Research Article  Open Access
Liang Sun, Yimin Gao, Yangzhen Liu, Guoliang Wang, Yiran Wang, Wenyan Zhai, Wen Wang, "Pressure Prediction of Electronic, Anisotropic Elastic, Optical, and Thermal Properties of Quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti)", Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 3231027, 18 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3231027
Pressure Prediction of Electronic, Anisotropic Elastic, Optical, and Thermal Properties of Quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti)
Abstract
The electronic, mechanical, anisotropic elastic, optical, and thermal properties of quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) under different pressure are systematically investigated by firstprinciples calculations. The bonding characteristics of these compounds are the mixture of metallic and covalent bonds. With an increase of pressure, the heights of total density of states (TDOS) for these compounds decrease at Fermi level. The highest volume compressibility among three compounds is Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} for its smallest relative volume decline. The relative bond lengths are decreasing when the pressure increases. The bulk and shear modulus of the one doped with Cr or Mo are larger than those of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} with pressure increasing. With an increase of pressure, the anisotropy of these compounds also increases. Moreover, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the biggest anisotropy among the three compounds. The results of optical functions indicate that the reflectivity of the three compounds is high in visibleultraviolet region up to ~10.5 eV under ambient pressure and increasing constantly when under pressure. Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest loss function. The calculated sound velocity and Debye temperature show that they all increase with pressure. of the three compounds is also calculated.
1. Introduction
Layered ternary compounds combine both the merits of ceramic and metal with high electrical and thermal conductivities, damage tolerance, excellent thermal shock resistance, high temperature strength, and well oxidation and corrosion resistance properties [1–5]. The standard formula of those compounds is (M represents an early transition metal, A is an Agroup element which mostly is IIIA and IVA element, X means C or N atom, and ). When , more than 50 (211 phases) compounds have already been founded. They are all layered hexagonal structures with space group P_{63}/mmc consisting of alternate nearclosepacked layers of octahedral interleafed with layers of A atoms [5]. However, there are six 312 phases when has been determined, that is, Ti_{3}AC_{2} (A = Si, Ge, Sn, and Al) [6], V_{3}AlC_{2}, and Ta_{3}AlC_{2}, respectively. Only one polycrystalline, fully dense, predominantly singlephase bulk sample of Ta_{4}AlN_{3} (when ) compound was synthesized using hot isostatic pressing [7]. While being based on theoretical first principle, the properties of several new phases like Ta_{4}AlC_{3} [8], V_{4}SiC_{3} [9], and Ti_{4}SiN_{3} [10] are calculated but could not be factually fabricated in experiments.
Since 1996, highpurity Ti_{3}SiC_{2} was firstly synthesized by Barsoum and ElRaghy [11] using HIP process and the experimental and theoretical studies on frication of 312 MAX phases were conducted [11–19]. Ti_{3}SnC_{2} was discovered by Dubois et al. in 2007 [20]. Ti_{3}AlC_{2} was first synthesized and fabricated by Pietzka and Schuster in 1994 and the unit cell is hexagonal with lattice parameters of nm and nm and its theoretical density is 4.25 g/cm^{3} [21, 22]. Both compounds were found to be isostructural with Ti_{3}SiC_{2} and shared their many similar characteristics. Fully dense, predominantly singlephase samples of Ti_{3}Al_{1.1}C_{1.8} were fabricated by Tzenov and Barsoum [23]. Thier thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) in the temperature range of 25–1200°C is K^{−1}. The density of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} is lower than that of Ti_{3}SiC_{2} and Ti_{3}GeC_{2}, which is attractive as it is used as a structural material or reinforcement for polymers and metals. The macroscopic properties of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} were thought to be strongly related to its electronic and structural properties [24].
Firstprinciples calculations were supported to understand the electronic structure, elastic anisotropy, and other theoretical properties of this family of phases and to predicate new phases [6, 25–37]. Electrical structural, mechanical, and thermal properties of 312phase like elastic constants have also been investigated by means of firstprinciples theory especially for Ti_{3}AlC_{2} [23–27, 31, 32, 37–49]. Among 312 phases, some Alcontaining ones like Ti_{2}AlC and Ti_{3}AlC_{2} attract the most attention for their exceptional oxidation resistance to form a thin protective alumina layer on the surface [40, 41] and their crack selfhealing characteristics [42]. In previous studies, only Ti, V, Cr, Nb, and Ta elements can be combined Alcontaining MAX phase, while some exceptions as Zr, Nb Cr, Mn, and Mn atoms can be replaced the certain M element by solid solution to form quaternary Alcontaining MAX phases like (Nb_{0.8}Zr_{0.2})_{2}AlC [43], (Nb_{0.6}Zr_{0.4})_{2}AlC [44], and (Cr_{0.7}Mn_{0.3})_{2}AlC [45]. And the mass fraction of except M element is less than 0.5 of total Mcontent [46].
