Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 847940, 10 pages
Research Article

Biological and Physicochemical Parameters Related to the Nitrogen Cycle in the Rhizospheric Soil of Native Potato (Solanum phureja) Crops of Colombia

Laboratorio de Microbiología Agrícola, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Avenida carrera 30 no 45-03, A.A 14-490, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

Received 24 November 2010; Accepted 19 May 2011

Academic Editor: Paul Voroney

Copyright © 2011 Nathalia Flórez-Zapata and Daniel Uribe-Vélez. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Nitrogen (N) plays an important role in agricultural production. This study was designed to evaluate the presence of cultivable N cycle-associated microorganisms (nitrogen-fixing bacteria—NFB, proteolytic bacteria—PR, ammonifiers—AMO, ammonium-oxidizing bacteria—AOB, nitrite-oxidizing bacteria—NOB, and denitrifiers—DEN), and their relationship with physical-chemical and agronomic soil descriptors, in Solanum phureja rhizospheric soil samples, from traditional and organic crop management farms. A cluster analysis with the physical and chemical properties of soil, allowed to identify the organic matter content as an important factor that determines the outcome of that grouping. Significant differences ( ) between farms were found in the abundance of this groups, but correlation analysis showed that proteolytic and nitrogen fixing bacteria were the main nitrogen associated functional groups affected by soils' physical-chemical characteristics. The amount of ammonia available is affected by the agricultural management strategy, which consequently affects the NFB abundance. Finally the results showed that PR, protease activity and soil properties related with organic matter transformation has a positive relationship with productivity, which given the high organic matter content of the Andean soils being studied, we conclude that nitrogen mineralization process has an important role in the nitrogen cycle and its bioavailability in this ecosystem.

1. Introduction

Potato is the world’s fourth most popular food crop and one of the most important agricultural products for Colombia; it occupies the ninth place in area sown regarding transitory crops and sixth place in production value [1]. Solanum phureja is a native potato representing around 10% of potato crops produced in Colombia (having around 25,000 hectares planted and 150,000 tons produced per year), making Colombia the highest producer of such native potato amongst Andean countries [24].

The regions where potato crops are planted in Colombia are characterized by having a cold to very cold climate, due to their high altitude in the Andean mountains (2,000 meters above sea level (masl) to 3,500 masl), where fragile ecosystems such as Paramo are located. Such climatic conditions define important soil characteristics since they limit organic matter’s mineralization speed, this being one of the reasons for which the aforementioned soils are characterized by presenting high organic matter content (usually above 10%). The volcanic ash from andisols is considered to be the material of origin partially or completely affecting these soils’ fertility, because their organic and mineral composition is dominated by allophane and imogolite in their clay fraction, thereby interfering with nitrogen mineralization [5]. Besides, the humus-aluminum complex (a fraction acting as high immobilizer of available phosphorus in soil solution) also affects soil fertility [6].

The limiting condition of nutrients in soils is vitally important for potato growing because it is well know that such crops need to extract high quantities of nutrients from soil. This explains the favorable response to fertilization, given that major yields result from high nutrient input [7]. Nevertheless, potato farmers’ increased fertilizer use has become much greater than the productivity obtained [8]. Nowadays potato growers occupy second place in chemical fertilizer consumption in Colombia (following coffee producers), representing 14% to 23% of entire potato production costs [9], so fertilization thus appears to be a critical factor determining sector competitiveness (without emphasizing its environmental impact).

Potato is a very sensitive crop to nitrogen fertilization, especially in soils having high organic matter where such fertilization may reduce tuber yield and quality [10]. Excess nitrogen may prolong the vegetative phase and therefore interfere with the initiation of tuberization, decreasing yield and the percentage of dry matter accumulation in the tubers [11]. On the other hand, a low nitrogen application rate may produce premature senescence in the plants due to early translocation of nitrogen from the leaves to the tubers [12]. The low efficiency of species such as S. tuberosum in assimilating nitrogen has been well documented [13, 14]; an inappropriate use of this fertilizer may thus create environmental problems. For instance, unbalanced fertilization may intensify nitrogen leaching into water sources as well as N gaseous emission [1517]. Forms of reactive nitrogen input to ecosystems as a consequence of anthropogenic activities, such as agriculture and industry, should be expected to have implications for soil microorganisms mediating such transformation, as well as the cycle’s global dynamics, since it has been estimated that around 95% of nitrogen flow in the global terrestrial system is restricted to the plant-microorganism-soil system [18]. It has thus been estimated that around 50% of the nitrogen applied as mineral fertilizer has a negative effect on the environmental metabolism of nitrogen, thereby supporting the environmental quality of N [19].

