Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
Volume 2017, Article ID 6843574, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6843574
Research Article

An Automated Structural Optimisation Methodology for Scissor Structures Using a Genetic Algorithm

1Department of Mechanics of Materials and Constructions (MeMC) and Department of Architectural Engineering (æ-lab), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
2Department of Mechanics of Materials and Constructions (MeMC), VUB, Brussels, Belgium
3BATir Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bruxelles, Belgium
4Department of Architectural Engineering (æ-lab), VUB, Brussels, Belgium

Correspondence should be addressed to Aushim Koumar; eb.ca.buv@ramuoka

Received 2 September 2016; Revised 20 December 2016; Accepted 26 December 2016; Published 18 January 2017

Academic Editor: Vahid Hajipour

Copyright © 2017 Aushim Koumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Corsellis and A. Vitale, Transitional Settlement Displaced Population, Oxfam, Oxford, UK, 2005.
  2. E. P. Pinero, Project for a Mobile Theatre Architectural Design, vol. 12, 1961.
  3. C. Gantes, Deployable Structures: Analysis and Design, WIT Press, 2001.
  4. Y. Akgün, A novel transformation model for deployable scissor-hinge structures [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Stuttgart, 2010.
  5. N. De Temmerman, Design and analysis of deployable bar structures for mobile architectural applications [Ph.D. dissertation], Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, 2007.
  6. F. V. Jensen, Concepts for rectrable roof structures [Ph.D. thesis], University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  7. A. Koumar, T. Tysmans, N. De Temmerman, R. F. Coelho, and L. A. Mira, “Multi-criteria optimisation of a barrel vault structure for emergency relief,” in Proceedings of the Symposium: Shells, Membranes and Spatial Structures: Footprints (IASS-SLTE '14), Brasilia, Brazil, Septembre 2014.
  8. A. Kaveh and A. Davaran, “Analysis of pantograph foldable structures,” Computers and Structures, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 131–140, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  9. A. Kaveh and S. Shojaee, “Optimal design of scissor-link foldable structures using Ant Colony Optimization algorithm,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. J. Gantes, P. G. Georgiou, and V. K. Koumousis, “Optimum design of deployable structures using genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the InSmart Structures Conference, pp. 255–264, 1998.
  11. A. Kaveh and S. Shojaee, “Discrete-sizing optimal design of scissor-link foldable structures using genetic algorithm,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2–4, pp. 115–133, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Kaveh, A. Jafarvand, and M. A. Barkhordari, “Optimal design of pantograph foldable structures,” International Journal of Space Structures, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 295–302, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. P. Thrall, “Hangai prize papers for 2011: shape-finding of a deployable structure using simulated annealing,” Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, vol. 52, pp. 241–224, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. P. Thrall, M. Zhu, J. K. Guest, I. Paya-Zaforteza, and S. Adriaenssens, “Structural optimization of deploying structures composed of linkages,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 28, no. 3, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. A. Mira, A. P. Thrall, and N. De Temmerman, “The universal scissor component: optimization of a reconfigurable component for deployable scissor structures,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 317–333, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. Y. R. Elhaddad, “Combined simulated annealing and genetic algorithm to solve optimization problems,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 68, pp. 1508–1510, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. N. Kumbharana and G. M. Pandey, “A comparative study of ACO, GA and SA for solving travelling salesman problem,” Societal Applications of Computer Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 224–228, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Alhanjouri and A. Belal, “Ant colony versus genetic algorithm based on travelling salesman problem,” International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 570–578, 1930. View at Google Scholar
  19. N. D. Lagaros, M. Papadrakakis, and G. Kokossalakis, “Structural optimization using evolutionary algorithms,” Computers and Structures, vol. 80, no. 7-8, pp. 571–589, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Yannick Garbusinski, Quote, 2013.
  21. European Committee for Standardisation, Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures, CEN, 2001.
  22. European Committee for Standardisation, Eurocode 0: Basis of structural design, CEN, 2002.
  23. European Committee for Standardisation, Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures, CEN, 2007.
  24. Abaqus, ABAQUS Documentation, Dassault Systmes, Providence, RI, USA, 2012.
  25. C. A. Coello Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuizen, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Series, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2007. View at MathSciNet
  26. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Srinivas and K. Deb, “Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 221–248, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. O. Shahvari, N. Salmasi, R. Logendran, and B. Abbasi, “An efficient tabu search algorithm for flexible flow shop sequence-dependent group scheduling problems,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 4237–4254, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. Shahvari and R. Logendran, “Hybrid flow shop batching and scheduling with a bi-criteria objective,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 179, pp. 239–258, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. O. Shahvari and R. Logendran, “An enhanced tabu search algorithm to minimize a bi-criteria objective in batching and scheduling problems on unrelated-parallel machines with desired lower bounds on batch sizes,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 77, pp. 154–176, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. E. M. Segal, L. Rhode-Barbarigos, S. Adriaenssens, and R. D. F. Coelho, “Multi-objective optimization of polyester-rope and steel-rope suspended footbridges,” Engineering Structures, vol. 99, pp. 559–567, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. M. Segal, L. Rhode-Barbarigos, R. D. F. Coelho, and S. Adriaenssens, “An automated robust design methodology for suspended structures,” Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 221–229, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. De Munck, S. De Sutter, S. Verbruggen, T. Tysmans, and R. F. Coelho, “Multi-objective weight and cost optimization of hybrid composite-concrete beams,” Composite Structures, vol. 134, pp. 369–377, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. MATLAB, Version 8.4.0.150421 (R2014b), The Math Works Inc, Natick, Mass, USA, 2014.
  35. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. G. Da Fonseca, “Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–132, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. A. Van Veldhuizen and G. B. Lamon, “Evolutionary computation and convergence to a pareto front,” in Proceedings of the Late Breaking Papers at the Genetic Programming Conference, 1998.
  37. J. D. Knowles, Local-search and hybrid evolutionary algorithms for pareto optimization [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Computer Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK, 2002.
  38. R. Filomeno Coelho, “Bi-objective hypervolume-based Pareto optimization,” Optimization Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1091–1103, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus