Mechanical Properties of High-Strength High-Performance Reinforced Concrete Shaft Lining Structures in Deep Freezing Wells

Table 9

Comparison of theoretically, experimentally, and numerically determined HSHPRCSL plastic ultimate bearing capacity.

Model	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)	(MPa)
A-1	65.3	49.19	31.85	2.62	40.26	17.0	17.51	18.72
A-2	72.2	54.98	35.44	2.74	44.79	19.5	20.25	21.82
A-3	76.8	58.87	37.82	2.83	47.80	21.0	22.08	22.40
A-4	67.9	51.38	33.21	2.67	41.98	16.8	16.99	17.50
A-5	74.2	56.67	36.48	2.78	46.11	19.0	19.29	20.87
A-6	79.3	61.01	39.12	2.87	49.45	21.0	21.21	23.01
A-7	62.2	46.45	30.13	2.55	38.08	15.5	16.58	16.95
A-8	78.3	60.14	38.59	2.85	48.78	21.5	23.13	23.88

Note: is the average cube compressive strength; is the standard cube compressive strength; is the prismatic axial compressive strength; is the prismatic axial tensile strength; is the biaxial compressive strength; is the experimentally determined ultimate bearing capacity; is the theoretically determined ultimate bearing capacity; and is the numerically determined ultimate bearing capacity.