Combined Effect of Compaction Methods and Loading Conditions on the Deformation Behaviour of Unbound Granular Material

Figure 5

Relations between the axial strain and loading number under different confining pressures. (a) (s) = 0.1, GM, (b) (s) = 0.1, GF, (c) (s) = 0.1, LX1, (d) (s) = 0.1, LX2, (e) (s) = 0.3, GM, (f) (s) = 0.3, GF, (g) (s) = 0.3, LX1, (h) (s) = 0.3, LX2, (i) (s) = 0.5, GM, (j) (s) = 0.5, GF, (k) (s) = 0.5, LX1, (l) (s) = 0.5, LX2, (m) (s) = 0.7, GM, (n) (s) = 0.7, GF, (o) (s) = 0.7, LX1, (p) (s) = 0.7, LX2, (q) (s) = 0.9, GM, (r) (s) = 0.9, GF, (s) (s) = 0.9, LX1, and (t) (s) = 0.9, LX2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

(m)

(n)

(o)

(p)

(q)

(r)

(s)

(t)