Advances in Condensed Matter Physics

Advances in Condensed Matter Physics / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5958408 |

E. M. Shehata, M. M. Ibrahim, M. R. Balboul, "Facile and Novel in-Plane Structured Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites for Memory Applications", Advances in Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 2018, Article ID 5958408, 9 pages, 2018.

Facile and Novel in-Plane Structured Graphene/TiO2 Nanocomposites for Memory Applications

Academic Editor: Mohindar S. Seehra
Received06 Nov 2017
Revised01 Jan 2018
Accepted11 Feb 2018
Published14 Mar 2018


Here, we report a simple strategy for the preparation of graphene/TiO2 nanocomposite by UV-assisted incorporation of TiO2 nanosol in graphene oxide (GO) dispersion. The proposed method is facile and of low cost without using any photocatalysts or reducing agents; this can open up a new possibility for green preparation of stable graphene dispersions in large-scale production. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) have been used to characterize carefully the as-prepared composites and to confirm the successful preparation of the nanocomposites. The average crystallite size of TiO2 nanoparticles calculated from XRD pattern using Rietveld analysis is ~35 nm. TEM measurements show the adsorption of TiO2 onto graphene (G) sheets, which prevents the restacking of graphene sheets. Current-voltage and capacitance-voltage measurements were used to investigate the electrical resistive memory properties of GO, GO/TiO2, and G/TiO2 thin films. Observed results show hysteresis behavior due to the charge trapping and detrapping process, indicating that the prepared thin films exhibit an excellent resistance switching memory characteristic for G/TiO2 device.

1. Introduction

Carbon electronic devices have attracted a great deal of importance as promising electronic systems for modern high-performance computers. It is expected that electronic devices for the next generation will be lighter and foldable for applications in wearable computers, flexible displays, and cost effectiveness [14]. In particular, carbon nanotubes, graphene, graphene oxide (GO), or their composites have become a sparkling rising star on the horizon of material science in the last several years [5, 6]. The superior properties of graphene including large specific surface area, excellent mobility of charge carriers, and good electrical conductivity [7, 8] support graphene as a test bed for fundamental science.

As a promising application for graphene oxide, resistive random access memory (RRAM) has attracted a great deal of interest as a next generation nonvolatile memory (NVM) device for high-performance computer. Up to now, GO/TiO2 nanoparticle RRAM devices have shown low switching voltage (about ±1 V) [9] and good endurance up to 105 cycles and long retention time more than 5 × 103 s [10]. Also, excellent large flexibility area without degradation of memory performance for ~100 cycles has also been reported for GO-based device [11]. The optimization of the graphene-based materials for memory application passes through universal parameters such as preparation technique including the type of reduction method, additives/size, and device structure configuration.

Starting with the reduction of exfoliated GO, chemical [12] and thermal reduction [13] have been used for obtaining conductive graphene sheets or films. But here you must keep in mind that chemical reduction often uses hydrazine which is toxic chemical, while thermal reduction is not suitable for plastic substrates, intrinsic weaknesses. Recent researches focus on developing a facile and green reduction method that is suitable for various substrates. Radiation reduction of GO is deemed as the simpler, purer, and less harmful method that may overcome the shortcomings of other conventional reduction methods [14]. In practical applications, graphene nanosheets usually suffer from agglomeration or restacking giving rise to a great technical difficulty in the fabrication of graphene-based devices. These agglomerations are due to the strong van der Waals interactions between graphene sheets. Thus, there has been a clear interest in the development of low cost and reliable synthetic methods for the preparation of the soluble-processable graphene derivatives [15]. On the other hand, the vast majority of the graphene-based RRAM devices reported in literature are made of metal-insulator-metal- (MIM-) type structures. A simple and effective alternative structure is the planar configuration where a significant lower intrinsic capacitance is performed compared to the MIM structure [16, 17]. In our present investigation, we report a facile preparation strategy of graphene/TiO2 thin film for possible RRAM memory applications using planar configuration. UV irradiation is used as a green and simple tool for the reduction of GO/TiO2 dispersion. Loading TiO2 nanoparticles on the graphene nanosheets surface are anticipated to prevent the restacking of graphene nanosheets, thus resulting in enhanced electrical performance.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Natural graphite flakes with an average diameter of <50 μm were supplied from Merck KGaA, Germany. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4), sodium nitrate (NaNO3), H2SO4 (98%), and H2O2 (30%) were obtained from El Nasr Pharmaceutical Chemicals Co., Egypt. Titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) (98%) was purchased from Strem Chemicals Co., USA. All reagents were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of GO

Graphite oxide was prepared from flake graphite powder by a modified Hummers method [18]. In brief, graphite oxide was synthesized by an oxidation of graphite with KMnO4 and NaNO3 in concentrated sulfuric acid. Then, the oxidation was performed by adding graphite powder (0.5 g) to 50 mL of 98% H2SO4 in an ice bath; then 5 g of NaNO3 was added gradually while stirring. Subsequently, 2 g of KMnO4 was added slowly avoiding a sudden increase of temperature. When the addition was finished, the resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h under ice-water bath to ensure that the temperature remains below 10°C. Later, the ice bath was removed and the reaction mixture was heated to 35°C for 2 h. The reaction was quenched by pouring 250 ml distilled water and 20 ml H2O2 (30%) at room temperature to dilute the solution and destroy unreacted KMnO4. The graphite oxide was collected and washed with 10% HCl and distilled water three times. To prepare GO dispersion, 100 mg graphite oxide was dispersed in 100 ml of DI water and ultrasonicated for hours until the solution became clear. Then the GO dispersion was centrifuged with 4000 rpm for 10 min to remove any unexfoliated graphite oxide.

2.3. Preparation of TiO2 Nanosol

In a typical procedure, 6.8 ml TTIP was added dropwise into 100 ml of 0.1 M HNO3 under vigorous stirring. Then, the mixture was heated by water bath at 50°C for 24 h under stirring to form TiO2 aqueous nanosol.

2.4. Preparation of Thin Films

GO dispersion and TiO2 nanosol were mixed in the ratio 9 : 1 and sonicated for 15 min to get well dispersed GO/TiO2 suspension (GOT). The reduction of GOT to graphene/TiO2 (GT) was carried out by exposure to UV lamp (450W Xenon arc lamp) up to four hours. Thin films were grown onto ultrasonically cleaned glass substrates by employing solution casting of GOT and GT suspensions. Certain amount of GOT and GT suspensions were drop casted onto glass substrate and left for drying at room temperature. In order to avoid thick films, the casting of the prepared suspensions was controlled very carefully.

2.5. Characterization

The morphology of the as-prepared samples was characterized with transmission electron microscopy (JEM-100CS, JEOL Japan) operated at acceleration voltage of 80 kV. Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) was carried out at room temperature with JASCO FT/IR-6300 (Japan) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 and used for the detection of chemical interaction in the as-prepared samples. Raman measurements were performed at room temperature using WItec alpha 300 R confocal Raman microscope, Germany. The crystalline phase of the products was characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses by a Shimadzu machine (XRD-6000 series) with Cu Kα radiation, operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. Electrical characterization of the as-prepared thin films was carried out by Keithley 2635A using finger type Ag electrodes onto glass substrate of area 2.5 × 2.5 cm2. The width of gap between two successive electrodes and the overlap electrode were 0.5 mm. The characteristics were measured using Hioki 3532 LCR Hi-Tester at fixed frequency (100 kHz).

3. Results and Discussion

The overall procedure for the formation of GOT dispersion is illustrated in Figure 1. The TiO2 nanoparticles, prepared through sol-gel process, absorbed a lot of hydroxyl groups on its surface, while GO sheets have high content of oxygen functional groups, such as carboxylic acid (–COOH) and hydroxyl group (–OH), in the basal planes and the edge sides that could provide enough chemical groups to accomplish the chemical bonding reactions with TiO2 nanoparticles [19].

By exposing GOT dispersion to UV irradiation, its color changes from light brown to black (Figure 2(a)). This change in color indicates that GO is reduced to graphene due to the partial restoration of the network within the carbon structure. The photo-assisted reduction of GO at the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles was believed to be associated with photocatalytic reactions [20]. Electron–hole pairs were generated upon UV irradiation of the TiO2 nanoparticles [21, 22]. The electrons could be efficiently captured by the sp2 regions of GO, whereas the holes reacted with surface-adsorbed water to generate oxygen and protons [23]. Moreover, electrons delocalized in the sp2 regions of GO together with protons may initiate the reactions to dissociate oxygenated functional groups at the boundary of sp2 regions. The drop casted GOT and GT thin films over glass substrate were shown in Figure 2(b). It can be noted that well-adhered and uniform thin films can be conveniently prepared by this method.

