Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Applied and Environmental Soil Science / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Soil Management for Sustainable Agriculture 2013

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 487865 |

Luis A. Milesi Delaye, Alicia B. Irizar, Adrián E. Andriulo, Bruno Mary, "Effect of Continuous Agriculture of Grassland Soils of the Argentine Rolling Pampa on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen", Applied and Environmental Soil Science, vol. 2013, Article ID 487865, 17 pages, 2013.

Effect of Continuous Agriculture of Grassland Soils of the Argentine Rolling Pampa on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen

Academic Editor: María Cruz Díaz Álvarez
Received11 Apr 2013
Accepted20 Aug 2013
Published08 Oct 2013


Long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil organic nitrogen (SON) following cultivation of grassland soils (100/120-year tillage (T) + 20/30-year no tillage (NT)) of the Rolling Pampa were studied calibrating the simple AMG model coupled with the natural 13C abundance measurements issued from long-term experiments and validating it on a data set obtained by a farmer survey and by long-term NT experiments. The multisite survey and NT trials permitted coverage of the history of the 140 years with agriculture. The decrease in SOC and SON storage that occurred during the first twenty years by a loss through biological activity was 27% for SOC and 32% for SON. The calibrated model described the SOC storage evolution very well and permitted an accurate simultaneous estimation of their three parameters. The validated model simulated well SOC and SON evolution. Overall, the results analyzed separately for the T and NT period indicated that the active pool has a rapid turnover (MRT ~9 and 13 years, resp.) which represents 50% of SOC in the native prairie soil and 20% of SOC at equilibrium after NT period. NT implementation on soils with the highest soil organic matter reserves will continue to decrease (17%) for three decades later under current annual addition.

1. Introduction

It is well established that grassland soils, particularly Mollisols, originally rich in soil organic matter (SOM), rapidly lose important quantities of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) after cultivation [110]. Long-term cultivation effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil organic nitrogen (SON) provide necessary information to evaluate the sustainability of cropping systems and their effects on the environment. Assessment of SOM is a valuable step towards identifying the overall quality of a soil [1113].

The agriculture of the Argentine Rolling Pampa consists of a sequence of arable crops for 100 to 120 years followed by two or three decades of cropping under no tillage (NT). Before the 1970s, maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and flax (Linun usitatisinum L.) were alternated with pastures for beef production. Since the 1970s, largely due to economic reasons, there has been an important increase in the area under arable crops, with the cropped area increasing relative to the pasture area at an annual rate of 4% [14]. This resulted in an increase in tillage intensities. Furthermore, soybean was often double cropped with wheat (W/S) in the same year. Fertilizer use was relatively restricted until 1992 (<5 kg N ha−1año−1) [7, 1517], and liming is not practiced by farmers. Conservation tillage, based on chisel plow as primary tillage and no-tillage (NT) practices, was first introduced in the middle of the 1970s to provide several environmental benefits such as reduction of soil erosion, improvement of the soil structure and infiltration, and conservation of soil water. Until 1988, the agricultural area under NT was only 0.02% of the total national agricultural surface. After that NT has continued to develop and evolve, and the Rolling Pampa has become one of the world’s fastest growing areas of NT adoption. Currently, the agriculture surface under NT represents 78.5% of the national agricultural area [18]. In the 1990s, the agricultural intensification advanced towards simplified production schemes under NT, with spring-summer species, especially soybean (70% of the agricultural surface) and, secondarily, maize (15% of the agricultural area) and wheat preceding soybean some years, or otherwise, the soil remaining fallow between the two summer crops. About 80% of soybean, 61% of wheat and 72% of maize are cultivated under continuous NT [19]. This general adoption of NT occurred together with a high dependence on broad spectrum herbicides and increasing mineral nitrogen fertilization rates related to maize and wheat production [17]. These deep modifications of production systems seem to be the origin of the notable decrease in SOM in different zones of this region. In fact, Michelena et al. [20] documented reductions of 21, 56, and 10–84% in SOC, SON, and extractable phosphorus (P), respectively, of half unit in pH values, of 40–60% in stability structure, and of 54–73% in the infiltration rate, following cultivation. This evolution is generally considered to cause water erosion. On the other hand, the soils under NT with dominance of soybean also present a progressive decrease in their physical, chemical, and biological fertility [21]. The main causes of such decrease include the long periods of fall-winter fallow, the low annual C input to the soil, and the enhancement of the mineralization of SOM by products of the biological fixation of N. In addition, NT presents little soil coverage and low structure stability, tends to compaction, reduces the infiltration rate due to the presence of a laminar structure, and produces a significant contribution of N to the groundwater and surface waters [2226].

SOM changes are likely to be slower in more temperate than in tropical climates [5, 27, 28]. Burke et al. [5] showed that SOC loss under cultivation increases with precipitation. The climate of the Rolling Pampa, with high annual rainfall and a soil temperature that infrequently reaches 0°C, favors a higher organic decomposition than North American or European climates. Among pedoclimatic characteristics, the amount and nature of clay and calcium carbonates participate in protecting SOM from decomposition by adsorption and aggregation, thus slowing turnover and effectively increasing SOM. Particularly, it was shown that montmorillonite presents a higher protecting role than kaolinite [29]. In the soils of the Rolling Pampa, the predominant mineral of the clay fraction is illite. Since calcium carbonates are removed from the overlying horizons, physical protection of the two latter components would be very low. The silt fraction (2–50 μm) of the Pampean soils has a high amount of phytolites (to 50% from 2–20 μm) [30]. This particularity leads to envisage an interaction between SOM and phytolites. Some authors proposed explaining SOM stability of grassland soils by a physical-chemical protection intervening preferentially adsorption mechanisms [31, 32].

During the first years of cultivation, decomposition of easily decomposable roots and crown tissue, soluble fractions, and prehumic substances, in which their production is much greater for native grasses than for cultivated crops, accounts for high initial SOM losses [27, 3335]. SOM reduction upon cultivation is sensitive to organic management, and the difference relative to general trends depends on the farming practices, especially those involving crop residue utilization, animal manures, crop rotation, fertilizers, and tillage. Several mechanisms have been proposed for the organic matter losses following cultivation of prairie soils: mechanical disruption of previously unavailable organic matter available as substrates for microorganisms, a decrease in the amount and changes in the type of residue applied [36], dilution with subsoil having less SOM [37], and soil erosion [3, 38].

To estimate and predict the evolution of soil fertility to cover the entire period of time since the beginning of agriculture in the Rolling Pampa, we need a model of long-term SOM evolution such as CENTURY, Roth-C, DAISY, or CN-SIM [39]. These models differ by the number of pools taken into account, the initialization and the size of such pools, and the number of parameters considered and their estimation. When we have minimal data input, it is necessary to abandon the explicit part of elementary processes and replace them by gross simulations indicating the average trends [4042]. In a work on the Rolling Pampa, Andriulo et al. [43] modified the Hénin-Dupuis model [44] in combination with natural 13C abundance and applied it on a soil following cultivation and on a soil with a long cropping history both in medium-term studies (13 years). This model, which they named the AMG model, allowed them to obtain a very good prediction of the evolution of C from old and young SOC with an accurate simultaneous estimation of only three model parameters (humification coefficient, , mineralization coefficient, , and stable carbon, Cs). AMG, a simple model designed to simulate SOC evolution, is embedded in the soil-plant simulation model STICS [45]. The model runs on an annual time step and assumes that fresh organic matter is either decomposed or humified in the soil after one-year decay. Three compartments are considered: crop residues and stable and active SOM [46].

In the Rolling Pampa, there are no long-term experiments with which we can systematically follow SOM stocks and residue inputs after cultivation and later NT of grassland soils. Since evolution is still relatively recent in Argentine and cultivation of natural grassland soils has developed progressively, there are fields with a different number of years under continuous agriculture since the beginning of the agriculture. Information regarding crop rotations, cultivation systems and yields, which can be obtained from each field by means of a survey, would compose a data set simulating the results of a long-term experiment. This approach has been used by Boiffin et al. [47].

