Advances in Civil Engineering

Advances in Civil Engineering / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Recycling of Construction and Demolition Wastes for Durable Transportation Infrastructure

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8875402 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8875402

Le Ding, Junhui Zhang, Bowen Feng, Cheng Li, "Performance Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Mixtures Containing Construction and Demolition Waste Applicated as Pavement Base", Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 8875402, 11 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8875402

Performance Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Mixtures Containing Construction and Demolition Waste Applicated as Pavement Base

Academic Editor: Fan Gu
Received05 May 2020
Revised30 Jun 2020
Accepted02 Jul 2020
Published23 Jul 2020

Abstract

Construction and demolition waste contain large amount of concrete and bricks. To identify its feasibility of applying in asphalt stabilized gravel mixtures as pavement base, this paper carried out researches on properties of recycled asphalt mixture (RAM) by laboratory testing, under different contents of recycled aggregates (RA) and proportions of bricks to concrete. First, the basic physical properties of each component of the RAM were determined. According to the actual screening passing rate, the Bailey method was used to design and verify the grading of RAM, and then initial asphalt content was estimated. The stability, flow value, voidage, and bulk density were obtained by Marshall Test, and the optimal asphalt-aggregate ratios were determined under different RA contents and proportion of bricks to concrete. Subsequently, the uniaxial compression test, splitting tensile test, immersion Marshall test, freeze-thaw splitting test, and Hamburg rutting test were performed to investigate mechanical properties, water stability, and high-temperature stability of RAM. The results shows that as the content of RA increases from 0% to 100%, the corresponding compressive strength, resilient modulus, and splitting tensile strength all decrease; the same change trend is presented in the residual stability and freeze-thaw splitting test strength ratio and rutting depth. According to the requirement of pavement base of high-grade roads in China’s standards, the recommended RA content and proportion of bricks to concrete were proposed for the design RAM.

1. Introduction

Extensive urbanization in China has led to the generation of multitudinous construction and demolition wastes (CDW), about 1.7 billion tons in 2019, resulting in many imminent problems to be solved urgently, e.g., occupation of land, overconsumption of resources, and environmental pollution [13]. Simultaneously, for the sake of environmental protection, the government has already banned or restricted quarrying in many areas of China, leading to source materials used for highway engineering becoming more costly and difficult to obtain [4, 5]. Thus, recycling CDW into road materials is a promising way to address these issues, with significant environmental and economical benefits.

The composition of CDW is complicated with many sources; waste concrete and bricks are two main parts occupied for 60% and 20% of the whole wastes [6, 7], and they can be processed into RA after crushing and screening. Compared with natural aggregates (NA), RA are covered with lots of cement mortar and microcracks. Thus, RA show significant characteristics of low strength, high voidage, small bulk density, and large water absorption [8]. Some studies on the application of CDW have verified its feasibility of using in highway engineering, as pavement base materials [912] or subgrade fillers [13]. Their mechanical properties [1416], durability and stability [1719], and effect of specimens compaction method were comprehensively studied [20]. To improve the property of these RA mixtures, some kinds of additives were optional [2123]. To realize the accuracy and efficient utilization of CDW, the separation technology of RA compositions, e.g., recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) and recycled brick aggregates (RBA), developed rapidly. Lots of physical methods, including spirals, density and magnetic eddy current, and optical and air jigging, have already achieved effective separation of RCA and RCB [2426]. However, most existing tests only used waste concrete, and waste bricks were discarded, or the RA were regarded as an integral, and the effect of proportions of internal compositions is often ignored. The impact of recycled concrete and bricks on the performance of RAM has not been investigated deeply when it comes to be used as pavement base materials.

In this paper, the recycled coarse aggregates (4.75∼26.5 mm), taken from RCA and RBA, were used for replacing natural ones, for application of RAM as pavement base. The RA content was set in five ratios: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, and four proportions of bricks to concrete (0 : 10, 2 : 8, 4 : 6, 6 : 4) were considered. First, the adhesions between asphalt and three types of coarse aggregates (NA, RCA, RBA) were investigated from the view of microstructure by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Then the properties of RAM were determined by the Standard Marshall Test, and the optimal asphalt dosage was obtained under different RA contents and brick-concrete proportions. On this basis, the performance tests of RAM applicated as the pavement base, including mechanical properties, temperature stability, and water stability, were carried out to find a suitable design scheme of RAM.

2. Materials

2.1. Asphalt Mixtures Composition
2.1.1. Coarse and Fine Aggregates

Three types of aggregates were used: RCA, RBA, and NA. RA were supplied by a CDW recycling plant in Changsha, China. After removing impurities (ceramics, wood, rubber, etc), the CDW were screened into RA in four gradings: 0–4.75 mm, 4.75–9.5 mm, 9.5–19 mm, and 19–26.5 mm. The particles of size larger than 26.5 mm were eliminated, and the RCA and RBA were separated manually (Figure 1).

Since it was difficult to identify the ingredients of finer RA, the used aggregates of grading less than 4.75 mm were all selected from NA. The remaining three gradings’ aggregates were composed of NA and RA in proportion. The properties of RA and NA are evaluated in Table 1 according to China’s standard: Aggregate Test Code for Highway Engineering (JTG E42-2005). It is indicated that the RA had a lower apparent density, a higher water absorption, and needle flake content. The main reason is the change of performances ascribes to the adsorbed mortar on the surface of RA.


Detection indexesRCA (mm)RBA (mm)Limestone natural aggregatesCode value
4.75–9.59.5–1919–26.54.75–9.59.5–1919–26.50–4.754.75–9.59.5–1919–26.5

Apparent density (kg/m3)2.502.552.532.382.412.442.7232.7212.7132.711
Water absorption (%)5.715.445.5017.0816.5514.610.780.610.520.34
Needle flake content (%)7.87.13.27.36.93.512.68.39.86.9
Crushed value (%)26.126.627.328.629.329.821.622.322.5

2.1.2. Asphalt and Mineral Powder

The engineering properties of asphalt binder are presented in Table 2. All of them complied with the requirements of Highway Asphalt Pavement Construction Technical Specifications (JTG F40-2004). The mineral powder was obtained from a commercial source, its specific gravity was equal to 2.728 g/cm3 (>2.5), and the hydrophilic coefficient was 0.79 (<1), which also could meet the requirement of JTG F40-2004.


Test itemTest valueTest methodsSpecification of JTG F40-2004

Penetration (%)68.5T0604-201160∼80
Ductility(10°C, 5 cm/min), cm19T0605-2011
(15°C, 5 cm/min), cm101T0605-2011
Softening point, °C48.3T0606-2011
Flash points, °C280T0611-2011
Paraffin content, %2.1T0615-2011

Test methods referenced from China’s Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011).
2.1.3. Grading Design

The aggregate grading design has a great impaction on the mechanical properties, an excellent grade is a necessary precondition to ensure the service life of the asphalt pavement layer [27]. In this test, to form continuous graded skeleton with dense structure with large particle size and less asphalt content, ATB-25 was selected as the targeted grading for its high shear and flexural tensile strength. Since Bailey method is effective in making coarse aggregates to form a dense skeleton, this method is used to carry out grading design [28]. The synthetic Bailey grading curve is shown in Figure 2. It is close to the recommended median curve of ATB-25 in China’s standard: Aggregate Test Specification of Highway Engineering (JTG E42-2005).The coarse RA mainly replaces NA in the same grading. Since the finer RA were hardly to be distinguished as concrete or bricks, the synthetic prorotion of bricks to concrete in RAM would be uncontrollable in the conditon of adding finer RA. On this basis, the detailed dosage RCA and RBA were selected in accordance with given proportions in each grading of aggregates, and the specified RA contents and proportion of bricks to concrete can be realized simultaneously.

