Research Article
Importance-Performance Analysis of Prefabricated Building Sustainability: A Case Study of Guangzhou
Table 4
Background information of respondents.
| Item | Total sample (n = 224) | Number | Percentage (%) |
| Sex | | | Male | 141 | 62.95 | Female | 83 | 37.05 |
| Age | | | 25 and lower | 2 | 0.89 | 26–35 | 92 | 41.07 | 36–45 | 45 | 20.09 | 46–55 | 39 | 17.41 | 56 and higher | 46 | 20.54 |
| Educational level | | | High school and below | 41 | 18.30 | Junior college | 44 | 19.64 | Undergraduate | 64 | 28.57 | Master | 47 | 20.98 | Doctor | 28 | 12.50 |
| Work unit | | | Government | 16 | 7.14 | Owner | 29 | 12.95 | Construction | 34 | 15.18 | Survey and design | 38 | 16.96 | Supervision | 12 | 5.36 | Consulting | 34 | 15.18 | Colleges and universities | 9 | 4.02 | Prefabricated factory | 17 | 7.59 | Others | 35 | 15.63 |
| Working time in the field of construction engineering | | | 5 and lower | 47 | 20.98 | 6–10 | 90 | 40.18 | 11–15 | 20 | 8.93 | 16–20 | 11 | 4.91 | 21–25 | 19 | 8.48 | 26 and higher | 37 | 16.52 |
| Prefabricated building participation time | | | 0 | 46 | 20.54 | 1–2 | 39 | 17.41 | 3–5 | 83 | 37.05 | 6–10 | 33 | 14.73 | 11–15 | 6 | 2.68 | 16–20 | 7 | 3.13 | 21–25 | 4 | 1.79 | 26 and higher | 6 | 2.68 |
|
|