Our objectives were (a) to calibrate the AMG model on the Pergamino soil series of the Rolling Pampa by applying the natural 13C abundance technique during two periods: a long crop cultivation (T) of native grassland and a more recent one under NT and (b) to validate it on other soils series of the same region by using the performing model version over the environmental functions proposed by Saffih-Hdadi and Mary [46], with some differences, in the same two mentioned periods where it was possible to reconstruct the agricultural history through survey and to obtain long-term information from NT experiments, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Study Area

This work was carried out in the Argentine Rolling Pampa (Figure 1). The soils are developed on deep loess sediment. The study area is located between 32° and 35°S and 58° and 63°W. Soils, formed from loess, are Typic, Vertic, and Aquic Argiudolls (US Soil Taxonomy) and are deep, relatively well drained, slightly acidic, originally well supplied with SOM, and very fertile. They usually have a silty-loam A horizon (19–26% clay, 55–74% silt, and 4–24% fine and very fine sand) followed by a silty-clay Bt horizon (30–55% in the Bt). Thickness of the Bt horizon is ~60 cm. The climate can be defined as temperate humid without a dry season and with a very hot summer [7]. Monthly mean temperatures range from 9°C in July to 24°C in February. Minimal soil temperature never reaches 0°C; therefore, soils do not freeze, and biological activity is never severely depressed. Rainfall varies from 900 to 1000 mm year−1, 70–75% of which occurs in spring and summer, when monthly rainfall erosivity is greatest. The relief is moderately undulating, with slopes of up to 3%. The combination between the degree of slopes and their length results in some water erosion susceptibility.

2.2. Selection of Study Sites

The data used to calibrate the model, applying the natural 13C abundance technique, came from two sites (sites A and B). Site A consisted of a long-term soybean monoculture experiment, carried out at the Pergamino Experimental Station of the National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (33°01′S; 61°10′W), Buenos Aires province, Argentina, for 33 years, (1980–2012), where the soil is plowed with moldboard plow/double disk at a depth of 15 cm and disk and teeth harrowed at a depth of 10 cm. The experiment started from a known situation taken as a reference of the native prairie (adjacent to the former). Site B (33°58′S; 60°34′W), with 22 years under NT (), started after 80 years of cultivation (1991–2012). Both sites are developed on a fine, illitic, thermic Typic Argiudoll (US Soil Taxonomy), Luvic Phaeozem (WRB) of the Pergamino series without water erosion phases (soil slope < 0.3%). The texture of the A horizon is silty loam with 25% and 64% clay and silt, respectively. The mean annual temperature is 16.7°C, and the mean annual rainfall for the 1910–2012 period was 965 mm (agroclimatological network database, INTA).

To validate the model during the T period, we used a survey, which consisted in selecting different sites in which time of continuous cultivation since natural grassland and crop successions were known. We opened profiles to start Bt2 horizon depth in the highest site of the landscape of each field. We considered mainly the pedological profiles of Argiudolls. Only two fields classified as Argialbolls were included because their A2 horizon was very thin. Hence, we excluded the surface horizons with a clay content lower than 19%, the clay soils truncated by erosion and without A horizon, and flooding soils. The soil series or soil phases as well as the soil slope of each site studied were identified by INTA soil survey maps [4853]. Three sites (Pergamino, Correa, and Urquiza soil series) were selected to determine the time zero of the T period for SOC and SON (Table 1).

Soil series Symbol Soil typeAgriculture timeSlope Sampling dateLocationFait

T period
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll0<1.01990 34°10′S∣60°40′WCalibration/validation
CorreaCrTypic Argiudoll0<1.0199032°49′S∣61°20′WValidation
UrquizaUrTypic Argiudoll0<1.0199033°55′S∣60°25′WValidation
RojasRoTypic Argiudoll2<1.0199033°56′S∣60°55′WValidation
PeyranoPyVertic Argiudoll51.5–3199033°31′S∣60°25′WValidation
Rojas 5Ro5Typic Argiudoll8<1.0199033°55′S∣60°50′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll10<1.0199033°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll13<1.0199333°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll23<1.0200433°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll27<1.0200833°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll31<1.0201033°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll33<1.0201233°57′51.35′′S∣60°34′39,34′′WCalibration
Las gamasLGAeric Argialboll34<1.0199033°44′S∣60°48′WValidation
RojasRoTypic Argiudoll35<1.0199034°02′S∣60°47′WValidation
Pergamino 6 o Peyrano 2xPe6 o Py2xTypic Argiudoll401.5–3199033°39′S∣60°42′WValidation
Villa EloisaVe2Typic Argiudoll551.5–3199033°00′S∣61°10′WValidation
Las gamasLGAeric Argialboll60<1.0199033°45′S∣60°50′WValidation
Arroyo dulce 2AD2Typic Argiudoll64<1.0199034°08′S∣60°22′WValidation
Arroyo dulce 2AD2Typic Argiudoll70<1.0199034°15′S∣60°17′WValidation
UrquizaUrTypic Argiudoll72<1.0199033°55′S∣60°25′WValidation
Arrecifes 2Ar2Typic Argiudoll721–1.5199033°52′S∣60°17′WValidation
Correa 1Cr1Typic Argiudoll751–1.5199032°49′S∣61°20′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll80<1.0199033°46′S∣60°38′WCalibration/validation
Rojas 4Ro4Typic Argiudoll801–1.5199034°14′S∣60°35′WValidation
Arroyo dulce 2AD2Typic Argiudoll83<1.0199034°10′S∣60°30′WValidation
PeyranoPyVertic Argiudoll84<1.0199033°22′S∣60°47′WValidation
Peyrano 1 o Peyrano 2xPy1 ó Py2xVertic Argiudoll871–1.5199033°32′S∣60°46′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll100<1.0201033°46′S∣60°38′WCalibration
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll102<1.0201233°46′S∣60°38′WCalibration
Peyrano 2xPy2xVertic Argiudoll1121.5–3199033°35′S∣60°48′WValidation
Casilda 1Ca1Vertic Argiudoll1131–1.5199033°07′S∣61°20′WValidation

NT period
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll0<0.3197933°57′36,26′′S∣60°33′50,25′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll0<0.3198733°57′32,06′′S∣60°33′41,58′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll0<0.3198733°57′31,54′′S∣60°33′44,85′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll17<0.3200433°57′32,06′′S∣60°33′41,58′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll17<0.3200433°57′31,54′′S∣60°33′44,85′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll21<0.3200833°57′32,06′′S∣60°33′41,58′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll21<0.3200833°57′31,54′′S∣60°33′44,85′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll25<0.3200433°57′36,26′′S∣60°33′50,25′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll25<0.3201233°57′32,06′′S∣60°33′41,58′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll25<0.3201233°57′31,54′′S∣60°33′44,85′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll29<0.3200833°57′36,26′′S∣60°33′50,25′′WValidation
PergaminoPeTypic Argiudoll33<0.3201233°57′36,26′′S∣60°33′50,25′′WValidation

T: tillage; NT: no tillage.

To validate the model during the NT period we used information issued during three long-term tillage systems experiments developed on the Pergamino series: a 34-year-old (1979–2012) doubled cropped wheat/soybean-maize (W/S-M) and a 25-year-old (1987–2012) soybean (SS) and maize monocultures (MM), both carried out at the Pergamino Experimental Station. We used only the NT systems from three long-term experiments. Each experiment presented a completely randomized block design. W/S-M started after a long alternating pasture/agriculture period, and the monocultures started 9 years after and were cultivated majorly with soybean conventionally tilled. The main plot was 45 m long by 14 m wide, and the tillage systems were randomized in the main plots. Weeds were chemically controlled, and no previous old plowed soil was recorded under the plow depth. Wheat and maize were fertilized with 90 and 100 kg N ha−1, respectively, as well as with 12 kg P ha−1.

