Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 9735795, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9735795
Research Article

Pareto-Optimization of HTS CICC for High-Current Applications in Self-Field

ENEA C. R., 00044 Frascati, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Giordano Tomassetti; ti.aene@ittessamot.onadroig

Received 13 September 2017; Revised 23 November 2017; Accepted 7 December 2017; Published 28 January 2018

Academic Editor: Ying Xu

Copyright © 2018 Giordano Tomassetti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Senatore, M. Alessandrini, A. Lucarelli, R. Tediosi, D. Uglietti, and Y. Iwasa, “Progresses and challenges in the development of high-field solenoidal magnets based on RE123 coated conductors,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 10, Article ID 103001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A National Effort to Introduce New Technology into the Power Delivery Infrastructure, Superconductivity Program for Electric Systems, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/cable_overview2.pdf.
  3. T. Brown, L. Bromberg, and M. Cole, “Results of Compact Stellarator engineering trade studies,” in Proceedings of the 2009 23rd IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering - SOFE, pp. 1–4, San Diego, CA, USA, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. De Marzi, N. C. Allen, L. Chiesa et al., “Bending Tests of HTS Cable-In-Conduit Conductors for High-Field Magnet Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 26, no. 4, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Z. Ni, Q. Wang, F. Liu, and L. Yan, “A homogeneous superconducting magnet design using a hybrid optimization algorithm,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 24, Article ID 125402, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Kim and M. Yoon, “Design study of a superconducting gantry for carbon beam therapy,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 69, p. 1048, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Dey and A. B. Choudhury, “A comparative study between scalarization approach and Pareto approach for multi-objective optimization problem using Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) formulated based on superconducting fault current limiter,” in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, ICPEICES 2016, India, July 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Liu, H. Polinder, A. B. Abrahamsen et al., “Optimization and comparison of superconducting generator topologies for a 10 MW wind turbine application,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 53, pp. S191–S202, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Comsol Multiphysics, 2014, http://www.comsol.com.
  10. P. M. Leys, M. Klaeser, F. Schleissinger, and T. Schneider, “Analysis of the anisotropic critical current behaviour of HTS coated conductors,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 507, no. 2, Article ID 022013, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Pardo, M. Vojenčiak, F. Gömöry, and J. Šouc, “Low-magnetic-field dependence and anisotropy of the critical current density in coated conductors,” Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 6, Article ID 065007, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust optimization - Methodology and applications,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 453–480, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Bertsimas, D. Pachamanova, and M. Sim, “Robust linear optimization under general norms,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 510–516, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Kanno e and I. Takewaki, “Evaluation and maximation of robustness of trusses by using semidefinite programming,” in Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO), Rio de Janeiro.
  15. X. Du and W. Chen, “Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. Indraneel, “Robustness optimization for constrained nonlinear programming problems,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 585–618, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Doltsinis and Z. Kang, “Robust design of structures using optimization methods,” Computer Methods Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 193, no. 23-26, pp. 2221–2237, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, University of Michigan Press, Oxford, UK, 1975. View at MathSciNet
  19. D. E. Goldberg, “Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning,” Choice Reviews Online, vol. 27, no. 02, pp. 27-0936–27-0936, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. Y. Shi and R. C. Eberhart, “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 69–73, IEEE Service Center, Anchorage, AK, USA, 1998.
  21. M. Dorigo, Dorigo Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms [Ph.D. thesis], Politecnico di Milano, Italy, 1992.
  22. G. Tomassetti and L. Cagnina, “Particle swarm algorithms to solve engineering problems: a comparison of performance,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 435104, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. H.-D. Joos, “A methodology for multi-objective design assessment and flight control synthesis tuning,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 161–176, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus