Research Article
A DSM-Based CCPM-MPL Representation Method for Project Scheduling under Rework Scenarios
Table 3
Case activity parameters.
| ID | Activity | Duration (day) | Learning curve | Optimistic | Most likely | Pessimistic |
| A | Perform preliminary market analysis | 5 | 8 | 15 | 0.5 | B | Evaluate marketability options | 5 | 8 | 15 | 0.6 | C | Engage feasibility consultants | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.3 | D | Evaluate planning and zoning process | 10 | 13 | 20 | 0.5 | E | Perform massing study | 20 | 24 | 35 | 0.6 | F | Develop conceptual design | 30 | 35 | 50 | 0.8 | G | Identify external stakeholders | 5 | 8 | 15 | 0.4 | H | Identify permits and approvals | 10 | 13 | 20 | 0.7 | I | Complete phase 1 ESA | 10 | 13 | 20 | 0.3 | J | Evaluate consultants and contractors | 10 | 13 | 20 | 0.6 | K | Obtain rough construction costs | 5 | 8 | 15 | 0.5 | L | Determine highest and best use | 3 | 5 | 9 | 0.5 | M | Identify debt options | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0.4 | N | Identify equity options | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0.5 | O | Update financial underwriting | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.5 | P | Reevaluate the organization strategy | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.6 | Q | Estimate the schedule | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.6 | R | Gain control of the site and/or client | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.6 | S | Review and approve | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.7 |
|
|