Accordingly, ways must be sought for making fertilization practice more efficient, for example by studying the microbial communities involved in nutrient biotransformation such as nitrogen because such transformation determines its bioavailability for the plant. Taking this into account, our objective was to evaluate the abundance of some functional groups of N-cycling microorganisms (biological nitrogen fixers, proteolytic bacteria, ammonifiers, ammonium and nitrite oxidizers, and denitrifiers) and its relationship with other biochemical and physical-chemical characteristics, associated with the edaphic metabolism of nitrogen in the native potato (Solanum phureja) crops. This study was conducted under the hypothesis that soil physical-chemical properties can affect the population size of such functional groups as well as soil’ enzymatic activity, and the establishment of specific relations allows us to identify important points of N cycle that regulates its bioavailability under S. phureja crop conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil Samples

Rhizospheric soil samples were collected from seven S. phureja crops located in the Cundinamarca department, one of the major native potato sowing areas in Colombia. Five of these crops were being traditionally managed with 700 to 900 kg ha−1 of 12 : 24 : 12 or 14 : 30 : 15 NPK fertilizer application rates. Another two crops were being organically managed; they were characterized by compost amendments being applied for fertilization. The crop area was sampled by taking five rhizospheric soil samples for each crop covered in zigzag, leaving a 20–25 meter distance between sampled plants. Each of the five subsamples was sifted by 0.5 cm diameter sieve and then mixed in equal parts to obtain two compound samples per farm one stored at 4°C for microbial analysis and the other at −20°C for enzymatic analysis. Additional data regarding productivity and fertilization plan were analyzed for traditionally managed farms.

Physical-chemical analysis of soils was done in the Laboratory of Soils of the Agronomy College at the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, using standard methodologies for the measurement of moisture, pH, organic carbon (OC), Ca, K, Mg, Na, cationic exchange capacity (CEC), P, Cu, Fe, Mn, clay, silt and sand percentage, total nitrogen (inorganic plus organic), ammonium, and nitrate.

2.2. Microbial Count of Edaphic Nitrogen Metabolism-Associated Functional Groups

Nitrogen-fixing bacteria were analyzed by plate count in modified NFB agar [20], (components per liter: 5 g malic acid, 0.5 g K2HPO4, 0.1 g NaCl, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.02 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.05 g Bromothymol Blue, 2 g KOH, 8 g mannitol, 8 g glucose) supplemented with 2 mL micronutrient solution (components per liter: 0.2 g Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.235 g MnSO4, 0.280 g H3BO3, 0.08 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.0024 g ZnSO4·7H2O), 1 mL of vitamin solution 0.1 g L−1 (biotin, 0.2 g L−1pyridoxine) and 4 mL of Fe-EDTA solution (5.56 g FeSO4 7 H2O L−1, 8.258 g L−1 Na2 EDTA) and solidified with 1.5% Oxoid agar-agar, pH was fixed at 7.0. Each plate was incubated for 5 days at 28°C; all soil samples were analyzed in triplicate.

The abundance of proteolytic microorganisms (PR), ammonifiers (AMO), ammonium oxidizers (AOB), nitrite oxidizers (NOB), and denitrifiers (DEN) was measured by the most probable number (MPN) method. Briefly, culture media was prepared using Winogradsky’s salt solution diluted to 50 mL·L−1 and supplemented with a 1 mL·L−1 microelement solution [21]. Different carbon and nitrogen sources were used according to the group of interest. Gelatine (30 g·L−1) was used for PR as the sole carbon and nitrogen source, whereas asparagine (0.2 g L−1) was used for AMO. Calcium carbonate (1 g L−1) was used as carbon source and ammonium sulphate (0.5 g L−1) and sodium nitrite (5 g L−1) as nitrogen source for BOA and BON. DEN were grown with potassium nitrate (2 g L−1) and sodium acetate (10 g L−1). Tubes were incubated in triplicate for 15 days at 30°C for PR, AMO, and DEN, and 30 days for BOA and BON. Each microbial population was estimated in specific growth media depending on the test. Gelatin liquefaction was used for determining PR abundance [22]. Ammonium production was used for determining AMO by Nessler’s reagent [23]. Nitrite production for BOA estimation and nitrite consumption for BON estimation were determined with Griess Ilosvay reagent [24]. Nitrite consumption and gas production were determined by Durham bell for estimating DEN [25]. Microorganism MPN was calculated by using McCrady tables [26]; counts were expressed as microorganism MPN by gram of dry soil.

