Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 512621, 4 pages
Research Article

The Origin and Coupling Mechanism of the Magnetoelectric Effect in TMCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (TM = Ni and Co)

1National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL), MPA-CMMS Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
2Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6
3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA 99004, USA
4Materials Synthesis & Integrated Devices, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
5Material Science and Technology Division, LANL, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

Received 30 May 2014; Accepted 19 August 2014; Published 8 September 2014

Academic Editor: Krishnakumar Pillai

Copyright © 2014 Eundeok Mun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Most research on multiferroics and magnetoelectric effects to date has focused on inorganic oxides. Molecule-based materials are a relatively new field in which to search for magnetoelectric multiferroics and to explore new coupling mechanisms between electric and magnetic order. We present magnetoelectric behavior in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTN) and CoCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTC). These compounds form tetragonal structures where the transition metal ion (Ni or Co) is surrounded by four electrically polar thiourea molecules [SC(NH2)2]. By tracking the magnetic and electric properties of these compounds as a function of magnetic field, we gain insights into the coupling mechanism by observing that, in DTN, the electric polarization tracks the magnetic ordering, whereas in DTC it does not. For DTN, all electrically polar thiourea molecules tilt in the same direction along the c-axis, breaking spatial-inversion symmetry, whereas, for DTC, two thiourea molecules tilt up and two tilt down with respect to c-axis, perfectly canceling the net electrical polarization. Thus, the magnetoelectric coupling mechanism in DTN is likely a magnetostrictive adjustment of the thiourea molecule orientation in response to magnetic order.

1. Introduction

In magnetoelectric multiferroics, magnetic and electric order coexist and are coupled to each other. For example, if a magnetic field can modify ferroelectricity or an electric field can modify magnetic order, new functionalities can be envisioned with applications to electric devices and sensors [13]. A great effort has been dedicated to finding new classes of multiferroic materials and understanding magnetoelectric coupling mechanisms [4]. Molecule-based magnets are a promising class of materials in which to couple magnetic and electric order. Here, magnetism can derive from magnetic metal ions and ferroelectricity from electrically polar organic molecule fragments [57].

NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2, dichloro-tetrakis-thiourea-nickel (DTN) [811], has been extensively studied for its quantum magnetism. It possesses a field-induced quantum phase transition that has been analyzed in terms of Bose-Einstein condensation of the spin degrees of freedom [12]. Recently it was also found to show magnetostriction consistent with exchange striction in the antiferromagnetic state [7]. DTN is a molecule-based magnet in which NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 molecules pack in a body-centered tetragonal structure, with Ni–Cl–Cl–Ni bonding along the c-axis and hydrogen bonding between thiourea molecules in the ab-plane. The four thiourea molecules surrounding each Ni ion are electrically polar. The components of the thiourea electric polarization in the ab-plane cancel each other; however, the c-axis components are added to create a net electric polarization along c, which could be responsible for the magnetic field-modified ferroelectricity in this material. The Ni2+S = 1 spins are gapped at zero field due to single ion anisotropy, with an ground state and an excited state [9]. Application of a magnetic field along the c-axis lowers the state until it becomes degenerate with the ground state. The two levels are degenerate between 2 and 12 T since the levels are broadened (dispersed) by antiferromagnetic coupling. At 2 T, where the ground state and state first become degenerate, antiferromagnetic order results with the spins in the ab-plane, perpendicular to the applied field. Above 2 T the spins increasingly “cant” as the magnetic field is increased, until they saturate at 12 T. For magnetic fields in the ab-plane, the different levels mix together, the spin gap never closes, and no magnetic ordering occurs for any field. For H  ∣∣ c it has been observed that the electric polarization also shows a strong magnetic-field dependence between 2 and 12 T [7] similar to the magnetization. We have suggested [7] that the thiourea molecules could be responsible for the electric polarization, and their angles with respect to the crystalline axes are changed when magnetostriction acts on the Ni spins and distorts the shape of the unit cell. Thus, we proposed that an indirect magnetostrictive mechanism is responsible for magnetoelectric coupling in DTN. Here we present new results on CoCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTC), which shows magnetism but no electric polarization, confirming our assumption.