2.3. Sampling and Analysis

For the calibration model, three composed soil samples were taken from three 2 m wide pits of sites A in 1990, 1993, 2003, 2007, 2010, and 2012 and of site B in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2012. These soil samples were taken from at least two soil depths of the full A horizon and then C, N, and natural 13C abundance were determined (except for 13C in 2000). For the validation during the T period, soil samples were taken from a 2 m wide pit by site in 1990 for all sites (Table 1). Ten measurements of horizon thickness were obtained. Soils were collected in A11/Ap, A12, and A3/BA horizons. Ten 1 kg simple samples were sampled in each horizon to compose one soil sample. For the validation model during the NT period, in June, before carrying out the tillage previous to maize in W/S-M, SS, and MM (2004, 2008, and 2012), soil samples were taken at three depths: 0–5, 5–10, and 10–20 cm. Three sites were chosen at random for subsampling in each of the treatments, avoiding visible wheel tracks. In the selected sampling years, we covered the full A horizon thickness.

Samples were dried and sieved finer than 2 mm. Organic matter more coarse than 2 mm was taken into account in this study. Particle size was measured according to the pipette method [54]. C, N, and 13C contents were determined by dry combustion with a mass spectrometer (Fisons/Isochrom) coupled with a CN analyzer (Carlo Erba NA 1500). Soil bulk density (BD) measurements were used to transform mass-based measurements into volume-based ones. BD was determined by the cylinder method [55]. During the first period of validation, BD was measured with 50 or 200 cm−3 cylinders, and four replications were sampled in each soil horizon. In the experiments, in a place adjacent to the disturbed sample, a small pit of 0–30 cm depth was opened, and a cylinder was extracted at each depth. The cylinder (58.9 cm3) was placed vertically at 0–5 cm and horizontally at the other two soil depths. All the samples were dried in an oven at 105°C to constant weight. A mass of 2500 Mg ha−1 was chosen to calculate SOC and SON stocks.

2.4. Estimation of Organic Additions

In order to estimate organic additions, culture succession, crop yield, residue removal by burning, and nitrogen fertilization were retained in each field. Before 1947, we used an average yield from typical maize-wheat or maize-linseed sequences in a proportion of 2 or 3 maize crops for each wheat or linseed, depending on the geographical zone and farmer declaration on the proportion. Values for the crop residue additions were based on measured straw [56] as well as on inputs from stem bases and roots calculated as follows: straw harvest index (crop yield/total air dry matter) before 1947 were 0.20, 0.20, and 0.10 for maize, wheat, and linseed, respectively, between 1948 and 1990 were 0.40, 0.36, 0.23, 0.40, 0.36, 0.38, and 0.30 for maize, wheat, soybean, sunflower, sorghum, oat, pea, and lentil, respectively, and after 1990 were 0.50, 0.42, and 0.38 for maize, wheat, and soybean; below-ground C biomass, including roots and rhizodeposits, was considered 0.30 of the total air dry matter for all crops [57]; after harvest, aerial crop residue biomass was reduced to 15% of total aerial crop residue due to burning of maize, linseed, and wheat straws from start of cultivation to mechanical harvest and from W/S during the 1970s. This biomass was considered as black carbon; the C/N ratios before 1990 were 87 for maize, 96 for wheat, 44 for soybean, 24 for sorghum, 12 for prairies, 55 for linseed, 74 for clover, 49 for sunflower, 7 for carrot, 17 for lentil, 29 for pea, 23 for vetch, and 67 for black carbon, whereas those after 1990 were 57 and 64 for maize and wheat, respectively, due to an increase in mineral nitrogen fertilization rate; the C content of straw and below-ground biomass was assumed to be 40% of the total dry matter; and the C biomass from weeds was assumed as 1 Mg ha−1 year−1 before mechanical weed control was replaced by chemical control (~1990).

In the experiments, annual yields and aerial biomass were used to estimate organic additions and the straw harvest index, below-ground C biomass, and C/N ratios found after 1990 were used. The C content was also 40% of the total dry matter, and no C biomass from weeds was considered.

2.5. Three-Compartment Model

The basic equations of AMG model (Figure 2) are the following [43]: where is the SOC amount (Mg ha−1), Cs is the stable amount (Mg ha−1), Ca is the active amount (Mg ha−1), is the mass of annual input (represents the total mass of organic carbon returned to soil through all crop residues (straw, stubble, roots, and rhizodeposits, in Mg ha−1 year−1), is the humification coefficient (unitless), and is the mineralization coefficient of the active pool (yr−1).

These equations can be integrated if is considered constant every year. Then, the evolution of the carbon reserve may be described by the following equation: where is the initial SOC amount (Mg ha−1). In (2), the second term on the right side represents the decomposition of the “old carbon” (i.e., existing at time 0), while the third term represents the (net) newly humified carbon which reaches an asymptote: where is the maximum quantity of soil C originated from crop sequences (Mg ha−1) and Ceq is the total quantity of soil at equilibrium (Mg ha−1).

This model is traditionally used to describe the turnover of SOC. Here we also use it to simulate the turnover of soil total SON stock where Ns is the amount of stable N (Mg ha−1), is the amount of initial active N (Mg ha−1), is the amount of initial total N (Mg ha−1), is the amount of N from crop residues annually added to soil (Mg ha−1 year−1), is the humification coefficient (unitless), and is the mineralization coefficient of the active fraction (year−1).

2.6. Calibration Procedure

As stated previously, the data set obtained from two long-term experiments (sites A and B) was used to calibrate the AMG model. The second and third terms of (2) were determined separately by using the 13C natural abundance technique which allows obtaining a unique evaluation of the parameters , , and Cs in long-term experiments [43, 58].

Since we needed measurements of natural δ13C abundance to establish the origin of the SOM in each site, we used the technique developed by Cerri et al. [59] and Balesdent et al. [60]. The proportion of soil C derived from C3 crops () was calculated as where is the isotopic abundance of 13C in the soil at time (‰), is the isotopic abundance of 13C in the soil at time (‰) taken at the reference, and is the isotopic abundance of 13C of the crop in the crop sequence (‰). These last values were −26.3 and −24.98‰  for A and B sites A and B, respectively [43].

When is known, the young and old carbon contents can be calculated. The contents (g kg−1 soil) derived from crop sequence residues (CDC) and native prairie or after long-term cultivation period (CDP) in our case were calculated as where represents the total content of bulk soil (g kg−1 soil).

The SOC stocks (total, originated from crop sequences and native prairie, in Mg ha−1) were calculated using the following equation: where represents , CDC, or CDP, is the depth (m), and BD is the bulk density (Mg m−3) of the corresponding soil depth. SON stocks were also calculated at 2500 Mg soil ha−1.

We tried to fit the two C models (young and old) at the same time, that is, by minimizing the sums of the square of deviations from the model for the variables CDC and CDP. While optimizing, we took account of the variance of the data by weighting the sums of squares of deviations. The following quantity was minimized as follows: where SSQDC and SSQDP are the sums of squares of deviations (observed, simulated) of the variables CDC and CDP, respectively; and are the mean experimental variances obtained for the variables CDC and CDP. Fitting was performed by fixing and and optimizing three parameters: Cs, , and .

In the case of N, , , and Ns were treated as follow.

(a) values were optimized and fixed in T and NT period, respectively, and in this last period the same value estimated in SOC simulation was used; (b) in the cultivation period and optimized in the NT period; (c) Ns values were optimized in both tillage periods.

The values to simulate SON evolution are different from those used to simulate SOC evolution. The value adopted for SON simulation for all residues during the cultivation period means that N harvest residue addition is completely humified. This hypothesis is supported by 15N-labeled harvest residue incubations mixed with the soil [61].

To judge the goodness of fit of the SOC and SON models, we used the absolute root mean square error (RMSE), in Mg ha−1, defined as follows: where is the number of observations of each data set , and and are the observed and simulated values of SOC (SON), respectively. The optimization was conducted using the Newton’s method of Excel solver.

2.7. Validation Procedure

The proportions of stable pool to total SOC at the beginning of the simulations, estimated from the model calibration in the Pergamino soil series for sites A and B were applied in the soil series included in the T and NT validation periods. The proposed default value of the relationship (0.65) was not used because it can vary along the agriculture period and can be smaller in the native grassland [62]. The SOCreference (native grassland) used for the sites included in the cultivation period were obtained from Michelena et al. [20]. The values obtained by calibration were only applied for soybean culture. The values used for the other crops were taken from international references, according to the evolution of different residue management practices (stubble burning, mineral N and P fertilization, tillage system, and weed control). As normally accepted, the value of is highly dependent on the pedoclimatic conditions and tillage systems. Thus, we used the environmental functions proposed by Saffih-Hdadi and Mary [46] with the introduction of a third environmental factor (rainfall index) during the cultivation period. The value obtained from NT calibration was used for the NT period.

