Advances in Condensed Matter Physics

Advances in Condensed Matter Physics / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Theoretical Analysis and Computational Simulation of Advanced Structured Materials

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 232510 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/232510

Study on Macroscopic and Microscopic Mechanical Behavior of Magnetorheological Elastomers by Representative Volume Element Approach

Academic Editor: Daniel Balint
Received20 Dec 2013
Revised05 Jun 2014
Accepted05 Jun 2014
Published10 Jul 2014

Abstract

By using a representative volume element (RVE) approach, this paper investigates the effective mechanical properties of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) in which particles are aligned and form chain-like structure under magnetic field during curing. Firstly, a three-dimensional RVE in zero magnetic field is presented in ABAQUS/Standard to calculate the macroscopic mechanical properties of MREs. It is shown that the initial shear modulus of MREs increases by 56% with a 20% volume fraction of particles compared to that of pure rubber. Then by introducing the Maxwell stress tensor, a two-dimensional plane stress RVE for the MRE is developed in COMSOL Multiphysics to study its response under a magnetic field. The influences of magnetic field intensity, radius of particles, and distance between two adjacent particles on the macroscopic mechanical properties of MRE are also investigated. The results show that the shear modulus increases with the increase of the applied magnetic field intensity and the radius of particles and the decrease of the distance between two adjacent particles in a chain. The predicted numerical results are consistent with theoretical results from Mori-Tanaka model, double inclusion model, and dipole model.

1. Introduction

Increasing interest in magnetorheological elastomers (MREs), in which micron sized ferrous particles are dispersed in soft matrix such as rubber, is driven by their unique property of magnetic-mechanical coupling [14]. This kind of material renders changeable shear modulus with various applied magnetic field. MREs have many advantages such as good stability, controllability, reversibility, and fast responsiveness and are thus widely applied in variable stiffness devices. In recent years, many researchers have focused on MREs. Gong et al. [58] carried out an investigation on preparation and application of MREs. Dorfmann and Ogden [9] developed constitutive models for MREs under finite deformation. Besides, theoretical dipole model, which takes into account the magnetic dipole interaction between two adjacent particles in a chain, was widely used to study the mechanical properties of MREs [1013]. Because of the complexity involved in magnetic-mechanical coupling, few studies on the macro-/microscopic mechanical properties of MREs were carried out based on finite element method (FEM).

In order to study the unique response of anisotropic MREs, the property of a field under localized and microscopic condition has to be homogenized to get macroequivalent properties. Therefore, both macro- and microscales should be considered. This paper aims to study the effective mechanical properties of anisotropic MREs by using FEM. A three-dimensional representative volume element (RVE) with microscale for the MRE is developed in ABAQUS/Standard and solved by assigning periodic boundary conditions to obtain its macroscopic mechanical properties with no field applied. Secondly, by introducing the Maxwell stress tensor, a two-dimensional plane stress RVE for the MRE is developed in COMSOL Multiphysics to study its response under a magnetic field. Finally, influences of magnetic field intensity, radius of particles, and distance between two adjacent particles in a chain on the macroscopic mechanical properties of MRE are also investigated.

2. Basics of MRE Composites with Periodic Structures

2.1. Microstructure of MREs

MREs consist of micron sized silicon rubber matrix and magnetizable carbonyl sphere particles (about 3 to 5 μm). They are classified into two parts: isotropic MREs (Figure 1(a)) and anisotropic MREs (Figure 1(b)).

2.2. Governing Equations

Several methods can be used to compute the magnetic force, for example, the Lorentz, the Maxwell stress tensor, and the virtual work method [14]. For numerical simulation without electric current, the Maxwell stress tensor is a mature way and is widely used [1518]. Cauchy’s equation of continuum mechanics reads where is density and is the coordinates of a material point, is the stress tensor, and is an external volume force such as gravity (). In the stationary case, there is no acceleration, and the equation representing the force balance is In certain cases, the stress tensor can be divided into two parts. One depends on the electromagnetic field and the other is the mechanical stress tensor: It is sometimes convenient to use a volume force instead of the stress tensor for the electromagnetic induced stress tensor : Then (2) can be rewritten as The expressions for the stress tensor in a general electromagnetic context stem from a fusion of material theory, thermodynamics, continuum mechanics, and electromagnetic field theory. With the introduction of thermodynamic potentials of mechanical, thermal, and electromagnetic effects, explicit expressions for the stress tensor can be derived in a convenient way by forming the formal derivatives with respect to different physical fields [19, 20]. Alternative derivations can be made for a vacuum [21]. But it is difficult to polarize and magnetize materials. In general, an elastic solid material of that is dielectric and magnetic (nonzero ). The stress tensor is given as where is the magnetic flux density, is the magnetization vector, is the identity matrix, and is the magnetic permeability of vacuum, which is  H/m. Thus the Maxwell stress tensor can be applied on the boundary of iron particles to obtain the coupling of stress and magnetic field.

