Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Civil Engineering
Volume 2019, Article ID 2879156, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2879156
Research Article

Adsorption Property of Pb(II) by the Laterite-Bentonite Mixture Used as Waste Landfill Liner

1Key Laboratory of Geotechnical & Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China
3Laboratoire Navier/CERMES, Ecole des Ponts-ParisTech, 6-8 Av. Blaise Pascal, Cité Descartes, 77455 Marne-la-Vallée, France

Correspondence should be addressed to Yong-gui Chen; nc.ude.ijgnot@gyc

Received 29 January 2019; Revised 10 March 2019; Accepted 12 March 2019; Published 8 April 2019

Academic Editor: Hossein Moayedi

Copyright © 2019 Yong-gui Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

To assess the potential use of laterite-bentonite mixture as waste landfill liner, a range of batch tests were conducted to study the influence of contact time, solid to solution ratio, pH, ion strength, and temperature on Pb(II) adsorption. The experimental results showed that the uptake of Pb(II) by laterite-bentonite mixture increases with the increase of contact time and the adsorption equilibrium can be reached within 30 minutes. This process can be delineated well using a pseudo-second-order kinetics equation. Besides, with the increase of solid to solution ratio () and pH, Pb(II) will be adsorbed more by the laterite-bentonite mixture. However, the uptake of Pb(II) will decrease when ion strength rises in the solution and this is due to the competitive adsorption and cation exchange between different cations. When conducting the batch test at 298 K and 323 K, respectively, the experiment results showed significant growth when temperature increases because the adsorption process is an endothermic reaction. This influence of temperate can be described better by the Langmuir isotherm model than that by the Freundlich isotherm model. In each experiment condition, the uptake of Pb(II) increases with the increasing of bentonite content, indicating a good improvement in the effect of bentonite on laterite used as landfill liner.

1. Introduction

With the economic and social development of many countries in the past few decades, industrialization and urbanization grew rapidly along with the great increase in both industrial and municipal solid waste production. In China, the overall volume of municipal solid waste (MSW) increases at a rate of 5% to 8% per year, making the effective disposal of pollution becoming an urgent environmental problem. Generally, there are three main methods for MSW disposal: composting, incineration, and landfilling. By studying the exploiting and capital cost and the treatment efficiency, the sanitary landfill method, which allows the pollutant to decompose and becomes stabilized under control, is widely accepted and used in terms of its economic advantages [1]. However, the leachate, a poisonous and harmful liquid, forms in the process due to the underground water and precipitation, and it contains many heavy metal ions such as Zn(II), Pb(II), Cr(III), Cd(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) [2]. If these toxic metals move out of the landfills by advection and diffusion, the surrounding environment may be contaminated and the health of living plants and animals will be jeopardized [3, 4]. An effective way to restrict the migration of toxic ions is the usage of a liner to absorb these metal ions and separate the environment from MSW [5].

To achieve this goal, the high adsorption of the material used as liners is a crucial prerequisite [6, 7]. However, there are few natural soils and rocks at the landfill that could meet this requirement. For example, laterite, a kind of soil which is distributed wildly in tropical and subtropical regions of South China, is an expected source of liner material whose mechanical property is good. However, the tectonic fissure and low adsorption capacity bring some challenges for its safe application as the landfill liner for MSW [810]. Therefore, a lot of additives have been studied to improve the property of natural materials such as lime, cement, fly ash, clay soils, and shale to improve their adsorption [6, 8, 1113]. Among them, using bentonite as additive or the main material which has high cation exchange capacity (CEC) and specific surface area (SSA) can improve the adsorption property of the liner significantly and reduce its hydraulic conductivity effectively [14, 15]. The literatures showed that the adsorption property has been influenced by contact time, solid-liquid ratio, pH, ionic strength, and temperature [1618]. However, most of the literatures concentrate on the property of pure bentonite and natural clay [1923]. Scarce literatures discuss the property, especially the adsorption capacity of laterite-bentonite mixture other than its hydraulic conductivity [24, 25] and shear strength [26].