The mineralization rate depends particularly on soil temperature (Te), clay content , and a simple rainfall index (RI): where is the potential mineralization rate (year−1) in reference conditions and , , and are the temperature, clay, and rainfall functions, equal to 1 in reference conditions. The reference conditions are defined here as 15°C soil temperature, zero clay content, and 900 mm annual rain. The effect of clay content on mineralization of SOC is described by an exponential law: where is the clay content (g g−1 soil) and is a constant (g soil g−1 clay) with value of 2.72. The effect of temperature (Te, °C) on mineralization of humified organic matter is assumed to obey a logistic law:

The effect of water content on mineralization of SOM and residues was based on a very simple macroclimatic index since soil water data were not available. We assume the following relationship between mean annual precipitation () and annual potential evapotranspiration calculated by Thornwhite method (PET), both expressed in mm, considering and PET from the 1910–2012 period 965 mm and 870 mm, respectively (INTA, soil data network) (Table 2).


0.5; 0.6 0.5
0.6; 0.7 0.6
0.7; 0.8 0.7
0.8; 0.9 0.8
0.9; 1.0 0.9

In the model, the humification coefficient was only dependent on the quality of the residues. The values of all crops included in crop sequences extracted from published values are shown in Table 3.

DefaultStubble burning from aerial∣root biomass Mineral N/P fertilizationMechanicall weed controlNT


Taken from: a[43]; b[29, 47]; c[67]; d[46]; e[65].
NT: no tillage.

The values assumed for the ratio were very close to those obtained during the model calibration. Besides, values were fixed considering that all N additions are completely humified regardless of the type of tillage [61]. The initial SONreference for T sites was estimated using a C/N (we averaged SOC/NOC contents of the three sites without agriculture history of this paper (Table 1) and those reported by Michelena et al. [20].

Finally, to obtain the goodness of fit of the AMG model simulated versus observed SOC and SON values were compared separately for the T and NT periods.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Model Calibration

Figure 3 shows the evolution of the average 13C values and their depth distribution for the two study sites. The effect of C incorporation issued from C3 species in the SOM was recorded by decreasing 13C values in time. These results allowed progress in monitoring the young and old SOC compartments. In site B, where maize crops occupied half of the cropping history, the previous agricultural period enriched the δ13SOC (−18.3‰  at 0–14 cm soil depth) which had started from mixed C3/C4 grasslands (−19.6‰  at 0–14 cm soil depth).

The model fit to data using the Cs, , and values issued from 13C measurements in sites A and B is presented in Figure 4. The parameter settings used worked very well, and the model described the general trends in the soil carbon data well (RMSE 1.13 and 0.94 Mg SOC ha−1 for sites A and B resp.) despite the small available number 13C measurements to obtain the parameter values during the NT period.

The Cs values found were very similar in both sites, both in a situation of recent agriculture and in one of old agriculture (Table 4). Hence, the size of this pool can be considered as a valid indicator for the full period of the Pergamino soil series under agriculture. The SOC content of the A horizon was 12.5–13.0 mg SOC g−1. A similar result had been previously obtained in soils of this region [43]. This value represents 47% at the beginning of agriculture and 67% at the beginning of NT, 80 years after cultivation. These values are in agreement with previous reports in different countries [46, 62, 63]. The rate constant of mineralization was 0.108 and 0.078 year−1 and in agreement with the climate and soil conditions previously set, indicating a rapid transition to a new equilibrium under cultivation (mean residence time—MRT—of the active fraction ~9 years) and a significant decrease under NT (MRT ~13 years), respectively. In site A, the value was the same as that been previously obtained [64] and higher than that obtained for cereal crop (0.21) combining the AMG model with the 13C technique [65]. Soybean residue decomposes relatively faster than cereal residues and stimulates the mineralization of SOM [66]. However, as it has higher lignin content, its soil stabilization is favored when it is incorporated into the soil [56]. The value under NT was markedly smaller than under cultivation and slightly higher than that obtained by other authors [65, 66].

SiteFixed parametersOptimized parametersPredicted values at equilibrium
m k Csk Ceq
Mg ha−1Mg ha−1 year−1year−1Mg ha−1year−1Mg ha−1


k Nsk Neq
Mg ha−1Mg ha−1 year−1year−1Mg ha−1year−1Mg ha−1


The estimated annual C addition in crop sequences of sites A and B, with a very high proportion of soybean, is characteristic in the Rolling Pampa [68]. In both sites, the technology was unable to maintain existing SOC stocks. Novelli et al. [69] found that the SOC storage was negatively associated with the soybean cropping frequency in the cropping sequences. After the introduction of agriculture in site A, there was a rapid loss of SOC (25%) during the first ten years, followed by a period with a lower loss (15%) in 23 years. In site B, NT implementation after a long history of continuous cultivation led to a loss of SOC of 15%. At the equilibrium, the active fraction would represent 23 and 19% in sites A and B, respectively.

The same general trends were observed for the soil nitrogen data which were well described by the model: RMSE 0.04 and 0.05 Mg SON ha−1 for sites A and B, respectively (Figure 5). The two crop sequences had similar N additions. However, the size of Ns was smaller in site B than in site A (Table 4). This difference can be explained by the previous agriculture history. In site B, the long cultivation period without N fertilization, where maize culture occupied half of the total crop sequence and the other crops such as wheat and linseed with high C/N ratios before the NT period, led to a poor N resistant pool (). In contrast, soybean monoculture, implemented after a pristine prairie, showed a relatively high stable N pool (). Besides, since under NT part of the crop residues are not in contact with the soil, the value under NT was smaller than that in tilled soils. As a consequence, a similar addition tended to higher Neq in site A than in site B.

In site A, was 3.2 Mg ha−1. Then, the nitrogen mineralized during the first period of cultivation was large enough for crop requirements and the nonused mineral nitrogen was likely leached out of the rooting zone and into subterranean water reserves. The optimized values and the proportion of the stable fraction were close for SOC and SON. Similar results have been informed by Mary and Guérif [70] for the Rothamsted trials.

3.2. Model Validation

Mean SOC and SON contents and BD values of the sites surveyed and clay content at 2500 Mg soil ha−1 are shown in Table 5. Low variability of soil texture is observed among the study sites. Besides, some of the sites sampled during the T period did not meet the requirement of soil mass that is to have an A horizon with 2500 Mg ha−1.

SymbolSoil typeAgriculture timeDepthBulk densityCarbonNitrogenClayRequirement
yearscmMg m−3 g Kg−12500 Mg ha−1

T period
PeTypic Argiudoll0141471.071.11.2530.
CrTypic Argiudoll03071.191.2626.
UrTypic Argiudoll02881.071.2530.519.82.81.624.6Pass
RoTypic Argiudoll2131281.11.181.2724.923.714.
PyVertic Argiudoll5161071.071.221.2524.318.
Ro5Typic Argiudoll8221.17231.90.023.9Pass
LGAeric Argialboll34111131.181.181.222021.
RoTypic Argiudoll35151081.11.221.319.118.911.
Pe6 o Py2xTypic Argiudoll401841.191.3115.
Ve2Typic Argiudoll551581.221.2415.
LGAeric Argialboll6016581.231.281.319.119.411.
AD2Typic Argiudoll64201.25181.422.1Pass
AD2Typic Argiudoll7016571.231.411.3516.115.9141.
UrTypic Argiudoll7212651.151.361.3818.718.516.
Ar2Typic Argiudoll72201.2515.21.119.7Fail
Cr1Typic Argiudoll751681.191.319.417.31.51.424.1Fail
PeTypic Argiudoll8016571.251.321.281918.418.
Ro4Typic Argiudoll80151.2518.91.519.7Fail
AD2Typic Argiudoll832051.261.3519.720.71.41.923.5Pass
PyVertic Argiudoll8415871.221.381.2819.418.618.
Py1 ó Py2xVertic Argiudoll871551.281.2919.820.51.51.921.6Fail
Py2xVertic Argiudoll112131.2216.31.221.2Fail
Ca1Vertic Argiudoll1132061.241.312.712.21.00.923.2Fail

NT period
PeTypic Argiudoll010101.21.342016.41.91.6Pass
PeTypic Argiudoll010101.221.3516.815.71.51.4Pass
PeTypic Argiudoll010101.221.3417.1161.71.6Pass
PeTypic Argiudoll1755101.161.31.3317.214.314.
PeTypic Argiudoll1755101.141.271.3321.
PeTypic Argiudoll2155101.161.331.3417.614.
PeTypic Argiudoll2155101.271.391.3819.814.914.
PeTypic Argiudoll2555101.201.391.3823.616.514.
PeTypic Argiudoll2555101.151.331.3619.114.113.4Pass
PeTypic Argiudoll2555101.191.311.3821.115.214.2Pass
PeTypic Argiudoll2955101.161.321.3722.116.315.
PeTypic Argiudoll3355101.021.331.3621.615.914.9Pass

T: tillage; NT: no tillage.

The AMG model was able to provide satisfactory simulation of the evolution of SOC and SON stocks in the sites that satisfied soil mass requirement in the cultivation period (Figure 6).

Figure 7 shows the evolution of SOC and SON stocks of all the sites surveyed during the T period. Some variability was observed in the data set partly due to the nature of this study (i.e., survey). A part of the mentioned variation can be attributed to the vertical and horizontal spatial variation of surface deposits. This was confirmed by considering the three virgin sites which showed values of 65, 68, and 76 Mg SOC ha−1. These three values are in the content range reported for the virgin soils of the study area [20, 71]. These reports showed SOC contents which translated in storage values ranging from 60 to 80 Mg SOC ha−1 for a soil mass of 2500 Mg ha−1. So, we are confident that the current soil C storage of virgin soils corresponds to the C storage present in the last century. Also, certain cultivated sites with less than 40 Mg SOC ha−1 belong to soil series with high C contents in virgin state (Table 1 and Figure 7(a)). Therefore, variations in the observed SOC stocks cannot be completely explained by natural variability.

Water erosion can also explain part of the data variability, since it has been previously mentioned as a very important cause of losses in zones with high slopes [71]. Data showed that several sites older than 40 years are in slopes higher than 1% (Table 1). Six of these sites showed SOC stocks lower (≤40 Mg SOC ha−1) than the average stock of all T sites (Figure 7(a)). On the other hand, one of the sites with five years of tillage and a slope higher than 1.5% showed a SOC stock lower than that of the other young sites (Table 1 and Figure 7(a)). Furthermore, a decrease in the A horizon mass was observed in the soils located in slopes higher than 1% (Table 1). On the other hand, soil survey maps classify the soils with slopes higher than 1% as eroded phases [4853]. We are therefore confident that some of the losses for the sites with slopes higher than 1% are due to erosion. The sites with an A horizon soil mass smaller than 2500 Mg ha−1 were not taken into account in the validation (Table 5).

On average, during the first twenty years of cultivation, the SOC storage varied from 70 to 51 Mg ha−1 and SON storage varied from 6.6 to 4.5 Mg ha−1; this represents losses of 27 and 32% for SOC and SON, respectively (Figure 7). After the first twenty years, when water erosion was present (>1% slope), SOC and SON loss increased with the years of tillage. For instance, a soil with a slope higher than 1% had about 47 and 57% SOC and SON losses, respectively, after 40 years of tillage. A site located in the same soil series but after 112 years of tillage had 63 and 72% SOC and SON losses, respectively (dotted line). When erosion was not a factor, for instance the Pergamino soil series, SOC and SON losses were 30 and 43%, respectively. After 80 years of tillage, losses in the Pergamino soil series were in agreement with those in the other sites. This suggests that SOC and SON changes obtained by survey were the same as those obtained from long-term experiment evolution.

Average Cs, , and validated values were  Mg ha−1, year−1, and , respectively, whereas average and values were  Mg ha−1 and  Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively (solid line of Figure 7(a)). The average crop residue C input was necessary to maintain the equilibrium C level in 48 Mg ha−1 (19 mg C kg−1 soil). The active fraction changed from 37 Mg ha−1 at the beginning to 15 Mg C ha−1 at equilibrium. Average Ns and validated values were  Mg ha−1 and year−1, respectively, whereas average and values were  Mg ha−1 and  Mg ha−1 year−1 (solid line of Figure 7(b)).

The value obtained using the Saffih-Hdadi and Mary approximation was very close to the optimized value (0.106) and can be recommended to use under conventional tillage conditions. Overall, the MRT of the active compartment would be included in 9 years. This is twice the MRT of the North American prairie [72]. This model clearly shows that equilibrium is reached after the first 20 years following cultivation of grassland. The annual mineralization coefficient () from the three-compartment model can be compared with the annual mineralization coefficient () from the single-compartment model using the following relation: values varied with tillage time, from 0.056  year−1 at the beginning to 0.03 year−1 at equilibrium. The value from the active fraction was 2- to 3-fold higher than the values. Our values are intermediate between the Australian values (from 0.065 to 1.22 year−1) obtained by Dalal and Mayer [73] and the British value (0.008 year−1) obtained by Mary and Guérif [70] or French values (from 0.008 [74] to 0.03 year−1 [75]). Australian studies were carried out in a subtropical climate with average temperatures from 18.5 to 20.5°C, while British and French studies were carried out in a temperate climate with average temperatures from 9 to 13.5°C. In our study, the average temperature was 17°C.

The inclusion of the RI factor caused no changes in the estimated value: the Saffih-Hdadi and Mary approximation without inclusion of the RI factor gave a mean value of . As expected, the only model parameter that showed a difference with the value obtained for soybean in the calibrated model was due to the inclusion of residue management recorded by the survey. The crop history of the cultivation period showed similar crop sequences in all the sites in the last twenty years (1970–1990s) (data not shown). In general, organic additions were greater than those in the preceding period (Figure 8).

Before the 1960s, typical crop rotations were maize wheat or maize linseed, sometimes sunflower, with a ratio 2-3 years of maize to 1 year of wheat or linseed or sunflower. Residue burning was a common practice until 1950 and the oldest farmers declared that crop yields were much lower before 1960. After 1960, there was important technical progress (fall tillage, improvement of the drilling technique, better selection of soils, advances in crop protection, better harvesting efficiency, and genetic progress), which resulted in significant yield improvements [7]. Hence, in the older sites, it is probable that crop additions and SOC contents progressively decreased with time (1960–1970s). At that moment, INTA reported that SOC contents under annual crops had decreased from 28.0 to 13.5 mg g−1, that is, about 30 Mg SOC ha−1 after 70 years of crop cultivation [71]. Moreover, soybean introduction double cropped with wheat and the significant decrease of straw burning probably contributed to the increase in C additions into the soil. Thus, the decrease suffered by SOC and SON stocks observed in 1990 may have been higher before than after the 1960–1970s.

In general, the losses observed in our study are greater than those observed in other climatic regions with the same initial vegetation (grassland) [76]. Several reasons can explain these apparent faster losses in the soils of the Rolling Pampa.

One possible explanation is that the sites with less than twenty years of tillage (1970–1990s), as opposed to the oldest sites, have been, in general, cropped in soybean monoculture or soybean double cropped with wheat with many tillage operations per year, including mechanical weed control, and sometimes carried out under conditions, which favored mineralization. Besides, we have previously suggested that soybean accelerates SOM decomposition [77]. The comparison of the SOC stocks between soybean monoculture (site A) and crop rotations (T period) 33 years after the introduction of agriculture showed a smaller SOC stock with soybean monoculture than with crop rotation (Figure 7(a)).

Another factor which could explain the changes in SOC storage after grassland cultivation is the decrease in the amounts of crop residue additions. Our calculations show that under native vegetation, organic additions are as important as under cultivation, that is, about 3-4 Mg C ha−1 year−1. Aboveground production is presently substantially greater than the estimated production of native grassland. Hence, apparently, this factor cannot explain the differences observed.