2.3. Representative Volume Element and Periodic Boundary Conditions

In the theory of composite materials, representative volume element (RVE) is the smallest volume over which a measurement can be made that will yield a value representing the whole. Periodic boundary conditions (PBC) are often used to simulate a large system by modeling a small part that is far from its edge. Many researchers [2224] studied PBC and proved that PBC ensure the continuity of the deformation field. Because PBC will be applied to RVE models in FEM simulations, it is also required that RVE models have periodic microstructures. That is, if a particle intersects the RVE surface, it must be split into an appropriate number of parts and copied to the opposite sides. The interface between every two adjacent RVEs must have the same displacement and stress field, that is, satisfying the continuity conditions of stress. For a given average deformation gradient applied to the RVE model, the PBC can be represented by the following general format [25]: where and are the nodes of the opposite adjacent faces, is the identity matrix, is the force applied on the node, and and denote the position vectors of a material point in the original (undeformed) and deformed configuration, respectively. When the opposite faces are parallel, from (7), is a constant. We can use an equation constraint to realize (7) in FEA software. It can be proved that when (7) is satisfied, then (8) is also satisfied. If (7) and (8) are contented, the average mechanical properties from the RVE are those of the whole MREs.

2.4. Approaches for Macromechanical Property Prediction

There are two ways to get the macromechanical properties of composites. One is the direct FEM; the other is mean field homogenization. FEM is based on a RVE and gives accurate and detailed microfield. The second approach is based on the theory of Eshelby inclusion of various approximate models [26], such as the self-consistent model, generalized self-consistent model, Mori-Tanaka model [27], and double inclusions model [28]. It only gives approximations to the volume averages of stresses and strains, either at the macrolevel or in each phase. With the development of FEM, the first approach is widely used [29, 30] and can get accurate results than the second way. In this paper, the Mori-Tanaka model and double inclusion model in the absence of an effective magnetic field are used and compared with the FEM. In the case of a magnetic field, numerical FEM simulation based on the RVE is selected.

3. Material Description of the MRE

3.1. Carbonyl Iron Particles

Particulate filler herein is carbonyl iron particle, which is a typical high permeability material having low remanence and high magnetic saturation rate. The material parameters are given as follows: Young’s modulus is 210 GPa, Poisson’s ratio is 0.33 [31], and shear modulus is 78.94 GPa. The relative magnetic permeability is assumed to be 100.

3.2. Mechanical Properties of Rubber Matrix

The silicon rubber used as matrix in MREs can be modeled by a form of free energy function of Mooney-Rivlin [32], which is suitable for moderate finite deformation: where and are the modified invariants, is the ratio of the deformed elastic volume, and is the bulk modulus. The parameters and are 0.4 MPa and 0.1 MPa, respectively. The initial shear modulus of the silicon rubber can be calculated from as 1 MPa [33]. It is assumed that Poisson’s ratio is 0.47 for small compressibility. The relative magnetic permeability of silicon rubber is assumed to be 1. The bulk modulus and the initial Young modulus can be calculated from the following equation as ,  :

4. Macro-/Micromechanical Properties of the Isotropic MRE without Magnetic Field

As shown in Figure 2(a), numerical model of a three-dimensional RVE for the isotropic MRE is implemented in ABQAUS/Standard and a tension deformation is applied without a magnetic field. The volume fraction of particles is 0.2. The deformation of RVE with applied periodic boundary condition is shown in Figure 2(b).

Figure 3 shows the macroscopic tension stress-strain curve of the orthotropic MRE. As can be seen from Figure 3, the stress-strain response of the MRE is nonlinear. The numerical results are consistent with the predictions computed by the double inclusion model and Mori-Tanaka model. It can be obtained from Figure 3 that the initial Young modulus is 4.16 MPa.