In China, the laterite has been considered as the ideal material due to its small settlement, good overall performance, and low costs in many places of South China. Besides, Gaomiaozi (GMZ) bentonite from north of China is a promising additive due to its high CEC, large SSA, and low permeability. To guarantee the safe and long-term application of laterite-GMZ bentonite mixture used as MSW landfill liner, a batch test has been undertaken and effects of bentonite content, contact time, solid-liquid ratio, ionic strength, pH of solution, and temperature on the sorption of Pb(II) are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Apparatus

Laterite used in the present work was taken from Chenzhou City, Hunan province, China, and has been air-dried and sieved (0.5 mm sieve) for use. Some geotechnical and chemical property of this red powder are listed in Table 1 after standardized test (JTGE40-2007) [27] and XRF (X-ray fluorescence spectrometer) test. As can be seen, the laterite is composed of several minerals such as 80.2% kaolinite, 12.5% quartz, and 6.4% monticellite.

Table 1: Some geotechnical and chemical properties of laterite.

The GMZ bentonite was sampled from Gaomiaozi township in Northern China, and it had also been air-dried and sieved (0.5 mm sieve) for use. The basic properties of this light-grey powder are listed in Table 2 [28, 29]. As shown in the table, its main mineral component is montmorillonite (75.4%).

Table 2: Basic properties of GMZ bentonite.

Pb(NO3)2, a white crystal, used in this experiment was bought from the Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and its molecular weight is 331.21. The purity of this solid is more than 99.0%, and it is a kind of dangerous chemical which can be used as strong oxidant.

In the test procedures, three apparatus were used, including a centrifuge, constant temperature incubator, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The type of the centrifuge is TD3(800B) whose maximum relative centrifugal force (RCF) is . The incubator (HY-2 series) was produced by Shanghai Jing Hong Laboratory Instrument Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The ICP used in this study was produced by Agilent Technologies (California, America) whose type is PE8300.

2.2. Adsorption Test

Adsorption experiments were conducted using the batch test according to the ASTM (1993) standard [30] under two temperatures of 298 K and 323 K. The laterite and bentonite used in this test were mixed at the dry mass ratios of 1 : 0, 9 : 1, 8 : 2, and 0 : 1 and have been sieved with 0.5 mm mesh. Pb(II) solution (100 mg·L−1) was prepared by dissolving Pb(NO3)2 solid in distilled water under the specific mass ratio. The experiment procedures are as follows.

Soil powder and Pb(II) solution were mixed at different solid-liquid ratios () in the Erlenmeyer flask which contains 200 mL solution. The Erlenmeyer flask was sealed on the top and placed in a constant temperature shaking incubator at 180 rpm for 8 hours. At a given time, the Erlenmeyer flask was pulled out and placed in a centrifuge for 10 min at 9400 rpm for solid-liquid separation. The supernatant solution was sampled by using a dropper and dripped into the testing tube of ICP. Then the ion concentration of Pb(II) of this solution was obtained, which is termed equilibrium concentrations (Ce). To study the influence of contact time on the sorption, the concentration of Pb(II) in the supernatant is tested at regular intervals, from 5 min to 480 min. The solid-liquid ratio () was set as 0.5 to 200 g·L−1 for the investigation of its influence on soil adsorption property. Considering the different effect of pH and ion strength of the solution, NaCl solid was added into Pb(II) solution with concentrations of 0 mol·L−1, 0.01 mol·L−1, 0.1 mol·L−1, and 1 mol·L−1 and the pH of this solution was controlled from 2 to 11 in the experiment. There were 29 experiment conditions in total, and they are all listed in Table 3.

Table 3: Experiment conditions of Pb(II) adsorption property of soil.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Contact Time and Adsorption Kinetics

To study the influence of contact time of Pb(II) adsorption by laterite and its mixture with bentonite, the concentration of Pb(II) was measured at different contact times between soil particles and solution from 5 to 480 minutes. The experiment results are plotted in Figure 1. As can be drawn from the figures, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) increases with the increase in contact time and the equilibrium time of four different soils decreases from 30 minutes to 5 minutes apparently. Therefore, the equilibrium contact time for other studies in this research is determined at 30 minutes. In Figure 1, the adsorption rate (%) of Pb(II) and the adsorption capacity of soil per unit mass (qe) are expressed in following equation:where Ci and Ce (mg·L−1) are the initial Pb(II) concentration and equilibrium Pb(II) concentration in the solution, respectively; (L) is the total volume of the solution; and m (g) is the mass of adsorbent (i.e., soil particles).