Until recently, two novel quaternary MAX phases have been synthesized: (Cr_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} which reported on synthesizing by Cr_{2}AlC and TiC and (Mo_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} synthesized by powders of Mo, Ti, Al, and graphite which have the similar crystallographic characteristics. Liu et al. [31] synthesized the (Cr_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} and calculated its possessed ferromagnetism by firstprinciples calculations. Anasori et al. [46] firstly synthesized powder of (Mo_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} and then calculated its space group and lattice parameters by Rietveld analysis of powder XRD (Xray diffraction). Then, HSTM (highresolution scanning transmission electron microscopy) was introduced to study the structural characteristics and its ordered phase with Ti layers sandwiched between two Mo layers in a Ti_{3}AlC_{2} type structure. While there is no record on the electronic, optical, anisotropic elastic, and thermal properties of quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo), also the behavior of these phases under high pressure is still unknown. In present paper, the authors’ purpose is to investigate relations of electronic, optical, anisotropic elastic, and thermal properties of these compounds under ambient and static high pressure which have rarely been reported.
2. Calculation Details
(M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) MAX phases have a crystal structure of isotopic like Ti_{3}SiC_{2} and Ti_{3}AlC_{2} with a hexagonal symmetry. The space group is P6_{3}/mmc which consists of periodic stacking of Al atoms layers. The pertinent features of the structure for the computations are that M atoms occupy the (1/3, 2/3, 0.132493) and the titanium atoms occupy (0, 0, 0) Wyckoff sites, respectively, while Al atoms occupy the 2b (0, 0, 0.25) and the carbon atoms are situated at the 4f (1/3, 2/3, 0.574905). For M = Ti atoms, we define the Ti atoms located at 2a positions as and those at 4f positions as . The crystal structure and calculated cell parameters of (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Gr, Mo and Ti) are shown in Figure 1.
All calculations in present work were performed based on the planewave pseudopotential density function theory (DFT) by CASPTEP code [48, 49]. The CASPTEP code employed special point integration over the Brillouin zone and a planewave basis set for the expansion of the wave functions which has been well illustrated in the literature [50]. Pseudoatomic calculations were performed for Cr: 3s^{2} 3p^{6} 3d^{5} 4s^{1}, Mo: 4s^{2} 4p^{6} 4d^{5} 5s^{1}, Ti: 3d^{2} 4s^{2}, Al: 3s^{2} 3p^{1}, and C: 2s^{2} 2p^{2}, respectively. A gradientcorrected form of the exchangecorrelation functional PerdewWang generalizedgradient approximation (GGAPW91) was used [51]. The calculations have been performed using a planewave cutoff of 600 eV [52]. The Brillouinzone sampling was performed using Monkhorst–Pack mesh [53] and the total energy of selfconsistent convergence was at eV/atom and the maximum force on the atom was below eV/Å. The BroydenFletcherGoldfarbShannon (BFGS) algorithm is introduced to relax the whole structure to reach the ground state where both cell parameters and fractional coordinates of atoms were optimized simultaneously. The lattice parameters of (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) compounds and calculation method of our work are listed in Table 1. The lattice parameters of these compounds are in good agreement with other available experimental results. The induced pressure in this paper is defined as the force per unit area. A single number for the pressure implies that pressure is a scalar quantity, while, in fact, pressure can be seen as a tensor of the more general form [54]:

Each element of the tensor is the force that acts on the surface of the structure that has edges parallel to the , , and axis. The changes in unit cell lattice parameters and volume resulting from the stress can be obtained from an analysis of dynamics trajectory data.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Electronic Properties under Pressure
The total and atomic site partial densities of states (PDOS) of (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) under 0 GPa and 100 GPa pressure have been calculated, as shown in Figures 2–4, respectively. The atomic bonding characteristics are clearly illustrated in these PDOS and for C atoms do not display significantly the TDOS at the Fermi energy. Therefore, C atoms are not involved in electronic transport. Figures 2(a), 3(a), and 4(a) show the electronic structure of three compounds at 0 GPa while Figures 2(b), 3(b), and 4(b) display these of under 100 GPa. The Fermi level is set at and it can be clearly seen that there is a certain value of Fermi energy () of total DOS at the Fermi level. Therefore, three compounds in this work exhibit metallic properties, such as metallic conductivity. When pressure increased, the height of TDOS peaks decreases and of total DOS at the Fermi level also went down constantly. According to the results of Li et al. [55], it can be learnt that the minimum (maximum) of the DOS qualitatively indicates their stability (instability). Thus, the stability of these compounds becomes higher with an increase of pressure.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
From the partial DOS of each element shown in Figures 2–4, it is found that there is mainly a contribution of C 2s states for the energy range of eV. From −7.5 to 0 eV, the DOS of three compounds are dominated by hybridizing Ti 3d, M (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) 3d, Al 3s/3p, and C 2p states. Particularly, the total DOS at Fermi level manly originates from Ti or M (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) 3d states. Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} shows the biggest of the others because of Cr 3d states. Meanwhile, strong pd hybridization can be seen between TiC and M (Cr, Mo, or Ti)C atoms. Thus, there are covalent bonding contributions between TiC and MC atoms. In the pervious work [13, 56], the electronic structure of M_{2}InC (M = Ti, Zr, and Hf) and Ti_{3}AC_{2} (A = Si, Ge, and Sn) phases is affected by the M element.
3.2. Structural Anticompressibility
The relative volume of V/V_{0} and bond length of three quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} atoms are calculated with a function of pressure in order to investigate their physical change and the results are shown in Figure 5. The relative volume is defined as the volume anticompressibility which decreases with the increase of pressure from 0 to 100 GPa, as shown in Figure 5(a). And the highest volume anticompressibility among three compounds is Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} for the smallest relative volume decline.