Then a RVE with zero magnetic field which has one particle with a volume fraction of 0.2 is established. As can be seen from Figure 4, periodic boundary condition and shear strain are applied on the RVE. The predicted shear stress-strain curve is presented in Figure 6. It can be calculated from Figure 5 that the initial shear modulus is 1.56 MPa.

5. Macro-/Micromechanical Properties of Anisotropic MRE with Magnetic Field

5.1. Dipole Models

In the dipole model, the free energy function in MREs can be decomposed into three parts nominally representing the energy contributions from the matrix, particle, and the coupled interaction of magnetic filed and particles. The magnetic dipolar interaction between adjacent particles in a chain is illustrated in Figure 6.

The dipole model assumes that the interaction energy of the two dipoles is [34] where is the vacuum permeability, is the relative permeability, and is the magnetic dipole moment. It is assumed that per unit volume has pieces of particles, so where is the diameter of a particle and is the volume fraction of particles. It is defined that the shear strain is and the magnetic energy (per unit volume) is The initial shear modulus can be obtained by the second differentiation of with respect to . When approaches zero, the contribution to the shear stiffness can be written as As is indicated in (13), the magnetic field strength and diameter of particles and the distance between two adjacent particles in a chain are key factors affecting the initial shear modulus.

5.2. Magnetic Equations

In a current free region, where and is magnetic field strength, it is possible to define a scalar magnetic potential from the relation . Use the constitutive relation between the magnetic flux density and magnetic field together with the following equation: Then can be obtained from the following equation: By introducing the Maxwell stress tensor to relate the magnetic field and mechanical field, a two-dimensional plane stress RVE for the MRE is developed in COMSOL Multiphysics to study its response under magnetic field. The magnetic vector potential in the horizontal direction is input in the top and bottom boundaries. Consider where is the -direction element of .

As shown in Figure 7, the black arrow is the Maxwell surface stress tensor. It also shows that the magnetic flux density under a horizontal direction in the 2D plane stress for the anisotropic MRE is larger than under a perpendicular direction. Obviously, this is caused by the directivity of the magnetic field.

5.3. Results and Discussions

Figure 8 shows the simple shear deformation under a magnetic field using PBC. Modeling analyses on the MREs are implemented to investigate the effect of magnetic field strength, the particle radius, and the distance between two adjacent particles on the shear modules.