Figure 1: Influence of contact time on Pb(II) adsorption ( = 5 g·L−1; pH = 5.5; Ci = 100 mg·L−1; T = 298 K; ωb is the mass content of bentonite in the soil mixture).

Based on the experiment data, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) within 5 minutes are 10.55%, 35.11%, 55.32%, and 99.17% when bentonite content equals to 0%, 10%, 20%, to 100%, respectively. The ultimate adsorption rate of this kind heavy metal ion is 12.83%, 38.06%, 57.80%, and 100% when the bentonite content varies in the mixture. Obviously, the equilibrium adsorption rate of pure bentonite is about 8 times to pure laterite, and this can be explained by the much higher adsorption capacity of bentonite than that of laterite [31].

To analyze the influence of time on adsorption, three adsorption kinetic models are proposed to delineate the adsorption process, which are pseudo-first-order kinetics equation, pseudo-second-order kinetics equation, and intraparticle diffusion kinetics equation (i.e., W-M kinetics equation), respectively [32].

The pseudo-first-order kinetics equation and pseudo-second-order kinetics equation are based on the assumptions that the reaction rate is in direct proportion to the first and second power of reactant concentration. The equations can be expressed as follows:where qt (mg·g−1) is the adsorbed quantity of Pb(II) on soil particles at time t (min) and qe (mg·g−1) is the equilibrium adsorption capacity. k1 and k2 (g·mg−1·min−1) are the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order rate constants of adsorption, respectively.

The intraparticle diffusion kinetics equation was proposed by Weber and Morris based on three assumptions: (1) the resistance of film only works at the initial stage of adsorption in a short time or it is neglected; (2) the direction of diffusion is random and the concentration of adsorbate is constant; and (3) the intraparticle diffusion parameter is a constant.where ki (g·mg−1·min−1) is the intraparticle diffusion parameter and C (mg·g−1) is a constant.

Based on the three kinetics model, the fitting curves of the Pb(II) adsorption kinetics are plotted in Figure 2. The value of parameters in equations (2)–(4) can be calculated and are listed in Table 4. As can be drawn from the table, the values of correlation coefficient (i.e., R2) for pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics models are greater than 0.99, indicating a good fitting effect especially for the pseudo-second-order kinetics model. Besides, similar results with the use of the pseudo-second-order kinetics model can be found in the literatures using bentonite [17, 33, 34] or laterite [21] as adsorbent. Therefore, the proposed pseudo-second-order kinetics model can delineate this process very well. However, the correlation coefficients of intraparticle diffusion kinetics equation are far from 1, suggesting an improper use of this model.

Figure 2: Pb(II) adsorption kinetics plots of laterite-bentonite mixtures: (a) pseudo-first order; (b) pseudo-second order; (c) intraparticle diffusion.
Table 4: Values of pseudo-second-order kinetics parameters.
3.2. Influence of

To study the dependence of Pb(II) adsorption on solid to solution ratio, varied (0.5–200 g·L−1) adsorption experiments are conducted and the results are plotted in Figure 3. It is clear that the adsorption rate of Pb(II) ions increases with the increase of . Some researchers attribute this phenomenon to the greater cation availability of exchangeable sites with the increase of [20,33,35]. When this value equals to 100 g·L−1, 40 g·L−1, 20 g·L−1, and 5 g·L−1 for four laterite-bentonite mixtures whose mass content of bentonite is 0%, 10%, 20%, and 100%, respectively, the ultimate ion adsorption rate remains constant even when the solid mass into the solution is increased. Adding the soil particles into the solution does provide more adsorption sites, but the total quantities of Pb(II) cannot be adsorbed completely. This is ascribed to the decreasing concentration gradient between solution and adsorbent surface when a majority of Pb(II) ions were absorbed by the soil particles [36]. Besides, the equilibrium capacity of soil per unite mass decreases with the increase of . Similar results have been found for Cd(II) on the GMZ bentonite [16] and lead on the treated laterite [37], and this can be credited to the competition of soil particles.

