Research Article | Open Access
Zhi-Feng Wang, Wen-Chieh Cheng, Ya-Qiong Wang, "Quantitative Evaluation of Ground Movements Caused by Grouting during Shield Tunnelling in Clay", Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 7498367, 7 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7498367
Quantitative Evaluation of Ground Movements Caused by Grouting during Shield Tunnelling in Clay
Grouting has been deemed as one of the most effective measures for mitigation of ground movements during tunnel construction in soft soil. Notwithstanding that, a reliable measure to quantitatively evaluate the grouting-induced ground movements during shield tunnelling in soft soil has not yet been developed. This paper presents a simple method capable of quantitatively estimating the ground movements associated with grouting for tunnel-boring operations where the grouting parameters and soil properties are taken into consideration. The grouting process is simplified as the expansion of a cylindrical cavity with a uniform radial stress applied at soil-grout interface in a half plane, and the analytical solution proposed by Verruijt is introduced for determining the ground movements by the expansion of the cylindrical cavity. The proposed method is verified with a case history undertaken in London Clay. The results obtained suggest that this procedure would be helpful in managing the grouting parameters adopted in upcoming soft ground tunnelling project and mitigating the environmental impacts on nearby properties.
The shield tunnelling method has been widely used to construct underground structures in urban areas for more than 40 years [1–16]. During shield tunnelling, grouting is generally adopted for mitigation of soil settlement due to ground loss [17–20]. Many successful applications of grouting in clay have been reported by published literatures [21–28]. However, in the grouting process, due to the injection of pressurized grout, it will bring the additional loads on the surroundings (such as tunnel linings and ground) and be likely to cause the ground displacements, which can lead to adverse effects on existing building foundations or utilities [29–32]. Therefore, it is of great concern to estimate the magnitude of expected ground displacements before tunnel construction . At present, there are only a few investigations relating to the grouting-induced response during shield tunnelling [34–38]. Komiya et al.  investigated the effectiveness of grouting to reduce surface settlements caused by shield tunnelling in clayey soil based on the laboratory tests and a field case history. Bezuijen et al.  studied the distribution of grout pressure by performing the field testing in the construction of the Sophia Rail Tunnel. Zhang et al.  proposed a nondestructive testing method to evaluate the quality of the grouting treatment during shield tunnelling using ground penetrating radar (GPR). Farrell  reported a case history to mitigate the tunneling-induced settlement by the use of compensation grouting in London. Ye et al.  developed a half-spherical surface diffusion model to describe the infiltration effect of grouting during shield tunnelling. However, it is difficult to find out an available method to quantitatively evaluate the ground movements caused by grouting during shield tunnelling.
The objective of this paper is to develop an approach that is capable of estimating the ground movements induced by grouting during tunnel construction in soft soil by taking into account the grouting parameters (grout pressure and volume) and soil properties, based upon the expansion theory of a cylindrical cavity in a half plane. The proposed method was applied to analyse a case history undertaken in London Clay for demonstrating its applicability.
2. Simplification of Grouting Process of Shield Tunnelling in Soft Soil
During shield tunneling, the annular gap can generally be formed between the erected tunnel lining and the excavated ground due to the smaller extrados of tunnel lining than the shield. The annular gap needs to be soon backfilled with grout not only to stabilize the tunnel linings but also to mitigate the movements of surrounding soil. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) present the longitudinal and transverse views of the grout injection into the annular gap around tunnel lining, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 1 that the grout is injected through the pipes into the shield tail gap with a designed grouting pressure (pg) soon after installing the tunnel lining. Since the grouting process associated with the injection of pressurized grout into the annular gap can result in the additional loads on the surrounding soil and tunnel lining, the ground movements are thus expected. Grouting is a dynamic process, and for the sake of simplicity, this study assumed that the ground movements caused by grouting during shield tunnelling in soft soil are equal to those induced by the expansion of a cylindrical cavity (rsg) with uniform radial stress (pum) in a half plane, as indicated in Figure 1(c).
