Research Article
Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Prediction of Compressive Strength of Concrete
Table 3
Results of training and validation of the DT model, RF model, and NN model for compressive strength of concrete.
| Model | Curing age | Results of training set | Results of validation set | Results of testing set | R2 | RMSE | R2 | RMSE | R2 | RMSE |
| DT | 28 days | 0.7167 | 3.0717 | 0.4534 | 3.7188 | 0.4388 | 3.9073 | 56 days | 0.8604 | 2.0111 | 0.7519 | 2.4596 | 0.8008 | 2.2514 | 91 days | 0.8785 | 1.8454 | 0.8835 | 1.7957 | 0.8270 | 1.8294 | RF | 28 days | 0.9426 | 1.6433 | 0.7943 | 1.3400 | 0.6870 | 2.6912 | 56 days | 0.9670 | 1.1306 | 0.9343 | 1.7282 | 0.9058 | 1.1449 | 91 days | 0.9780 | 0.8957 | 0.9828 | 1.6123 | 0.9213 | 1.0700 | NN | 28 days | 0.9599 | 0.7251 | 0.9476 | 0.8213 | 0.9460 | 0.8106 | 56 days | 0.9769 | 0.7176 | 0.9872 | 0.8099 | 0.9500 | 0.9100 | 91 days | 0.9770 | 0.8023 | 0.9824 | 0.9641 | 0.9562 | 0.9106 |
|
|