2. Results and Discussion

The literature shows that single crystals of DTN can be grown at room temperature from an aqueous solution [13], whereas single-phase samples of DTC require an ethanol solution [1416]. In this work, CoCl2 and SC(NH2)2 were dissolved in warm ethanol in separate glass beakers. After slowly mixing the solutions, the solvent was evaporated for a two-week period, and sub-mm dark blue plate-like crystals with clear facets were obtained, with the c-axis perpendicular to the plate surface. X-ray diffraction measurements at room temperature found a tetragonal structure with and lattice parameters  Å,  Å [1416]. The crystal structures of DTN and DTC are shown in Figure 1. In DTC, the Co ions pack in a face-centered arrangement, in contrast to DTN which is body centered. Each Co is surrounded by four thiourea molecules in the ab-plane, and two Cl’s along the c-axis. The Co-Cl axes are tilted 4  with respect to the c-axis, and the plane of the four Co-S bonds is tilted 8  from the ab-plane with the tilt angle alternating from one nearest-neighbor Co to the next along , , and (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Crystal structure of (a) NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTN) and (b) CoCl2-4SC(NH2)2 (DTC) with some atoms omitted for clarity. The cartoons on the left show the direction of the electric polarization produced by the S=C bonds.

The temperature and magnetic-field dependence of the magnetization, , of DTC was measured in a Quantum Design (QD) Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option up to  T and down to  K. In addition, measurements were extended up to  T and down to  K in pulsed magnetic fields (10 ms rise and 40 ms decay time) with an extraction magnetometer [17] at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) in Los Alamos National Laboratory. Specific heat, , was measured by the relaxation technique down to  mK in a QD PPMS with a dilution refrigerator option. The electric polarization change, , as a function of magnetic field was measured in pulsed magnetic fields for both and H parallel and perpendicular to c-axis [6, 7]. Platinum contacts were sputtered onto the samples to measure the induced magnetoelectric currents. The induced magnetoelectric currents onto the electrode generated by the sample are recorded by using a Stanford Research 570 current-to-voltage amplifier.

The inverse magnetic susceptibility, , as a function of temperature is linear above 120 K and no anisotropy between the ab-plane and the c-axis is observed as shown in Figure 2. A fit to the Curie-Weiss law above 120 K results in a paramagnetic Curie temperature  K and the effective moment 5.5 , which is somewhat bigger than the expected free Co2+ ion value with spin S = 3/2. The inset to Figure 2 shows the specific heat versus temperature at various magnetic fields. At zero field it shows a peak consistent with long-range magnetic ordering below  K, as shown in the inset of Figure 2, in agreement with the earlier results [14, 15]. We found that applying a magnetic field of ~3 T is sufficient to suppress below the lowest measured temperature of 50 mK. Thus DTC does not require a magnetic field to close a spin gap and induce magnetic order, in contrast to DTN.

Figure 2: Inverse magnetic susceptibility, , of CoCl2-4SC(NH2)2 as a function of temperature for magnetic fields H of 1 kOe applied ∣∣ ab and ∣∣ c. Solid lines represent a Curie-Weiss fit. Inset shows specific heat data at selected magnetic fields for H ∣∣ c.

The magnetization isotherms, , for DTC were measured at  K up to 60 T (see Figure 3(a)). As the magnetic field increases, rises rapidly until ~2 T. The T region also corresponds to the suppression of long-range order in the specific heat. For , curves for both ab-plane and c-axis increase monotonically, reaching the value of ≈3.2 /f.u. at  T. The effective moment and the saturated magnetization value are close to the expected Co2+ value, while no magnetic anisotropy can be resolved for DTC. The lack of anisotropy in an ion implies that the three unpaired electrons in Co2+ occupy the three levels, or else that splitting among and levels is very small.

Figure 3: (a) CoCl2-4SC(NH2)2. Left axis: magnetization isotherms at  K for H ∣∣ ab (open circles) and H ∣∣ c (solid line). Right axis: electric polarization change at  K for H ∣∣ ab and  ∣∣ c. The horizontal small arrows indicate the up- and down-sweeps of the magnetic field. (b) NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2. Left axis: at  K for H ∣∣ c (solid line). Right axis: at for H ∣∣ c (solid squares) and quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations of the electric polarization (solid circles) [7].