Verruijt  developed an analytical solution for calculating the deformations by expansion of a circular cavity with uniform radial stress in a half plane, and in this study, Verruijt’s solution was adopted to determine the ground movements caused by grouting during shield tunneling in soft soil. The physical meaning of the radius of circular cavity and the uniform radial stress can be interpreted as the radius of the soil-grout interface (rsg is related to the diameter of tunnel lining and grout volume) and the uniform pressure at the soil-grout interface (pum is related to the grout pressure), respectively.
3. Ground Displacement Caused by Grouting of Shield Tunnelling in Soft Soil
Verruijt  proposed a method for calculating the ground movements for the case of a uniform stress applied at the cavity boundary in a half plane using the complex variable function. Figure 2 shows the parameters needed for calculating the ground movements for the aforesaid case.
The equations for calculating the ground movements proposed by Verruijt  are shown as follows:where Re and Im mean taking the real and imaginary parts, respectively; SxA = the displacement of point A in x direction; SyA = the displacement of point A in y direction; υ = Poisson’s ratio; E = Young’s modulus; x and y are coordinate values of point A in x direction and y direction, respectively, as shown in Figure 2; Z = x + iy; and are the analytic functions and can be determined from the following equation:where Ht = the distance from the tunnel centre to the boundary of half plane; pum = the uniform pressure at the soil-grout interface, which is related to the grout pressure (pg); η = a parameter defined by pum, Ht and rsg; Λ = a parameter defined by Ht and rsg; rsg = the radius of the soil-grout interface, which can be estimated under equivalent volume conditions:where Dout = the outer diameters of the ring and VL = the grout volume per unit length.
4. Analysis of Case History
Wan et al.  presented a case study on the ground deformation response to the construction of crossrail tunnels in London Clay using earth pressure balance machines (EPBMs). Figure 3 presents the subsoil profiles for the worksite where two geological strata, that are, superficial deposits and London Clay, are identified. The thicknesses of the superficial deposits is measured to be 6 m, and it comprises a thin layer of made ground underlain by a series of river terrace deposits .
As shown in Figure 3, the unit weight of the superficial deposits averages 18 kN/m3. Avgerinos et al.  indicated that the modulus of elasticity for the superficial deposits is measured at 10.0 MPa. The successive London Clay at the depths varying from 6.0 to 59.9 m below the ground surface consisted of three units, that are, B2, A3, and A2, and the unit weight of London Clay averages 20 kN/m3. Gasparre et al. [41, 42] indicated that Young’s modulus for London Clay is measured to be 132 MPa. The axis of crossrail tunnels is some 34.5 m below the surface. The extrados of the tunnel rings measured at 6.8 m, and the width of each tunnel ring is 1600 mm. Additionally, this case history recorded both the grouting pressure (pg) and the volume of injected grout (VL), as shown in Figures 4 and 5. The grouting pressure varied from 74 to 279 kPa, with an average value of 173.1 kPa. The volume of injected grout was within the range of 2.74–3.47 m3/m, and the associated average value was measured at 3.12 m3/m.
By use of equation (8), the value of rsg = 3.54 m can be obtained. According to the soil stratum thickness, the weighted average value of Young’s modulus is calculated to as follows: . As discussed previously, the value of the uniform pressure acting at the soil-grout interface (pum) is an unknown parameter which is related to the grouting pressure (pg) and cannot be determined in a straightforward manner. Thus, this study chooses five values, i.e., pum = 0.2pg, 0.4pg, 0.6pg, 0.8pg, and 1.0pg, for the uniform pressure at the soil-grout interface for the calculation of ground movements. Since the vertical displacement of ground surface has been deemed as the major concern in tunnelling practice, it is primarily considered in this study. For the presented case history, the vertical displacement of ground surface can be calculated by substituting the weighted average value of Young’s modulus E, the value of rsg, and the five different values of pum into equations (1)∼(7). Table 1 shows the parameters used in the analysis. The coordinate values of x and y and the variations of the vertical displacement of ground surface against the chosen pum/pg ratios can be obtained with the parameters. The described procedure is briefed in Figure 6.