(a)
(b)
More insight into the chemical bonds will be gained by investigating the relative bonds length evolving with pressure and the results are shown in Figure 5(b). The relative bonds lengths are decreasing when the pressure increases. bond in Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} reflects almost the same tendency which is stronger than the one in Ti_{3}AlC_{2}. The curve of MoC bond is above that of CrC and which shows the highest covalent strength and also the MoAl bond strength. Thus, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} shows the highest volume anticompressibility because of its high strength of MoC and MoAl bond.
3.3. Anisotropic Elastic Properties under Pressure
The calculated full set of secondorder elastic constants of (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} under 0 GPa and 100 GPa via stress versus strain approach are included in Table 2 [57]. The method can be shown as follows: one can calculate all independent elastic constants by Hooker’s law. For hexagonal structure, the criterion can be written as

In (1), represents the nonzero elastic constants; and are the normal and shear stresses, and the corresponding uniaxial and shear strains are given by and , respectively. Then, the following two strain modes were applied to compute in the present paper:
Here, is the transpose of the strain matrix, and is the magnitude of Lagrangian strain. The abovementioned two different strain patterns are applied to the optimized crystal structure by varying the strain amplitude for each strain pattern. The number of steps for each strain is set as four in this work, and the maximum strain amplitude is 0.003. Then, the stress tensor can be evaluated as a function of strain.
Those parameters determine the response of the crystal to external forces which plays a crucial role in several engineering application as abrasive resistance phases. Several fundamental physical properties, like elastic anisotropic properties, specific heat, and Debye temperature, are related to those parameters. For anisotropic elasticity, the linear anisotropic ratio of of a hexagonal crystal can be expressed as [58]
In the present work, the linear anisotropic ratio at 0 GPa is found to be 1.01 for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, 1.08 for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and 1.27 for Ti_{3}AlC_{2}. Thus, the ratio increases from Cr and Mo to Ti for M element which reflects the increase of the anisotropic elasticity. When pressure increases to 100 GPa, the ratio is changed to be 1.08 for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, 1.21 for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and 1.09 for Ti_{3}AlC_{2}. Clearly, the ratio increases, accompanied with pressure of Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} while decreasing for Ti_{3}AlC_{2}.
Based on these elastic constants, the polycrystalline bulk modulus (the resistance of a material to hydrostatic pressure), shear modulus (the resistance of a material to shear), and Young’s modulus (resistance against uniaxial tensions or compression) can be given by Reuss and Voigt methods [59, 60]. The calculated elastic constants at 0 GPa and 100 GPa are also shown in Table 2 and the real polycrystalline values are estimated by Hill’s average [61]. The calculated , , and under pressure are displayed in Figure 6. From the figure, all elastic moduli increase with pressure and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has both the highest bulk modulus and smallest Young’s modulus while Ti_{3}AlC_{2} has the smallest bulk modulus and highest Young’s modulus. The bulk modulus and shear modulus doped with Cr or Mo are larger than Ti_{3}AlC_{2}. At 0 GPa, Poisson’s ratio of these compounds is much smaller than 0.3. With an increase of pressure, Poisson’s ratio is close to 0.3. As Greaves et al. mentioned [62], Poisson’s ratio tends to increase with the atomic packing density, so that (where cd, bcc, fcc, and hcp represent cubicdiamond, bodycentered cubic, facecentered cubic, and hexagonal closepacked crystalline structures, resp.). Moreover, for a certain crystalline structure and valence, Poisson’s ratio mostly increases with atomic number, and also the electronic band structure and the valence electron density come into play. As a result, the increase of Poisson’s ratio means the increase of atomic packing density and electronic band structure.
(a)
(b)
The value of is generally applied to indicate the compound with ductility or brittleness. It is supposed that the ductility (brittleness) compound, , is larger (lower) than 1.75. In our case, the compounds are brittle at 0 GPa. With an increase of pressure, the compounds present ductile. doped with Cr or Mo are larger than Ti_{3}AlC_{2} either at 0 GPa or at 100 GPa.
All single crystals exist anisotropy in this work, anisotropic index [63] is introduced to present anisotropy of the compounds and their shear anisotropic factors:
Here, , , , and are the bulk modulus and shear modulus estimation within the Voigt and Reuss methods, respectively. The anisotropic index () is the appropriate indicator of the mechanical anisotropic properties of compound. The larger is, the stronger the anisotropy of a compound is. For some single crystal data obtained from Ledbetter, of Mg is 0.04 and α Ti is 0.19 and for the majority of hexagonal crystals, they have the least anisotropy index among all the systems [63, 64]. Based on the abovementioned discussion, the values at 0 GPa are 0.033, 0.058, and 0.023 for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and Ti_{3}AlC_{2}, respectively. Thus, the highest anisotropy is Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} among three compounds. Moreover, the values at 100 GPa are 0.418, 0.584, and 0.151 for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and Ti_{3}AlC_{2}, respectively. With an increase of pressure, the anisotropy of compounds increases.