2.3. Determining Protease and Nitrogenase Activity in Soil Samples

Protease activity was measured as suggested by Ladd and Butler [27]; briefly 0.1 g of soil was incubated for 2 hr at 50°C in 1 mL of casein (2% solution) as substrate in alkaline conditions (Tris buffer pH 8.1). Amino acids released during incubation were colorimetrically measured at 700 nm using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. A standard curve was constructed with tyrosine to find the concentration of amino acids released by the sample’s enzymatic activity. Each sample was evaluated five times; two reaction controls were used (samples incubated without substratum). Soil nitrogenase was estimated by the acetylene reduction activity (ARA) test [28]. One mL from different soil sample dilutions was incubated in triplicate in bottles containing 9 mL semisolid NFB Agar. Inoculated bottles were incubated for 24 hours at 30°C; 10% of the bottle’s gaseous space was then replaced by acetylene, and then each sample was incubated again for 24 hours. Once incubation time had elapsed, the amount of produced ethylene was determined on a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph (Varian, Walnut Creek, Calif, USA). Nitrogenase activity was measured in triplicate for each farm and the results expressed in n moles of ethylene per gram of dry soil in 24 hours.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Microbial count analysis was expressed in logarithmic form, and thus an ANOVA was done for the abundance of each group. However, since data did not support normality assumption, we used a nonparametric approach to verify statistically significant differences through the Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test by pairs at significance level [29]. Enzymatic activity differences were analyzed by Tukey’s test at the same significance level. Correlation between the study variables was also analyzed using STATA 9.0. [30]. Relationships among the observed variables were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) using the R statistical package [31]. A hierarchical cluster analysis was done using each soil’s physical-chemical and biological variables, according to average linkage clustering method in STATA 9.0. [30].

3. Results

Table 1 presents the results of the physical-chemical analysis of the soil samples being studied; differences between farms were found independently of agricultural management, especially in organic carbon content, total nitrogen, soil moisture percentage, and soil texture patterns ranging from clay to clay loam (according to clay, silt, and sand percentage). pH values were observed from moderately acid to strongly acid, organic farms having the highest pH values. It should be noted that farms having organic management presented the lowest ammonium concentrations compared to traditional farms, except farm 1 which exhibited the highest total (organic) nitrogen and calcium content. Likewise, distinguishing characteristics between organically and traditionally managed farms were sodium (higher in organically managed farms) and iron concentration (higher in traditionally managed farms).

Table 1: Physical-chemical analysis of the soils being studied.

It was observed that the organic matter content of soils appeared to be a determinant factor in the observed clusters when performing hierarchical cluster analysis with the results of the physical-chemical variables evaluated (Figure 1). Farms having higher organic matter content (farms 1, 4, 6, and 7) were grouped in one cluster in this analysis and were separated from farms having lower organic matter content (2, 3 and 5). This result suggested that organic matter may have an important role in the physical-chemical differences of the soils being studied. It appeared that joint analysis of the physical-chemical parameters grouped the farms according to agricultural management, since it was observed how the organically managed farms (6 and 7) were grouped and separated from traditionally managed farms (1 and 4) within the cluster of fields having high organic matter content (1, 4, 6 and 7).

Figure 1: Hierarchical cluster analysis of the studied soils in relation to the physical-chemical variables evaluated.

Figure 2 presents the results of the nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB) counts. The highest count was for traditionally managed farms 3, 4, and 5 followed by farm 2 which presented intermediate values. Traditionally managed farm 1 and organically managed farms 6 and 7 presented the lowest counts. The relationship between NFB count and physical-chemical characteristics of the soil showed a positive correlation ( ) with ammonium concentration ( ), whereas there was a negative correlation with sand ( ) and sodium concentration ( ). There was positive correlation ( ) with silt ( ), clay ( ) and iron concentration ( ) and negative correlation with pH ( ) and moisture ( ).