Figure 7 presents the variation in the calculated vertical displacement of ground surface against the horizontal distance to the tunnel centre for the chosen five values of the usniform pressure. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the calculated vertical displacement against the various distances to the tunnel centre was increased with the increasing grouting pressure and that for the same grouting pressure, the calculated vertical displacement possessed a maximum value at the tunnel centre and was descended with the increasing distance to the tunnel centre. The maximum vertical displacement (Symax) against the chosen five values of pum was calculated to be 0.41 mm, 0.81 mm, 1.22 mm, 1.63 mm, and 2.04 mm, respectively.
Grouting is a complex procedure to simultaneously fill the annular gap formed between the erected tunnel lining and the excavated tunnel bore during the shield tunnelling process. The vertical displacement of ground surface (Sy) is generally consisted of two components: one is the displacement caused by ground loss during shield tunnel construction, and the other is the displacement due to the cavity expansion of injection of pressurized grout. However, in situ constraints and other reasons cause some difficulty in distinguishing the two components. The described procedure briefed in Figure 6 demonstrates how the vertical displacement of ground surface (Sy) induced by grouting can be calculated using equations (1)∼(7). Considering the pum/pg ratios being equal to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, the associated Symax (maximum vertical displacement) values of 0.41 mm, 0.83 mm, 1.22 mm, 1.63 mm, and 2.04 mm were calculated. The Symax values were then normalised with its maximum value () of 10.4 mm incurred in the shield tunnelling process in London Clay , as shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 not only clarified the normalised vertical displacement of ground surface () versus the pum/pg ratio relationship in the presented case history but also distinguished the Symax value from the value.
As can be seen, the normalised ground heave was increased linearly with the increasing pressure ratio and can be expressed using the equation = 0.19 pum/pg. Bezuijen et al.  reported that the value of pum/pg was typically 0.64–1.0 with reference to field measurements of grouting pressure in tunnel-boring operations. During the shield tunnelling process, the pressurised grout is injected into the annular gap formed between the erected tunnel lining and the excavated tunnel bore, and the distribution of the grout injected may be affected by the gravity and its rheology. It is often seen that the grout injected is distributed in an arbitrary manner, particularly for the tunnel invert. Secondary grout injection may be required to deal with the said problem preventing formation of cavity behind tunnel lining and further cracking of tunnel lining due to stress concentration resulting from the cavity behind.
In addition to the reasons above, ground heterogeneous nature and ordering of grout injection are also involved in the distribution of injected grout. Thus, the actual pressure distribution at the soil-grout interface cannot be uniform. This is deemed as the main cause to lead to the pum/pg ratio typically 0.64–1.0. In the event where the values of pum for the analysed case history were chosen to be 0.64pg∼1.0pg, the vertical displacement of ground surface due to grouting could reach 12∼19% of the maximum vertical displacement induced by shield tunnelling in soft soil. The results obtained from this study would be helpful in managing the grouting parameters adopted for upcoming tunnelling project and mitigating the environmental impacts on adjoining properties.
Grouting is a complex procedure to simultaneously fill the annular gap formed between the erected tunnel lining and the excavated tunnel bore during shield tunnelling process. It is of great importance to evaluate the ground movements caused by grouting during shield tunnelling in clay. This paper described a simple procedure for calculating the grouting-induced ground movements during shield tunnelling in soft soil using the expansion theory of a cylindrical cavity where the grouting parameters (grouting pressure and volume of injected grout) and the soil properties are taken into consideration. The grouting process is simplified as the expansion of a cylindrical cavity with a uniform radial stress at soil-grout interface in a half plane. The proposed method was verified with a case history of London Clay. The results obtained suggest that this procedure would be very helpful in managing the grouting parameters adopted for upcoming soft ground tunnelling project and mitigating the environmental impacts on adjoining properties.
The data used to support the findings of this research work are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The research described in this paper was funded by the project supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant no. 2019JQ-114), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant nos. 41702287 and 41807245), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 300102218517). These financial supports are gratefully acknowledged.
- R. J. Mair, “Tunnelling and geotechnics: new horizons,” Géotechnique, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 695–736, 2008.
- J. R. Standing and D. Selemetas, “Greenfield ground response to EPBM tunnelling in London Clay,” Géotechnique, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 989–1007, 2013.