3.1. TEM Images

The morphological structure of the as-prepared composites was investigated by TEM and displayed in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows GO sheets with flat and smooth surface that indicates the successful exfoliation of GO sheet from graphite containing ordered stacking graphene layers. On the other hand, Figure 3(b) reveals the surface of GT nanosheets that is uniformly covered by high dense TiO2 nanoparticles. It is especially noteworthy to mention that the GT suspension has been sonicated in deionized water before being performed by TEM and no individual TiO2 nanoparticles were observed. The attachment of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface of graphene sheet indicates that most of the TiO2 nanoparticles would not be peeled off during the sonication process and the restack of graphene nanosheets could be effectively prevented.

3.2. FTIR Spectra

FTIR spectroscopy was used to characterize the interaction between GO and TiO2 nanoparticles before and after UV irradiation. The FTIR spectrum of GOT (Figure 4(a)) shows absorption peaks at 3280 cm−1 assigned for O–H stretching vibration [24, 25] and 1384 cm−1 for C–O stretching vibration [26, 27], and the peak at 1627 cm−1 can be assigned to the C=C ring stretching or H–O–H bending band of the adsorbed H2O molecules [28]. Moreover, the entire obvious characteristic for oxygen-containing functional groups (i.e., –COOH) can also be observed in the FTIR spectrum of GOT. This reveals a considerable chemical bonding reactions, like dehydration condensation reaction, between TiO2 and GO [28]. The strong band around 585 cm−1 is attributed to Ti–O–C vibration indicating the successful adsorption of TiO2 nanoparticles onto GO nanosheets through chemical interaction between the surface hydroxyl groups of TiO2 and the functional groups of GO [19, 29]. Additionally, the bands related to the oxygen functional groups of GO were reduced in the spectrum of GT, revealing that the functional groups were almost removed under the effect of UV irradiation and thus GO was reduced successfully into graphene. Moreover, a new band at ~1580 cm−1 can be noted in the spectrum of GT that may be attributed to the skeletal vibrations of the graphene sheets [30].

3.3. Raman Spectra

Raman spectroscopy is a technique based on the analysis of the inelastically scattered light from the medium, produced by the interaction of the light with the atomic vibrations. This spectroscopy technique is generally used to characterize the crystal quality of carbonaceous materials. The position and width of the peaks are highly dependent on the sample temperature [31]. Figure 5 shows the Raman measurements of GOT films, carried out at room temperature, before and after UV irradiation. The typical modes of TiO2 anatase phase are clearly observed in both films at 152 cm−1, 408 cm−1, 511 cm−1, and 631 cm−1, attributed to , , , and , respectively [19, 32]. Moreover, two characteristic peaks at about 1349 and 1601 cm−1 for graphitized structure are also observed, ascribed to the D and G bands, respectively. As a result of edge defects, internal structural defects, and dangling bonds, the D band is known to be attribute to the disruption of the symmetrical hexagonal graphitic lattice, while the G band is due to the vibrational mode of the in-plane stretching motion of symmetric sp2 C–C bonds [33, 34]. The UV irradiated composite shows an increase of the D/G intensity ratio from 0.95 for unirradiated film to 0.99. The D/G intensity ratio has been widely used in the literature to quantify the defect density in sp2 -bonded carbons. The increase of the D/G intensity ratio in our work is attributed to the formation of defects and removal of oxide functional groups that suggests the successful UV reduction of GO [35]. Both FTIR and Raman emphasized the well samples preparation compared with other green and direct synthesis methods [19, 29].

3.4. XRD Results

Figure 6 shows the XRD spectrum of the as-prepared thin films. The main XRD peaks are attributed to pure tetragonal anatase phase structure at 25°, 37°, 48°, 53°, 55°, 62°, 69°, 70°, and 75° that can be indexed to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), (116), (220), and (215) crystal planes, which is in a good agreement with (JCPDS- 21-1272). The main crystal structure of the anatase TiO2 is the crystal facet (101). Due to the low reaction temperature employed during the preparation no rutile phase was detected [36]. Based on Rietveld analysis refinement patterns carried out by using MAUD program (red line in Figure 6) the average crystal size of the TiO2 nanoparticles was calculated to be ~35 nm. For GO, a strong peak centered at 2θ = 11.4° assigned to (001) plane is observed. This peak corresponded to an interlayer spacing of about 0.77 nm, indicating the presence of oxygen functionalities that facilitated the hydration and exfoliation of GO sheets in aqueous media [37]. After mixing TiO2 nanosol and GO dispersion the diffraction peaks intensities for both TiO2 and GO weakened in composite state.

Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of GT thin films after UV irradiation for different hours. Notably, the typical diffraction peak of graphene was not observed in the XRD pattern and a slight change in FWHM of (101) peak of anatase TiO2 was observed. A possible reason for this observation was that the characteristic (002) peak at 25.9° of graphene [38, 39] might be overlapped with the (101) peak of anatase TiO2 (25.3°). Interestingly, sharp peak was observed after exposing GOT suspension to UV irradiation for four hours. This indicates that the UV exposure time affects the crystallinity of GT nanocomposites and the average crystal size of TiO2 nanoparticles has been changed from ~35 nm up to ~75 nm which will affect their electrical properties.

3.5. Electrical Measurements

Typical curves of Ag/GO/Ag, Ag/GOT/Ag, and Ag/GT/Ag devices measured at room temperature (300 K) are shown in Figures 8 and 9. The voltage was swept from +20 V to −20 V and then −20 V to +20 V with a constant voltage sweeping rate. Hysteresis loops are clearly observed in the forward and reverse voltage scan in all curves. This indicates that all devices have two distinct conductivity states at the same voltage, ON state and OFF state, corresponding to the high-current and the low-current states, respectively. Figure 10 shows curves of Ag/GOT/Ag measured at different sweep voltages, a represented example. The electrical hysteresis behavior is independent of the sweep voltage. Furthermore, the behavior shown in the characteristics is the required feature for any memory device [40]. It can be postulated that the conductivity memory behavior of the as-prepared devices is strongly correlated with the presence of GO and graphene.

The resistive memory mechanism is quite complicated especially in the planar structure of our devices, while the memory behavior has been reported in devices with sandwich structures and explained by formation and rupture of metallic filaments [41]. The findings in the planar structures reported here seem to discharge this process, because the electrodes are considerable apart. Furthermore, migration of metallic species from electrodes is unlikely to occur. The memory behavior here might be attributed to the charge trapping and detrapping process. The interfacial defects in GO can act as trapping sites [42, 43] that capture electrons injected from the electrodes. Ag electrode is used because Ag is an electrochemically active material. When a positive voltage is applied, oxidation reaction may occur resulting in Ag+ cation and the electrons are injected from Ag to the LUMO level of graphene matrix. The electrons existing at the LUMO level are transported along the direction of applied voltage [44]. As a result, the conductivity of the device increases indicating the ON state. In reverse applied voltage, tunneling of the holes through the valence band of the graphene matrix occurs. Graphene is charged positively and negatively depending on the polarity of the applied voltage. Thus the graphene matrix can act as charge trapping element and is responsible for the low conductivity switching mechanism of the devices, thus indicating the OFF state.

Addition of TiO2 nanosol to GO and graphene causes enhancement in the memory behavior of the as-prepared devices. The maximum current differences between the high-current ON state and low-current OFF state for GO, GOT, and GT devices are 0.14 mA, 0.81 mA, and 18 mA mA, respectively, as shown in Figure 11.

TiO2 is an oxygen-vacancy doped semiconductor [45] because in TiO2 lattice each oxygen atom is surrounded by three titanium atoms and when an oxygen atom is removed from its original position the oxygen vacancies are created [46, 47]. The removal of the oxygen atoms enhances the Ag electrode oxidation and increases the injected electrons. Moreover, TiO2 causes an increase in the structural defects of GO and graphene that act as charge trapping sites. As a result, the conductivity of the thin films increases, which positively affects the memory behavior of the as-prepared devices.

To further understand the carrier transport mechanism, the forward measurement is done for the best device that is GT device as shown in Figure 12. The characteristics show hysteresis under voltage scan from 0.2 to 5 V and back, in both forward and reverse voltage sweeps. This means that the charge carriers, electrons (clockwise), and holes (anticlockwise) are involved in the charging and discharging processes of this device. Moreover, under applied voltage, the charged state of the composites or the ON state of the device is represented when the capacitance magnitude is large and vice versa [40].