Figure 3: Influence of on (a) equilibrium capacity of Pb(II) and (b) Pb(II) adsorption rate (pH = 5.5; Ci = 100 mg·L−1; T = 298 K; t = 30 min), ωb is the mass content of bentonite in the soil mixture.

On the contrary, increasing content of bentonite in the soil mixture brings a higher equilibrium adsorption capacity and ultimate adsorption rate of Pb(II). These results also indicate the higher cation exchange capacity of bentonite than that of laterite, leading to important influence on adsorption characteristic by the mass content of bentonite. Parallel results have been found in copper adsorption by sand-bentonite as liners [38] and Pb(II) adsorption by mixture of kaolinite-sago waste and bentonite-sago waste [39].

3.3. Influence of pH

Because the existence of Pb(II) is highly dependent on the pH value, the batch test was carried out under different pH values [211], and the experiment results are shown in Figure 4. Clearly, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) increases significantly with the increase of the pH value, and this trend becomes evident when bentonite content decreases. When the pH value of the solution equals to 2, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) is 0%, 4.49%, 14.08%, and 64%, respectively, for the four soil mixtures and this value aggrandize approximately to 100% when the pH of the solution is 11. The increase in the speed of ion adsorption rate is sharp when pH varies from 2 to 8, and it reduces when the pH value exceeds 8. The extent of total increase in adsorption is about 36% to 100% which indicates that pH plays a paramount role in the adsorption of Pb(II).

Figure 4: Influence of pH on Pb(II) adsorption ( = 5 g·L−1; pH = 5.5; Ci = 100 mg·L−1; T = 298 K; t = 30 min).

Similar influence of pH has been found in the literatures on Cu(II) [40], Cd(II) [20, 41], Ni(II) [41], La(III) [42], Pb(II) [41, 43], and Sr(II) [44]. The reason of the aforementioned experiment rules is ascribed to the change of hydrolysis degree of Pb(II) which depends highly on the pH of solution [45]. As is shown in equation (5) and Figure 5, the majority of Pb(II) exists as free Pb2+ when pH < 7.5 and K is the hydrolysis equilibrium constant of Pb(II):

Figure 5: Distribution of Pb(II) existence form as a function of pH.

In this situation, the high concentration of H+ will compete for the adsorption sites on soil particles. Therefore, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) is scarce in this condition. With the rise of pH [7.5–9.5], more Pb(OH)+ forms and a small part of Pb(II) has been hydrolyzed into Pb(OH)2 which will enhance the adsorption of Pb(II). With the further increase of pH [9.5–11], most of Pb(II) separates out of the solution in the form of the Pb(OH)2 sediment which has a strong influence on the equilibrium adsorption rate of this kind of heavy metal ion.

Besides, the surface property of soil particles will change with the increase of pH, such as surface charges of laterite and bentonite particles [37]. When the pH value of the solution is low, the high concentration of H+ leads to a positively charged surface of soil particles. The electrostatic repulsion between the surface charge and Pb(II) ions will result in a low adsorption rate of Pb(II). However, there is a specific pH value when the surface charge of soil particles equals to zero, which is named zero point charge (pHzpc). When pH > pHzpc, the particle surface becomes negatively charged, leading to a high uptake of Pb(II) because of the electrostatic attraction between cations and anions.

3.4. Influence of Ion Strength

To find out the effect of ion strength [Na+] on Pb(II) adsorption, the NaCl solid was added into Pb(NO3)2 to obtain a solution whose sodium concentration are 0 mol·L−1, 0.01 mol·L−1, 0.1 mol·L−1, and 1.0 mol·L−1, respectively. The experiment result is presented in Figure 6. It is obvious that the increase of ion strength plays a crucial role on the adsorption of Pb(II). The adsorption decreases sharply with the increase of NaCl concentration. For the four different soil mixtures, the adsorption rate of Pb(II) is 14.85%, 37.21%, 55.78% and 99.99%, respectively, when there is no Na+. However, the uptake extent of Pb(II) decreases to 4.63%, 4.94%, 9.51%, and 12.63% when the concentration of NaCl increases to 1.0 mol·L−1, and this decline is fast within certain range [0–0.1 mol·L−1]. This phenomenon is more apparent when the mass content of bentonite is high which indicates that sodium ion has a greater influence on bentonite than laterite.

Figure 6: Influence of initial ion strength on Pb(II) adsorption ( = 5 g·L−1; pH = 5.5; Ci = 100 mg·L−1; T = 298 K; t = 30 min).

Similar results have been reported in the literatures, and they attribute the reason to a competitive adsorption or the cation exchange between the added cation and adsorbate[16]. When Na+ is at a low concentration [0–0.1 mol·L−1], its greater hydration power leads to a cation replacement on soil particles. The active site on laterite and bentonite particles will be occupied by Na+. When the adsorption of Na+ saturates gradually with the increased concentration of NaCl, the decrease of Pb(II) adsorption rate slows down as shown in Figure 6 and other literatures[16]. Mg2+ and Ca2+ have similar comparative effect on Pb(II) adsorption and the effect on these three cations can be arranged in the following order: Mg2+ > Na+ > Ca2+ [37].

Other than cations, acid radicals also have an influence on the adsorption rate of Pb(II). The radius of Cl is smaller than NO3, leading to a stronger complexation between Cl and Pb2+. Therefore, the concentration of Pb(II) is lower when adding NaCl into the solution than NaNO3. Besides, SO42+ in the solution will also reduce the uptake rate of Pb(II) due to the chelate complex compound formed between SO42+ and Pb2+.

3.5. Influence of Temperature and Isothermal Adsorption

It is known that the environment temperature is a crucial factor to influence the physicochemical behavior of metal ions adsorbed by materials. Therefore, the batch test of Pb(II) adsorption is carried out at 25°C (298 K) and 50°C (323 K), and the experimental results are plotted in Figure 7. Clearly, the uptake of Pb(II) is higher when the temperature is higher, suggesting that the adsorption reaction of Pb(II) is an endothermic process. When the temperature rises from 289 K to 323 K and the equilibrium Pb(II) concentration (Ce) varies from 0 mg·L−1 to 1240 mg·L−1, the increase of adsorption capacity of soil per unit mass (qe) changes from 3 mg·g−1 to as high as 56.447 mg·g−1 for different laterite-bentonite mixtures. This influence effect is stronger for soils with more bentonite.

Figure 7: Adsorption isotherm of Pb(II) ( = 5 g·L−1; pH = 5.5; t = 30 min).

To simulate the adsorption isotherm of the Pb(II) adsorption on surface of soil particles, the Langmuir isothermal model and Freundlich isothermal model are adopted in this study and previous works. There are three assumptions of the Langmuir isothermal model: (1) adsorbate molecules are absorbed on the particle surface as a monolayer; (2) all the adsorption sites are the same; (3) there is no interaction between adsorbate molecules. The Langmuir isothermal model can be expressed as follows:where (mg·g−1) is the maximum adsorption capacity per unit mass, (L·mg−1) is the Langmuir adsorption constant which relates to the change of enthalpy of reaction process, and these can be calculated through the linear relationship between Ce/qe and Ce.

In contrast, the Freundlich isothermal model is an empirical formula for an inhomogeneous system as follows:where is already defined in equation (6) and (mg1−1/n·L1/n·g−1) and are the Freundlich isotherm parameters. The experiment data of the isotherm adsorption are fitted using the Langmuir and Freundlich models, and the results are plotted in Figures 8 and 9. As can be drawn from the curves, the values of correlation coefficient (R2) for soils using the Langmuir model are almost more than 0.99. But this value of the Freundlich fitted curves has a great distance with 1. Therefore, the adsorption behavior of Pb(II) can be accurately described by the Langmuir isotherm model. Therefore, it can be conjectured that a majority of adsorbate molecules are absorbed on the particle surface as a monolayer which is consistent with the assumptions of the Langmuir isothermal model.

Figure 8: Langmuir fitting curves of Pb(II) adsorption: (a) ωb = 0%; (b) ωb = 10%; (c) ωb = 20%; (d) ωb = 100%.
Figure 9: Freundlich fitting curves of Pb(II) adsorption.

The fitted values of parameters in the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models are listed in Table 5. As can be drawn, with the rise of temperature, the maximum adsorption capacity per unit mass () and the value of also have an apparent increment. This effect can be explained by the endothermic process of Pb(II) adsorption. In addition, KF in the Freundlich isotherm model is a parameter which represents the degree of adsorption. Its value increases obviously with the increase of , indicating a greater influence of bentonite on Pb(II) adsorption than that of laterite. Besides, the increase of in the Langmuir model also verifies this influence. To predict the maximum adsorption of the laterite-bentonite mixture, a simple equation was proposed as follows:where (%) is the bentonite content, (mg·g−1) and (mg·g−1) are the maximum adsorption of Pb(II) by pure laterite and bentonite, respectively, and is the maximum value of Pb(II) adsorption by the laterite-bentonite mixture.

Table 5: Parameters of the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.

When applying equation (8) at two different temperatures, the prediction equation above can be plotted in Figure 10. As is shown in the figure, the predicted value of maximum adsorption by mixture is almost equal to the experiment results, indicating the practical application of this prediction equation.

Figure 10: Comparison between the predicted values and experimental results of maximum Pb(II) adsorption by laterite-bentonite mixture.