2.1.4. Determination of Optimal Asphalt Content

Marshall testing was used to obtain the optimal asphalt-aggregate ratio. First, the synthetical bulk specific gravity γsb and the estimated optimal asphalt-aggregate ratio Pa were calculated; see equations (1) and (2). Then the asphalt-aggregate ratio was changed gradually with an increase of 0.3%∼0.5%, to identify the optimal one by comparative analysis in the property of RAM.where P1, P2, …, Pn is the mixture ratio of different mineral material components; γ1, γ2, …, γn is the the bulk specific gravity of the corresponding mineral; Pa is the estimated optimum asphalt-aggregate ratio; Pa1 is the standard optimum asphalt-aggregate ratio of asphalt mixtures for similar projects; and Psb1 is the bulk specific gravity of similar engineered aggregates.

The Pa is about 3.8% by calculation. The content of coarse aggregates was more in RAM than those in common asphalt mixture, and their particle size was big, leading to less asphalt content needed in RAM. The selected testing asphalt-aggregate ratios were set as 3.5% to 4.7% with an interval of 0.3%. To ensure the accuracy and validity of test results, the test temperature needs to be controlled strictly. The RCA were first put into an oven to be heated to 150°C, and then poured into a mixing pot for stirring for 180 seconds with the A70 matrix asphalt. And the compaction temperature was controlled in 140°C. In the mixing process, the proportion of bricks to concrete were set in four cases: 0 : 10, 2 : 8, 4 : 6, and 6 : 4. It was found that the uniformity of asphalt adhesion on the surface of RA differed a lot. With the increase of the content of RBA, the amount of asphalt absorbed on the surface of RA decreases, which proves that the oil absorption rate of RBA is relatively higher than that of RCA. When the RA content is 25%, the uniformity of adsorbed asphalt varies with the changing RBA content; see Figure 3.

In the forming process of tested samples of RAM, the specimens were set as the standard size: 101.6 × 63.5 mm (diameter × height), after compacting for 75 cycles both side, they were cooled for 12 hours at room temperature. Finally, all specimens were stripped ready to undergo Marshell testing. The mass of specimens in water and air and surface dry mass were tested, respectively, then the stability and flow value were tested by Marshall Stability Meter. According to the requirements of the specification (JTG F40-2004), the optimum asphalt-aggregate ratio OACopt can be calculated as equations (3)–(5). In condition of heavy traffic volume and summer hot area, the technical standard for ATB-25 is shown in Table 3.where a1 is the asphalt-aggregate ratio of maximum bulk specific gravity; a2 is the asphalt-aggregate ratio of maximum stability; a3 is the asphalt-aggregate ratio corresponding to the median of the voidage range; a4 is the asphalt-aggregate ratio corresponding to the median of the effective asphalt saturation range; OACmin is the minimum asphalt-aggregate ratio in accordance with the technical standard of asphalt mixture, 3.5%; OACmax is the maximum asphalt-aggregate ratio in accordance with the technical standard of asphalt mixture, 3.8%.


ItermTechnical requirements

Nominal maximum size of aggregate26.5 mm
Marshall specimen size101.6 mm  63.5 mm
Number of Marshall specimen compaction75 cycles double sided
Voidage2–6%
Asphalt saturation55–70%
Marshall stability8 kN
Flow value1.5–4 mm
Minimum voids of mineral aggregate%
Dynamic stability1000 times/mm
Freeze-thaw split intensity ratio75%
Residual stability80%

Figure 4 shows the test results of the case of 25% RA content. It can be found that with the increase of recycled bricks, the properties of RAM present a similar change trend. For instance, when not adding recycled bricks, the OACopt is calculated to be 3.76%, within the range of OACmin–OACmax. For the OACopt in other three cases, proportions of bricks to concrete (2 : 8, 4 : 6, 6 : 4) were calculated by the same method: 3.77%, 3.8%, 3.84%. It is worth noting that the flow value of RBA : RCA (0 : 10) shows its particular monotonically increasing characteristic. The possible reason is that in the condition of no recycled bricks, with the increase of asphalt dosage, the recycles mixtures contain more fluidity asphalt and less asphalt absorbed on the particle surface [29]; thus, the compression deformation of the specimen becomes larger, and it is seen that the flow value gradually increases. When adding recycled bricks, the change of flow value should comprehensively consider the effect of RBA and RCA.

