Research Article

Utilization of Waste Glass Powder and Glass Composite Fillers in Asphalt Pavements

Table 6

The adopted thickness and computed strains (using IITPAVE).

Type of fillerPercentage of filler in the mix (%)Resilient modulus at 35°C (MPa)The adopted thickness of surface course (mm)Computed vertical compressive strain at top of the subgradeComputed horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the bottommost bituminous layerComparison of the surface layer thickness of different mixes with respect to SD 4 mix (%)

Stone dust41360700.2374 × 10−30.1335 × 10−3100
5.51991620.2330 × 10−30.1339 × 10−388.57
72630570.2294 × 10−30.1339 × 10−381.43
8.52930560.2271 × 10−30.1334 × 10−380.00

Glass powder41610660.2358 × 10−30.1339 × 10−394.29
5.52134610.2319 × 10−30.1337 × 10−387.14
72834560.2281 × 10−30.1338 × 10−380.00
8.53072540.2267 × 10−30.1336 × 10−377.14

Glass-hydrated lime42042620.2323 × 10−30.1335 × 10−388.57
5.52542580.2294 × 10−30.1336 × 10−382.86
73111550.2263 × 10−30.1334 × 10−378.57
8.53512530.2247 × 10−30.1331 × 10−375.71