Performance-Based Seismic Fragility and Risk Assessment of Five-Span Continuous Rigid Frame Bridges

Table 4

The adjustment of 10 seismic waves.

ID no.	Seismic wave	Longitudinal			Transverse
		Sa (3.21, 5%) (g)	Amplification factor	Sa (T2) (g)	Sa (5.39, 5%) (g)	Amplification factor	Sa (T1) (g)
1	Chichi	0.0489	10.31	0.50	0.02124	11.77	0.25
2	Friuli	0.02620	19.08	0.50	0.0086	29.07	0.25
3	Holister	0.02164	23.11	0.50	0.01446	17.29	0.25
4	Kobe	0.04205	11.89	0.50	0.02019	12.38	0.25
5	Landers	0.12213	4.09	0.50	0.04500	5.56	0.25
6	Loma Prieta	0.09980	5.01	0.50	0.03172	7.88	0.25
7	LS	0.08630	5.79	0.50	0.00353	70.82	0.25
8	WC	0.00739	67.66	0.50	0.00783	31.93	0.25
9	Trinidad	0.00596	83.89	0.50	0.00201	124.38	0.25
10	Kocaele	0.31240	1.60	0.50	0.13063	1.91	0.25