Herein, a threedimensional plot of the mechanical modulus as a function of crystallographic orientation can straightly show mechanical anisotropic properties of each compound. The elastic compliance constants of each compound are used to study anisotropy properties of bulk and Young’s modulus from different directions of solid. For hexagonal crystal, the directional dependence of the bulk modulus and Young’s modulus could be calculated as follows [65]:
In the equations above, , , , , and represent elastic compliance constants and , , and are the direction cosines. The relationships of the direction cosines in spherical coordinates with respect to and ϕ are as follows: , , and into (3). We obtain the equations to plot threedimensional anisotropic mechanical figures which are shown in Figures 7 and 8; the details of our method have been presented in our previous work [66].
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
From Figure 7, the threedimensional plot of bulk modulus can straightly show that there are little anisotropic properties of bulk modulus. All the plots tend to be sphere and the size of the sphere reflects the value of bulk modulus. When the pressure increases, the size of the sphere also increases. The anisotropic properties of Young’s modulus are very important for the layerlike structure MAX phases and the properties under pressure are unknown. It can be seen from Figure 8 that Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the biggest anisotropy at 0 GPa with the increasing pressure; it tends to be stronger anisotropy than that of other two compounds, when at 50 GPa and 100 GPa, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} shows the strongest anisotropy which means its layerlike structure. The results are in excellent agreement with the aforementioned discussion.
3.4. Theoretical Vickers Hardness under Pressure
The bond compressibility was discussed in Section 3.2 while the Mulliken bond populations can also be used to calculate the bonding behavior and the theoretical Vickers hardness could be obtained under pressure of 0 GPa and 100 GPa. The relevant formula for the hardness is given as [67, 68]where is the hardness of a compound; is the hardness of type bond; is the bond length; is the volume of type bond; refers to the type bond density per cubic angstroms; and is the total number of type bonds in the cell; Ω and are the cell volume and overlap population of type bond, respectively.
With the help of Mulliken population analysis, the theoretical Vickers hardness values of M_{2}TiAlC_{2} are shown in Table 3. At 0 GPa, the calculated result for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} is 10.93 GPa, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} is 9.35 GPa, and Ti_{3}AlC_{2} is 9.93, respectively. Several experimental results have already been obtained: The intrinsic hardness for Ti_{3}AlC_{2} measured by nanoindentation experiments is about 11.4 GPa [69]. The hardness values measured by microindentations are almost in the range of 3–7 GPa for Ti_{3}AlC_{2} [70–72]. Because gain boundaries and impurities affect the measured hardness, the experimental results of hardness are always underestimated. Thus, our result seems reasonable, while for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, it is suggested that they also have higher hardness. When all the phases are under 100 GPa, it is clear to see that the theoretical Vickers hardness values of M_{2}TiAlC_{2} all increased according to the pressure. Based on the abovementioned discussion, the bond length decreased with an increase of pressure. The results indicated that the hardness increases with an increase of pressure, which is in excellent agreement with our results. The hardness of the compound doped with Cr and Mo is larger than that of the compound doped with Ti.

3.5. Optical Properties
The study of optical functions of solids helps to gain a better understanding of the electronic structure. CASTEP code is used to calculate the optical properties of solids due to electronic transitions.
In general, the difference in the propagation of an electromagnetic wave through vacuum or other materials can be described by a complex refractive index, :
In vacuum, is real and equal to unity. For transparent materials, it is purely real, with the imaginary part being related to the absorption coefficient by
Then, the reflection coefficient can be obtained for the simple case of normal incidence onto a plane surface by matching both the electric and magnetic fields at the surface:
The complex dielectric constant and the correlation between the dielectric function and refractive index can be shown as follows:
The relation between the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index and dielectric constant is as
Another frequently used quantity for expressing optical properties is the optical conductivity :
Here, is the angular frequency. The imaginary part of the dielectric function can be thought of as detailing the real transition between occupied and unoccupied electric states and given by [73]
is the energy of the incident photon, is the momentum operator, and is the Fermi function. The real part of the dielectric function can be obtained by the Kramerskronig transform which links both the real and imaginary parts. The optical properties of three compounds under 0 GPa and 100 GPa are calculated in the present paper. All the calculations in this work used 0.5 eV Gaussian smearing and the results at 0 GPa agree well with the pervious work: [74] and [75].
When all the phases are under 0 GPa (the calculated absorption spectrums are shown in Figure 9(a)(1)), there are three peaks for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} (6.7 eV, 13.4 eV, and 36.5 eV) and Ti_{3}AlC_{2} (5.5 eV, 12.4 eV, and 35.5 eV) as well as four peaks for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} (5.9 eV, 11.8 eV, 35.1 eV, and 44.2 eV), respectively. All the peaks are related to the transition from Ti atoms d to p states and M atoms d to p states due to their metallic nature. The photoconductivity reflects the electrical conductivity of material increase as a result of absorbing photons. In Figure 9(a)(2), there are two peaks for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} (3.8 eV and 35.8 eV) and Ti_{3}AlC_{2} (3.0 eV and 34.9 eV) as well as four peaks for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} (0.74 eV, 3.8 eV, 35 eV, and 43.9 eV), respectively. The reflectivity as a function of photon energy is presented in Figure 9(a)(3). It can be found that the reflectivity of three compounds is high in visible and ultraviolet region. In the visible region (0~4 eV), Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest reflectivity comparing to Ti_{3}AlC_{2} which has the smallest one, while in the ultraviolet region, three compounds reach their maximum at around 9~11 eV and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} is in the front rank which provides us with a well potential material as a coating film. The refractive index and extinction coefficient are illustrated in Figure 9(a)(4). It is found that the static refractive index is 15.5 eV for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, 12.9 eV for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and 9.3 eV for Ti_{3}AlC_{2}, respectively. Generally, the refractive index and extinction coefficient are in direct proportion to the real part and the imaginary part of the dielectric constant, respectively. Comparing with and for all compounds, they have the same trend which displays that the origin of the structures in the imaginary part of the dialectic function also explains the structures in the refractive index. The calculated loss function is shown in Figure 9(a)(5) and the peak of is related to the trailing edge in the reflection spectra. The main peak in spectra represents the characteristic associated with the plasma response and corresponding frequency is plasma frequency and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest loss function at 15 eV. The calculated real and imaginary part of the dielectric function are shown in Figure 9(a)(6). The dielectric function presents similar variation trends with those of refractive index; its giant real part is clearly seen. The peaks at about 1 eV correspond probably to the transition between the Al and C states or the Ti and M states, where the ambiguous origin is attributed mainly to the similar peak intervals. The real part vanishes at about 7.5 eV. Metallic reflectance characteristics are exhibited in the range of . The peak of the imaginary part of the dielectric function is related to the electron excitation. For the imaginary part of , the peak for <1.5 eV is due to the intraband transitions.
