Research Article
Utilization of Waste Glass Powder and Glass Composite Fillers in Asphalt Pavements
Table 6
The adopted thickness and computed strains (using IITPAVE).
| Type of filler | Percentage of filler in the mix (%) | Resilient modulus at 35°C (MPa) | The adopted thickness of surface course (mm) | Computed vertical compressive strain at top of the subgrade | Computed horizontal tensile strain at the bottom of the bottommost bituminous layer | Comparison of the surface layer thickness of different mixes with respect to SD 4 mix (%) |
| Stone dust | 4 | 1360 | 70 | 0.2374 × 10−3 | 0.1335 × 10−3 | 100 | 5.5 | 1991 | 62 | 0.2330 × 10−3 | 0.1339 × 10−3 | 88.57 | 7 | 2630 | 57 | 0.2294 × 10−3 | 0.1339 × 10−3 | 81.43 | 8.5 | 2930 | 56 | 0.2271 × 10−3 | 0.1334 × 10−3 | 80.00 |
| Glass powder | 4 | 1610 | 66 | 0.2358 × 10−3 | 0.1339 × 10−3 | 94.29 | 5.5 | 2134 | 61 | 0.2319 × 10−3 | 0.1337 × 10−3 | 87.14 | 7 | 2834 | 56 | 0.2281 × 10−3 | 0.1338 × 10−3 | 80.00 | 8.5 | 3072 | 54 | 0.2267 × 10−3 | 0.1336 × 10−3 | 77.14 |
| Glass-hydrated lime | 4 | 2042 | 62 | 0.2323 × 10−3 | 0.1335 × 10−3 | 88.57 | 5.5 | 2542 | 58 | 0.2294 × 10−3 | 0.1336 × 10−3 | 82.86 | 7 | 3111 | 55 | 0.2263 × 10−3 | 0.1334 × 10−3 | 78.57 | 8.5 | 3512 | 53 | 0.2247 × 10−3 | 0.1331 × 10−3 | 75.71 |
|
|