SON losses were more important than SOC losses, except in the case of soybean monoculture of the site A (Figure 7(b)), where the C/N ratio increased with time of cultivation (from 10-11 to 12–14), indicating the presence of physically protected SOM, with a low C/N ratio and a labile pool in the virgin soil with a faster mineralization rate than the rest of SOM during cultivation. Apparently, in uncultivated soils, macroaggregation plays an important role in N protection [7880]. Opposed trends in C/N have been reported in other studies where N fertilizers are regularly applied [2, 28]. We can assume that resistant organic fractions increased with time. Soils with a long period of cultivation would have a residual SOM that would mineralize less N. On the other hand, C/N ratios from sites with slopes >1% are not systematically greater than those from sites with slopes <1%. Therefore, we conclude that losses of N with the time under tillage were not due to erosion.

Farmer surveys not only have the advantage of their low cost but also provide the required information on equilibrium values of SOC and SON. The principal problem is that they mix sites with a different crop history. Despite the measure of the true Rolling Pampa crop history in the oldest sites, there is not the same history in the youngest sites.

Overall, the results in the Rolling Pampa after 120 years of tillage indicate that the SOM is composed of two pools: an active pool with a rapid turnover (MRT ~9 years) which represents 50% of SOC (SON) in the native prairie soil and a stable pool. SOM storage after 120 years of tillage is probably a result of an important decrease in the active fraction of a native soil, which would not be compensated by the inputs from the crops. At equilibrium, the active fraction would represent only 30% of the SOC and 20% of the SON.

In the NT period, the AMG model showed a better simulation of SOC and SON evolution than in the cultivation period (Figure 9). In this period, both the site used for calibration and that used for validation belonged to the same soil series and were implemented in similar times (1980–2012s). We could have done the calibration of this period using the long-term trials, even without sufficient information on 13C measurements, but decided not to use them because there is no accurate information from the previous agricultural history cycles, corresponding to alternated agriculture and pasture cycles.

Despite the high value obtained for SOC, the model tended to underestimate them in M-W/S and MM sequences and overestimate them in SS. This fate is correlated with the quantity of annual C addition: 2.9, 4.2, and 4.8 Mg ha−1 year−1 in SS, MM, and M-W/S sequences, respectively (Table 6). The crop sequences with more C addition tended to have higher observed SOC stocks, although observed SOC stocks in M-W/S and MM had a higher variation among years than simulated stocks. Another factor causing high variability was the size of the stable pool, Cs. The size of this pool was fixed for all the sequences evaluated (32 Mg SOC ha−1). However, it is likely that the size under NT tended to be a little higher in MM and M-W/S and relatively lower in SS. A Cs of 33.9, 32.6 and 30.4 Mg ha−1 increases the value to 0.92. In general, a similar behaviour was observed for SON simulations among the different crop sequences, although with better quality adjustment than with SOC. The value was fixed at 0.83 for the three sequences. It is likely that in M-W/S the humification of N is higher than in SS and MM. Stemmer et al. [81] found that the mineralization of maize was delayed when straw was left on the surface and attributed it to the low contact of the residue with the soil. In MM, part of the maize stalks would be incorporated very slowly because they remain standing after the harvest and because their nature and morphology offer a contact surface with the soil of about half of that of wheat stubble [82]. However, in M-W/S, during the W/S period, the fall of soybean leaves with annual frequency from the R6/R7 stage, which have very low C/N relationships, stimulates the breakdown of residues and becomes a nitrogen fertilization of low dose (around 25 kg N ha−1) [83] that leads to the formation of labile fractions very processed by fungal activity [84]. The values of 1 and 0.63 for M-W/S and MM increased the value to 0.95.

Crop sequenceC0m
Mg ha−1Mg ha−1 year−1Mg ha−1

SS40.5 (2)2.8 (0.6 )0.4737.9
MM41.0 (2)4.2 (1.8)0.5538.9
W/S-M45.3 (0.8)4.8 (0.8)0.6740.4

N0 Neq
Mg ha−1Mg ha−1 year−1Mg ha−1

SS4.05 (0.2)0.068 (0.01)0.0573.3
MM4.20 (0.2)0.074 (0.03)0.0613.55
W/S-M4.33 (0.1)0.090 (0.01)0.0763.71

C0 (N0): initial soil C (N) stock; m ( ): annual C (N) addition; ( ): maximum humified C (N) stock; Ceq (Neq): soil C (N) stock at equilibrium. SS: soybean monoculture; MM: maize monoculture; W/S-M: doubled-cropped wheat/soybean maize.

The SOC stocks at the beginning of the MM and SS (Table 6) were smaller than SOC stocks found at equilibrium of the T period (Figure 7(a)), whereas the SON stocks showed the opposite pattern (Table 6 and Figure 7(b)). Soybean conventionally tilled before to the start of monocultures probably decreased the SOC stocks but not the SON stocks as happened in the same Figure 7 at the site A.

All sequences tended to decrease the SOC and SON stocks by 5–9% and 25–27% (Table 6). The higher initial organic stocks increased further losses.

The Ca varied from 8.0, 9.0, and 13.3 Mg ha−1 at the beginning to 7.2, 7.0, and 9.2 at equilibrium for SS, MM and M-W/S, respectively. When equilibrium is reached, this fraction would represent 18, 18, and 22% of SOC. It would be necessary to increase the annual C addition by 40–45% to maintain the value in SS and M-W/S, respectively.

The active fraction Na varied from 1.38, 1.43, and 1.50 Mg ha−1 at the beginning to 0.63, 0.78, and 0.85 at equilibrium for SS, MM, and M-W/S, respectively. When equilibrium is reached, this fraction would represent 19, 22, and 23% of SON.

Overall, the results indicate that although the NT implementation in the rich SOM soils of the Rolling Pampa after a century of continuous agriculture contributed to a decrease in the SOM mineralization rate (overall MRT of active SOM compartment would be included in 13 years), the system also implies a low humification from harvest crop residues addition. The active fraction continued to decrease even in cases of high C and N input rates. At equilibrium, this fraction would represent between 20 and 25% of the overall SOM, corresponding to very high and low soybean frequency in crop sequences, respectively.

In 2010, we sampled fourteen new sites of Pergamino soils with a long time of continuous agriculture and at least five years under NT to obtain the SOC and NOC stocks at time zero of the future independent validation sites. The SOC and NOC values were  and (data not shown). The AMG model previsions for the next 30 years are 15 and 20% in SOM loss in the sites where organic reserves are highest and annual C additions are 2.8 and 4.8 Mg ha−1 year−1, respectively; meanwhile, SOM will remain steady and will tend to go up slightly for the same inputs in the sites where organic reserves are smallest. Using the Century model for the same region, Caride et al. [85] predicted a decrease of 15% in SOM for the next 60 years, in agreement with our results.

A strategy to balance the decreasing tendency in SOM reserves is to increase the residue addition to the soil by means of intensification of sequences, including the use of cover crops [86].

4. Conclusions

The approach used to reconstitute the overall continuous agriculture history (T + NT periods) from grassland soils of the rolling Pampa was successful. During the cultivation period, the decrease in SOC and SON storage was due to two causes: a loss through biological activity and a loss through erosion. The samples were stratified (according to landscape position), allowing the selection of situations where biotransformation processes are dominant. The simple AMG model adequately simulated the evolution of SOC and SON stocks both during the T period and in the NT period when the erosion was not a major factor regarding N and C losses. The stable pool represented near 50% of total SOC and SON before cultivation and its proportion increased with the increase in agriculture time. The active fraction presented a rapid turnover during the T period ( years), which slowed down during the NT period ( years). The environmental functions used over the active mineralization rate worked very well in tillage soils, and the values found were very close to those obtained with 13C measurements. During the first twenty years, there was a loss of 27% for SOC and 32% for SON, and after that the equilibrium was apparently reached. The soils remained rich in SOM reserves. The NT applied in these conditions reduced not only the active mineralization rate but also the humification coefficient. In consequence, a slow new loss was produced: SOM storage after 140 years of continuous agriculture is probably the result of an important decrease in the active fraction, which would not be compensated by the inputs from the crops. A reduction of 20% or no reduction of the SOM reserves is expected in this region for the next 30 years with the average C (3.8 Mg C ha−1 year−1) and N (0.08 Mg N ha−1 year−1) annual addition, in the sites with the current highest (85.2 Mg SOM ha−1 year−1) and the smallest (66.7 Mg SOM ha−1 year−1) SOM, respectively.


The authors thank Jérôme Guérif for contributing to put all the available means to carry out this work and Denis Angers for the assistance in compiling the paper, Leticia García, Liliana Darder, and Olivier Delfosse for laboratory assistance, and Diego Colombini, Fabio Villalba, and Alberto Rondán for field assistance. This study was supported by National INTA and PICT 2004 21078 Projects.


  1. H. Jenny, Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1941.
  2. C. A. Campbell, “Soil organic carbon, nitrogen and fertility,” in Soil Organic Matter, M. Schnitzer and S. U. Kahn, Eds., pp. 173–272, Elsevier Scientific Publishing, New York, NY, USA, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. P. Voroney, J. A. Van Veen, and E. A. Paul, “Organic C dynamics in grassland soils. 2. Model validation and simulation of the long-term effects of cultivation and rainfall erosion,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 211–224, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. Tiessen and J. W. B. Stewart, “Particle-size fractions and their use in studies of soil organic matter. II. Cultivation effects on organic matter composition in size fractions,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 509–514, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  5. I. C. Burke, C. M. Yonker, W. J. Parton, C. V. Cole, K. Flach, and D. S. Schimel, “Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 800–805, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. A. Bowman, J. D. Reeder, and R. W. Lober, “Changes in soil properties in a central Plains rangeland soil after 3, 20, and 60 years of cultivation,” Soil Science, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 851–857, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. J. Hall, C. M. Rebella, C. M. Ghersa, and J. P. H. Culot, “Field Crop systems of the pampas,” in Field Crop Ecosystems, C. J. Pearson, Ed., pp. 413–450, Elsevier, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  8. W. M. Post and K. C. Kwon, “Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential,” Global Change Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 317–327, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. K. Mann, “Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation,” Soil Science, vol. 142, pp. 279–288, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. R. Olson, “Soil organic carbon sequestration, storage, retention and loss in U.S. croplands: issues paper for protocol development,” Geoderma, vol. 195-196, pp. 201–206, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  11. E. G. Gregorich, M. R. Carter, D. A. Angers, C. M. Monreal, and B. H. Ellert, “Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 367–385, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  12. D. W. Reeves, “The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 131–167, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. Giacometti, M. S. Demyan, L. Cavani, C. Marzadori, C. Ciavatta, and E. Kandeler, “Chemical and microbiological soil quality indicators and their potential to differentiate fertilization regimes in temperate agroecosystems,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 64, pp. 32–48, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. C. Senigagliesi and M. Ferrari, “Soil and crop responses to alternative tillage practices,” in International Crop Science I, D. R. Buxton, R. Shibles, R. A. Forsberg et al., Eds., pp. 27–35, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wis, USA, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Sillanpää, Micronutrients and the Nutrient Status of Soils: A global Study, Issue 48, FAO, Roma, Italy, 1982.
  16. J. J. De Battista, A. E. Andriulo, M. C. Ferrari, and C. Pecorari, “Evaluation of the soils structural condition under various tillage systems in the pampa humeda (Argentina),” in Proceedings of the 13th ISTRO Conference, pp. 99–103, Aalborg, Denmark, July 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. F. Viglizzo, F. Lértora, A. J. Pordomingo, J. N. Bernardos, Z. E. Roberto, and H. Del Valle, “Ecological lessons and applications from one century of low external-input farming in the pampas of Argentina,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 83, no. 1-2, pp. 65–81, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. AAPRESID, “Evolución de la superficie en Siembra Directa en Argentina,” Asociación Argentina de Productores de Siembra Directa, 2013, View at: Google Scholar
  19. “Sistema integrado de información agropecuaria,” 2013, View at: Google Scholar
  20. R. O. Michelena, C. B. Irurtia, F. A. Vavruska, R. Mon, and A. Pittaluga, “Degradación de suelos en el norte de la región pampeana,” Publicación Técnica 6, Proyecto de Agricultura Conservacionista, INTA, Pergamino, Argentina, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. B. Restovich, A. E. Andriulo, and C. Amendola, “Introduction of cover crops in a soybean-corn rotation: effect on some soil properties,” Ciencia Del Suelo, vol. 29, pp. 61–73, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. B. Restovich, A. E. Andriulo, and S. I. Portela, “Introduction of cover crops in a maize-soybean rotation of the Humid Pampas: effect on nitrogen and water dynamics,” Field Crops Research, vol. 128, pp. 62–70, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. C. Sasal, A. E. Andriulo, and M. A. Taboada, “Soil porosity characteristics and water movement under zero tillage in silty soils in Argentinian Pampas,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. I. Portela, A. E. Andriulo, E. G. Jobbágy, and M. C. Sasal, “Water and nitrate exchange between cultivated ecosystems and groundwater in the Rolling Pampas,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 134, no. 3-4, pp. 277–286, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. C. Sasal, M. G. Castiglioni, and M. G. Wilson, “Effect of crop sequences on soil properties and runoff on natural-rainfall erosion plots under no tillage,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 24–29, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. L. Darder, M. C. Sasal, M. G. Wilson, A. Andriulo, and A. Paz Gonzales, “Pérdida de nitrógeno en sedimentos por escurrimiento bajo distintas secuencias de cultivo en siembra directa,” in Proceedings of the 4th Congreso sobre Uso y Manejo de Suelo, La Coruña, España, July 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. A. Campbell, K. E. Bowren, M. Schnitzer, R. P. Zentner, and L. Townley-Smith, “Effect of crop rotations and fertilization on soil organic matter and some biochemical properties of a thick Black Chernozem,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 377–387, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  28. P. E. Rasmussen and W. J. Parton, “Long-term effects of residue management in wheat-fallow. I: inputs, yield, and soil organic matter,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 523–530, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. S. Jenkinson, “The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil,” Philosophical Transactions B, vol. 329, no. 1255, pp. 361–368, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  30. C. Pecorari, J. Guérif, and P. Stengel, “Fitolitos en los suelos pampeanos. Influencia sobre las propiedades físicas determinantes de los mecanismos elementales de la evolución de la estructura,” Ciencia Del Suelo, vol. 8, pp. 135–141, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  31. F. Bartoli, Le Cycle Biogéochimique du Silicium sur Roche Acide: Application à Deux Ecosystèmes Forestières Tempérés (Vosges) [Thèse de doctorat], Université Nancy, 1981.
  32. F. Andreux, S. Bruckert, A. Correa, and B. Souchier, “Sur une méthode de fractionnement physique et chimique des agrégats des sols: origines possibles de la matière organique des fractions obtenues,” Comptes Rendus de L'Académie des Sciences, vol. 291, pp. 381–384, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. Boiffin and A. Fleury, “Quelques conséquences agronomiques du retournement des prairies permanentes,” Annales Agronomiques, vol. 4, pp. 555–573, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Cambardella and E. T. Elliot, “Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 777–783, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  35. H. H. Janzen, C. A. Campbell, S. A. Brandt, G. P. Lafond, and L. Townley-Smith, “Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1799–1806, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  36. D. Arrouays, J. Balesdent, J. C. Germon, P. A. Jayet, J. F. Soussana, and P. Stengel, Stocker du Carbone dans les Sols agricoles de France?Expertise Scientifique Collective, 2002.
  37. D. A. Angers, “Changes in soil aggregation and organic carbon under corn and alfalfa,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1244–1249, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. S. Schimel, D. C. Coleman, and K. A. Horton, “Soil organic matter dynamics in paired rangeland and cropland toposequences in North Dakota,” Geoderma, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 201–214, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  39. P. Smith, J. U. Smith, D. S. Powlson et al., “A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments,” Geoderma, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 153–225, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Guérif, “Modification de la répartition et de l’évolution des matières organiques par la simplification du travail du sol: conséquences sur quelques propriétés physiques,” in Les Rotations Céréalières Intensives. Dix Années D’études Concertées, pp. 63–88, INRA-ONIC-ITCF, Paris, France, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  41. A. R. Kemanian and C. O. Stöckle, “C-Farm: a simple model to evaluate the carbon balance of soil profiles,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. T. Gollany, R. W. Rickman, Y. Liang, S. L. Albrecht, S. Machado, and S. Kang, “Predicting agricultural management influence on long-term soil organic carbon dynamics: implications for biofuel production,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 234–246, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Andriulo, B. Mary, and J. Guerif, “Modelling soil carbon dynamics with various cropping sequences on the rolling pampas,” Agronomie, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 365–377, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  44. S. Hénin and M. Dupuis, Essai de Bilan de la Matière Organique du Sol, 1945.
