Research Article
Generative Design of Housing Spatial Layout Based on Rectangular Spaces
Table 1
Comparison of different approaches to design GSL.
| Limitations | Approach | General method | Strengths |
| An absence of a fixed outer boundary | Axis area | Using changeable end boundaries to define the scope of each space | Coding is easy | A lack of diversity in the design of interior spaces | Dimensions are not limited |
| Spaces and cells should be measured according to their dimensions | Network oriented | In a grid, assign a set of cells to each space | Different types of spaces are available | Complex designs require heavy coding | An outer border that can be fixed |
| Access to a variety of shapes of spaces is not optimal | Topological | A space is defined by its topology and geometry | Spaces that should be prioritized | Some designs have a high level of coding complexity | Fixing the outer border may be possible |
| The complexity of hybrid coding | Hybrid | Combinations of the three methods described above | Using the potential and avoiding the limitations of different methods | The absence of a written path |
|
|