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have successfully prepared GT nanocomposite via UV irradiation. TEM images reveal the uniform attachment of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface of graphene sheets. Simple solution casting technique has been employed to fabricate three coplanar devices (Ag/GO/Ag, Ag/GOT/Ag, and Ag/GT/Ag). These devices have been characterized with and measurements. characteristics show hysteresis loops in both positive and negative applied voltages. In comparison, the ON/OFF ratio is 0.14 mA and 18 mA for GO and GT devices, respectively. This increment is due to the addition of TiO2 nanoparticles that increase the charge trapping sites and enhanced the conductivity of the thin film. In addition, the measurement confirmed that both electrons and holes take part in the charging and discharging processes of these devices. The easy processing technique and simple device structure provide an opportunity to develop the next generation electronic RRAM memory devices.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. B. Li, X. Cao, H. G. Ong et al., “All-carbon electronic devices fabricated by directly grown single-walled carbon nanotubes on reduced graphene oxide electrodes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 28, pp. 3058–3061, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. U. Park, S. Nam, M. S. Lee, and C. M. Lieber, “Synthesis of monolithic graphene–graphite integrated electronics,” Nature Materials, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 120–125, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. He, S. Wu, S. Gao et al., “Transparent, flexible, all-reduced graphene oxide thin film transistors,” ACS Nano, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 5038–5044, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. W. J. Yu, S. H. Chae, S. Y. Lee, D. L. Duong, and Y. H. Lee, “Ultra‐transparent, flexible single‐walled carbon nanotube non‐volatile memory device with an oxygen‐decorated graphene electrode,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 1889–1893, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. Li and R. B. Kaner, “Materials science: graphene-based materials,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5880, pp. 1170-1171, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S. I. Khondaker, and S. Seal, “Graphene based materials: past, present and future,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1178–1271, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. M. Torres, L. M. P. Martinez, J. L. Figueiredo, J. L. Faria, and A. M. T. Silva, “Graphene oxide-P25 photocatalysts for degradation of diphenhydramine pharmaceutical and methyl orange dye,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 27, pp. 361–368, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. F. Machadoab and P. Serp, “Graphene-based materials for catalysis,” Catalysis Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, article 54, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. Chao, F. Yuan, H. Wu, N. Deng, Z. Yu, and R. Wei, “Graphene oxide and TiO2 nano-particle composite based nonvolatile memory,” in Proceedings of the 15th Non-Volatile Memory Technology Symposium (NVMTS '15), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Beijing, China, October 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. Senthilkumar, A. Kathalingam, S. Valanarasu, V. Kannan, and J.-K. Rhee, “Bipolar resistive switching of solution processed TiO2-graphene oxide nanocomposite for nonvolatile memory applications,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, no. 37, pp. 2432–2435, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Y. Jeong, J. Y. Kim, J. W. Kim et al., “Graphene oxide thin films for flexible nonvolatile memory applications,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 4381–4386, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Allen, J. D. Fowler, V. C. Tung, Y. Yang, B. H. Weiller, and R. B. Kaner, “Temperature dependent Raman spectroscopy of chemically derived graphene,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 19, p. 193119, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X. Wang, L. Zhi, and K. Mullen, “Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 323–327, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  14. B. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Wang et al., “Radiation induced reduction: an effective and clean route to synthesize functionalized graphene,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 7775–7781, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. B. Liu, Y. F. Xu, X. Y. Zhang et al., “Porphyrin and fullerene covalently functionalized graphene hybrid materials with large nonlinear optical properties,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 113, no. 29, pp. 9681–9686, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Kiazadeh, H. L. Gomes, A. R. Da Costa et al., “Planar non-volatile memory based on metal nanoparticles,” in Proceedings of the 2011 MRS Spring Meeting, vol. 1337, pp. 151–156, April 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. T. Nguyen, D. Li, P. Borah et al., “Photoinduced charge transfer within polyaniline-encapsulated quantum dots decorated on graphene,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 8105–8110, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. S. Hummers Jr. and R. E. Offeman, “Preparation of graphitic oxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 1339, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Liu, X. Dong, X. Wang, C. Sun, J. Li, and Z. Zhu, “A green and direct synthesis of graphene oxide encapsulated TiO2 core/shell structures with enhanced photoactivity,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 230, pp. 279–285, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Williams, B. Seger, and P. V. Kamt, “TiO2-graphene nanocomposites. UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide,” ACS Nano, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1487–1491, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Stankovich, R. D. Piner, X. Chen, N. Wu, S. T. Nguyen, and R. S. Ruoff, “Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 155, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Fujishima, X. Zhang, and D. A. Tryk, “TiO2 photocatalysis and related surface phenomena,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 515–582, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. R. Han and