Vibration Theoretical Analysis of Elastically Connected Multiple Beam System under the Moving Oscillator

He, Binbin; Feng, Yulin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4950841

Advances in Civil Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 4950841 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4950841

Vibration Theoretical Analysis of Elastically Connected Multiple Beam System under the Moving Oscillator

Binbin He^1,2and Yulin Feng^3,4

Academic Editor: Salvatore Grasso

Received30 Jul 2019

Revised08 Sept 2019

Accepted19 Sept 2019

Published16 Oct 2019

Abstract

To investigate the vibration analysis of elastically connected multiple beam system (ECMB) under the moving oscillator, finite sine-Fourier transform has been applied to the dynamic partial differential equations of ECMB with respect to space coordinates. Then, the numerical integration has been used to solve the equations. Finally, the expression for vibration analysis of ECMB under the moving oscillator has been derived based on finite sine-Fourier inverse transform. Using the method developed in this study and ANSYS numerical method, the vibration analysis of a four-layer beam system under moving oscillator with different speeds has been calculated. The results show that the calculated results from the method developed in this study are in good agreement with the ANSYS numerical calculation results, and the differences between the two calculation results are all less than 2%, which verified the correctness of the method developed in this study. The method developed in this study has been applied to the beam-rail system on a railway line in China. The effect of the train speed and interlayer stiffness on the vibration of beam-rail system has been investigated. The results show that the maximum dynamic deflection of the rail under the train load is always near the midspan, while the maximum dynamic deflections of the track plate, base plate, and bridge occur after the train travel through the midspan. The interlayer stiffness has a larger impact on the vibration of the rail and the track plate and little impact on the vibration of the base plate and the bridge.

1. Introduction

Beam-type structures are widely used in mechanical, civil, rail transportation, material engineering, and other fields. In engineering applications, it is of great importance to predict the dynamic response of beam-type structures accurately [1, 2].

Hitherto, there are many studies conducted by researchers all over the world on the dynamic response of beam-type structures under a moving oscillator. Also, there are many studies on the dynamic response of single-beam under a moving oscillator [3–5]. An important extension to the concept of single-beam is the double-beam system. The dynamic response of double-beam under a moving oscillator was investigated by different methods [6, 7]. Due to the complexity of the three-beam, the previous studies on the vibration problems of three-beam under a moving oscillator were mostly aimed at its vibration characteristics [8].

In many engineering applications, the vibration theory of single-beam, double-beam, and three-beam cannot meet the requirement. Therefore, it is urgently required to develop a method which can determine the vibration response of ECMB. Hitherto, there are only a few studies on the vibration problem of ECMB. Rao [9] investigated the natural vibrations of elastically connected multi-Timoshenko beams. Kelly and Srinivas [10] developed a general theory for the free response of elastically connected axially loaded beams. A set of coupled partial differential equations that govern the free response of a set of n elastically connected axially loaded beams has been developed and nondimensionalized. Using Timoshenko and high-order shear deformation theory, Stojanović et al. [11] investigated a general procedure for the determination of the natural frequencies and buckling load for a set of beam system under compressive axial loading. Ariaei et al. [12] investigated the dynamic behavior of n parallel identical elastically connected Timoshenko beams subjected to a moving load. A relatively new computed approach called the Adomian modified decomposition method has been used to analyze the free vibration problem for an elastically connected multiple beam with arbitrary boundary conditions [13]. Through a differential transform method, a new procedure for determining natural frequencies and mode shapes of a system of elastically connected multiple rotating tapered beams has been presented [14]. Bakhshi Khaniki and Hosseini-Hashemi [15] investigated the dynamical behavior of ECMBs with respect to a moving mass. For double- and three-layered microbridge systems, using Laplace transform, an analytical solution has been developed. Moreover, for higher-layered microbridge systems, a state space method has been used. Hashemi and Bakhshi Khaniki [16, 17] studied the forced vibration of multilayered nanobeam systems (MLNBS) under a moving nanoparticle. Eringen’s nonlocal theory and Euler Bernoulli beam theory were used to model each layer of the MLNBS. It was shown that nonlocality has a significant effect in analyzing such systems. Kargarnovin et al. [18] proposed a closed-form solution to study the dynamics of a composite beam with a single delamination under the action of a moving constant force; the delaminated beam was divided into four interconnected beams using the delamination limits as their boundaries. In summary, most of the current research methods for the vibration response of double-beam and three-beam systems under a moving oscillator have complicated derivation, with low computational efficiency and many limiting conditions. There are only a few studies on the vibration response of ECMBs.

