Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4102156, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4102156
Research Article
Synthesis of Thinned Planar Antenna Array Using Multiobjective Normal Mutated Binary Cat Swarm Optimization
School of Electrical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751013, India
Received 19 October 2015; Accepted 23 March 2016
Academic Editor: Christian W. Dawson
Copyright © 2016 Lakshman Pappula and Debalina Ghosh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Linked References
- L. Schwartzman, “Element behavior in a thinned array,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 571–572, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- R. L. Haupt, “Thinned arrays using genetic algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 993–999, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- K. Chen, X. Yun, Z. He, and C. Han, “Synthesis of sparse planar arrays using modified real genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1067–1073, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- L. Zhang, Y. C. Jiao, B. Chen, and H. Li, “Orthogonal genetic algorithm for planar thinned array designs,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2012, Article ID 319037, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
- G. Oliveri and A. Massa, “Genetic algorithm (GA)-enhanced almost difference set (ADS)-based approach for array thinning,” IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- V. Murino, A. Trucco, and C. S. Regazzoni, “Synthesis of unequally spaced arrays by simulated annealing,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- W.-B. Wang, Q.-Y. Feng, and D. Liu, “Synthesis of thinned linear and planar antenna arrays using binary pso algorithm,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 127, pp. 371–387, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- Ó. Quevedo-Teruel and E. Rajo-Iglesias, “Ant colony optimization in thinned array synthesis with minimum sidelobe level,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 349–352, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- L. Zhang, Y.-C. Jiao, Z.-B. Weng, and F.-S. Zhang, “Design of planar thinned arrays using a Boolean differential evolution algorithm,” IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2172–2178, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- G. Oliveri, L. Manica, and A. Massa, “ADS-based guidelines for thinned planar arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1935–1948, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- N. Jin and Y. Rahmat-Samii, “Advances in particle swarm optimization for antenna designs: real-number, binary, single-objective and multiobjective implementations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 3 I, pp. 556–567, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- J. S. Petko and D. H. Werner, “Pareto optimization of thinned planar arrays with elliptical mainbeams and low sidelobe levels,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1748–1751, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- M. A. Panduro, D. H. Covarrubias, C. A. Brizuela, and F. R. Marante, “A multi-objective approach in the linear antenna array design,” AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 205–212, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- F. Tokan and F. Güneş, “The multi-objective optimization of non-uniform linear phased arrays using the genetic algorithm,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, no. 17, pp. 135–151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- F. Tokan and F. Güne, “Pareto optimal synthesis of the linear array geometry for minimum sidelobe level and null control during beam scanning,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 557–566, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- S. K. Goudos, K. A. Gotsis, K. Siakavara, E. E. Vafiadis, and J. N. Sahalos, “A multi-objective approach to subarrayed linear antenna arrays design based on memetic differential evolution,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 3042–3052, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- S. Pal, B. Y. Qu, and S. Das, “Optimal synthesis of linear antenna arrays with multi-objective differential evolution,” Progress in Electromagnetic Research B, vol. 21, pp. 87–111, 2009. View at Google Scholar
- D. Mandal, A. K. Bhattacharjee, and S. P. Ghoshal, “Comparative optimal designs of non-uniformly excited concentric circular antenna array using evolutionary optimization techniques,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICETET '09), pp. 619–624, Nagpur, India, December 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- M. A. Panduro, C. A. Brizuela, J. Garza, S. Hinojosa, and A. Reyna, “A comparison of NSGA-II, DEMO, and EM-MOPSO for the multi-objective design of concentric rings antenna arrays,” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1100–1113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- M. A. Panduro and C. Brizuela, “Evolutionary multi-objective design of non-uniform circular phased arrays,” International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 549–564, 2008. View at Google Scholar
- C.-Y. Chan and P. M. Goggans, “Multiobjective design of linear antenna arrays using Bayesian inference framework,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 5525–5530, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
- M. A. Panduro, C. A. Brizuela, and D. H. Covarrubias, “Design of electronically steerable linear arrays with evolutionary algorithms,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- S.-C. Chu and P.-W. Tsai, “Computational intelligence based on the behavior of cats,” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 163–173, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- L. Pappula and D. Ghosh, “Linear antenna array synthesis using cat swarm optimization,” AEU—International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 540–549, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- G. Panda, P. M. Pradhan, and B. Majhi, “IIR system identification using cat swarm optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12671–12683, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- P. M. Pradhan and G. Panda, “Solving multiobjective problems using cat swarm optimization,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2956–2964, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- N. Srinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221–248, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
- Z. S. W. Y. Lingnan, “Invasive weed optimization algorithm of discrete binary version,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), vol. 10, pp. 55–60, 2011. View at Google Scholar
- H. Wu, C. Liu, and X. Xie, “Thinning of concentric circular antenna arrays using improved binary invasive weed optimization algorithm,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 365280, 8 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
- K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- C. A. Coello Coello, G. T. Pulido, and M. S. Lechuga, “Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 256–279, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257–271, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
- P. M. Pradhan and G. Panda, “Connectivity constrained wireless sensor deployment using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms and fuzzy decision making,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1134–1145, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus