Research Article

Liquefiable Ground Treatment Using Cruciform Section Probe Resonant Compaction Method: A Case Study in the Xitong Expressway, Eastern China

Table 9

Liquefiable evaluations by the SPT.

Hole numberDepth (m)NNcrN/Ncr

12.0–2.372.742.55
3.5–3.876.431.09
5.0–5.3207.682.6
6.5–6.8308.703.45
8.0–8.3239.562.41
9.5–9.82810.312.72
11.0–11.32610.972.37
12.5–12.82511.562.16
14.0–14.33712.093.06

22.0–2.382.962.7
3.5–3.893.672.45
5.0–5.3177.642.23
6.5–6.8278.663.12
8.0–8.3229.522.31
9.5–9.82610.272.53
11.0–11.34210.933.84
12.5–12.83911.523.39
14.0–14.33812.053.15

32.0–2.382.623.05
3.5–3.8116.381.72
5.0–5.3207.632.62
6.5–6.8208.652.31
8.0–8.3259.512.63
9.5–9.82810.262.73
11.0–11.33610.923.3
12.5–12.84011.513.48
14.0–14.33812.042.31

42.0–2.3132.854.56
3.5–3.8106.381.57
5.0–5.3147.631.83
6.5–6.8258.652.89
8.0–8.3259.512.63
9.5–9.82110.262.05
11.0–11.32810.922.56
12.5–12.83311.512.87
14.0–14.33012.042.49
15.5–15.84112.533.27

52.0–2.3102.753.64
3.5–3.8106.361.57
5.0–5.3137.611.71
6.5–6.8198.632.2
8.0–8.3219.492.21
9.5–9.82510.242.44
11.0–11.33710.903.39
12.5–12.84111.493.57
14.0–14.33412.022.83
15.5–15.83512.512.8

62.0–2.382.623.05
3.5–3.8176.342.68
5.0–5.3187.592.37
6.5–6.8238.622.67
8.0–8.3299.483.06
9.5–9.83910.233.81
11.0–11.33010.892.75
12.5–12.84211.483.66
14.0–14.33612.013
15.5–15.85512.504.4

72.0–2.392.653.4
3.5–3.8133.543.67
5.0–5.3187.582.37
6.5–6.8248.602.79
8.0–8.3309.473.17
9.5–9.83510.213.43
11.0–11.33710.873.4
12.5–12.83011.462.62
14.0–14.33412.002.83
15.5–15.83412.492.75