In the present paper, based on the finite sine-Fourier transform, a method for calculating the vertical vibration response of ECMB under the moving oscillator has been developed. This method has the advantages of fewer constraints, higher computational efficiency, and a wider range of application. A comparison of the calculated results using this method, ANSYS numerical method, and existed literature showed that they are in good agreement. Therefore, the correctness of the method developed in this study has been verified. The problem of a dynamic response of beams subjected to moving oscillators is a reasonable idealization of how railway tracks and pavements behave under wheel load. This problem has been studied in some of above-mentioned studies [19–22]. Further, a beam-rail system on a railway line in China has been used as a case study. By simplifying the train into an oscillator system, the effect of the train speed on the dynamic deflection and amplification coefficient of beam-rail system and the effect of interlayer stiffness on the dynamic deflection of the midspan of beam-rail system have been analyzed.

The original contribution of this article is to consider an elastically connected multiple beam system subjected to a moving oscillator, and the semianalytical expression form of this article is easy to solve, which results in high computational efficiency. The semianalytical method can provide a theoretical basis for deriving a practical formula for engineering calculation and make up the deficiency of numerical simulation analysis. This study could be useful in different subjects of science, e.g., mechanical, civil, traffic, and material engineering and many other fields. For example, the dynamic behavior of the bridge-track system of railway (maglev) under the train load or multilayered nanobeam systems as a part of nanostructures has achieved more usages with improvements done in nanotechnology and the usage of smaller devices in designing different machines.

2. Mathematical Model and Governing Equations

2.1. Governing Equations of ECMB under the Moving Oscillator

The schematic diagram for ECMB under a moving oscillator is shown in Figure 1. All of beams are homogeneous and prismatic and have the same length , but they can have different mass or flexural rigidities, which makes the model more real in reflecting some actual engineering projects. According to the d’Alembert principle, the dynamic equilibrium equation of an oscillator system is

According to the d’Alembert principle, the dynamic equilibrium equations of ECMB arewhere with are the dynamic deflection, elastic modulus, horizontal inertia moment, and beam mass per unit length for each layer of beam, respectively; are the unsprung mass and sprung mass, respectively; and is the dynamic deflection of the sprung mass, and it is assumed that the unsprung mass moves along the beam without separating from the beam body. In this way, the deflection of unsprung mass is the same as that of the beam segment at the same location; and are the spring coefficient and damping coefficient of an oscillator system, respectively; with is the interlayer spring stiffness; is Dirac function; is the moving speed of the oscillator; is the external force; and is the gravitational acceleration.

2.2. Finite Sine-Fourier Transform

In order to solve equations (1)–(7), the finite sine-Fourier transform has been used and the transformation is defined as follows [23]:

For a small deformation, the boundary conditions of ECMB are

Based on the boundary conditions [24], the finite sine-Fourier transform of the fourth derivative of the displacement function with respect to the coordinate is

Applying finite sine-Fourier transform with respect to the space coordinate to both sides of equations (1)–(7) gives

Although k and i in the above equations are between , taking N items can generally meet the accuracy requirement.

Further, equations (13)–(18) can be expressed aswherewhere , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and are all matrices and and are matrices.

2.3. Solution of Equations

As the position of the moving oscillator on ECMB changes with time, the mass matrix , the damping matrix and the stiffness matrix in equation (19) also all change with time . Hence, the dynamic equilibrium equations for the coupling system of ECMB under moving oscillator are differential equations with time-varying coefficients. Further, the coefficient matrices , , and also vary with the change in the speed . The reaction of the entire structural system is calculated step by step at every time increment , and the imbalance of the system within is usually ignored in the calculation. On the other hand, the time-varying characteristic of the system is approximated by a series of constantly changing time-invariant systems. Therefore, the method of is used in this study to solve equation (19).

, , and are the displacement, velocity, and acceleration at time , respectively, and they have been set to satisfy the dynamical equation (19) as follows:

The displacement, velocity, and acceleration at the initial time are as follows:

Using the method, the velocity and displacement at time arewhere are the parameters of the method.

Further, the acceleration, velocity, and displacement at time () are

By substituting into equation (9), we can obtainwhere .