Identically, the OACopt of RAM in different RA contents is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen that, with the increase of RA content and proportion of bricks to concrete, the OACopt gradually increases. When the proportion of brick to concrete is 6 : 4, as the RA content increases from 0% to 100%, the OACopt increases by 0.85%. In the condition of 25% RA content, with the increase of the proportion of bricks to concrete from 0 : 10 to 6 : 4, the OACopt increases by 0.08%. By the same analysis, when the RA content increases to 50%, 75%, and 100%, the OACopt increases by 0.1%, 0.12%, and 0.08%. Therefore, contrasted with proportion of bricks to concrete, the RA content has a greater impaction on OACopt of RAM.

2.2. Test Methods
2.2.1. Microstructure Analysis

To compare the adhesion mechanism between NA, RCA, RBA, and asphalt, it is necessary to analyze their microstructures. The tested aggregates of appropriate particle size were taken out from the internal structure of the specimen artificially, and they were cut into samples of nail size by a precision cutting machine; thus, the microstructure can be observed by SEM. Marshall specimens were prepared with 50% RA content and proportion of bricks to concrete 4 : 6, the OACopt was 4.14%.

2.2.2. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical strength of RAM mainly depends on the particle friction, aggregate lithology, and performances of the asphalt. Thus, different gradation design and composition of aggregates affect mechanical properties of RAM obviously [30, 31]. The main indexes are compressive strength, resilient modulus, and splitting tensile strength.

When the compressive strength and resilient modulus were measured, the specimens were formed by static pressing with a load of 2000 kN. The height and diameter of the specimens were both 100 ± 2 mm, and their densities met the requirements of Marshall Standard Compaction. After curing, specimens were subjected to uniaxial compression test with Mechanical Testing System (MTS) at room temperature with a loading rate of 2 mm/min.

According to the failure load P, the loading and unloading tests were carried out step by step in strict accordance with five grading loads: 0.1P, 0.2P, 0.3P, 0.4P, and 0.5P. After testing, the compressive strength and elastic modulus were calculated as shown in equations (6) and (7):where RC is the compressive strength (MPa) of the specimen; P is the maximum load (N) of the specimen at failure limit; and d is the specimen diameter (mm).where P5 is the fifth load value (MPa); h is the specimen height (mm); A is the radial cross-sectional area of specimen (mm); and Δ5 is the axial average amplitude fifth loading (mm).

In the splitting tensile strength test, the Standard Marshall Compaction specimens were used, and both sides of them were compacted for 75 cycles. After demoulding, they were placed in a constant temperature tank and immersed in water for 1.5 h. The distance of each specimen was 15 mm, the Marshall Stability Meter was used to measure the splitting tensile strength with the loading rate of 50 mm/min.

2.2.3. Water Stability

The residual stabilities of the two groups of specimens formed by Marshall Compaction were used to evaluate their water stabilities. The size of specimens was 101.6 × 63.5 mm (diameter × height), satisfied with the requirements of China’s standard (JTG E20-2011): Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering. Before testing, two groups of specimens were immersed in a 60°C constant temperature tank for 30 min and 48 h, respectively, shown in equation (8).where MS0 is the immersion residual stability (kN); MS2 is the stability of the specimen after soaking for 48 h (kN); and MS1 is the stability of the specimen after immersion of 0.5 h (kN).