- W. C. Cheng, J. C. Ni, and S. L. Shen, “Experimental and analytical modeling of shield segment under cyclic loading,” International Journal of Geomechanics, vol. 17, no. 6, Article ID 04016146, 2016.
- W.-C. Cheng, J. C. Ni, J. S.-L. Shen, and H.-W. Huang, “Investigation into factors affecting jacking force: a case study,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 322–334, 2017.
- W.-C. Cheng, J. C. Ni, A. Arulrajah, and H.-W. Huang, “A simple approach for characterising tunnel bore conditions based upon pipe-jacking data,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 71, pp. 494–504, 2018.
- J. X. Lai, H. B. Fan, J. X. Chen, J. L. Qiu, and K. Wang, “Blasting vibration monitoring of undercrossing railway tunnel using wireless sensor network,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID 703980, 2015.
- J. Lai, X. Wang, J. Qiu et al., “A state-of-the-art review of sustainable energy based freeze proof technology for cold-region tunnels in China,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 3554–3569, 2017.
- P. Li, F. Wang, and Q. Fang, “Undrained analysis of ground reaction curves for deep tunnels in saturated ground considering the effect of ground reinforcement,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 71, pp. 579–590, 2018.
- P. Li, K. Chen, F. Wang, and Z. Li, “An upper-bound analytical model of blow-out for a shallow tunnel in sand considering the partial failure within the face,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 91, Article ID 102989, 2019.
- J. Qiu, Y. Xie, H. Fan, Z. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Centrifuge modelling of twin-tunnelling induced ground movements in loess strata,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 10, no. 22, p. 493, 2017.
- J. Qiu, H. Liu, J. Lai, H. Lai, J. Chen, and K. Wang, “Investigating the long-term settlement of a tunnel built over improved loessial foundation soil using jet grouting technique,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 32, no. 5, Article ID 04018066, 2018.
- S.-L. Shen, Z.-F. Wang, J. Yang, and C.-E. Ho, “Generalized approach for prediction of jet grout column diameter,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 139, no. 12, pp. 2060–2069, 2013.
- S. L. Shen, Z. F. Wang, and W. C. Cheng, “Estimation of lateral displacement induced by jet grouting in clayey soils,” Géotechnique, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 621–630, 2017.
- H. Fattahi and N. Babanouri, “RES-based model in evaluation of surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling,” Indian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 746–752, 2018.
- Y.-Q. Wang, Z.-F. Wang, and W.-C. Cheng, “A review on land subsidence caused by groundwater withdrawal in Xi’an, China,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 2851–2863, 2019.
- Z.-F. Wang, S.-L. Shen, and G. Modoni, “Enhancing discharge of spoil to mitigate disturbance induced by horizontal jet grouting in clayey soil: theoretical model and application,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 111, pp. 222–228, 2019.
- J. Y. Fu, J. S. Yang, S. T. Zhu, and Y. F. Shi, “Performance of jet-grouted partition walls in mitigating the effects of shield-tunnel construction on adjacent piled structures,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 31, no. 2, Article ID 04016096, 2016.
- W. C. Cheng, J. C. Ni, S. L. Shen, and Z. F. Wang, “Modeling of permeation and fracturing grouting in sand: laboratory investigations,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 2067–2082, 2018.
- N. P. G. Atangana, J. Chen, G. Modoni, A. Arulrajah, and Y. H. Kim, “A review of jet grouting practice and development,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 11, no. 16, p. 459, 2018.
- Y. Wei, Z. Wu, X. Yao, and X. Gao, “Quantifying effect of later curing on pores of paste subject to early-age freeze-thaw cycles by different techniques,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 31, no. 8, Article ID 04019153, 2019.
- D. I. Harris, R. J. Mair, J. P. Love, R. N. Taylor, and T. O. Henderson, “Observations of ground and structure movements for compensation grouting during tunnel construction at Waterloo station,” Géotechnique, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 691–713, 1994.
- S.-W. Lee, “The use of compensation grouting in tunnelling: a case study,” Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2002.