3. Method Validation

To validate the accuracy of the method developed in this study for calculating the dynamic response of ECMB under a moving oscillator, a four-layer beam system is taken as an example. Using the MATLAB program and ANSYS numerical method, the vibration analysis of a four-layer beam system has been calculated for four moving speeds. Taking a four-story beam system as an example, using the MATLAB program and ANSYS numerical method, the vibration analysis of a four-layer beam system has been calculated for four moving speeds (i.e., 16 m/s, 32 m/s, 128 m/s, and 160 m/s). Furthermore, the results of the dynamic response time-history curves and the peak of vibration analysis of the midspan deflection have been compared [25]. A comparison of results from the Matlab program and ANSYS numerical calculations is shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. In addition, the multilayer beam system was degraded to a double-layer beam to compare with the methods of the existed literature conveniently, and then the dynamic response of double-layer beam under the moving oscillator was calculated and compared with the results of Wu and Gao’s method [6]. The dynamic response peaks of each layer at the positions of x = 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m were, respectively, extracted as shown in Table 2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

In Table 1, , , , and are ANSYS calculation results of the peak of vibration analysis of the midspan deflections of the first layer, second layer, third layer, and fourth layer, respectively. , , , and are the Matlab calculation results of the peak of vibration analysis of the midspan deflections of the first layer, second layer, third layer, and fourth layer, respectively. , , , and are the calculation errors between the Matlab program and ANSYS calculation results of the peaks of vibration analysis of the midspan deflections of the first layer, second layer, third layer, and fourth layer, respectively. In Figure 2, , , , and are the midspan dynamic deflections of the first layer, second layer, third layer, and fourth layer, respectively.

From Table 1, it can be seen that , , , and of four moving speeds are less than 1.89%, 1.23%, 0.91%, and −0.48%, respectively. Since the differences are small, the correctness of the method developed in this study has been verified. From Figure 2, it can be seen for the dynamic time-history curves of the midspan deflections at the first layer, second layer, third layer, and fourth layer, the Matlab program results are in good agreement with the ANSYS numerical calculation results. From Table 2, it could be seen that the deviation of the calculation results of two methods at different positions (x = 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m) is less than 1.8%. Since the differences are small, the correctness of the method developed in this study has been verified again.

The advantages of the method developed in this study in terms of higher number of layers in this paper for specific performance are as follows: the system studied in this paper consists of n identical beams, in general, when much more layers are considered, the coupled partial equations are difficult to solve. Compared with the literature [12], this paper does not need to build a special relation of the stiffness of intermediate springs for decoupling the equation of motion; with the finite sine-Fourier transform, the equations can be uncoupled and solved. Compared with the literature [6], when studying the vibration of double-beam system, this paper does not need to divide into the vibration of two single-beam systems subjected to the same force, interlayer stiffness, damping, material properties of each layer, and moving oscillator [19]. When the number of layers increases, only the increased layer needs to be input into Formula (19) after the finite sine-Fourier transform; as long as the appropriate value of is chosen, the vibration of elastically connected multiple beam system under the moving oscillator can be carried out, where, although is between , taking items can generally meet the accuracy requirement of engineering calculation [26].

4. Analysis of Examples

Since the method developed in this study has been verified (Section 3), it has been applied to a 32 m span beam-rail system (rail, track plate, base plate, and bridge) on a line in China [6, 27], as shown in Figure 3. The train model has been simplified into a system consisting of wheel, spring, damper, and sprung mass. The material properties and geometric parameters of the beam-rail system are shown in Table 3.

4.1. Effect of Train Speed on the Vibration of the Beam-Rail System

Figure 4 shows the variations of the dynamic deflections of rail, track plate, base plate, and bridge when the train moves across the bridge at the low speeds (i.e. 8 m/s and 32 m/s), medium-high speeds (64 m/s and 80 m/s), and high speeds (128 m/s and 160 m/s). In Figure 4, is the dynamic deflection and is the position of the train on the bridge. Figure 5 shows the comparison between the curves of the dynamic deflections of the rail, track plate, base plate, and bridge and the train position on the bridge with and .

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

From Figures 4 and 5, it can be seen that when the train speed increases from 8 m/s to 200 m/s, the peaks of the vibration analysis of the rail, track plate, base plate, and bridge deflection in the beam-rail system all increase initially and then subsequently decrease, which shows that for the beam-rail system, there is a critical train speed. The maximum dynamic deflection always occurs near the midspan of the rail, and the excitation effect of the train has a significant effect only on the first order frequency of the rail. Hence, the investigation on the maximum dynamic deflection of the rail can be done by analyzing the maximum dynamic deflection at midspan only. However, the shapes of dynamic deflection curves of the track plate, base plate, and bridge vary with the train speed, the dynamic response frequency increase with the train speed increase, and the position of the maximum dynamic deflection shifts from the midspan to the traveling direction of the train with the train speed increase. Further, it can be seen that the dynamic deflection response curves of the base plate and the bridge are basically the same. This is due to the large vertical compressive stiffness of the sliding layer, which causes the base plate and the bridge to act as one unit.