In the freeze-thaw splitting test, the two groups of Marshall Specimens were processed with compaction for 50 cycles both side. The first group specimens were placed at room temperature, while the second were saturated in a vacuum for 15 min, and then placed in water for 30 min before taking out. Before sealing them with plastin warps, adding 10 ml water. Subsequently, they were put into a constant temperature and humidity box. One freeze-thaw cycle was completed at this moment. Finally, group 1 and group 2 were put into a 25°C constant temperature tank for 2 h, and the maximum failure load was measured to calculate the freeze-thaw splitting test strength ratio:where TSR is the freeze-thaw splitting tensile strength ratio; RT2 is the splitting tensile strength of effective specimens after freeze-thaw cycle (MPa); and RT1 is the splitting tensile strength of effective specimens with freeze-thaw cycle (MPa).

2.2.4. High-Temperature Stability

To study the impact of brick and concrete aggregates on the high-temperature performance of RAM, the Hamburg rutting test was carried out. The rutting specimens were made in size of 300 × 300 × 50 mm (length/width/thickness) according to China’s standard (JTG E20-2011). After being repeatedly rolled by a hydraulic molding machine for 12 cycles, they were placed in the temperature of 45°C for 48 h. This condition can simulate the dry state of pavement materials within 5∼12 h. Simultaneously, the comparative tests were conducted in the temperature of 60°C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure

From the perspective of aggregate surface, RA, especially RCA is formed in cement hydration products, including ettringite, and calcium superoxide, these components have a certain activity to trigger chemical reactions with acid asphalt [32]. Furthermore, the surface of RCA formed rich edges and corners during the crushing process, and they were covered with a large amount of cement mortar, making the surface of RA rougher than NA. Thus, the adhesion between RA and asphalt demonstrated a unique behaviour. The comparison in Figures 6(a) and 6(b) confirms this phenomenon. The loose structure of mortar and large number of gaps lead to the increase of crushing value of RCA, which indirectly leads to the change of aggregate particle sizes [33]. In contrast, the surface of RBA is smooth with many holes, resulting in higher water absorption and smaller density than RCA, as shown in Figure 6(c). Thus, in the pavement base construction, the RBA content should be controlled within a certain range due to its lower strength [34, 35].

The interfaces of three aggregates and asphalt differed significantly. NA and asphalt were bonded with a clear dividing line in good adhesion shown in Figure 6(a). The possible reason is that the selected NA is limestone, an alkaline active substance that can react with acidic materials in asphalt [36]. By contrast, the adhesion interface between RBA and asphalt presented a concave and convex shape; see Figure 6(b). As cement mortar is covered on the surface of RCA, its main chemical components are plentiful SiO2 [37], resulting in a weak reaction with asphalt in a small adhesion. In Figure 6(c), cracks appeared at the adhesion interface between RBA and asphalt, with a comparatively poor adhesion. A large number of microholes appear on the surface of RBA over time, which is advantageous to the physics conglutination of the asphalt, but on the chemical composition analysis, the surface of RBA contains a large amount of SiO2 and Al2O3 with a stronger acid performance [38], it is difficult to react with asphalt to form strength bonding layers. Therefore, the adherence interface between RBA and asphalt is not neat.

3.2. Mechanical Property

Figure 7(a) shows the change of the compressive strength of RAM under different RA contents. When not adding RBA, and the RA content increased from 0% to 100%, the compressive strength reduced by 14.4%. When the proportion of brick to concrete was 2 : 8, 4 : 6, 6 : 4, the compressive strength decreased by 22.7%, 40.5%, and 50.5%, respectively. It shows that with the increasing of proportion of RBA, it adversely affects the compressive strength of RAM. The rank of the strength in three aggregates is NA > RCA > RBA. When the RA content increases, especially when the RBA content increases, the compressive strength of RAM decreases significantly.

For resilient modulus presented in Figure 7(b), when not adding RBA, the resilient modulus decreased by 20.9% as the RA content changed from 0% to 100%. In the same condition, when the proportion of bricks to concrete changed to 6 : 4, the resilient modulus decreased by 79.1%, and the reduced amplitude is 3.78 times that of the previous one. The main reason is that the increase in proportion of bricks and concrete leads to a larger voidage and a smaller adhesion for RAM, making resilient modulus of RAM gradually decrease.