(a)
(b)
When under 100 GPa, it can be seen that the absorption index increases with the pressure from Figure 9(b)(1). The number of peaks for each compound is the same as that under 0 GPa pressure and the energy also increases constantly. Clearly, accompanied with the pressure, their metallic nature increases. Figure 9(b)(2) shows the photoconductivity of each compound increases with energy and pressure. For Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, there is one more peak appearing around 6.3 eV. As in Figure 9(b)(3), from the range of 0~30 eV, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest conductivity and reflectivity. From the range of 30~60 eV, Ti_{3}AlC_{2} has the highest conductivity and reflectivity. It is found that the reflectivity of three compounds is the highest in visible and ultraviolet parts up to ~12 eV, and for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} when pressure is high the peaks of reflectivity will appear in the ultraviolet range. The refractive index and extinction coefficient are illustrated in Figure 9(b)(4). The static refractive index is found and is 12 eV for Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2}, 11.9 eV for Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}, and 13.3 eV for Ti_{3}AlC_{2}. It means the refractive index of Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} decreases and that of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} increases comparing with that at ambient pressure. In Figure 9(b)(5), as discussed above, Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest loss function under 100 GPa pressure. The calculated real and imaginary part of the dielectric function are shown in Figure 9(b)(6); the real part vanishes at about 9.5 eV.
3.6. Thermal Properties
The Debye temperature could be estimated by the mean sound velocity of , using the following equation [19]:where is the Debye temperature, represents Plank’s constant, represents Boltzmann’s constant, is the number of atoms in unit cell, is the volume of unit cell, and is the circumference ratio. The polycrystalline structure of mean sound velocity is calculated by (12) [51, 76]:
and represent the longitudinal and transverse sound velocity, respectively. It is determined that and can be calculated by the bulk modulus and shear modulus from Navier’s equations:
The calculated sound velocity and Debye temperature at ambient pressure and under pressure of M_{2}TiAlC_{2} are shown in Table 4. Clearly, the sound velocity and Debye temperature of each compound increase with pressure. Bai et al. [56] calculated the sound velocity and Debye temperature of Ti_{3}SiC_{2} and Ti_{3}GeC_{2}, while the results agreed well with that measured in experiments [12, 77]. It is suggested that the method used for estimating the elastic properties and Debye temperature of ternary triennium carbide is accurate. Figure 10 shows the Debye temperature of three compounds as a function of pressure. Ti_{3}AlC_{2} has the largest Debye temperature under pressure.

The specified heat capacity at constant volume as a function of temperature can be calculated by the Debye QHA [78]:
In the equation above, is Avogadro’s constant and is the Boltzmann constant. Using the calculated Debye temperatures, the difference in specific heat for each compound with pressure in the series calculated is shown in Figure 11. The pressure range is 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 GPa.
From the figure, of each compound decrease slightly with pressure and increase dramatically with temperature. When temperature is below 500 K, increases rapidly with well accompanied with the wellknown Debye model; when temperature is above 500 K, increases slowly with the temperature approaching the Dulong–Petit limit as 149.652 J·mol^{−1} K^{−1}. In our case, , where is the gas constant equal to 8.314 J·mol^{−1} K^{−1}.
4. Conclusions
The pressure prediction of electronic, anisotropic elastic, optical, and thermal properties of quaternary (M_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} (M = Cr, Mo, and Ti) were investigated under pressure from 0 GPa to 100 GPa by firstprinciples calculations. There is a certain value of total DOS at the Fermi level which exhibits metallic property, such as metallic conductivity. Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} shows the biggest value of because of Cr 3d states. For the strong pd hybridization, there are covalent bonding contributions between TiC and MC atoms. Besides, the highest volume compressibility among three compounds is Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} for its smallest relative volume decline. The relative bonds lengths are decreasing when the pressure increases while MoC bond and MoAl bond have high strength.
All elastic moduli increase with pressure and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} got the highest bulk modulus but the smallest Young’s modulus while Ti_{3}AlC_{2} has the smallest bulk modulus and the highest Young’s modulus. Also, Cr_{2}TiAlC_{2} and Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} have higher hardness by the theoretical hardness calculations. When under 100 GPa, it is clearly seen that the theoretical Vickers hardness values of all compounds increased according to the pressure. From the analysis of optical functions of all compounds, it is found that the reflectivity of three compounds is high in visibleultraviolet region up to ~10.5 eV under ambient pressure and increasing constantly when under pressure. Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2} has the highest loss function. The calculated sound velocity and Debye temperature at ambient pressure and under pressure show they all increase with pressure. of each compound decreases slightly with pressure and increases dramatically with temperature.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Professor Y. H. Cheng for providing the CASTEP code. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51501139), the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province in China (Special Foundation for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, no. 2015B010122003, and Special Foundation for Practical Science and Technology Research and Development Project, no. 2015B090926009), and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project of China (no. 2014M552434).
References
 W. Jeitschko, H. Nowotny, and F. Benesovsky, “Kohlenstoffhaltige ternäre Verbindungen (Hphase),” Monatshefte für Chemie, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 672–676, 1963. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. C. Zhou and Z. M. Sun, “Microstructure and mechanism of damage tolerance for Ti_{3}SiC_{2} bulk ceramics,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 360–363, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Barsoum, H.I. Yoo, I. K. Polushina, V. Y. Rud', Y. V. Rud', and T. ElRaghy, “Electrical conductivity, thermopower, and Hall effect of Ti_{3}AlC_{2}, Ti_{4}AlN_{3}, and Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 10194–10198, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Hu, Y. Sakka, H. Tanaka, T. Nishimura, and S. Grasso, “Low temperature thermal expansion, high temperature electrical conductivity, and mechanical properties of Nb_{4}AlC_{3} ceramic synthesized by spark plasma sintering,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 487, no. 12, pp. 675–681, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Barsoum, “The ${\text{M}}_{\text{N+1}}\text{A}{\text{X}}_{\text{N}}$ phases: a new class of solids: thermodynamically stable nanolaminates,” Progress in Solid State Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 1–4, pp. 201–281, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Y. Gamarnik and M. W. Barsoum, “Bond lengths in the ternary compounds Ti_{3}SiC_{2}, Ti_{3}GeC_{2} and Ti_{2}GeC,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 169–174, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Barsoum, T. ElRaghy, and A. T. Procopio, “Synthesis of Ti_{4}AIN_{3} and phase equilibria in the TiAIN system,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 373–378, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Dahlqvist, B. Alling, and J. Rosén, “Stability trends of MAX phases from first principles,” Physical Review B, vol. 81, no. 22, Article ID 220102, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Parvin, M. M. Hossain, and A. Islam, “Phase stability and physical properties of hypothetical V_{4}SiC_{3},” https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.4452. View at: Google Scholar
 M. M. Hossain, M. S. Ali, and A. K. M. A. Islam, “Structural, elastic, electronic and optical properties of a newly predicted layeredternary Ti_{4}SiN_{3}: a firstprinciples study,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0553. View at: Google Scholar
 M. W. Barsoum and T. ElRaghy, “Synthesis and characterization of a remarkable ceramic: Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 1953–1956, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Radovic, M. W. Barsoum, A. Ganguly et al., “On the elastic properties and mechanical damping of Ti_{3}SiC_{2}, Ti_{3}GeC_{2}, Ti_{3}Si_{0.5}Al0.5C_{2} and Ti_{2}AlC in the 300–1573 K temperature range,” Acta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2757–2767, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. D. He, Y. L. Bai, Y. B. Li, C. C. Zhu, and M. Li, “Ab initio calculations for properties of MAX phases Ti_{2}InC, Zr_{2}InC, and Hf_{2I}nC,” Solid State Communications, vol. 149, no. 1314, pp. 564–566, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Li, R. Ahuja, M. W. Barsoum, P. Jena, and B. Johansson, “Optical properties of Ti_{3}SiC_{2} and Ti_{4}AlN_{3},” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 22, Article ID 221907, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Goto and T. Hirai, “Chemically vapor deposited Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1195–1201, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. C. Zhou, Z. M. Sun, X. H. Wang, and S. Q. Chen, “Ab initio geometry optimization and ground state properties of layered ternary carbides Ti_{3}MC_{2} (M = Al, Si and Ge),” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 13, no. 44, pp. 10001–10010, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Ahuja, O. Eriksson, J. M. Wills, and B. Johansson, “Electronic structure of Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, no. 16, pp. 2226–2228, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Finkel, M. W. Barsoum, and T. ElRaghy, “Low temperature dependencies of the elastic properties of Ti_{4}AlN_{3}, Ti_{3}Al_{1.1}C_{1.8}, and Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1701–1703, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. M. Sun, S. Li, R. Ahuja, and J. M. Schneider, “Calculated elastic properties of M_{2}AlC (M=Ti, V, Cr, Nb and Ta),” Solid State Communications, vol. 129, no. 9, pp. 589–592, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Dubois, T. Cabioc'h, P. Chartier, V. Gauthier, and M. Jaouen, “A new ternary nanolaminate carbide: Ti_{3}SnC_{2},” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 2642–2644, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Pietzka and J. C. Schuster, “The ternary boundary phases of the quaternary system TiAlCN,” in Concerted Action on Materials Science, Leuven Proceedings, Part A, Commission of the European Communities, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 M. A. Pietzka and J. C. Schuster, “Summary