Research Article
The Effect of Land Cover Change on Soil Properties around Kibale National Park in South Western Uganda
Table 4
Effect of land use/cover change on selected physicochemical properties.
| Depth (cm) | Land use | Landscape position | Clay | Silt | OM | N | Av.P | BD | Ca | K | Mg | Na | pH | % | ppm | Mg/m3 | Cmol (p)/kg |
| 0–15 | Forest | Back slope | 14.67 | 12.67 | 6.42 | 0.27 | 3.70 | 1.69 | 6.43 | 0.26 | 1.67 | 0.05 | 4.30 | | Foot slope | 16.67 | 14.67 | 6.54 | 0.24 | 3.00 | 1.65 | 12.97 | 0.16 | 2.85 | 0.04 | 5.13 | Tea | Back slope | 17.33 | 14.00 | 7.07 | 0.29 | 28.10 | 1.55 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 3.30 | | Foot slope | 29.33 | 12.00 | 7.33 | 0.32 | 12.90 | 1.39 | 3.37 | 0.18 | 0.99 | 0.04 | 3.77 | Eucalyptus | Back slope | 34.67 | 16.00 | 4.75 | 0.25 | 15.50 | 1.53 | 11.53 | 0.34 | 2.32 | 0.04 | 5.53 | | Foot slope | 37.33 | 16.00 | 5.19 | 0.22 | 7.00 | 1.26 | 7.13 | 0.34 | 1.68 | 0.05 | 4.73 |
| 15–30 cm | Forest | Back slope | 19.33 | 14.00 | 5.96 | 0.30 | 2.90 | 1.36 | 6.00 | 0.12 | 2.24 | 0.03 | 4.30 | | Foot slope | 27.33 | 16.00 | 5.89 | 0.23 | 3.70 | 1.52 | 9.27 | 0.16 | 2.16 | 0.05 | 5.10 | Tea | Back slope | 24.00 | 13.33 | 6.62 | 0.26 | 26.60 | 1.19 | 3.77 | 0.28 | 0.90 | 0.04 | 3.63 | | Foot slope | 30.00 | 20.00 | 5.66 | 0.25 | 12.20 | 1.17 | 3.33 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.04 | 3.80 | Eucalyptus | Back slope | 30.00 | 25.33 | 5.81 | 0.25 | 16.60 | 1.27 | 7.90 | 0.32 | 2.06 | 0.04 | 5.37 | | | Foot slope | 32.00 | 24.00 | 4.71 | 0.27 | 7.40 | 1.17 | 3.20 | 0.33 | 1.08 | 0.20 | 4.40 |
| Land use () | | | 5.00 | 4.95 | 1.08 | ns | 5.31 | 0.15 | 2.41 | ns | 0.43 | ns | 0.41 | Landscape () | | | 4.08 | ns | ns | ns | 4.33 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | Depth () | | | ns | 4.04 | ns | ns | ns | 0.12 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | Land use*LP() | | | ns | ns | ns | ns | 7.51 | ns | 3.40 | ns | 0.60 | ns | 0.58 |
|
|