A Cost-Benefit Methodology for Selecting Analytical Reinforced Concrete Corrosion Onset Models

<table class="table-group" id="tab18"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Sensitivity indicators (<span class="nowrap"><svg height="8.68572pt" id="M420" style="vertical-align:-0.0498209pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 10.0819 8.68572" width="10.0819pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z"></path></g></svg>)</span></td><td class="align_center">Weighting (<span class="nowrap"><svg height="9.14241pt" id="M421" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 16.6229 9.14241" width="16.6229pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M689 332C689 394 670 448 646 448C620 448 597 421 597 396C597 386 600 381 608 372C619 359 620 334 620 315C620 150 538 45 454 45C414 45 386 67 386 122C386 138 388 158 394 180L457 426L452 432L377 416L315 156C302 100 259 45 216 45C176 45 148 67 148 122C148 133 152 158 156 180C162 212 173 259 194 332C201 357 206 384 206 405C206 430 198 448 174 448C125 448 66 406 23 342L43 319C84 368 110 383 121 383C126 383 128 382 128 377C128 370 127 359 122 343C99 268 84 204 77 156C74 137 70 111 70 104C70 25 125 -12 180 -12C228 -12 276 12 319 50C338 8 378 -12 418 -12C549 -12 689 166 689 332Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.931,3.132)"><path d="M782 650H541L536 618L564 614C597 609 604 600 584 574C535 508 486 451 437 395C394 473 361 533 343 575C331 605 335 610 375 615L400 618L407 650H156L147 618C222 612 230 608 267 537L375 330C277 214 186 117 163 96C108 43 97 38 27 32L18 0H265L274 32L251 35C204 41 202 47 224 80C264 138 327 213 397 293L504 80C520 48 516 42 472 36L440 32L433 0H707L716 32C627 38 622 43 581 121L455 361L629 548C685 606 696 610 775 618L782 650Z"></path></g></svg>)</span></td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Elasticity coefficient</td><td class="align_center">0.3</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Pearson’s coefficient</td><td class="align_center">0.1</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Bias on the output’s mean</td><td class="align_center">0.2</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Output’s standard deviation</td><td class="align_center">0.4</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Advances in Civil Engineering

tab18

Table 18

Table 18: A Cost-Benefit Methodology for Selecting Analytical Reinforced Concrete Corrosion Onset Models 