Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Applied and Environmental Soil Science / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Integrated Approaches to Soil Contamination Monitoring

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 3590548 |

Daniel Moraetis, Nikolaos Lydakis-Simantiris, Despina Pentari, Emmanouil Manoutsoglou, Chryssa Apostolaki, Vasilios Perdikatsis, "Chemical and Physical Characteristics in Uncultivated Soils with Different Lithology in Semiarid Mediterranean Clima", Applied and Environmental Soil Science, vol. 2016, Article ID 3590548, 13 pages, 2016.

Chemical and Physical Characteristics in Uncultivated Soils with Different Lithology in Semiarid Mediterranean Clima

Academic Editor: Francesco Sdao
Received30 Oct 2015
Accepted06 Apr 2016
Published20 Jun 2016


The aim of this study is to identify the chemical and physical characteristics in uncultivated soils derived from different parent materials under semiarid Mediterranean climatic conditions which favoured the formation of fragile soils. The current work is of great interest in the agriculture and environmental stakeholders for providing a “benchmark” of undisturbed soil quality regarding organic content and nutrients availability. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used as the primary tool to demonstrate the soil quality stage, regarding nutrient availability. The statistical analysis revealed that one of the major physicochemical characteristics such as cation exchange capacity (CEC) is controlled exclusively from mineralogy and not from organic matter. Mineralogy and bulk chemical analysis is directly related to soil parent material lithology. The availability of inorganic nutrients (macro- and micronutrients) is low and relatively identical to most of the soils. PCA shows the unusual correlation of K+ with not only illite content but also the OM in soils. The development of soils which are already of low quality in respect of organic content and nutrients is evident in Crete in most of the 54 samples investigated.

1. Introduction

Soil is the dynamic link between the biosphere and lithosphere and constitutes a practically not renewable (very low rate of formation) natural resource, with a key role for the environment and for the agriculture. It is a key component of the Earth System since it controls the hydrological, ecological, biological, and geochemical cycles [15]. The properties that are critical for soil quality (i.e., nutrients content, pH, and electrical conductivity) are governed by climatic, biological, and geological factors [69]. Mineral weathering is an important source of inorganic nutrients in soils under natural conditions [10]. Geologic gradient affects severely nutrient pools in soils [10]. Areas underlain by serpentinite or generally ultramafic rocks are rich in Mg, Fe, Ni, and Cr and depleted in K, Ca, P, and Zn [11]. On the other hand, soils developed in volcanic ash exhibit high cation exchange capacity (CEC) [12]. Hepper et al. [13] stated that CEC was controlled mainly by clay content in ash rich soils and by organic matter (OM) in ash free soils.

Apart from nutrients release through weathering processes, soil characteristics are further affected by atmospheric deposition, drainage outflow, biomass removal, and other processes such as cation exchange and organic matter decomposition, while pronounced interrelations exist between all factors mentioned above [7].

High geologic variability mainly appeared in tectonically active areas like boundaries of orogenetic belts. Crete is situated in the external plate of the Eurasian plate and exhibits a large variety of geomorphic and geologic features. So far, a number of papers have been published concerning soil taxonomy in Greece (i.e., [14, 15]). The geological framework of Crete has been studied thoroughly [1618] and soil development appears mainly in limestones, ultramafic rocks, calcareous marls, metamorphic rocks (phyllites-quartzites), and alluvial sediments. Moreover, Crete exhibits a semiarid Mediterranean climate (long hot-summers 20–31°C) which remained unchanged the last 20 Ma (late Miocene-early Pliocene till present) [19]. Thus, soils appear relatively fragile with low organic content, sparse vegetation, and being prone to desertification [20, 21]. The last decade a major concern has been raised regarding the preservation of our soils and that it is mentioned also in the recent accomplished European funded project Soil Transformation in European Catchments (SoilTrEC) [22]. Climate change has been reported as a severe driving force for soil deterioration in areas such as England and Wales [2327]. Crete will also be affected by climate change and represents an area of high desertification risk. Although many studies on the soil degradation have been published for Mediterranean countries, very few are reporting the current state of uncultivated and undisturbed soils [2830]. The reason behind it is that very few places in Europe are still intact of manmade activities. Many soil modeling studies specifically for carbon sequestration and/or erosion are missing data for undisturbed soils (initial conditions) ([31] and references therein and [32]). The lack of data is magnified when the soil lithology variability is considered. Crete still preserves several places of undisturbed soil development over different lithologies. Such areas could be used as a benchmark against which the soil manmade impact and the future climatic changes could be further quantified.

The present study aims to identify physical and chemical characteristics in undisturbed soils of different lithology of parent rock with sparse vegetation under the influence of Mediterranean climatic conditions. We aim to clearly demonstrate the fragile nature of soils from Crete for uncultivated areas with low organic content and to supply data that are important for assessing thin soils in semiarid climates. For this reason, soil samples from uncultivated areas of different bedrocks were collected and their mineralogical characteristics, physical and chemical properties, and their nutrient content were investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied on chemical and physical characteristics of all samples in order to identify groups of samples with common characteristics and to investigate and to rationalize the potential correlations among soil characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Geological Outline

The samples were collected from six areas in the island of Crete with four different bedrock lithologies. The different bedrocks are alluvial sediments (quaternary sediments) from two plateaus, ultramafic rocks, quartzite-phyllite rocks, and Neocene marly limestones. Mesozoic limestones were excluded since they are mainly situated in high altitudes with limited soil profiles. The aforementioned lithologies are present at Omalos Plateau (O) in western Crete, Lasithi Plateau in East Crete (La), Anogia in central Crete (U), Kantanos (Ka) and Kantanos-Kountoura (Kb) in western Crete, and Platanos (PL) in west Crete (Figure 1). The areas exhibit generally thin soil development.

Omalos area is situated in the west part of “Lefka Ori” mountains and its geomorphology is a typical plateau (1050 m elevation). The rock formations around the Omalos Plateau are mainly part of the Trypali limestones and less of the Plattenkalk limestones with minor outcrops of phyllites-quartzites series, whereas quaternary sediments have filled the plateau [1618, 33]. The soil samples were collected from areas where the soil overlaid the quaternary formations (alluvial) within the plateau.

Lasithi soils were collected from Lasithi Plateau (353 m), which shows similar geological setting to Omalos Plateau. Limestones, mainly of Plattenkalk nappe and phyllites-quartzite group, are situated in the surrounding area of the plateau, whereas the soil samples were collected from the top of alluvial deposits.

Anogia area is underlain by ophiolites (mainly ultramafic rocks: peridotites). The most extended ophiolite outcrop in Crete exists in the area of Anogia village (701 m elevation). The ultramafic rocks comprise predominantly serpentinized peridotites. The overlying soil is mainly of limited thickness, whereas in land depressions and cavities the soil layer appears much thicker.

The parent rock of Kantanos area comprises metamorphic quartzite-phyllite group. Quartzite group in west Crete facies belt is characterized by an alternation of meta-greywackes, meta-sandstones, and metapelites [34, 35]. Two different sets of soil samples were collected from Kantanos area (Ka) and Kantanos-Kountoura area (Kb) (both around 350 m elevation). The former soil is developed in eroded quartzite-phyllite group rich in quartz, whereas the latter is developed in phyllite-quartzite group with less quartz and higher mica content.

Platanos area comprises mainly of Neocene marls with intercalations of limestones and sandstones. The area is situated in the most western part of Crete compared to the other sampling sites (Figure 1) and elevation is 250 m.

2.2. Sample Collection and Pretreatment

Sampling was carried out using a special soil auger, designed for all soil types, and samples were collected from the top 20 cm. 54 samples were collected from sites chosen according to three strategic guidelines: (i) sites with uncultivated in situ soils (covered rarely by shrubs), (ii) sites where the mineralogical variation was apparent due to different parent materials, and (iii) sites with varied precipitation due to orientation (east-west). Samples were taken from six different areas, as follows (Figure 1): Omalos Plateau, nine samples (O1–O9); Kantanos, seven samples (Ka1–Ka7); Kantanos-Kountoura, eleven samples (Kb1–Kb11); Anogia, eight samples (U1–U8); Lasithi, eleven samples (La1–La11); and Platanos, eight samples (PL1–PL8). Samples were transferred to the laboratory, dried at 37°C for 48 h, and subsequently sieved through the 2 mm sieve.