of constitutional data on the AluminumCarbonTitanium system,” Journal of Phase Equilibria, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 392–400, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. V. Tzenov and M. W. Barsoum, “Synthesis and characterization of Ti_{3}AlC_{2},” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 825–832, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. C. Zhou, X. H. Wang, Z. M. Sun, and S. Q. Chen, “Electronic and structural properties of the layered ternary carbide Ti_{3}AlC_{2},” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2335–2339, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bouhemadou, “Calculated structural, electronic and elastic properties of M_{2}GeC (M=Ti, V, Cr, Zr, Nb, Mo, Hf, Ta and W),” Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 959–967, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bouhemadou, “Prediction study of structural and elastic properties under pressure effect of M_{2}SnC (M=Ti, Zr, Nb, Hf),” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 403, no. 17, pp. 2707–2713, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bouhemadou and R. Khenata, “Prediction study of structural and elastic properties under the pressure effect of M_{2}GaC (M=Ti, V, Nb, Ta),” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 4, Article ID 043528, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Hu, H. Zhang, F. Li, Q. Huang, and Y. Bao, “New phases' discovery in MAX family,” International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, vol. 36, pp. 300–312, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Magnuson, J.P. Palmquist, M. Mattesini et al., “Electronic structure investigation of Ti_{3}AlC_{2}, Ti_{3}SiC_{2}, and Ti_{3}GeC_{2} by soft xray emission spectroscopy,” Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 24, Article ID 245101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhou and Z. Sun, “Electronic structure of the layered compound Ti_{3}GeC_{2},” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 1430–1432, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Liu, E. Wu, J. Wang et al., “Crystal structure and formation mechanism of (Cr_{2/3}Ti_{1/3})_{3}AlC_{2} MAX phase,” Acta Materialia, vol. 73, pp. 186–193, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. M. Fang, R. Ahuja, O. Eriksson et al., “General trend of the mechanical properties of the ternary carbides M_{3}SiC_{2} (M = transition metal),” Physical Review B, vol. 74, no. 5, Article ID 054106, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Luo, C. M. Fang, and R. Ahuja, “Nanolayered max phases from ab initio calculations,” in Condensed Matter Theories, pp. 207–211, World Scientific Publishing, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Etzkorn, M. Ade, and H. Hillebrecht, “Ta_{3}AlC_{2} and Ta_{4}AlC_{3}—singlecrystal investigations of two new ternary carbides of tantalum synthesized by the molten metal technique,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1410–1418, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Mo, P. Rulis, and W. Y. Ching, “Electronic structure and optical conductivities of 20 MAXphase compounds,” Physical Review B, vol. 86, no. 16, Article ID 165122, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Li, B. Wang, Y. Li, and R. Wang, “Firstprinciples study of electronic structure, mechanical and optical properties of V_{4}AlC_{3},” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 42, no. 6, Article ID 065407, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Li, J. Kuo, B. Wang, Y. Li, and R. Wang, “A new layer compound Nb_{4}SiC_{3} predicted from firstprinciples theory,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 42, no. 7, Article ID 075404, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. M. Sun and Y. C. Zhou, “Ab initio calculation of titanium silicon carbide,” Physical Review B, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1441–1443, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhou and Z. Sun, “Electronic structure and bonding properties in layered ternary carbide Ti_{3}SiC_{2},” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 12, no. 28, pp. L457–L462, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. H. Wang and Y. C. Zhou, “Hightemperature oxidation behavior of Ti_{2}AlC in air,” Oxidation of Metals, vol. 59, no. 34, pp. 303–320, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Sundberg, G. Malmqvist, A. Magnusson, and T. ElRaghy, “Alumina forming high temperature silicides and carbides,” Ceramics International, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1899–1904, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. J. Yang, Y. T. Pei, J. C. Rao, and J. T. M. De Hosson, “Selfhealing performance of Ti_{2}AlC ceramic,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 8304–8313, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Naguib, G. Bentzel, J. Shah et al., “New solid solution MAX phases: (Ti_{0.5}, V_{0.5})_{3}AlC_{2},(Nb_{0.5}, V_{0.5})_{2}AlC,(Nb_{0.5}, V_{0.5})_{4}AlC_{3} and (Nb_{0.8}, Zr_{0.2})_{2}AlC,” Materials Research Letters, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 233–240, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Nowotny, P. Rogl, and J. C. Schuster, “Structural chemistry of complex carbides and related compounds,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 126–133, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Mockute, J. Lu, E. J. Moon et al., “Solid solubility and magnetism upon Mn incorporation in the bulk ternary carbides Cr_{2}AlC and Cr_{2}GaC,” Materials Research Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–22, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Anasori, J. Halim, J. Lu, C. A. Voigt, L. Hultman, and M. W. Barsoum, “Mo_{2}TiAlC_{2}: a new ordered layered ternary carbide,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 101, pp. 5–7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. He, Y. Bai, C. Zhu, Y. Sun, M. Li, and M. W. Barsoum, “General trends in the structural, electronic and elastic properties of the M_{3}AlC_{2} phases (M = transition metal): a firstprinciple study,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 691–698, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous electron gas,” Physical Review, vol. 136, pp. B864–B871, 1964. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, “Selfconsistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Physical Review A, vol. 140, pp. A1133–A1138, 1965. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio totalenergy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1045–1097, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko et al., “Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation,” Physical Review B, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 6671–6687, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Sjöstedt, L. Nordström, and D. J. Singh, “An alternative way of linearizing the augmented planewave method,” Solid State Communications, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 15–20, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, “Special points for Brillouinzone integrations,” Physical Review B: Solid State, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 5188–5192, 1976. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 D. A. McQuarrie, Statistical Mechanics, chapter 3, Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