Similarly, shown in Figure 7(c), compared to NA, the splitting tensile strength of pure RCA mixtures (100% of RA content, proportion of bricks to concrete 0 : 10) reduced by 21.6%. When not adding NA, and the proportion of bricks to concrete increased to 2 : 8, 4 : 6, and 6 : 4, the split tensile strength decreased by 37.1%, 46.4%, and 48.5%, respectively. Compared with NA, the adhesion of RA to asphalt is weak, with the increase of RA content, the splitting tensile strength of RAM decreases. Particularly, when the proportion of bricks to concrete was 6 : 4 with RA content of 75% or 100%, the reduced amplitude was significant. In practical construction, considering the variation of tensile strength should be kept within a certain range, when the RA content is greater than 75%, it is recommended the proportion of bricks to concrete should not exceed 4 : 6, to prevent a significant reduction in splitting tensile strength.

3.3. Water Stability

In Figure 8(a), the change law of water stability was consistent with that of the mechanical property. When the increase of proportion of brick to concrete and RA content from 0% to 100%, the residual stability decreased. The residual stability of pure RCA mixtures decreased by 4.9% compared to NA. When the proportion of brick to concrete was 6 : 4, with the RA content increase from 0% to 100%, the residual stability decreased by 13%, 2.7 times of the previous condition, indicating that the proportion of bricks to concrete has a great influence on residual stability. Simultaneously, to meet the specification requirements, the proportions of bricks to concrete should be within 4 : 6 and 2 : 8 in the condition of RA content of 75% and 100%, respectively.

Figure 8(b) shows the experimental results of freeze-thaw splitting test strength ratio of RAM. When the RA content exceeded 50%, its decline speed became larger with the increase of proportion of bricks to concrete. In particular, the strength ratio of pure RCA mixtures decreased by 8.5% compared to NA mixtures. When the proportion of bricks to concrete changed to 6 : 4, this value even decreased by 30.9%. In the specification of China (JTG F40-2004), the requirement of strength ratio of freezing-thawing splitting test should not be less than 75%; thus, the proportion of bricks to concrete should be controlled within 6 : 4 and 4 : 6 in cases of 25% and 50% RA content, and less than 2 : 8 if RA content exceeds 75%.

In general, with the increase of RA content and proportion of bricks to concrete, the water stability indexes all decrease. The porosity of RAM gets larger as RA content increases, and water molecules can move into internal part of the specimen more easily. Simultaneously, as the composition of RA is complex, the adhesion strengths between different recycled materials and asphalt are diverse, which directly affects the bonding effect. Large voidage and the shortage of adhesion make the water stability performance of RAM poorer.

3.4. High-Temperature Stability

Figure 9 shows the test results of high-temperature stability under two temperatures (45°C and 60°C). When the RA content increased from 0% to 100%, the dynamic stability all increased regardless of proportions of bricks to concrete. As the RA surface was rougher than that of NA with more edges, corners, and more coarse aggregates, it was conducive to the formation of an embedded structure. The design gradation of RA by Bailey method was close to the median value, ensuring that the RAM was compacted densely. For pure RCA mixtures, the dynamic stabilities were 1.88 and 1.75 times that of NA mixtures, respectively, in two temperatures. When the adding RA content was 100% and proportion of bricks to concrete was 6 : 4, the ratio of dynamic stability between RAM and NA mixtures still remained in 1.56 and 1.59. In the condition of fixed RA content, the dynamic stability decreases with the increasing proportion of bricks to concrete. With the increase of content of bricks to a certain value, the water absorption ability of RAM got higher, but the amount of adsorbed asphalt decreased, making the internal cohesion of RAM weakened.

Figure 10 reveals that the change law of rutting depth was consistent in two temperatures. In contrast to the dynamic stability, with the RA content increased from 0% to 100%, more coarse aggregates existed in RAM, and the embedded skeleton structure was formed easily with a better rutting resistance ability; thus, the rutting depths all decreased. During the rutting board forming process, with the low strength of RBA, it was easy to be crushed into fine aggregates to fill the skeleton between particles, making the structure more compacted and not easy to form rutting. Overall, for its porous characteristics, RBA can absorb surplus asphalt and improve the adhesion between asphalt and aggregates.