Figure 2: Nitrogen fixing bacteria count in NFB agar. Values having the same letter were not significantly different according to Kruskal Wallis pairwise test, significance level. The error bars shown correspond to the standard deviation of the microbial count for each farm.

Table 2 gives the microbial count for other groups associated with the edaphic metabolism of nitrogen. The results indicated a significant difference between farms for all microbial groups estimated, except for proteolytic microbial counts which did not present statistical differences between farms. DEN bacteria presented the lowest count in organically managed farm 6; intermediate values were found in farms 2, 3, and 7 followed by farms 1, 4, and 5, all of them having traditional management and presenting the highest counts. Functional groups PR and AMO were close to three orders of magnitude ( to  mpn g−1 dry soil), this being higher than BOA and BON count ( to  mpn g−1 dry soil).

Table 2: Most probable number for some functional groups associated with the edaphic metabolism of nitrogen. The average of three values is shown for every functional group, expressed as mpn g−1 dry soil. Values having the same letter were not significantly different according to Kruskal Wallis pairwise test, significance level.

Correlation analysis between the abundance of different functional groups, productivity, and other physical-chemical soil characteristics revealed a positive correlation ( ) between proteolytic bacteria and crop productivity ( ), soil moisture ( ), cation exchange capacity ( ), copper ( ) and total nitrogen ( ), and for organic carbon ( ). Otherwise, this microbial group had a negative correlation ( ) with phosphorus ( ). Other functional groups did not present statistically significant relationships.

The enzymatic activity results revealed statistically significant differences between farms. For instance, farms 1 and 6 had the highest protease activity (traditionally and organically managed, resp.) (Figure 3). The soil samples from these farms also presented the highest levels of organic carbon and total nitrogen (Table 1). Protease activity had a positive correlation ( ) with copper ( ).

Figure 3: Protease activity. The bars correspond to average enzymatic activity, expressed in μg of tyrosine per gram of dry soil during 2 h−1. Values shown with the same letters were not significantly different according to Tukey’s test, significance level. The error bars shown correspond to standard deviation for each data set.

Regarding nitrogenase activity, there was no correlation between nitrogen-fixing microbial count and nitrogenase activity. For instance, the lowest NFB count was found in the soil sample from farm 6, even though nitrogenase activity was highest (Figure 4); however, nitrogenase activity and microbial count were both high in soil samples from farm 3. Such enzymatic activity had a significant correlation ( ) with AMO bacteria ( ), manganese ( ), and also with magnesium ( ) ( ).

Figure 4: Nitrogenase activity. The bars correspond to average enzymatic activity, expressed in n moles of ethylene per gram of dry soil during 24 hours. Values shown with the same letter were not significantly different according to Tukey’s test, significance level. The error bars correspond to standard deviation bars for each data set.

PCA was also performed for identifying the main variables related to the nitrogen cycle in this study. Figure 5 shows the analysis explaining the variability of this set of data.

Figure 5: Principal component analysis of physical-chemical, biochemical, and biological data related to nitrogen cycle. The parameters represented in this analysis were: (a) protease: protease activity, OC: organic carbon, N: percentage of total nitrogen, PRO: proteolytic bacteria counts, productivity: crop productivity, and (b) ARA: nitrogenase activity, Mg: magnesium, H: moisture percentage, AMO: ammonifiers, NFB: nitrogen-fixing bacteria counts, NH4: ammonium, Fe: iron.

4. Discussion

N cycle is a very important process in any agricultural system but particularly in potato crops where both nitrogen excess and deficiency may interfere with the duration of the crop cycle and therefore tuber production yield [10]. The native potato S. phureja is planted in Colombia in high mountains soils, having high organic content and low temperature and pH values; our study showed that such characteristics are determinant for N cycling-associated microbial activity, where N mineralization by proteolytic bacteria seems to play a major role.