4. Conclusion

In this study, the adsorption of Pb(II) by laterite-bentonite mixture was investigated using the batch test under different conditions, including bentonite content (0–100%), contact time (5–480 min), solid to solution ratio (0.5–200 g·L−1), pH (2–11), ion strength (0–1 mol·L−1), and temperature (328 K, 323 K). To evaluate the influence of those conditions, three adsorption kinetic models and two adsorptive isotherm models are used to analyze the experiment data and the feasibility of different models in this research. Several important conclusions are drawn as follows:(1)With the increase of contact time and bentonite content, the uptake of Pb(II) will increase and reach an equilibrium concentration in the end. The higher the content of bentonite in the mixture is, the shorter the equilibrium time will be. In general, the adsorption process can reach the equilibrium within 30 minutes. The experiment data can be fitted best with the pseudo-second-order kinetics equation among pseudo-first-order kinetics, second-order kinetics, and intraparticle diffusion kinetics equation. The Pb(II) adsorption rate of pure bentonite is about 8 times than laterite because of the much higher adsorption capacity of bentonite than laterite.(2)When increasing the , the adsorption rate of Pb(II) ions will increase apparently because of the more adsorption sites in the Pb(NO3)2 solution. However, the equilibrium capacity of laterite-bentonite mixture will decrease because of the decreasing concentration gradient between solution and adsorbent surface.(3)The uptake of Pb(II) will change significantly with the change of solution pH and Na+ concentration in the solution. When pH increases from 2 to 11 and the concentration of NaCl decreases from 1.0 mol·L−1 to 0 mol·L−1, the concentration of comparative cation such as H+ and Na+ will decrease in the solution, leading to the better adsorption of Pb(II) by soil particles. This indicates that the main adsorption mechanism in this process is the cation exchange and electrostatic adsorption.(4)The adsorption rate of Pb(II) in higher temperature (323 K) is obviously greater than the value in lower temperature because the Pb(II) adsorption by laterite-bentonite mixture is an endothermic reaction. The Langmuir isotherm equation can delineate the adsorption result better than the Freundlich isotherm model, indicating a majority of monolayer adsorbate molecules in the Pb(II) adsorption process.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41422207 and 41772279), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (15A009), Scientific and Technical Fund of Hunan Province, Changsha, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. S. Renou, J. G. Givaudan, S. Poulain, F. Dirassouyan, and P. Moulin, “Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 468–493, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. M. Moody and T. G. Townsend, “A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition,” Waste Management, vol. 63, pp. 267–274, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. A. Rahman, L. K. Foong, R. W. Lewis, and R. Nazir, “Laboratory investigation of LNAPL migration in double-porosity soil under fractured condition using digital image analysis,” Transport in Porous Media, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 521–542, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. F. Loke, N. Abd Rahman, R. Nazir, and R. W. Lewis, “Study of aqueous and non-aqueous phase liquid in fractured double-porosity soil using digital image processing,” Geologia Croatica, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Bellir, M. Bencheikh-Lehocine, A. H. Meniai, and N. Gherbi, “Study of the retention of heavy metals by natural material used as liners in landfills,” Desalination, vol. 185, no. 1–3, pp. 111–119, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Çoruh and O. N. Ergun, “Use of fly ash, phosphogypsum and red mud as a liner material for the disposal of hazardous zinc leach residue waste,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 173, no. 1–3, pp. 468–473, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. M. Chen, “A fundamental theory of environmental geotechnics and its application,” Chinese Journal of Geotech Engineering, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–46, 2014, in Chinese. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Sobti and S. K. Singh, “Sorption behaviour of heavy metals in sand-bentonite-coal ash mixes for use as a liner material in landfills,” International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Prakash and E. Poulose, “Kuttanad clay amended laterite as a landfill liner for waste disposal facilities,” International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 75–78, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Mohamed, M. T. Abdelrahman, and F. Abdelaal, “Sand bentonite mixture as secondary liners in landfills,” International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 225–228, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. I. Bozbey and E. Guler, “Laboratory and field testing for utilization of an excavated soil as landfill liner material,” Waste Management, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1277–1286, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Li, C. Lin, and Z. Zhang, “Utilization of shale-clay mixtures as a landfill liner material to retain heavy metals,” Materials & Design, vol. 114, pp. 73–82, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Malusis, J. E. Maneval, E. J. Barben, C. D. Shackelford, and E. R. Daniels, “Influence of adsorption on phenol transport through soil–bentonite vertical barriers amended with activated carbon,” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol. 116, no. 1–4, pp. 58–72, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y.-G. Chen, W.-M. Ye, X.-M. Yang, F.-Y. Deng, and Y. He, “Effect of contact time, pH, and ionic strength on Cd(II) adsorption from aqueous solution onto bentonite from Gaomiaozi, China,” Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 329–336, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Chen, B. Zhu, D. Wu et al., “Eu(III) adsorption using di(2-thylhexly) phosphoric acid-immobilized magnetic GMZ bentonite,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 181-182, pp. 387–396, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Yu, L. Zhu, B. Guo, and S. He, “Adsorption of mercury on laterite from Guizhou province, China,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1328–1334, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Du and S. Hayshi, “A study on sorption properties of Cd2+ on Ariake clay for evaluating its potential use as a landfill barrier material,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 14–24, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. Sun, Y.-G. Chen, Y.-J. Cui, W.