Nutrient Status of Vermicompost of Urban Green Waste Processed by Three Earthworm Species—Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatus

Table 4

ANOVA of different nutrients of vermicomposts produced by three species of earthworms and compost (Treatments) of Floral Waste across different time intervals.

Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F
OC
Time Intervals	76.11592	3	25.37197	28.39579^**
Treatments	426.3413	3	142.1138	159.0508^**
Error	8.041606	9	0.893512
N
Time Intervals	0.151425	3	0.050475	118.7647^**
Treatments	0.649525	3	0.216508	509.4314^**
Error	0.003825	9	0.000425
C/N Ratio
Time Intervals	1629.242	3	543.0806	67.49946^**
Treatments	103.9289	3	34.64297	4.305774^**
Error	72.41133	9	8.045703
P
Time Intervals	0.130719	3	0.043573	78.33333^**
Treatments	0.127569	3	0.042523	76.44569^**
Error	0.005006	9	0.000556
C/P Ratio
Time Intervals	4035.872	3	1345.291	636.1514^**
Treatments	295.7819	3	98.59395	46.6224^**
Error	19.0326	9	2.114733
K
Time Intervals	0.062619	3	0.020873	81.45528^**
Treatments	0.072769	3	0.024256	94.65854^**
Error	0.002306	9	0.000256
Ca
Time Intervals	2.90885	3	0.969617	23.82676^**
Treatments	3.5505	3	1.1835	29.08259^**
Error	0.36625	9	0.040694
Mg
Time Intervals	0.1621	3	0.054033	35.62637^**
Treatments	0.31855	3	0.106183	70.01099^**
Error	0.01365	9	0.001517

Level of significance: ^**𝑃<.001