Research Article

Global Seismic Fragility Functions for Low-Rise RC Frames with Construction Deficiencies

Table 1

Observed response and damage condition of Model-1 under significant runs.

Run (%)Roof/1st story displacement, inch (mm)Roof/1st story drift (%)Base shear kips (kN)Damage pattern

54.87 (123.69)1.7526.51 (117.92)(i) Ground-story column base observed with small flexural cracks.
(ii) Major cracks were observed at the first-story column base.
(iii) On the ground story, clear visible diagonal direction cracks.
(iv) On the joint panels at the first story, small cracks were also observed with a bat-like pattern.

307.18 (182.37)2.5730.91 (137.48)(i) Existing cracks were significantly widened during this excitation.
(ii) The column base cracks were further widened at both stories as well as the flexural vertical.
(iii) Horizontal cracking at beam member ends.
(iv) Severe cracking was observed at ground-story joint panel regions with concrete detachment.

4013.31 (338.19)4.7741.48 (184.50)(i) All the existing damages were aggravated significantly.
(ii) The columns’ base was observed with severe concrete crushing and spalling with more severity at ground-story column bases.
(iii) Concrete spalling and detachment were observed at the joint panel regions of the ground.
(iv) The first-story joint panel regions were extremely damaged and with concrete spalling at the base.(v) After this excitation, the test model was near to the collapse stage.