S. J. Hwang, “Soft-chemical synthesis of nanometer-thick carbon-coated titania: effect of carbon-coating on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 5494–5498, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  24. G. Fang, H. Li, F. Yang, X. Liu, and S. Wu, “Preparation and characterization of nano-encapsulated n-tetradecane as phase change material for thermal energy storage,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 153, pp. 217–221, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. I. A. W. Tan and H. A. L. Ahmad, “Equilibrium and kinetic studies on basic dye adsorptionby oil palm fibre activated carbon,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 127, pp. 111–119, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. Geng, S. Yang, Y. Zhang et al., “Nitrogen doping effects on the structure of graphene,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 257, no. 21, pp. 9193–9198, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. P. Vinayan, R. Nagar, V. Raman, N. Rajalakshmi, K. S. Dhathathreyan, and S. Ramaprabhu, “Synthesis of graphene-multiwalled carbon nanotubes hybrid nanostructure by strengthened electrostatic interaction and its lithium ion battery application,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 9949–9956, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Q. Li, B. Guo, J. Yu et al., “Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 28, pp. 10878–10884, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T.-D. Nguyen-Phan, V. H. Pham, E. W. Shin et al., “The role of graphene oxide content on the adsorption-enhanced photocatalysis of titanium dioxide/graphene oxide composites,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 226–232, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Nethravathi and M. Rajamathi, “Chemically modified graphene sheets produced by the solvothermal reduction of colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide,” Carbon, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 1994–1998, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. Xu, S. Alur, Y. Wang et al., “In situ Raman analysis of a bulk GaN-based Schottky rectifier under operation,” Journal of Electronic Materials (JEM), vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 2237–2242, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. Zhang, X. Pu, G. Ding et al., “Two-phase hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2-graphene hybrids with improved photocatalytic activity,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 572, pp. 199–204, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. J. Allen, V. C. Tung, and R. B. Kaner, “Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 132–145, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. S. A. S. Shah, A. R. Park, K. Zhang, J. H. Park, and P. J. Yoo, “Green synthesis of biphasic TiO2-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 3893–3901, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Eigler, C. Dotzer, and A. Hirsch, “Visualization of defect densities in reduced graphene oxide,” Carbon, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 3666–3673, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L.-L. Tan, W.-J. Ong, S.-P. Chai, and A. R. Mohamed, “Reduced graphene oxide-TiO2 nanocomposite as a promising visible-light-active photocatalyst for the conversion of carbon dioxide,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, article 465, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Z. Xiong, L. L. Zhang, J. Ma, and X. S. Zhao, “Photocatalytic degradation of dyes over graphene-gold nanocomposites under visible light irradiation,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 33, pp. 6099–6101, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. N. R. Khalid, Z. Hong, E. Ahmed, Y. Zhang, H. Chan, and M. Ahmad, “Synergistic effects of Fe and graphene on photocatalytic activity enhancement of TiO2 under visible light,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, no. 15, pp. 5827–5834, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Liu, H. Bai, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, X. Zhang, and D. D. Sun, “Self-assembling TiO2 nanorods on large graphene oxide sheets at a two-phase interface and their anti-recombination in photocatalytic applications,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 4175–4181, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  40. R. Kaur and S. K. Tripathi, “Study of conductivity switching mechanism of CdSe/PVP nanocomposite for memory device application,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 133, article 59, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. M. Jilani, T. D. Gamot, P. Banerji, and S. Chakraborty, “Studies on resistive switching characteristics of aluminum/graphene oxide/semiconductor nonvolatile memory cells,” Carbon, vol. 64, pp. 187–196, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Myung, J. Park, H. Lee, K. S. Kim, and S. Hong, “Ambipolar memory devices based on reduced graphene oxide and nanoparticles,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 2045–2049, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Wang, W. Yang, Q. Sun et al., “The mechanism of the asymmetric SET and RESET speed of graphene oxide based flexible resistive switching memories,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 063509, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. V. Kannan and J. K. Rhee, “A solution processed nonvolatile resistive memory device with Ti/CdSe quantum dot/Ti-TiOx/CdSe quantum dot/indium tin-oxide structure,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 110, article 17, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Z. Tang, Y. Chi, L. Fang, R. Liu, and X. Yi, “Resistive switching effect in titanium oxides,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1494–1507, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. J. Choi, D. S. Jeong, S. K. Kim et al., “Resistive switching mechanism of TiO2 thin films grown by atomic-layer deposition,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 98, no. 3, Article ID 033715, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. Acharyya, A. Hazra, and P. Bhattacharyya, “A journey towards reliability improvement of TiO2 based resistive random access memory: a review,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 541–560, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 E. M. Shehata et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.