2.3. Mineralogical Analysis

Mineralogical composition was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique using a Siemens D500 powder diffractometer, on two grain fractions, silt (<63 μm) and clay (<2 μm). These fractions were attained by separation with an Atterberg cylinder [36]. The data were obtained at 35 kV and 35 mA, with a graphite monochromator, using CuKa radiation. A 0.03° scanning step and 2-s scanning time per step were used for the range 3 to 70°. The qualitative evaluation of the data was done with the Software Diffrac Plus (SOCABIM SAS France). The quantitative analysis was carried out by the Rietveld Method.

2.4. Chemical Analyses on Soils and Extraction Solutions

The bulk chemical analysis of the samples was carried out by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (S2 Ranger, Bruker EDS XRF), on the less than 2 mm sample fraction. Measurements were carried out at 40 kV with an Al filter (500 μm) for the heavier elements (Fe, Mn, Ti, Ca, and K) and at 20 kV for the lighter elements (P, Si, Al, Mg, and Na) without the use of filter. pH was determined in the supernatant of a soil : water mixture 1 : 2, according to Thomas [37] by a pH meter (WTW, 340i). Electrical conductivity was determined by a conductivity electrode (WTW, 340i) in the extract from saturated soil pastes. Calcium content was determined in the same extract after filtration, by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) (Perkin Elmer, AA100). Available K+ and Mg2+ were extracted from soil samples by agitation in 1 M CH3COONH4 pH 7 solution [38, 39] and determined by AAS. Available micronutrients Fe2+, Cu2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+ were extracted from the soil samples by the DTPA method, at pH 7.3 [40], and their concentrations were determined by AAS. Phosphorous extraction was carried out by a 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate solution [41] and its concentration was measured photometrically at 882 nm (HACH, DR/4000U) using a standard calibration curve. Nitrates were extracted with 1 M KCl and NO3-N concentration was measured photometrically [42]. The concentration of organic matter was calculated according to Walkley and Black [43].

2.5. Cation Exchange Capacity-Grain Size Analysis

Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was determined by the method described by Sumner and Miller [44] modified for soils in arid regions. After the removal of CaCO3 with HCl 2 N, soil samples were saturated with CaCl2 2 N and the adsorbed Ca2+ was extracted using NaCl 2 N solution [45]. Determination of Ca2+ in extracted solutions was carried out by AAS.

The content of sand, clay, and silt of the samples (grain size analysis) was determined with the Bouyoucos method [36].

3. Results

Results for the physical and chemical parameters of soils are presented separate for each area and then PCA analysis is applied for all samples and it is presented in a separate section. Lasithi and Omalos are presented together since they are both plateau areas and Kantanos and Kantanos-Kountoura data are also presented together since both are adjacent areas with seemingly the same soil parent material.

3.1. Omalos and Lasithi Plateaus

Omalos and Lasithi soils have been developed in plateau and the parent material is alluvial deposits as has already been mentioned. The soils have contrasting characteristics in mineralogy, in bulk chemical analysis and other physical and chemical parameters. The silt fractions (<63 μm) of Omalos (O) soils exhibit higher quartz content compared to the Lasithi (La) soils and this is also reflected in the chemical analysis of the soils (Tables 1 and 2). Chlorite is present in the clay fraction (<2 μm) for La soil samples, but it is absent in O samples. Illite and kaolinite are characteristic weathering products of feldspars which are present in the bedrocks. Calcite is only a minor phase in both areas despite the widespread limestone outcrops in the plateau surrounding area attributed to the ease of calcite dissolution (karstification). O soils contain higher kaolinite and less illite content compared to La soils.

<63 μm (%)<2 μm (%)

Smectite14.8 11.4

—: not determined.

Sample Na2O (%)MgO (%)K2O (%)CaO (%)TiO2 (%)MnO (%)Fe2O3 (%)Al2O3 (%)SiO2 (%)P2O5 (%)LOI (%)SUM


—: not determined.