Despite these soils’ high organic matter, potato growers usually apply high N fertilization input thereby affecting the microbial population and soil physical-chemical parameters. In the literature, contradictory results are found to describe the effect of agricultural practices on these physical-chemical soil variables. Some authors reported few differences in this variables in relationship with the agricultural management [32]. However, others [33, 34] observed differences in physical-chemical variables in the tested soils in relation to the type of amendment applied (organic or mineral fertilizers). For instance higher pH values [32, 33], and calcium levels [3234], had been associated with organic management, and similar results were observed in our study (Table 1). Other physical-chemical characteristics that showed some differences between soil management strategies include the ammonium content in soils of mineral fertilized farms, possibly as a result of the incorporation of this element in the scheme of fertilization. Since in soil ammonium is fixed to clay [35], whereby a positive correlationship between these variables was expected, however we did not find such correlation in our study. On the other hand, high concentrations of sodium were found in the soils with organic management, however there is not an obvious reason to support the effect of organic amendments on the accumulation of such element [36].

As described above organic matter content of soils appeared to be a determinant factor in the observed clusters when performing hierarchical cluster analysis with the results of the physical-chemical variables evaluated. Sparling and colleagues [37] emphasized the importance of organic matter in soil because of influence on soil’s physical, chemical, and biological properties; then it is possible that in the soils being studied, this was a factor that determined the physical and biological properties of soil as well as the relations between them.

In the present study, for instance, NFB had a positive relationship with ammonium concentration in the soil. As it is well know that ammonium may inhibit nitrogenase activity [3840], then such correlation may be the result of this group’s better growth efficiency in response to available ammonium in the soil, more energy being available for cell proliferation instead of energy being wasted through the high energetic cost of nitrogen fixing as a source of ammonium [41].

A negative relationship was also found between the number of NFB and soil moisture. Such relationship was not expected since oxygen availability becomes reduced in humid environments, a factor which might benefit microorganisms depending on biological fixation for their development since it has been shown that oxygen can regulate nitrogenase activity and enzyme stability [42, 43]. However, concerning the availability of ammonium present in those soils, oxygen was probably not the limiting factor for NFB growth which included great microorganism diversity having different oxygen affinities such as aerobes, microaerophiles, facultative anaerobes, and obligate anaerobes [44].

Despite N fixation seeming to play no major role in the soils being analyzed, an expected correlation between the number of NFB and Fe was found, possibly because Fe is a nitrogenase enzyme cofactor [45]. A positive correlation was found between nitrogenase activity in soils and Mg which acts as the cofactor for ATP transport-related enzymes inside cells, this being an energetic molecule in high demand in this process [44]. This suggested that, despite the proliferation of NFB associated with the metabolism of ammonium present in the environment, NFB was an active group which might participate in the biological input of nitrogen to the soil environment in the S. phureja crops being studied. The positive relationship of NFB with clay and silt, which are textural characteristics influencing microorganism abundance, was anticipated since they are capable of harboring surface-adhered bacteria providing a physical protection and restricted mobility barrier ensuring these microorganisms’ greater retention in the soil [46]. Despite the relationships between NFB and some physical-chemical variables, no relationship was found of this group with agronomic variables such as fertilization (kg ha−1 of nitrogen, potassium, or phosphorus applied) and production.

Regarding proteolytic microorganisms, a relationship was found between variables involved in organic matter mineralization such as moisture, cation-exchange capacity, organic carbon total N content (N which can be mineralized), and productivity (Figure 5). As described by Arslan et al. [47], N mineralization in the soil is a key process in N cycling, and soil characteristics such as organic matter, water holding capacity, and total N are important environmental factors affecting this soil’s process. Therefore, relationships found between proteolytic microorganisms, productivity, and N mineralization-related physical chemical properties suggest that the N entry mechanism through its mineralization from organic matter sources plays an important role in the production system, despite the high levels of inorganic fertilizer applied in the fields under study (700 to 900 kg ha−1  of which between 90 and 150 kg ha−1 are nitrogen). Such influence of organic nitrogen has been previously discussed by Gastal and Lemaire [48] who suggested that although the acquisition of N by plants is generally in inorganic forms as ammonium or nitrate, soil organic N can also be used by the plant, even representing a significant portion of the total N absorbed, in particular ecological conditions such as those of acid soils and low-temperature environments, these being characteristic of the soils in our study.

