Comprehensive Framework of Major Power Project Management Based on System Thinking

Table 1

Comprehensive evaluation indicators and weights of major power project management.

Dimension	Layer	Weight of layer	Indicator	Weight of indicator	Integrated weight
Construction entity	Project breakdown structure (A)	0.0728	EBS (a1)	0.5000	0.0364
			WBS (a2)	0.5000	0.0364
Objective management	Quality management (B)	0.1510	Quality management system (b1)	0.3956	0.0597
			Physical quality (b2)	0.2747	0.0415
			Quality behavior (b3)	0.3297	0.0498
	Safety management (C)	0.1510	Safety management system (c1)	0.2683	0.0405
			Risk control (c2)	0.1863	0.0281
			Hazard elimination (c3)	0.2235	0.0338
			Accidents, injuries and deaths (c4)	0.3219	0.0486
	Schedule management (D)	0.1258	Schedule management system (d1)	0.2479	0.0312
			Milestone control (d2)	0.2479	0.0312
			Acceleration measurements (d3)	0.2066	0.0260
			Construction delay (d4)	0.2975	0.0374
	Cost management (E)	0.1049	Cost management system (e1)	0.2586	0.0271
			Payment control (e2)	0.2155	0.0226
			Cost saving measurements (e3)	0.2155	0.0226
			Cost overrun (e4)	0.3103	0.0325
	Environment protection (F)	0.0874	Environment protection system (f1)	0.3956	0.0346
			On-site environment protection (f2)	0.3297	0.0288
			Green construction (f3)	0.2747	0.0240
Organization	Organization and coordination (G)	0.1812	OBS ()	0.2835	0.0514
			Responsibility mechanism ()	0.2362	0.0428
			Coordination mechanism ()	0.1969	0.0357
			Political mechanism ()	0.2835	0.0514
Technical support	Technical support (H)		New technology utilization (h1)	0.2546	0.0320
			Intelligent construction site (h2)	0.2122	0.0267
			Information technology (h3)	0.1768	0.0222
			Innovation and promotion (h4)	0.3564	0.0449