Table 2 shows the chemical composition (XRF) of the soil samples. Omalos soils have higher SiO2 content (83.1%) compared to other areas. Lasithi samples exhibit higher MgO content (3.79%) compared to Omalos soils (0.47%).

Average, minimum, maximum values, and standard deviation (due to spatial variability) of the physicochemical parameters measured for all soils are illustrated in Table 3. Lasithi soils have statistically the same pH (7.4) compared to Omalos soils (6.4) (Table 3). This is not the case with electrical conductivity values (O: 187, La: 364 μS/cm) and this is related to different availability of nutrients in the two areas. Lasithi soils exhibit on average higher availability of nutrients compared to Omalos soils (La: 114, 228, 38 mg/kg, O: 50, 64, 5 mg/kg, for K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, resp.); however, there is spatial variability for both sites which is expected in sedimentary basins such as in those plateaus.

CEC (meq/100 g)K+ (mg/kg)Mg2+ (mg/kg)Ca2+ (mg/kg)Cu2+ (mg/kg)Mn2+ (mg/kg)Fe2+ (mg/kg)Zn2+ (mg/kg)P- (mg/kg)N- (mg/kg)OM%

O (9 samples)


La (11 samples)


U (8 samples)


Ka (7 samples)


Kb (11 samples)


PL (8 samples)


Lasithi samples have higher CEC values (8.52 meq/100 gr), compared to Omalos soils CEC (4 meq/100 gr) (Table 3). Grain size analysis shows loam and silt loam fractions for O soils, whereas La soils are finer (mainly in clay loam fraction).

3.2. Anogia

Anogia soils contain abundant serpentine in both 63 μm and 2 μm soil fractions (Table 1). Serpentine is a typical constituent of ultramafic rocks (ophiolites) and outcrops in the area. The presence of talc in the silt soil fraction can also be attributed to the bedrock. Quartz content in the silt fraction is not related to the parent material. Chlorite in both silt and clay soil fractions could be either primary (from ultramafic rocks) or secondary mineral. Smectite in the clay fraction is a secondary mineral.

The chemical composition of Anogia soils resembles that of ultramafic rocks with SiO2 content < 45% and high MgO concentration (26.4%) (Table 2).

Anogia soils exhibit an average pH value of 7.4. Electrical conductivity is rather low (279 μS/cm). Magnesium shows high availability in Anogia soils (1611 mg/kg) whereas potassium and calcium are rather low (66 and 4 mg/kg, resp.) (Table 3).

Anogia samples display the highest cation exchange capacity (12 meq/100 g) compared to the CEC of the other soils (Table 3). Anogia soils are coarse grain (sandy loam).

3.3. Kantanos and Kantanos-Kountoura

Kantanos and Kantanos-Kountoura soils contain abundant illite, kaolinite, and quartz (Table 1). Quartz is the predominant mineral in the silt fraction (<63 μm) for both Ka and Kb soils. Illite and kaolinite are present in both 63 μm and 2 μm soil fractions and both are typical products of weathered micaceous rocks such as those in phyllites-quartzites series. However, although the silt fraction of the two soils has comparable mineralogical composition, the clay fraction of Ka soil is rich in kaolinite whereas that of Kb soil has high illite content (Table 1).

Ka soils exhibit higher concentration of SiO2 (72.1%) compared to Kb soils (62.2%) (Table 2).

Low pH values are observed for soil samples from Ka and Kb (5.6, 6.2), which are related to SiO2-rich parent materials (Phyllites-Quartzites). Electrical conductivity exhibits spatial variability for both areas and the average value is higher for Kb soils (Ka: 292, Kb: 603 μS/cm). Potassium concentration in extraction solutions from the Kb soils is higher (200 mg/kg) compared to that from Ka soils (61 mg/kg) something that is in accordance with the higher illite content in the clay fraction for Kb soils (Tables 1 and 3).

Ka and Kb soils show low CEC (Ka: 2.1 meq/100 g, Kb: 3.1 meq/100 g). Moreover, soils from Ka and Kb areas are sandy loam and sandy clay loam, respectively.

3.4. Platanos

Platanos soils contain abundant calcite in both the silt and clay fractions which is related to sedimentation in shallow marine basins [46] (Table 1). Platanos soils are developed over marly limestones and sandstones (Neocene rocks). Smectite is present in the clay fraction.

On Table 2 the high CaO (26.4%) and SiO2 (24.2%) contents are illustrated and are typical for submarine sediments with marly limestones and sandstones. MgO is noticeable (2.45%), whereas high loss on ignition (LOI) is attributed to calcite presence.

PL soils exhibit the highest pH values compared to other soils (in average 7.9, standard deviation 0.3) which can be related to the high content of basic cations (Ca2+: 125 mg/kg) in extraction solution (Table 3). Moreover, PL soils have the highest electrical conductivity (1496 μS/cm).

Platanos samples exhibit the second higher cation exchange capacity (CEC) compared to other soils (11 meq/100 gr). Grain size distribution is that of clay loam for PL soils.

3.5. Principal Component Analysis

The chemical analysis (XRF) is presented in Table 2. Figure 2(a) shows the Principal Components Analysis (PCA) results for 54 samples with variables the chemical species obtained by XRF analysis. The first three principal components describe 81% of the total variability. Three groups of samples are set, that is, PL samples (high Ca content), U soils (high Mg content), and Ka, Kb, O, and La soil samples (high Si2O content) (groups in circles in Figure 2(a)). The first component (34% variability) correlates Si2O and Al2O3, the second component (32% variability) correlates MnO, Fe2O3, and MgO, and the third principal component strongly correlates K2O and Al2O3. The categorization of Ka, Kb, O, and La in the same group shows common chemical characteristics of those soil samples. Figure 2(b) shows another PCA that is applied for physical and chemical variables such as clay content, OM, CEC, pH, N-NO3, and P-PO4. The first three principal components (PCs) captured 75% of the variability and there is an obvious correlation between CEC, pH, clay content, and N-NO3 content. Samples from La show some increase in P-PO4 that is related to organic content. The first PC (34% of variability) correlates the CEC and N-NO3 content with clay content and pH. The second PC (22% of variability) strongly correlates OM% and P-PO4. The third PC (19% of variability) correlates the OM% with N-NO3.

Figure 3(a) shows the PCA analysis for all soil samples for variables such as macronutrients content (K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+), OM%, clay content, and total illite content in both silt and clay fractions. The first three principal components described the 75% of total variability. The striking feature in this analysis is the first principal component that describes 34% of total variability and sets K+ content, organic content, and illite content to be analogous. The illite content is referred to as corrected since the total concentration percentage includes illite in both silt and clay fractions and normalized to 100. The second PC shows (23% variability) that Ca2+ is related to clay content and the third PC (20% variability) correlates Mg2+ and K+ with clay content. Figure 3(b) shows the PCA for all samples with variables, only the macronutrient availability. It is clear that K+ and Mg2+ availability in soils is relatively the same in all samples and deviates only for Anogia soils (U-samples in circle Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) and some soil samples from Platanos area (PL-arrows in Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Kb11 sample (arrow in Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) exhibits higher K+ availability compared to all samples. The first two PCs capture 73% of variability and Mg2+ related positively to K+ (first PC-37% variability) whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ are negatively correlated with K+ (second PC-36% variability).

Micronutrients (Zn2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+), clay content, and OM% are the variables for the PCA depicted in Figure 4(a). The first 3 PCs explain the 79% of the variability. The first PC (39% of variability) shows high correlation with organic content for all micronutrients apart from Zn2+. The second PC (21% variability) interrelates Cu2+ content to clay content. The third PC (19% variability) shows low interrelation between Fe2+ and OM% and high correlation with Cu2+ and Zn2+. Figure 4(b) shows PCA for the micronutrients (Zn2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, and Mn2+) and it is obvious that all samples are gathered in a cloud and only three samples are deviated (shown with black arrows in Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). The first two PCs capture 73% of total variability. The first PC (47% variability) correlates Fe2+ with Cu2+ and Mn2+, and the second PC (26% variability) correlates Zn2+ and Cu2+.

4. Discussion

4.1. Mineralogy and Chemical Analysis of Soils in relation to Different Parent Material

As it is expected, parent material influences primary mineral phases of soils. Two main reasons impose differences in the soil samples from Omalos Plateau and Lasithi Plateau and these are differences in the parent material and differences in the amount of precipitation in those areas. The presence of feldspars and chlorites and the lower quartz content in La soils compared to O soils are attributed to differences in the lithology of the weathering products (Table 1). This can be attributed to lithology differences of the surrounding rocks (phyllites and quartzites series) which they supplied with weathered products (sediments), both plateaus. In western Crete, phyllites and quartzites are dominated by quartz (Omalos Plateau-quartzites), whereas in eastern Crete they have high mica content (Lasithi Plateau-phyllites). The presence of less illite and more kaolinite in O soils compared to La soils can be attributed to higher precipitation in O plateau compared to La plateau. Omalos Plateau is situated in higher elevation compared to Lasithi Plateau, whereas apart from the orographic gradient there is also strong directional gradient since western parts of the island gets more rain than the eastern part and that is demonstrated by recent studies (i.e., 1190–1670 mm/a in Omalos Plateau, 720–1190 mm/a in Lasithi Plateau) [47, 48]. Kourgialas et al. [49] presented the strong rainfall gradient due to elevation differences (, = rain, and = elevation).

The silt fraction of Anogia soils exhibits characteristic primary mineralogy with serpentine and talc as inherited from ultramafic rocks (Table 1). Smectite (a secondary mineral) in clay fraction can be attributed to Mg abundance in soil. The detection of quartz is noteworthy; a possible explanation for the presence of quartz may be dust deposition [50, 51].

Ka and Kb soils have quartz, feldspars, and phyllosilicates (paragonite) in silt and clay fractions which are related to phyllites-quartzite parent material. Ka soils exhibit differences in secondary minerals compared to Kb soils. Ka soils contain lower illite in clay fraction compared to Kb soils, which is attributed to differences within the phyllites and quartzites series (Kb soils less acidic: low presence of quartzites) since both sampling areas are in the same elevation. This is an evident that soils from different lithology exhibit different content of secondary mineralogy like illite under the same climatic conditions (same amount of rain).

Platanos soils show mineralogy which is characteristic of the calcaric Neocene sediments (parent material) with abundant calcite in both silt and clay fractions. The presence of smectite in the PL soils is linked to MgO presence in chemical analysis. PL soils contain illite, which might be secondary and/or primary sedimentary mineral.

Smectite is present in soils with different lithological characteristics (i.e., ultramafic: U, alluvial: La, and limestone: PL). This is an indication that factors like precipitation and drainage of soils affect concentration of basic cations (i.e., Mg2+ and Ca2+) favouring the formation of smectite. This is also evident from bulk chemical analysis where U, PL, and La exhibit significant Mg2+ concentrations (Table 2).

Bulk chemical analysis of soils reflects the main characteristics of the parent materials (Table 2, Figure 2). The striking feature is the relative common chemical characteristics for O, La, Ka, and Kb soils (Figure 2) which is evidence that alluvial sediments in Omalos and Lasithi Plateau are comprised of weathered products of metamorphic schists like those in Ka and Kb sites. Thus, O and La soils exhibit high SiO2 concentration in bulk chemical analysis related to alluvial rocks lithology. O soils exhibit higher SiO2 content compared to La soils probably due to higher precipitation in Omalos Plateau as it has been already mentioned, which promotes the increase of elements leaching and the increase of weathering resistant material like quartz. The highest MgO and FeO concentrations are found in U soils since they are inherent characteristics of its parent material (serpentine). Kb and Ka soils exhibit the highest SiO2 concentration that is related to their parent materials (phyllites and quartzites); Kb soils show lower SiO2 concentration compared to Ka due to less acidic parent material in the former as it has already been mentioned. PL soils show the highest CaO content compared to the other soils related to a Neocene sediment mixture of sand and marly limestones.

Soil texture shows that sedimentary parent material exhibits finer grain size soils (PL, O, and La), whereas soils with nonsedimentary parent material are coarser grained (Ka, Kb, and U). Parent material of the PL soils (soils with finer grains) is a biochemical sedimentary rock and the deposition of fine grain calcite is common [46].

4.2. Macronutrients and Micronutrients in relation to Different Soil Parent Material

PCA analysis showed strong interrelation between potassium content, organic matter, and illite content (Figure 3(a)). In addition, Ca2+ is related to clay content and negatively related to Mg2+ and K+. Moreover, it is obvious from Figure 3(a) that most of the soil samples are gathered in one “cloud” without separating any group, except Anogia soils (U). The same is shown from PCA, where three macronutrients are considered as variables (K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) (Figure 3(b)). The previous shows soils from different lithologies (alluvial-O, La metamorphic Ka, Kb, and calcaric PL) to have identical availability of macronutrients and the samples deviating from those are Anogia samples due to high availability of Mg (samples in circles, Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) and some samples from Platanos area due to high availability of Ca (arrows in Figure 3(b)). In other words it is shown that all soils apart from Anogia samples and some from Platanos area are in a common state regarding K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ availability. Only in Anogia soils, lithology characteristics of the parent material influence macronutrient availability such as Mg2+, whereas the case is the same with some samples from Platanos area. Stutter et al. [7] showed that a strong relationship exists between basic cations (i.e., Ca2+, Mg2+) and basic parent material in soils. The high calcite content in PL soils is due to the origin of the Neocene parent material (sediment pool in shallow marine environment) [46] which mainly consist of unconsolidated crystals of calcite, clay minerals, and quartz. To verify the results, -tests were applied for all samples to identify significant different average values. As it is shown in Table 3, most of the samples are not significantly different regarding K+ availability, apart from Kb samples, which show higher illite content. The previous is observed also in Figure 3(b) where Kb samples are along K+ variable axis. Omalos samples exhibit the lowest K+ availability and they are slightly different to La soil samples which are probably connected with increased K leaching due to higher precipitation in Omalos Plateau compared to Lasithi Plateau. In addition, potassium availability in our case is controlled by both illite content and organic matter, which is an unusual case and it is observed only when organic matter contribution in the total CEC is less than 15%, which has been shown by detailed study of Poonia and Niederbudde [52] on the K+ absorption in soils. The aforementioned is verified by the weak interrelation of OM% and CEC as revealed in PCA (Figure 2(b)). Visualization of the aforementioned is shown also in Figures 5(a) and 5(b) where plots of K+ availability versus illite content and OM content share an almost identical (0.53 to 0.59).

Identical results can be inferred for Mg2+ availability; thus, all samples apart from U exhibit the same Mg2+ and there is again a small difference between O and La samples as it is for potassium. Calcium shows no statistical difference in average values among all soil samples and that is also the case for the soils with calcaric parent material. Someone could infer that the in situ uncultivated soils investigated in Crete regarding K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ have reached a common stage in the availability of these nutrient elements. Differences are observed in soils like Anogia (ultramafic parent material) and in some soils in Platanos (calcaric parent material), where the lithological factor is still strong and overcomes the low organic matter availability.

Figure 4(a) shows that the micronutrients are mostly associated with organic content. Micronutrients availability in 54 soils is relatively identical as it is described in Figure 4(b). Only three samples exhibit high values of certain elements (arrows in Figures 4(a) and 4(b)), an observation that can be related to spatial lithological and/or chemical differences. Indeed, Table 3 shows on average identical statistical values for most of the micronutrients. Fe exhibits on average statistical different values only for the areas of La and U: the former is related to the high organic content (i.e., La11) whereas the latter is related to the higher content of minerals rich with Fe (i.e., chlorite) and this is also obvious in bulk chemistry of U soils (Table 2). U soils exhibit high pH, which is crucial for low leaching rate of available Mn2+ and Fe2+ into soil solution [53]. In contrast, soils with low pH (i.e., Kb11, Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) show higher availability in Mn2+ and Fe2+ and that is also observed by other researchers [54]. Thus, pH seems to influence availability of Mn2+ and Fe2+. In addition, Cu2+ and Zn2+ concentrations are low and they do not vary significantly among the soils, probably due to the relatively low organic matter content (see Section 4.3) and/or the already low concentrations of these ions in the bedrock geology (limestones, ultra-mafic rocks, etc.).