Likewise, Jackson et al. [19] have argued that the N cycle in soil is driven by soil organic matter which contains approximately 5% N, as well as other labile sources of carbon and N, such as radical exudates, dead microbial cells, and cellular excretion products. According to these authors, this organic material is depolymerized by the action of extracellular enzymes releasing monomers like amino acids which, in turn, are broken down by mineralization-releasing ammonium which can be successively used for ammonium-oxidizing bacteria, nitrite oxidizers, and denitrifying bacteria, thereby ensuring the flow of N throughout the ecosystem. These authors have also highlighted that the carbon and nitrogen cycles are closely related, since microbial processes can address N conversion into forms available to plants when the right amount of carbon is available. In the same way, L. Böeme and F. Böeme [49] said that proteases activity is necessary to release N for plant uptake because most of the N compounds in mineral soils are organically bound. Therefore, if N conversion through proteolytic activity is a process which addresses this element’s cycle in the soil, the enzyme-driven depolymerization should be the limiting step in generating bioavailable N. This suggests that the most appropriate way for determining organic N depolymerization would be protease activity determination [50]. In the present study, overall protease activity showed no correlation with other parameters related with the mineralization of organic matter. However, there was a general tendency concerning farms having greater amounts of organic carbon and total N, also presenting the highest protease activity, confirming the reports of other authors such as Fuka et al. [51], Kunito et al. [52], and Saha et al. [53].

On the other hand, farm 5 which presented the lowest organic carbon and total N levels also had high proteolytic activity, even being comparable to that of farms 1 and 6 therefore suggesting that other factors were affecting soil protease activity. This farm contained the highest percentage of clay which, as suggested by Fuka et al. [51], influences proteolytic activity due to protease stabilization on clay particles whereas enzymatic activity in sandy soil only depends on the activity of enzymes released by soil microorganisms. Then, excluding farm 5 from correlation analysis led to significant positive correlation of protease activity with production, organic carbon, cation-exchange capacity, moisture, and total nitrogen (not shown results). This result in addition to the high heterotrophic microbial (proteolytic and ammonifying bacteria) counts, and their relationship with soil physical-chemical parameters related to organic matter mineralization would again support that N mineralization apparently plays an important role in N cycling in S. phureja crops directly interfering with their productivity. As it is known that the soil N cycle can be divided into three subcycles: elemental, autotrophic, and heterotrophic, which compete for one or more of the soil N pools, such as the ammonium pool, and the outcome of such competition determines which subcycle dominates [35], it may thus be possible that the heterotrophic subcycle (mineralization) dominates N transformation over the elemental subcycle (biological oxidation-reduction reactions) in the soils being studied which have high organic matter content.

This study found a positive relationship between protease activity and copper levels measured in the soil. Similar findings were obtained by Kunito et al. [52] who indicated that these results may have been due to multicollinearity between determined copper, soil organic carbon, and pH. The phenomenon could have been similar in our case as the copper concentration was also associated with moisture, organic carbon and total N, being variables expected to favor such enzyme activity. Moreover, while it has been recognized that metalloproteases are the main source of soil peptidases [22], to the best of our knowledge, copper has not yet been described as being a cofactor that enhances its activity.

5. Conclusions

Organic nitrogen contribution to the system through proteolytic microorganisms appeared to be important in the N cycling of Solanum phureja rhizospheric soils under study, which are typical Andean high mountain potato’s crop soils with high organic matter content and low temperature and pH. Thus, other functional groups such as those associated with biological nitrogen fixation seemed to play a secondary role in incorporating N into the soil in this type of ecosystem. This was probably because N contribution is largely mediated by mineral fertilization or by organic sources, thereby reducing the incentive for NFB to increase edaphic N.

The other functional groups, involved in soil N metabolism in this study, showed no close relationship to the physical-chemical variables of soil and crop agronomic characteristics such as fertilization and production, which would afford no possible reason for their use as N cycle markers in ecosystems similar to that of the native S. phureja potato.


The authors would like to thank the Colombian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and CENICAFE (the National Federation of Coffee Growers’ Research Institution) which provided the financial support for this paper. We would also like to thank the members of the CIMA research consortium (Consorcio de Investigación en Metagenomica Agricola) for supporting this paper. They are grateful to Fernando Tunjano from FEDEPAPA for his help in finding the farms and the farmers who allowed them to incorporate their potato fields in this work.


