Review Article
Geotechnical Engineering Properties of Soils Solidified by Microbially Induced CaCO3 Precipitation (MICP)
Table 3
Advantages and disadvantages of grouting methods.
| Method | Procedure | Advantage/disadvantage | Reference |
| Two-phase grouting method | Placement: bacterial injection, CaCl2 injection | Avoiding clogging | [66] | Parallel injection method | The bacteria and the cementation fluid were injected at the same time | Most calcite precipitating close to the inlet area | [67] | Repeated staged injection method | Bacterial injection, static period for 2 h, cementation fluid injection | Reducing porosity | [67] | Soaking method | Bacterial injection, soaking in the cementation fluid | The pores becoming smaller or even blocked, the cementation fluid being difficult to penetrate into | [68] | Electro-biogrouting method | Imposing electric field with a certain voltage gradient | Promoting the diffusion of biomass in soil pore, more uniform | [69] | Spraying method | Spraying bacteria solution evenly on the surface of sand practices | Improving the average hardness and compressive strength | [70] | Unsaturated percolation method | Using peristaltic pump to control the infiltration rate (the saturation is about 75%) | Having better curing effect, with the average compression strength being 19.7 MPa | [71] |
|
|