- M. S. P. Wan, J. R. Standing, D. M. Potts, and J. B. Burland, “Measured short-term ground surface response to EPBM tunnelling in London Clay,” Géotechnique, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 420–445, 2017.
- D. Selemetas and J. R. Standing, “Response of full-scale piles to EPBM tunnelling in London Clay,” Géotechnique, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 823–836, 2017.
- A. R. Bunawan, E. Momeni, D. J. Armaghani, K. Nissa binti Mat Said, and A. S. A. Rashid, “Experimental and intelligent techniques to estimate bearing capacity of cohesive soft soils reinforced with soil-cement columns,” Measurement, vol. 124, pp. 529–538, 2018.
- Z. Rashid, X. Tang, Q. Yang, Z. Tian, Y. Zhang, and W. Xu, “Mechanism of electro-osmotic chemical for clay improvement: process analysis and clay property evolution,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 166, pp. 18–26, 2018.
- Y. Wei, X. Gao, F. Wang, and Y. Zhong, “Nonlinear strain distribution in a field-instrumented concrete pavement slab in response to environmental effects,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 367–380, 2019.
- W.-C. Cheng, L. Wang, Z.-F. Xue, J. C. Ni, M Rahman, and A. Arulrajah, “Lubrication performance of pipejacking in alluvial deposits,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 91, Article ID 102991, 11 pages, 2019.
- Z.-F. Wang, J. S. Shen, and W.-C. Cheng, “Simple method to predict ground displacements caused by installing horizontal jet-grouting columns,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 1897394, 2018.
- Z.-F. Wang, W.-C. Cheng, and Y.-Q. Wang, “Investigation into geohazards during urbanization process of Xi’an, China,” Natural Hazards, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 1937–1953, 2018.
- Y. Wei, X. Gao, and S. Liang, “A combined SPM/NI/EDS method to quantify properties of inner and outer C-S-H in OPC and slag-blended cement pastes,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 85, no. 85, pp. 56–66, 2018.
- X. Bian, Y.-J. Cui, and X.-Z. Li, “Voids effect on the swelling behaviour of compacted bentonite,” Géotechnique, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 593–605, 2019.
- M. Hasanipanah, M. Noorian-Bidgoli, D. Jahed Armaghani, and H. Khamesi, “Feasibility of PSO-ANN model for predicting surface settlement caused by tunneling,” Engineering with Computers, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 705–715, 2016.
- K. Komiya, K. Soga, H. Akagi, M. R. Jafari, and M. D. Bolton, “Soil consolidation associated with grouting during shield tunnelling in soft clayey ground,” Géotechnique, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 835–846, 2001.
- A. Bezuijen, A. M. Talmon, F. J. Kaalberg, and R. Plugge, “Field measurements of grout pressures during tunnelling of the Sophia Rail Tunnel,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2004.
- F. Zhang, X. Xie, and H. Huang, “Application of ground penetrating radar in grouting evaluation for shield tunnel construction,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2010.
- R. P. Farrell, “Tunnelling and compensation grouting at bond street, London,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 471–482, 2015.
- F. Ye, T. Yang, J.-H. Mao, X.-Z. Qin, and R.-L. Zhao, “Half-spherical surface diffusion model of shield tunnel back-fill grouting based on infiltration effect,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 83, pp. 274–281, 2019.
- A. Verruijt, “Deformations of an elastic half plane with a circular cavity,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. 2795–2804, 1998.
- V. Avgerinos, D. M. Potts, J. R. Standing, and M. S. P. Wan, “Predicting tunnelling-induced ground movements and interpreting field measurements using numerical analysis: crossrail case study at Hyde Park,” Géotechnique, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 2018.
- A. Gasparre, S. Nishimura, N. A. Minh, M. R. Coop, and R. J. Jardine, “The stiffness of natural London Clay,” Géotechnique, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2007.
- A. Gasparre, D. W. Hight, M. R. Coop, and R. J. Jardine, “The laboratory measurement and interpretation of the small-strain stiffness of stiff clays,” Géotechnique, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 942–953, 2014.
Copyright © 2019 Zhi-Feng Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.