Research Article
Wildfire Susceptibility Mapping Using Five Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms: The Case Study of the Mediterranean Region of Turkey
Table 5
The prediction performance results of the models according to the measurement methods.
| Measurements | LightGBM | GBM | XGBoost | AdaBoost | CatBoost | Train | Test | Train | Test | Train | Test | Train | Test | Train | Test |
| Overall accuracy | 99.886 | 94.703 | 85.675 | 84.488 | 90.443 | 88.801 | 86.430 | 86.021 | 99.126 | 95.473 | Precision | 0.999 | 0.933 | 0.822 | 0.816 | 0.871 | 0.863 | 0.840 | 0.855 | 0.989 | 0.951 | Recall | 0.999 | 0.939 | 0.844 | 0.838 | 0.884 | 0.885 | 0.854 | 0.873 | 0.990 | 0.954 | Sensitivity | 0.999 | 0.956 | 0.873 | 0.853 | 0.929 | 0.892 | 0.876 | 0.846 | 0.993 | 0.956 | Specificity | 0.999 | 0.939 | 0.844 | 0.838 | 0.884 | 0.885 | 0.854 | 0.873 | 0.990 | 0.954 | AUC | 0.999 | 0.948 | 0.858 | 0.846 | 0.907 | 0.888 | 0.865 | 0.859 | 0.991 | 0.955 | F1 | 0.999 | 0.936 | 0.833 | 0.827 | 0.877 | 0.874 | 0.847 | 0.864 | 0.990 | 0.952 | Kappa Index | 0.998 | 0.894 | 0.712 | 0.689 | 0.808 | 0.774 | 0.728 | 0.719 | 0.982 | 0.909 |
|
|