Integrated Management Software for Factory Production of Modular Buildings
Table 2
Productivity comparison between existing process and optimized process.
Category
#
Existing
Optimized
Remark and optimization plan
Time (min)
Manpower
Time (min)
Manpower
Prestation
PS-OS-2
60
3
60
3
PS-M-1
60
1
60
1
PS-M-2
60
1
60
1
PS-A-F-1
180
2
60
6
Add manpower
PS-A-F-2
120
2
60
4
Add manpower
PS-A-F-3
60
3
60
3
PS-A-W-1
60
2
60
2
PS-A-C-1
15
2
15
2
PS-A-C-2
120
2
240
1
Downsize manpower
PS-MA-1
120
4
60
8
Add manpower
PS-MA-2
120
1
60
2
Add manpower
Station
S-1
130
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-2
120
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-3
90
2
60
3
Add manpower
S-4
90
2
60
3
Add manpower
S-5
120
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-6
80
2
60
4
Integrate process
S-7
50
2
S-8
120
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-9
120
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-10
130
2
60
4
Add manpower
S-S-1
120
1
120
1
Poststation
WP-1
60
1
60
1
WP-2
30
2
30
2
WP-3
90
1
90
1
WP-4
60
1
60
1
WP-5
30
3
30
3
EP-1
240
1
60
4
Add manpower
EP-2
60
4
60
4
Manpower ∗ Total time
5710
5070
11.2% reduction
PS : prestation, S : station, OS : outsourcing, M : member, A: assemble, F : floor, W : wall, C : celling, MA : modular assemble, WP: wet process, EP : end process.