  1. C. Espinal, H. Martínez, N. Pinzón, and C. Barrios, “La cadena de la papa en colombia una mirada global de su estructura y dinamica 1991–2005,” Documento de Trabajo no. 54, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural Observatorio Agrocadenas, Bogotá, Colombia, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. E. Ñústez, “La papa criolla (Solanum phureja): un cultivo para destacar en Colombia,” Boletín de la Papa, vol. 3, no. 25, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Diazgranados and A. Chaparro-Giraldo, “Desarrollo de un sistema de regeneración en papa criolla Solanum phureja Juz. et. Buk. Var. yema de huevo clon 1,” Agronomía Colombiana, vol. 25, pp. 7–15, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. P. D. Porras, “La papa en Colombia: desarrollo de una Cadena agroalimentaria estratégica,” Revista Papa, vol. 20, pp. 5–29, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. L. Parfitt, “Allophane and imogolite: role in soil biogeochemical processes,” Clay Minerals, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 135–155, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Castro, “Balance y prospectiva de la investigación en el campo de la fertilización para el sistema de producción de papa en Colombia,” in Proceedings of the 1st Taller Nacional sobre suelos, fisiología y nutrición vegetal en el cultivo de la papa, Bogotá, Colombia, February 2005.
  7. H. J. Villamil, “Fisiología de la nutrición en papa,” in Proceedings of the 1st Taller Nacional Sobre Suelos, Fisiología y Nutrición Vegetal en el Cultivo de la Papa, Bogotá, Colombia, February 2005.
  8. H. Ruiz, “Inventario de la oferta tecnológica para la fertilización en el cultivo de la papa en Colombia,” in Proceedings of the 1st Taller Nacional Sobre Suelos, Fisiología y Nutrición Vegetal en el Cultivo de la Papa, Bogotá, Colombia, February 2005.
  9. H. Villareal, P. Porras, A. Santa, J. Logoeyte, and D. Muñoz, “Costos de producción de papa en las principales zonas productoras de Colombia,” 2007,
  10. C. M. Giletto, H. E. Echeverria, and V. Sadras, “Nitrogen fertilization of potato in the southern pampas,” Ciencia del Suelo, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 44–51, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. A. Saluzzo, H. E. Echeverría, F. H. Andrade, and M. Huarte, “Nitrogen nutrition of potato cultivars differing in maturity,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 157–165, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. E. Kleinkopf, D. T. Westermann, and R. B. Dwelle, “Dry matter production and nitrogen utilization by six potato cultivars,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 73, pp. 799–802, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. V. Rourke, “Soil solution levels of nitrate nitrogen in a potato-buckwheat rotation,” American Potato Journal, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. A. Porter and J. A. Sisson, “Petiole nitrate content of Maine-grown Russet Burbank and Shepody potatoes in response to varying nitrogen rate,” American Potato Journal, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 493–505, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. N. Galloway, A. R. Townsend, J. W. Erisman et al., “Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5878, pp. 889–892, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. V. Smil, “Global population and the nitrogen cycle,” Scientific American, vol. 277, pp. 76–81, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  17. P. M. Vitousek, J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth et al., “Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences,” Ecological Applications, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 737–750, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Rosswall, “The internal nitrogen cycle between microorganisms, vegetation and soil,” Ecological Bulletins, pp. 157–167, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. E. Jackson, M. Burger, and T. R. Cavagnaro, “Roots, nitrogen transformations, and ecosystem services,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 59, pp. 341–363, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. R. J. Rennie, “A single medium for the isolation of acetylene-reducing (dinitrogen-fixing) bacteria from soils,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Pochon and P. Tardieux, Techniques d'Analyse en Microbiologie du Sol, Éditions de la Tourelle, Saint-Mandé, France, 1962.
  22. H. J. Bach and J. C. Munch, “Identification of bacterial sources of soil peptidases,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 219–224, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Amora-Lazcano, M. M. Vázquez, and R. Azcón, “Response of nitrogen-transforming microorganisms to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Alexander and F. E. Clark, “Nitrifying bacteria,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, M. Alexander, F. E. Clark, and C. A. Black, Eds., part 2, pp. 1477–1483, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis, USA, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  25. Y. Horiba, S. T. Khan, and A. Hiraishi, “Characterization of the microbial community and culturable denitrifying bacteria in a solid-phase denitrification process using poly ( -caprolactone) as the carbon and energy source,” Microbes and Environments, vol. 20, pp. 25–33, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. H. McCrady, “Tables for rapid interpretation of fermentation tube results,” Public Health Journal Toronto, vol. 9, pp. 201–220, 1918. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. N. Ladd and J. H. A. Butler, “Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. W. F. Hardy, R. D. Holsten, E. K. Jackson, and R. C. Burns, “The acetylene-ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation,” Plant Physiology, vol. 43, pp. 1185–1207, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  29. W. H. Kruskal and W. A. Wallis, “Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis,” Journal of the American statistical Association, vol. 47, pp. 583–621, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  30. StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 9, StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex, USA, 2005.
