Research Article
An Improved Low-Cost Continuous Compaction Detection Method for the Construction of Asphalt Pavement
Table 2
Compaction degree results at typical locations of section 7#.
| Positioning results | CMV | CCV | VCVe | CMV1 | CMV2 | CMV3 | CCV1 | CCV2 | CCV3 | VCVe1 | VCVe2 | VCVe3 |
| P1 (2.97, 11.49) | 105.01 | 84.39 | 245.27 | 98.31 | 101.25 | 223.18 | 134.62 | 59.85 | 219.59 | P2 (2.93, 13.18) | 93.78 | 145.76 | 181.74 | 93.27 | 168.69 | 159.54 | 115.95 | 127.24 | 166.50 | P3 (2.99, 14.45) | 126.73 | 206.05 | 229.71 | 125.15 | 240.98 | 168.49 | 158.89 | 178.58 | 218.74 | Average | 108.51 | 145.40 | 218.91 | 105.58 | 170.30 | 183.74 | 136.49 | 121.89 | 201.61 | SD | 13.68 | 49.67 | 27.04 | 13.99 | 57.06 | 28.13 | 17.58 | 48.62 | 24.83 | COV (%) | 12.60 | 34.16 | 12.35 | 13.25 | 33.50 | 15.31 | 12.88 | 39.89 | 12.32 | Average (S7) | 107.75 | 155.93 | 202.13 | 109.59 | 157.79 | 177.83 | 103.26 | 155.95 | 195.45 |
|
|
SD: standard deviation; COV: coefficient of variation.
|