 Y. F. Li, Y. M. Gao, B. Xiao et al., “Theoretical study on the stability, elasticity, hardness and electronic structures of W–C binary compounds,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 502, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. L. Bai, X. D. He, Y. Sun, C. Zhu, M. Li, and L. Shi, “Chemical bonding and elastic properties of Ti_{3}AC_{2} phases (A = Si, Ge, and Sn): a firstprinciple study,” Solid State Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1220–1225, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Zhao, J. M. Winey, and Y. M. Gupta, “Firstprinciples calculations of second and thirdorder elastic constants for single crystals of arbitrary symmetry,” Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 9, Article ID 094105, 7 pages, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Wang, J. Y. Wang, Y. C. Zhou, and C. F. Hu, “Phase stability, electronic structure and mechanical properties of ternarylayered carbide Nb_{4}AlC_{3}: an ab initio study,” Acta Materialia, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1511–1518, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. K. R. Patil, S. V. Khare, B. R. Tuttle, J. K. Bording, and S. Kodambaka, “Mechanical stability of possible structures of PtN investigated using firstprinciples calculations,” Physical Review B, vol. 73, no. 10, Article ID 104118, 8 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. J. Wu, E. J. Zhao, H. P. Xiang, X. F. Hao, X. Liu, and X. J. Meng, “Crystal structures and elastic properties of superhard IrN_{2} and IrN_{3} from first principles,” Physical Review B, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 054115, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Zhou, L. J. Liu, B. L. Li, P. Wu, and Q. G. Song, “Structural, elastic and electronic properties of intermetallics in the PtSn system: a density functional investigation,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 921–931, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, and T. Rouxel, “Poisson's ratio and modern materials,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 823–837, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. I. Ranganathan and M. OstojaStarzewski, “Universal elastic anisotropy index,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 5, Article ID 055504, 4 pages, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Ledbetter and S. Kim, Handbook of Elastic Properties of Solids, Liquids, and Gases, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
 K. B. Panda and K. S. Ravi Chandran, “Determination of elastic constants of titanium diboride (TiB_{2}) from first principles using FLAPW implementation of the density functional theory,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 134–150, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Sun, Y. Gao, B. Xiao, Y. Li, and G. Wang, “Anisotropic elastic and thermal properties of titanium borides by firstprinciples calculations,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 579, pp. 457–467, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. M. Gao, “Theoretical model of intrinsic hardness,” Physical Review B, vol. 73, no. 13, Article ID 132104, 4 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Gou, L. Hou, J. Zhang, and F. Gao, “Pressureinduced incompressibility of ReC and effect of metallic bonding on its hardness,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 24, Article ID 241901, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. P. Bei, V. GauthierBrunet, C. Tromas, and S. Dubois, “Synthesis, characterization, and intrinsic hardness of layered nanolaminate Ti_{3} AlC_{2} and Ti_{3} Al_{0.8} Sn_{0.2} C_{2} solid solution,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 102–107, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. C. Zhou, J. X. Chen, and J. Y. Wang, “Strengthening of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} by incorporation of Si to form Ti_{3}Al_{1 − x}Si_{x}C_{2} solid solutions,” Acta Materialia, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1317–1322, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. W. Barsoum and M. Radovic, “Elastic and mechanical properties of the MAX phases,” Annual Review of Materials Research, vol. 41, pp. 195–227, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.H. Han, S.S. Hwang, D. Lee, and S.W. Park, “Synthesis and mechanical properties of Ti_{3}AlC_{2} by hot pressing TiC_{x}/Al powder mixture,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 979–988, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Wang, Y. Zheng, M.Q. Cai, H. T. Huang, and H. L. W. Chan, “Firstprinciples study on the electronic and optical properties of BiFeO_{3},” Solid State Communications, vol. 149, no. 1516, pp. 641–644, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Ali, A. K. M. A. Islam, M. M. Hossain, and F. Parvin, “Phase stability, elastic, electronic, thermal and optical properties of Ti_{3}Al_{1 − x}Si_{x}C_{2} (0≤x≤1): first principle study,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 407, no. 21, pp. 4221–4228, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. JiuXing, J. Shan, W. ZhenHua, and T. ChangLong, “Electronic structure and optical properties of layered ternary carbide Ti_{3}AlC_{2},” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 28, no. 3, Article ID 037101, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. H. Deng, B. B. Fan, and W. Lu, “Firstprinciples investigations on elastic properties of α and β Ta_{4}AlC_{3},” Solid State Communications, vol. 149, no. 1112, pp. 441–444, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Finkel, B. Seaman, K. Harrell et al., “Electronic, thermal, and elastic properties of Ti_{3}Si_{1 − x}Ge_{x}C_{2} solid solutions,” Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 8, Article ID 085104, 6 pages, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Kittel, Ed., Introduction to Solid State Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd edition, 1966.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Liang Sun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.