4.2. Effect of Stiffness of Each Layer under the Rail on the Vibration of Beam-Rail System

For the train speed of 100 m/s, the effects of the fastener under the rail, the rubber pad under the supporting block, and the sliding layer stiffnesses on the vibration of the beam-rail system have been investigated. In each calculation, only one of three above stiffnesses has been changed, and the other two remain unchanged. Then, three different calculation schemes have been designed. For the stiffness of the fastener under the rail and the stiffness of the rubber pad under the supporting block , the range is 40 MN/m²∼100 MN/m², with an increment of 10 MN/m². For the stiffness of the sliding layer , the range is 500 MN/m²∼2e5 MN/m², with an increment of 100 MN/m². Figures 6–8 show the maximum dynamic deflections of the rail, track plate, base plate, and bridge corresponding to different stiffnesses of the fastener under the rail and the rubber pad under the supporting block and the sliding layer, respectively, where is the peak dynamic response of the midspan deflection.

From Figure 6, it can be seen that as the stiffness of the fastener under the rail increases, the maximum rail dynamic deflection decreases with a larger decrease in amplitude; the maximum dynamic deflection of the rail plate fluctuates at first and then gradually flattens, and the variations of the maximum dynamic deflections of the base plate and the bridge are very small and they are basically the same. Therefore, the use of fasteners with high elasticity can effectively reduce the vibration of the rail. As shown in Figure 7, the stiffness of the rubber pad under the supporting block mainly affects the vibrations of the rail and the track plate. When the stiffness of the rubber pad increases from 40 MN/m² to 100 MN/m², the maximum dynamic deflection of the rail first fluctuates sharply and then flattens after reaching to a certain amplitude, the maximum dynamic deflection of the track plate also fluctuates drastically at first and then flattens after dropping to a certain value, and the maximum dynamic deflections of the base plate and the bridge remain practically unchanged. From Figure 8, it can be seen that as the stiffness of the sliding layer increases, the maximum rail dynamic deflection increases at first and then tends towards a constant value, the maximum dynamic deflection of the track plate and the base plate first decreases and then tends towards a constant value, and the maximum dynamic deflection of the bridge remains practically unchanged.

5. Conclusions

Based on finite sine-Fourier inverse transform, the expression for dynamic response of a ECMB under a moving oscillator has been derived. Further, the vibration analysis of a four-layer simply supported beam system under moving oscillator with different speeds and the vibration analysis of a double-layer simply supported beam system under moving oscillator with different positions have been calculated. Comparing with the numerical methods developed in earlier studies, the method developed in this study has the advantages of clearer concept, simpler programming, and less computational effort. A beam-rail system on a line in China has been used as a case study, and the effect of the train speed and interlayer stiffness on the dynamic deflection and amplification coefficient of the midspan of the beam-rail system has been analyzed. Moreover, from the case study, the following conclusions have been obtained, which are meaningful to engineering design.(1)The results show that the calculated results are in good agreement with those of ANSYS numerical and the existing literature. Hence, the correctness of the method developed in this study has been verified.(2)This study could be useful in different subjects of science, e.g., mechanical, civil, traffic, and material engineering and many other fields. For example, the dynamic behavior of the bridge-track system of railway (maglev) under the train load or multi layered nanobeam systems as a part of nanostructures has achieved more usages with improvements done in nanotechnology and the usage of smaller devices in designing different machines.(3)The vertical dynamic deflection of the rail in the beam-rail system under the train load always reaches a maximum near the midspan. The maximum dynamic deflections of the track plate, base plate, and bridge may not occur when the train is located at the midspan but occurs after the train travels through the midspan.(4)In the beam-rail system, there are several critical speeds which should be paid attention to and avoided in the practical engineering. The interlayer stiffness has a larger impact on the vibration of the rail and the track plate while it has a smaller impact on the vibration of the base plate and the bridge.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0405101) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91647103). The authors deeply thank Xilin Chai for his assistance in theoretical derivation and modification in this paper.

References

Y. X. Li and L. Z. Sun, “Active vibration control of elastically connected double-beam systems,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 143, no. 9, Article ID 04017112, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jiang, Y. Feng, W. Zhou, and B. He, “Vibration characteristic analysis of high-speed railway simply supported beam bridge-track structure system,” Steel and Composite Structures, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 591–600, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Eftekhar Azam, M. Mofid, and R. Afghani Khoraskani, “Dynamic response of timoshenko beam under moving mass,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mu and D.-H. Choi, “Dynamic responses of a continuous beam railway bridge under moving high speed train with random track irregularity,” International Journal of Steel Structures, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 797–810, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. S. Kumar, C. Sujatha, and S. Krishnapillai, “Non-uniform Euler-Bernoulli beams under a single moving oscillator: an approximate analytical solution in time domain,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 4479–4487, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wu and Y. Gao, “Dynamic response of a simply supported viscously damped double-beam system under the moving oscillator,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 384, pp. 194–209, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. P. Wang and M. S. Li, “Analysis of vertical dynamic response of simply supported beam traversed by successive moving loads,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 556–562, pp. 751–754, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. W. Hyer, W. J. Anderson, and R. A. Scott, “Non-linear vibrations of three-layer beams with viscoelastic cores, II: Experiment,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Rao, “Natural vibrations of systems of elastically connected Timoshenko beams,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1232–1237, 1974.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Kelly and S. Srinivas, “Free vibrations of elastically connected stretched beams,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 326, no. 3–5, pp. 883–893, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Stojanović, P. Kozić, and G. Janevski, “Exact closed-form solutions for the natural frequencies and stability of elastically connected multiple beam system using Timoshenko and high-order shear deformation theory,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 332, no. 3, pp. 563–576, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Ariaei, S. Ziaei-Rad, and M. Ghayour, “Transverse vibration of a multiple-Timoshenko beam system with intermediate elastic connections due to a moving load,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 263–281, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Mao, “Free vibration analysis of elastically connected multiple-beams by using the Adomian modified decomposition method,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 331, no. 11, pp. 2532–2542, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghafarian and A. Ariaei, “Free vibration analysis of a system of elastically interconnected rotating tapered Timoshenko beams using differential transform method,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 107, pp. 93–109, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Bakhshi Khaniki and S. Hosseini-Hashemi, “The size-dependent analysis of multilayered microbridge systems under a moving load/mass based on the modified couple stress theory,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 132, no. 5, p. 200, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hosseini Hashemi and H. Bakhshi Khaniki, “Dynamic behavior of multi-layered viscoelastic nanobeam system embedded in a viscoelastic medium with a moving nanoparticle,” Journal of Mechanics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 559–575, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Hashemi and H. B. Khaniki, “Dynamic response of multiple nanobeam system under a moving nanoparticle,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 343–356, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Kargarnovin, M. T. Ahmadian, and R.-A. Jafari-Talookolaei, “Analytical solution for the dynamic analysis of a delaminated composite beam traversed by a moving constant force,” Journal of Vibration and Control, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1524–1537, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu and Y. Gao, “Analytical solutions for simply supported viscously damped double-beam system under moving harmonic loads,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 141, no. 7, Article ID 04015004, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Muscolino and A. Palmeri, “Response of beams resting on viscoelastically damped foundation to moving oscillators,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1317–1336, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Biondi, G. Muscolino, and A. Sofi, A Substructure Approach for the Dynamic Analysis of Train-Track-Bridge System, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 2005.
G. Muscolino, A. Palmeri, and A. Sofi, “Absolute versus relative formulations of the moving oscillator problem,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1085–1094, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Guo, Z. Zhai, Z. Yu, F. Chen, Y. Gong, and T. Tan, “Experimental and numerical analysis of the bolt connections in a low-rise precast wall panel structure system,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 7594132, 22 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zheng, H. Zhong, Y. Fang, W. Zhang, K. Liu, and J. Fang, “Rockburst prediction model based on entropy weight integrated with grey relational BP neural network,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 3453614, 8 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Huang, L. Z. Jiang, Y. F. Chen, Y. Luo, and W. B. Zhou, “Experimental study on the seismic performance of concrete filled steel tubular laced columns,” Steel and Composite Structures, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 719–731, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Ba, Z. Kang, and J. Liang, “In-plane dynamic Green’s functions for inclined and uniformly distributed loads in a multi-layered transversely isotropic half-space,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 293–309, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Gou, W. Zhou, Y. Bao, X. Li, and Q. Pu, “Experimental study on dynamic effects of a long-span railway continuous beam bridge,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 669, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Binbin He and Yulin Feng. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1096

Downloads

1188

Citations