Utilization of Waste Glass Powder and Glass Composite Fillers in Asphalt Pavements

Table 9

Global warming potential of various mixes.

Type of filler	Filler content (%)	Quantity of bitumen (ton/km)	Quantity of coarse aggregate (ton/km)	Quantity of fine aggregate (ton/km)	Quantity of SD (ton/km)	Quantity of GP (ton/km)	Quantity of hydrated lime (ton/km)	Total emission (kgCO2 equivalent)	Savings in conventional aggregates with respect to SD 4 mix (ton)	Savings in bitumen with respect to SD 4 mix (ton)
GHG emission (kgCO2 equivalent/kg)		0.426	0.0026	0.0026	0.0026	0	0.785
Stone dust	4.0	78.70	422.56	644.96	44.48	0	0	36419	0	0
	5.5	67.10	377.56	561.38	54.65	0	0	31170	138.75	11.70
	7.0	55.65	350.78	507.70	64.62	0	0	26107	229.18	23.05
	8.5	54.53	346.61	487.99	77.53	0	0	25602	265.97	24.17
Glass powder	4.0	71.95	398.74	608.61	0	41.97	0	33270	104.65	6.75
	5.5	64.03	370.12	550.31	0	53.57	0	29670	191.57	14.67
	7.0	55.48	342.53	495.77	0	63.10	0	25813	273.71	23.22
	8.5	51.38	332.11	467.57	0	74.29	0	23695	312.32	27.32
Glass lime composite	4.0	63.62	379.55	579.31	0	19.98	19.98	45277	153.14	15.08
	5.5	56.72	357.51	531.56	0	32.93	18.82	41245	222.93	21.98
	7.0	51.00	339.78	491.79	0	44.71	17.88	37928	280.43	27.70
	8.5	48.38	327.30	460.80	0	55.99	17.23	36183	323.90	30.32