The electric polarization measurements indicate no observable signal up to 60 T as shown in Figure 3(a). Thus, for both the ordered and the paramagnetic region in DTC, no correlation between magnetism and electric polarization is observed. By contrast, Figure 3(b) shows results for DTN, where and are plotted at  K. Application of a magnetic field between 2 and 12 T induces canted antiferromagnetism of the Ni spins and the resulting magnetization tracks the electric polarization change [7].

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, DTN shows spatial-inversion-symmetry breaking and a magnetic field-modified electric polarization, whereas DTC is spatial-inversion symmetric and has no evidence of magnetic field-induced electric polarization changes. It is expected that the Ni magnetic forces create distortions and modify the angles of the thiourea molecules, in particular the double carbon-sulfur bonds, thereby creating a magnetic field-modified electric polarization. The observed electric polarization change as a function of magnetic field has been modified by the sum of exchange striction and crystal electric field striction [7]. By contrast, any magnetostriction in DTC does not break the centrosymmetric crystal structure and thus does not change the electric polarization.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


High magnetic field measurements were conducted at the NHMFL pulsed-field facility, which is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through Cooperative Grant no. DMR-1157490, the State of Florida, and the U.S. Department of Energy. Work at LANL was supported by the Department of Energy’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development program. The work at EWU was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant no. DMR-1306158.


  1. A. J. Freeman and H. Schmid, Eds., Magnetoelectric Interaction Phenomena in Crystals, Gordon and Breach, London, UK, 1975.
  2. M. Fiebig, “Revival of the magnetoelectric effect,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. R123–R152, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Kimura, “Spiral magnets as magnetoelectrics,” Annual Review of Materials Research, vol. 37, pp. 387–413, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. J. F. Scott, “Data storage: multiferroic memories,” Nature Materials, vol. 6, pp. 256–257, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Horiuchi and Y. Tokura, “Organic ferroelectrics,” Nature Materials, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 357–366, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. S. Zapf, M. Kenzelmann, F. Wolff-Fabris, F. Balakirev, and Y. Chen, “Magnetically induced electric polarization in an organometallic magnet,” Physical Review B, vol. 82, no. 6, Article ID 060402(R), 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. V. S. Zapf, P. Sengupta, C. D. Batista, F. Nasreen, F. Wolff-Fabris, and A. Paduan-Filho, “Magnetoelectric effects in an organometallic quantum magnet,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 83, Article ID 140405, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. S. Zapf, V. F. Correa, P. Sengupta et al., “Direct measurement of spin correlations using magnetostriction,” Physical Review B, vol. 77, Article ID 020404, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. S. Zapf, D. Zocco, B. R. Hansen et al., “Bose-einstein condensation of S = 1 nickel spin degrees of freedom in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 7, Article ID 077204, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. A. Zvyagin, J. Wosnitza, C. D. Batista et al., “Magnetic excitations in the spin-1 anisotropic heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain system NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, Article ID 047205, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. L. Yin, J. S. Xia, V. S. Zapf, N. S. Sullivan, and A. Paduan-Filho, “Direct measurement of the Bose-Einstein condensation universality class in NiCl2-4SC(NH2)2 at Ultralow Temperatures,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, Article ID 187205, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. V. S. Zapf, M. Jaime, and C. D. Batista, “Bose-Einstein condensation in quantum magnets,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 86, p. 563, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Paduan-Filho, R. D. Chirico, K. O. Joung, and R. L. Carlin, “Field-induced magnetic ordering in uniaxial nickel systems: a second example,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 4103–4105, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Forstat, N. D. Love, J. McElearney, and H. Weinstock, “Magnetic transition in thiourea-coordinated cobalt chloride,” Physical Review, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 406–409, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Ni, H. N. Spector, and H. Weinstock, “Magnetothermal properties of heat transport in cobalt chloride thiourea,” Physical Review B, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 3370–3379, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. S. Murugan and P. Ramasamy, “Growth and characterization of metal-organic crystal: tetra thiourea cobalt chloride (TTCoC),” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 311, no. 3, pp. 585–588, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. A. Detwiler, G. M. Schmiedeshoff, N. Harrison, A. H. Lacerda, J. C. Cooley, and J. L. Smith, “Magnetization of UBe13 to 60 T,” Physical Review B, vol. 61, article 402, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus