Research Article

Evaluation of Backfill Operation Models Using SBSC and IFAHP Approach

Table 1

Description of evaluation indexes.

Evaluation indexesDescriptionReferences

Financial perspective (B1)
Total capital input (C1)Investment related to mine backfill including equipment, technology, professional technicians, and managersAgrawal et al. [41]
Operational cost optimization (C2)Optimization of expense items associated with operational activitiesLee et al. [42]
Profit variance (C3)Comparison of actual profit and planned profitEpstein et al. [24]

Stakeholders’ perspective (B2)
Mine owner satisfaction (C4)Satisfaction degree of mine owner with financial and backfill operational managementLin et al. [43]
Backfill vendor satisfaction (C5)Satisfaction degree of backfill vendor with financial and empowermentMoon et al. [11]
Regulatory satisfaction (C6)Compliance with standards and rules from regulatory bodiesModak et al. [44]

Internal process perspective (B3)
Mining-separation-backfill balance (C7)Mining, separation, and backfill process remain closed-loop connectionQi et al. [45]
Flexibility (C8)Ability to adapt to environmental and market changesBaatartogtokh et al. [3]
Communication and collaboration efficiency (C9)Effectiveness of communication and collaboration among stakeholdersTsai et al. [46]

Learning and growth perspective (B4)
Training and development (C10)Improvement of employee’s capacity by training of expertise and skillModak et al. [44]
Technological innovation capability (C11)Motivation and capacity to continuously improve technologyKhaleie et al. [48]
Knowledge sharing (C12)Sharing knowledge and information associated with backfill activities among stakeholdersTsai et al. [46]
Environmental perspective (B5)
Tailings utilization (C13)Minimization of risk of environmental pollution through implementing backfill technologyLiu et al. [49]
Reduction of environmental impact (C14)Percentage of tailings backfilled to underground voidsQi et al. [45]

Social perspective (B6)
Employee accident (C15)Occupational accident rate of employeeZhao et al. [50]
Health of residents (C16)Impact on community residents’ health conditionLiu et al. [51]