  31. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008, ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  32. P. Mäder, A. Fließbach, D. Dubois, L. Gunst, P. Fried, and U. Niggli, “Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5573, pp. 1694–1697, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. L. R. Bulluck, M. Brosius, G. K. Evanylo, and J. B. Ristaino, “Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. S. F. Araújo, V. B. Santos, and R. T. R. Monteiro, “Responses of soil microbial biomass and activity for practices of organic and conventional farming systems in Piauí state, Brazil,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 225–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. D. Myrold, “Transformations of nitrogen,” in Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, D. M. Sylvia, J. J. Fuhrmann, P. G. Hartel, and D. A. Zuberer, Eds., pp. 333–372, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Howe and M. Wagner, “The effect of papermill wastewater and organic amendments on sodium accumulation by potted cottonwoods,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. G. P. Sparling, T. Graham Shepherd, and H. A. Kettles, “Changes in soil organic C, microbial C and aggregate stability under continuous maize and cereal cropping, and after restoration to pasture in soils from the Manawatu region, New Zealand,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 225–241, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  38. F. Houwaard, “Influence of ammonium and nitrate nitrogen on nitrogenase activity of pea plants as affected by light intensity and sugar addition,” Plant and Soil, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 271–282, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Knowles and D. Denike, “Effect of ammonium-, nitrite- and nitrate nitrogen on anaerobic nitrogenase activity in soil,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 353–358, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  40. V. Rajaramamohan-Rao, “Nitrogen fixation as influenced by moisture content, ammonium sulphate and organic sources in a paddy soil,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 445–448, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  41. D. Kleiner, “Ammonium uptake and metabolism by nitrogen fixing bacteria,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 111, no. 1-2, pp. 85–91, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Hartmann and R. H. Burris, “Regulation of nitrogenase activity by oxygen in Azospirillum brasilense and Azospirillum lipoferum,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 944–948, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  43. R. L. Smith, C. Van Baalen, and F. R. Tabita, “Alteration of the Fe protein of nitrogenase by oxygen in the Cyanobacterium anabaena sp. strain CA,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 2537–2542, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  44. D. A. Zuberer, “Biological dinitrogen fixation: introduction and nonsymbiotic,” in Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, D. M. Sylvia, J. J. Fuhrmann, P. G. Hartel, and D. A. Zuberer, Eds., pp. 373–404, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  45. S. J. Ferguson, “Nitrogen cycle enzymology,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 182–193, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  46. K. C. Marshall, “Clay mineralogy in relation to survival of soil bacteria,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 13, pp. 357–373, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  47. H. Arslan, G. Güleryüz, and S. Kirmizi, “Nitrogen mineralisation in the soil of indigenous oak and pine plantation forests in a Mediterranean environment,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. F. Gastal and G. Lemaire, “N uptake and distribution in crops: An agronomical and ecophysiological perspective,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 53, no. 370, pp. 789–799, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  49. L. Böhme and F. Böhme, “Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilisation,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. P. Schimel and J. Bennett, “Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm,” Ecology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 591–602, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  51. M. M. Fuka, M. Engel, A. Gattinger et al., “Factors influencing variability of proteolytic genes and activities in arable soils,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1646–1653, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. T. Kunito, K. Saeki, S. Goto, H. Hayashi, H. Oyaizu, and S. Matsumoto, “Copper and zinc fractions affecting microorganisms in long-term sludge-amended soils,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. Saha, K. A. Gopinath, B. L. Mina, and H. S. Gupta, “Influence of continuous application of inorganic nutrients to a Maize-Wheat rotation on soil enzyme activity and grain quality in a rainfed Indian soil,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 44, no. 5-6, pp. 521–531, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar