123572.721738678.4484854
Residual−10689199.00046347212.0000.0003739487.2584854
Std. predicted value−1.9776.9190.0001.0004854
Std. residual−2.85612.3840.0000.9994854

Limited modeldPredicted value−8359116.0017571524.003786390.104531787.97820,350
Residual−15785886.00070738864.0000.0007574095.20120,350
Std. predicted value−2.6803.0420.0001.00020,350
Std. residual−2.0849.3380.0001.00020,350

aDependent variable: heating load of a DOE small office building. bPredictors: (constant), visibility, diffuse radiation, atmospheric station pressure, wind speed, total sky cover, dry bulb temperatures, direct normal radiation, relative humidity, global horizontal radiation, horizontal infrared radiation, and dew point temperatures; cpredictors: (constant), precipitable water, direct normal radiation, total sky cover, AOD, relative humidity, atmospheric station pressure, diffuse radiation, dew point temperatures, global horizontal radiation, and horizontal infrared radiation; dpredictors: (constant), wind speed, dry bulb temperatures, relative humidity, global horizontal radiation, atmospheric station pressure, and dew point temperatures.