  45. N. Brisson, C. Gary, E. Justes et al., “An overview of the crop model STICS,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 18, no. 3-4, pp. 309–332, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Saffih-Hdadi and B. Mary, “Modeling consequences of straw residues export on soil organic carbon,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 594–607, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Boiffin, J. Zaghabi, and M. Sebillote, “Systèmes de culture et statut organique des sols dans le Noyonnais: application du modèle de Hénin-Dupuis,” Agronomie, vol. 6, pp. 437–446, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  48. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3360-32, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  49. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3360-31, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  50. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3560-3, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  51. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3360-19, Casilda, Santa Fe, Argentina, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  52. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3360-7 y 8, Totoras y Serodino, Santa Fe, Argentina, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  53. INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, “Carta de suelos de la República Argentina,” Hoja 3360-13 y 14, Cañada de Gómez y Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  54. A. Klute, Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Part 1, SSSA Book Series 5, 2nd edition, 1986.
  55. W. Burke, D. Gabriela, and J. Bruma, Soil Structure Assessment, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1986.
  56. G. E. Cordone, M. C. Ferrari, J. Ostojic, and G. Planas, “Post-harvest amount, quality and distribution of crop residue in the ‘Pampa Húmeda’ (Argentina),” in Agronomy Abstracts, ASA, CSSA, SSSA Annual Meetings, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  57. M. A. Bolinder, H. H. Janzen, E. G. Gregorich, D. A. Angers, and A. J. VandenBygaart, “An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 118, no. 1–4, pp. 29–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. G. A. Piccolo, A. E. Andriulo, and B. Mary, “Changes in soil organic matter under different land management in Misiones province (Argentina),” Scientia Agricola, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 290–297, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. C. Cerri, C. Feller, J. Balesdent, and A. Plenesassagne, “Application du traçage isotopique naturel en 13C à l’étude de la dynamique de la matière organique dans les sols,” Comptes Rendus De L'Académie Des Sciences, vol. 300, pp. 423–426, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  60. J. Balesdent, A. Mariotti, and B. Guillet, “Natural 13C abundance as a tracer for studies of soil organic matter dynamics,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  61. B. Mary and S. Recous, “Measurement of nitrogen mineralization and inmobilization fluxes in soil as a mean of predicting net mineralization,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 3, pp. 291–300, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  62. D. R. Huggins, G. A. Buyanovsky, G. H. Wagner et al., “Soil organic C in the tallgrass prairie-derived region of the corn belt: effects of long-term crop management,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 219–234, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. E. A. Paul, S. J. Morris, R. T. Conant, and A. F. Plante, “Does the acid hydrolysis-incubation method measure meaningful soil organic carbon pools?” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1023–1035, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. E. Andriulo, J. A. Galantini, and A. Irizar, “Fuentes de variación de los parámetros intervinientes en balances de carbono edáfico simplificados,” in Proceedings of the 19th Congreso Latinoamericano de la Ciencia del Suelo, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  65. B. Mary and R. Wylleman, “Characterization and modelling of organic C and N in soil in different cropping systems,” in Proceedings of the 11th Nitrogen Workshop,, pp. 251–252, Reims, France, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  66. D. R. Huggins, R. R. Allmaras, C. E. Clapp, J. A. Lamb, and G. W. Randall, “Corn-soybean sequence and tillage effects on soil carbon dynamics and storage,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Lehmann and J. Stephen, Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology, Earthscan, London-Sterling, UK, 2009.
  68. R. Alvarez, “Balance de carbono en los suelos,” 2013, View at: Google Scholar
  69. L. E. Novelli, O. P. Caviglia, and R. J. M. Melchiori, “Impact of soybean cropping frequency on soil carbon storage in Mollisols and Vertisols,” Geoderma, vol. 167-168, pp. 254–260, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. B. Mary and J. Guérif, “Interêts et limites des modèles de prévision de l’évolution des matières organiques et de l’azote dans le sol,” Cahiers Agricultures, vol. 3, pp. 247–257, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  71. L. Tallarico and R. Caravello, “El suelo en la región triguera argentina,” in Programa de Trigo Y Cebada Cervecera, IDIA/INTA 233-5, pp. 172–181, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  72. J. Balesdent, G. H. Wagner, and A. Mariotti, “Soil organic matter turnover in long-term field experiments as revealed by carbon-13 natural abundance,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  73. R. C. Dalal and R. J. Mayer, “Long-term trends in fertility of soils under continuous cultivation and cereal cropping in southern Queensland. II. Total organic carbon and its rate of loss from the soil profile,” Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 281–292, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  74. J. Keli Zagbahi, Système de culture, système de production et statu organique des sols: essai de diagnostic sur les pratiques d’entretien organique dans une petite région agricole [Thèse de Doctorat], Institut National Agronomique de Paris-Grignon, 1984.
  75. D. Plénet, E. Lubet, and C. Juste, “Evolution à long terme du statut carbone du sol en monoculture non irriguée du maïs (Zea mays L.),” Agronomie, vol. 13, pp. 685–698, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  76. R. Nieder and D. K. Benbi, Carbon and Nitrogen in the Terrestrial Environment, Springer Science, 2008.
  77. A. Irizar, A. E. Andriulo, and B. Mary, “Long-term impact of no tillage in two intensified crop rotations on different soil organic matter fractions in Argentine Rolling Pampa,” The Open Agriculture Journal, vol. 7, pp. 22–31, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  78. J. Hassink, “Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 126–134, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. C. A. Cambardella and E. T. Elliott, “Carbon and nitrogen dynamics of soil organic matter fractions from cultivated grassland soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  80. M. H. Beare, M. L. Cabrera, P. F. Hendrix, and D. C. Coleman, “Aggregate-protected and unprotected organic matter pools in conventional- and no-tillage soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 787–795, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  81. M. Stemmer, M. von Lützow, E. Kandeler, F. Pichlmayer, and M. H. Gerzabek, “The effect of maize straw placement on mineralization of C and N in soil particle size fractions,” European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. Chesson, “Plant degradation by rumiants: parallels with litter decomposition in soils,” in Driven By Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition, G. Cadisch and K. E. Giller, Eds., pp. 47–66, CAB International, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  83. M. A. Bortolato, A. E. Andriulo, D. Colombini, F. Villalba, and L. Hanuch, “Aporte de nitrógeno al suelo de las hojas del cultivo de soja,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Congreso Argentino de la Ciencia del Suelo, Rosario, Argentina, May 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  84. M. H. Beare, B. R. Pohlad, D. H. Wright, and D. C. Coleman, “Residue placement and fungicide effects on fungal communities in conventional and no-tillage soils,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 392–399, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  85. C. Caride, G. Piñeiro, and J. M. Paruelo, “How does agricultural management modify ecosystem services in the argentine Pampas? The effects on soil C dynamics,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 154, pp. 23–33, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. P. Bertuzzi, E. Justes, C. Les Bas, B. Mary, and V. Souchère, “Effets des cultures intermédiaires sur l’érosion, les propriétés physiques du sol et le bilan carbone,” in Réduire les fuites de nitrate au moyen de cultures intermédiaire: Conséquences sur les bilans d’eau et d’azote, autres services écosystémiques, chapter 5, pp. 1–28, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Luis A. Milesi Delaye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.