As shown in Figures 9, 10, and 11, the initial shear modulus increases with increasing magnetic flux density and radius of particles and decreasing distance between two adjacent particles in a chain. The simulation results are in good agreement with theoretical results from the dipole model represented by (13). The magnetic field will cause the magnetic force and thus will result in compression of the matrix (rubber), which is actually magnetic prestressed. This is explained by the fact the particles attract each other and thus increase the stiffness of material in some way. If a shear deformation is implemented, it must overcome the magnetic force in the direction of the magnetic field. So, the shear stress increases with the increase of magnetic flux density. For the same reason, the magnetic force and the shear stress increase with increasing radius of particles and decreasing distance between two adjacent particles.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, by using ABAQUS and COMSOL Multiphysics, magnetic-mechanical behaviors of MREs are investigated via FE simulations on RVEs with periodic boundary conditions being applied. An analysis of 3D RVE for the MRE without a magnetic field shows that the initial shear modulus of the MRE increases to nearly 1.56 times compared to that of the pure rubber acting as the matrix. A simple shear deformation of plane stress RVE using the Maxwell stress tensor is further implemented to characterize the properties of anisotropic MRE in the presence of a magnetic field. The numerical results show that an increase in initial shear modulus can be achieved when the intensity of magnetic field and radius of particles increase and the distance between two adjacent particles decreases. All the modeling results are in good agreement with theoretical results. Future works will be concentrated on the macro-/micromechanical properties of anisotropic MREs by using three-dimensional FEM.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11172171 and 11272362) and Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20130073110054) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. L. Borcea and O. Bruno, “On the magneto-elastic properties of elastomer-ferromagnet composites,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 2877–2919, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  2. T. A. Duenas and G. P. Carman, “Large magnetostrictive response of Terfenol-D resin composites (invited),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 4696–4701, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Jin, T. H. Tiefel, R. Wolfe, R. C. Sherwood, and J. J. Mottine Jr., “Optically transparent, electrically conductive composite medium,” Science, vol. 255, no. 5043, pp. 446–448, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Sandlund, M. Fahlander, T. Cedell, A. E. Clark, J. B. Restorff, and M. Wun-Fogle, “Magnetostriction, elastic moduli, and coupling factors of composite Terfenol-D,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 5656–5658, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. Ge, X. Gong, Y. Fan, and S. Xuan, “Preparation and mechanical properties of the magnetorheological elastomer based on natural rubber/rosin glycerin hybrid matrix,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 22, Article ID 115029, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  6. W. Jiang, Z. Cao, R. Gu, X. Ye, C. Jiang, and X. Gong, “A simple route to synthesize ZnFe2O4 hollow spheres and their magnetorheological characteristics,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 18, no. 12, Article ID 125013, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Yang, X. Gong, L. Zong, C. Peng, and S. Xuan, “Silicon carbide-strengthened magnetorheological elastomer: preparation and mechanical property,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Zhang, X. Gong, W. Jiang, and Y. Fan, “Investigation of the durability of anisotropic magnetorheological elastomers based on mixed rubber,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 19, no. 8, Article ID 085008, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. A. Dorfmann and R. W. Ogden, “Magnetoelastic modelling of elastomers,” European Journal of Mechanics A: Solids, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 497–507, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. L. C. Davis, “Model of magnetorheological elastomers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 3348–3351, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Jolly, J. D. Carlson, B. C. Muñoz, and T. A. Bullions, “The magnetoviscoelastic response of elastomer composites consisting of ferrous particles embedded in a polymer matrix,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 613–622, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Shen, M. F. Golnaraghi, and G. R. Heppler, “Experimental research and modeling of magnetorheological elastomers,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Shiga, A. Okada, and T. Kurauchi, “Magnetroviscoelastic behavior of composite gels,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 787–792, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. H. Woodson and J. R. Melcher, Electromechanical Dynamics, Wiley, 1985.
  15. Y.-H. Pao, “Electromagnetic forces in deformable continua,” in Mechanics Today, vol. 4 of NSF-Supported Research, pp. 209–305, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J. Mizia, K. Adamiak, A. R. Eastham, and G. E. Dawson, “Finite element force calculation: comparison of methods for electric machines,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 447–450, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. H. Jang, J. W. Yoon, N. Y. Park, and S. M. Jang, “Torque and unbalanced magnetic force in a rotational unsymmetric brushless DC motors,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 5157–5159, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. J. Griffiths and R. College, Introduction to Electrodynamics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1999.
  19. A. Kovetz, The Principles of Electromagnetic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990. View at: MathSciNet
  20. O. B. Wilson, Introduction to Theory and Design of Sonar Transducers, Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, Calif, USA, 1988.
  21. R. K. Wangsness, Electromagnetic Fields, vol. 1, Wiley-VCH, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1986.
  22. C. Chen, T. Lu, and N. Fleck, “Effect of imperfections on the yielding of two-dimensional foams,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2235–2272, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Demiray, W. Becker, and J. Hohe, “Analysis of two- and three-dimensional hyperelastic model foams under complex loading conditions,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 985–1000, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Hohe and W. Becker, “Geometrically nonlinear stress-strain behavior of hyperelastic solid foams,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 443–453, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Z. Guo, X. Peng, and B. Moran, “Large deformation response of a hyperelastic fibre reinforced composite: theoretical model and numerical validation,” Composites A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1842–1851, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. D. Eshelby, “The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems,” Proceedings of the Royal Society London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 241, pp. 376–396, 1957. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  27. T. Mori and K. Tanaka, “Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions,” Acta Metallurgica, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 571–574, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. Nemat-Nasser and M. Hori, “Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous solids,” in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  29. Z. Guo, F. Caner, X. Peng, and B. Moran, “On constitutive modelling of porous neo-Hookean composites,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2338–2357, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  30. Z. Guo, X. Shi, Y. Chen, H. Chen, X. Peng, and P. Harrison, “Mechanical modeling of incompressible particle-reinforced neo-Hookean composites based on numerical homogenization,” Mechanics of Materials, vol. 70, pp. 1–17, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. S. Bergström and M. C. Boyce, “Mechanical behavior of particle filled elastomers,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 633–656, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. C. Boyce and E. M. Arruda, “Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 504–523, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. N. Gent, Engineering with Rubber: How to Design Rubber Components, Hanser, 2001.
  34. R. Rosensweig, Ferrohydrodyn Amics, Cambridge University, New York, NY, USA, 1985.

Copyright © 2014 Shulei Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1901 Views | 1415 Downloads | 6 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.