4. Conclusions

As a promising material in pavement base, RAM play an increasingly important role in recycling solid wastes and reducing engineering cost. Laboratory tests were performed to investigate the effect of recycled bricks and concrete on the property of RAM. The conclusions that can be drawn from the previous findings and observations are listed below:(1)According to the design of Bailey method, the final proportion of each grading aggregate is 33.3%, 24%, 12.3%, 26%, and 4.4%, close to the recommended median curve; it is helpful to make tested aggregates form a dense skeleton structure.(2)Through Marshall Test, it seems that the stability, density, and asphalt saturation decrease with the increase of RA content, but oppositely for the flow value and voidage.(3)From the scanning electron microscopy, the adhesion interface morphology between three aggregates and asphalt, as well as their adhesion property, is significantly different; natural aggregates show the best bonding with asphalt, the recycled concretes the second, and the recycled bricks the worst.(4)China’s technical specification (JTG F40-2004) and the test results of the road performances of RAM were taken as reference. The RA content and the corresponding proportion of bricks to concrete are recommended as follows to fill the requirement of pavement base in expressway: when the RA contents are 25% and 50%, the corresponding proportion of bricks to concrete should be controlled within 6 : 4 and 4 : 6, and it should be less than 2 : 8 if RA contents increase to more than 75%.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878078, 51911530215, and 51478054), Training Program for High-Level Technical Personnel in Transportation Industry (2018-025), Excellent Youth Foundation of Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2018JJ1026), and Key Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (17A008). This work was also supported by the Key Project of Open Research Fund of National Engineering Laboratory of Highway Maintenance Technology (kfj150103) and Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (CX20190644).

References

  1. L. Zheng, H. Wu, H. Zhang et al., “Characterizing the generation and flows of construction and demolition waste in China,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 136, pp. 405–413, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Jin, B. Li, T. Zhou, D. Wanatowski, and P. Piroozfar, “An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 126, pp. 86–98, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Ghisellini, X. Ji, G. Liu, and S. Ulgiati, “Evaluating the transition towards cleaner production in the construction and demolition sector of China: a review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 195, pp. 418–434, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. N. Soutsos, K. Tang, and S. G. Millard, “Concrete building blocks made with recycled demolition aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 726–735, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Huang, X. Wang, H. Kua, Y. Geng, R. Bleischwitz, and J. Ren, “Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 129, pp. 36–44, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. Kourmpanis, A. Papadopoulos, K. Moustakas, M. Stylianou, K. J. Haralambous, and M. Loizidou, “Preliminary study for the management of construction and demolition waste,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Ossa, J. L. García, and E. Botero, “Use of recycled construction and demolition waste (cdw) aggregates: a sustainable alternative for the pavement construction industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 135, pp. 379–386, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Cardoso, R. V. Silva, J. D. Brito, and R. Dhir, “Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: a literature review,” Waste Management, vol. 49, pp. 131–145, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Park, “Application of construction and building debris as base and subbase materials in rigid pavement,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 558–563, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Sangiorgi, C. Lantieri, and G. Dondi, “Construction and demolition waste recycling: an application for road construction,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 530–537, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Sobhan and R. J. Krize, “Fatigue behavior of fiber-reinforced recycled aggregate base course,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. D. Rey, J. Ayuso, A. Barbudo, A. P. Galvín, F. Agrela, and J. D. Brito, “Feasibility study of cement-treated 0–8 mm recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste as road base layer,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 678–692, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Zhang, L. Ding, F. Li, and J. Peng, “Recycled aggregates from construction and demolition wastes as alternative filling materials for highway subgrades in China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 255, Article ID 120223, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. Pérez, A. R. Pasandín, and L. Medina, “Hot mix asphalt using c & d waste as coarse aggregates,” Materials & Design (1980–2015), vol. 36, pp. 840–846, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. R. Pasandín and I. Pérez, “Laboratory evaluation of hot-mix asphalt containing construction and demolition waste,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 43, pp. 497–505, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Arabani, F. M. Nejad, and A. R. Azarhoosh, “Laboratory evaluation of recycled waste concrete into asphalt mixtures,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 531–539, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Wu, J. Zhong, J. Zhu, and D. Wang, “Influence of demolition waste used as recycled aggregate on performance of asphalt mixture,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 679–688, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Medina, W. Zhu, T. Howind, M. I. S. D. Rojas, and M. Frías, “Influence of mixed recycled aggregate on the physical–mechanical properties of recycled concrete,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 68, pp. 216–225, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Arshad and M. F. Ahmed, “Potential use of reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled concrete aggregate in base/subbase layers of flexible pavements,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 151, pp. 83–97, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. J. Jiang and L. F. Fan, “An experimental investigation of optimal asphalt–aggregate ratio for different compaction methods,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 91, pp. 111–115, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Ahmedzade and B. Sengoz, “Evaluation of steel slag coarse aggregate in hot mix asphalt concrete,” Journal of Hazard Materials, vol. 165, no. 1–3, pp. 300–305, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. C. Rubio, F. Moreno, A. Belmonte, and A. Menéndez, “Reuse of waste material from decorative quartz solid surfacing in the manufacture of hot bituminous mixes,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 610–618, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Huang, R. N. Bird, and O. Heidrich, “A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 52, pp. 58–73, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Hu, Y. Chen, F. Naz, C. Zeng, and S. Cao, “Separation studies of concrete and brick from construction and demolition waste,” Waste Management, vol. 85, pp. 396–404, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Mulder, T. P. R. D. Jong, and L. Feenstra, “Closed cycle construction: an integrated process for the separation and reuse of c & d waste,” Waste Management, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1408–1415, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Ulsen, H. Kahn, G. Hawlitschek, E. A. Masini, and S. C. Angulo, “Separability studies of construction and demolition waste recycled sand,” Waste Management, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 656–662, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Qasrawi and I. Asi, “Effect of bitumen grade on hot asphalt mixes properties prepared using recycled coarse concrete aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 121, pp. 18–24, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. Jitsangiam, P. Chindaprasirt, and H. Nikraz, “An evaluation of the suitability of superpave and marshall asphalt mix designs as they relate to Thailand’s climatic conditions,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 40, pp. 961–970, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. M. Rafi, A. Qadir, and S. H. Siddiqui, “Experimental testing of hot mix asphalt mixture made of recycled aggregates,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1316–1326, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Peng, J. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Yao, and A. Zhang, “Modeling humidity and stress-dependent subgrade soils in flexible pavements,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 120, Article ID 103413, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Zhang, J. Peng, W. Liu, and W. Lu, “Predicting resilient modulus of fine-grained subgrade soils considering relative compaction and matric suction,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, pp. 1–13, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Hou, X. Ji, J. Li, and X. Li, “Adhesion between asphalt and recycled concrete aggregate and its impact on the properties of asphalt mixture,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 2528, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Paranavithana and A. Mohajerani, “Effects of recycled concrete aggregates on properties of asphalt concrete,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. Jankovic, D. Nikolic, and D. Bojovic, “Concrete paving blocks and flags made with crushed brick as aggregate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 659–663, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. S. Poon and D. Chan, “Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 578–585, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Zeng, X. Yao, J. Zhang, Q.-F. Gao, J. Chen, and Y. Gui, “Ponded infiltration and spatial-temporal prediction of the water content of silty mudstone,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. D. Wong, D. D. Sun, and D. Lai, “Value-added utilisation of recycled concrete in hot-mix asphalt,” Waste Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 294–301, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Mueller, A. Schnell, and K. Ruebner, “The manufacture of lightweight aggregates from recycled masonry rubble,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 98, pp. 376–387, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Le Ding et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views256
Downloads324
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.