-M. Ye, and D.-B. Wu, “Removal of europium on GMZ bentonite corroded by young cement water at different temperatures,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 1297–1305, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Kaya and A. H. Ören, “Adsorption of zinc from aqueous solutions to bentonite,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 125, no. 1–3, pp. 183–189, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. L. C. Morandini and A. D. L. Leite, “Characterization and hydraulic conductivity of tropical soils and bentonite mixtures for CCL purposes,” Engineering Geology, vol. 196, pp. 251–267, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. A. Kasim, N. A. C. Azmi, M. Mukri, and S. N. A. M. Noor, “Effect on physical properties of laterite soil with difference percentage of sodium bentonite,” International Conference on Applied Physics and Engineering, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  22. MO Transport, JTG E40-2007: Test Methods of Soils for Highway Engineering, People’s Transportation Press, Beijing, China, 2007, in Chinese.
  23. L. X. Qian, “A fundamental study of GMZ bentonite as buffer material in deep geological disposal for high-level radioactive waste,” Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2007, Doctor Thesis. View at Google Scholar
  24. Y. G. Chen, X. M. Liu, X. Mu et al., “Thermal conductivity of compacted GO-GMZ bentonite used as buffer material for a high-level radioactive waste repository,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 9530813, 11 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. ASTM, “Standard test method for 24-h batch-type measurement of contaminant sorption by soils and sediments,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 44–47, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. A. M. W. Hefne, “Kinetic and thermodynamic study of the adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution to the natural and treated bentonite,” International Journal of Physical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 281–288, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Robati, “Pseudo-second-order kinetic equations for modeling adsorption systems for removal of lead ions using multi-walled carbon nanotube,” Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. X. Li, J. Hu, G. D. Sheng, G. X. Zhao, and Q. Huang, “Effect of pH, ionic strength, foreign ions and temperature on the adsorption of Cu(II) from aqueous solution to GMZ bentonite,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 349, no. 1–3, pp. 195–201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Mitra, L. S. Thakur, V. K. Rathore, and P. Mondal, “Removal of Pb(II) and Cr(VI) by laterite soil from synthetic waste water: single and bi-component adsorption approach,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 57, no. 39, pp. 18406–18416, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Chatterjee and S. De, “Application of novel, low-cost, laterite-based adsorbent for removal of lead from water: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 193–203, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Kaoser, S. Barrington, M. Elektorowicz, and L. Wang, “Copper adsorption with Pb and Cd in sand-bentonite liners under various pHs. Part II. Effect on adsorption sites,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2241–2255, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Yunita, “Adsorption Pb2+ menggunakan campuran kaolin-ampas sagu dan bentonite-ampas sagu,” Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia, 2011, Master Thesis. View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Hu, Y. Wu, N. Yi, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and X. Xin, “Chemical properties of dissolved organic matter derived from sugarcane rind and the impacts on copper adsorption onto red soil,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 27, pp. 21750–21760, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. A. Taha, M. A. Shreadah, A. M. Ahmed, and H. F. Heiba, “Multi-component adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), and Ni(II) onto Egyptian Na-activated bentonite; equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics, and application for seawater desalination,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1166–1180, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Bourliva, A. K. Sikalidis, L. Papadopoulou et al., “Removal of Cu2+ and Ni2+ ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto natural palygorskite and vermiculite,” Clay Minerals, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Chen, C. Zhu, Y. Sun, H. Duan, W. Ye, and D. Wu, “Adsorption of La(III) onto GMZ bentonite: effect of contact time, bentonite content, pH value and ionic strength,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 3, pp. 1339–1347, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Chen, R. Huang, C. Zhu et al., “Adsorptive removal of La(III) from aqueous solutions with 8-hydroxyquinoline immobilized GMZ bentonite,” Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 665–674, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C.-H. Weng, “Modeling Pb(II) adsorption onto sandy loam soil,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Goldberg and R. A. Glaubig, “Effect of saturating cation, pH, and aluminum and iron oxide on the flocculation of kaolinite and montmorillonite,” Clays and Clay Minerals, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 220–227, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. A. Glatstein and F. M. Francisca, “Influence of pH and ionic strength on Cd, Cu and Pb removal from water by adsorption in Na-bentonite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 118, pp. 61–67, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. V. O. Njoku, “Biosorption potential of cocoa pod husk for the removal of Zn(II) from aqueous phase,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 881–887, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. X. Huang and M. Pan, “The highly efficient adsorption of Pb(II) on graphene oxides: a process combined by batch experiments and modeling techniques,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 215, pp. 410–416, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. A. Drweesh, N. A. Fathy, M. A. Wahba et al., “Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solutions on HCl-treated Egyptian kaolin,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1674–1684, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. C. Chen and X. Wang, “Adsorption of Ni(II) from aqueous solution using oxidized multiwall carbon nanotubes,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 26, pp. 9144–9149, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. X. C. Fu, Physical Chmistry, High Education Press, Beijing, China, 1990.