Research Article

Finite Element Model Updating in Bridge Structures Using Kriging Model and Latin Hypercube Sampling Method

Table 4

Comparison of testing results and FE model results (unit: Hz).

Measured frequencyFEM frequencyError (%)Kriging modelGAPositionModal description

0.59110.489417.210.53690.5408Arch rib1st order symmetrical lateral bending
1.18041.032212.561.13071.13802nd order antisymmetrical lateral bending
1.83871.614512.191.76641.78053rd order symmetrical lateral bending
2.58832.309110.792.52282.54454th order antisymmetrical lateral bending
3.41362.934314.043.19783.23065th order symmetrical lateral bending
4.30123.800811.634.13384.17536th order antisymmetrical lateral bending
5.10214.537511.074.92154.97647th order symmetrical lateral bending

2.01432.0799−3.262.03502.0455Girder and arch rib1st order antisymmetrical vertical bending
2.93673.0691−4.512.97303.00572nd order symmetrical vertical bending
3.24993.5905−10.483.43773.49423rd order symmetrical vertical bending
3.82894.2221−10.274.14274.18154th order antisymmetrical vertical bending
4.79444.47136.744.40204.42825th order symmetrical vertical bending
4.95245.0990−2.965.25735.16146th order antisymmetrical vertical bending

3.97603.297917.053.76373.8466Girder1st order antisymmetrical lateral bending
4.62625.2794−14.125.02665.13182nd order symmetrical lateral bending

4.45074.6486−4.454.85884.8203Arch rib1st order torsional
5.48515.5923−1.955.96175.83062nd order torsional