4.3. Organic Matter, Nitrates, and Phosphates Availability in relation to Different Parent Material

OM content is similar in most of the soil samples and it is slightly lower than typical Mediterranean soils (1 to 1.5%) [5558], except La and Kb soils due to denser vegetation in those areas (shrubs, etc.). Two observations are obvious: parent material origin does not affect the OM content of uncultivated soils in Crete and that Mediterranean climate is a crucial regulating factor of OM content in soils. López-Piñeiro et al. [59] mentioned that many soils from the Mediterranean region are poor in organic matter. The same is observed also for nitrates and phosphates in the soils studied here. Fast decomposition of OM due to climatic conditions (low rainfall, high temperatures) and low vegetation grow (low input of organic residues) lead to high rates of N mineralization and finally high leaching of nitrates through rainfall during winter time and especially by first flush events [57, 6065]. The nitrogen-nitrate shows correlation with clay content this is related probably to positively charged sites in clays which has also been observed by others, especially in deeper soil horizons in the absence of organic matter [66]. Figure 2(b) shows P-PO4 to be strongly correlated with organic matter. The aforementioned are also evident in Table 3 where P-PO4 content is on average statistically different for La samples that also exhibit higher content of organic matter in some samples. The N-NO3 abundance is different for PL soils, which are finer. Kb and U soils show also different N-NO3 content which can be related to higher organic content and to the type of clay (i.e., smectite), respectively. More studies are needed in order to clarify these observations.

4.4. Soil Physicochemical Variations in relation to Different Soil Parent Material

Figure 2(b) shows that CEC is related to both clay content and pH and the correlation of organic content with CEC is rather weak. Only La sample exhibits high CEC which can be correlated with organic content which is different and higher compared to other soils in Crete. U, PL soils exhibit the highest CEC values and the highest smectite content compared to other soils and this is also verified by -test. However, considering the highest theoretical CEC of smectite for U soils (70–130 meq/100 g) [67] and that only the clay fraction contributed to CEC, then 16% of the total CEC could be exchanged into extraction solution. Thus, smectite is not the only mineral contributed to CEC. Hence, Wauters et al. [68] referred to exchange sites that consist of sites in planar and/or interlayer clay minerals, humic substances, and frayed edge sites (FES) located at the edges of micaceous minerals. In addition, Fe-Mn oxide minerals can contribute to CEC [69, 70]. Thus, in our case both edges of phyllosilicates minerals (i.e., serpentine, chlorite) and oxides surfaces could contribute to CEC. pH controls CEC of such surfaces.

PL, U, and La soils exhibit high pH values, due to the high content of basic cations like Mg2+ and Ca2+, whereas soils like Ka and Kb exhibit low pH, due to high content of silicon and depletion of basic cations. O and La soils exhibit different pH values despite their similar parent materials, due to differences within the alluvial deposits as already have been mentioned and/or the higher precipitation in Omalos Plateau. The dependence of CEC on pH is related to the presence of exchangeable sites on the edges of the silicate minerals and oxides and on the competitive adsorption of H+ in exchangeable sites [71, 72]. Thus, in the absence of significant organic matter, parent material affects directly the soil pH which in turn influences CEC.

4.5. Soil Quality in Fragile Undisturbed Soils of Crete

Finally the present study shows the fragile soil development in different lithological units of Crete. To visualize the low nutrient capacity of uncultivated soils in Crete, we consider the fertilization requirements of olive trees which are a widespread cultivation in Mediterranean area [73]. Table 4 shows the availability of macronutrients per hectare in the soils investigated and the recommended values for olive trees (in average rainfall 400–700 mm). It is clearly shown that the availability of nutrients is at least 575, 6, 1647, 3300, and 3368 times lower than the recommended fertilization (TDC-Olive project) values for olive trees cultivation. The previous values are calculated by comparing the area with the higher availability for each nutrient to the nutrient recommended value for olive trees cultivation. Thus, the soil states of the undisturbed soils in semiarid Mediterranean climatic conditions have developed soils of low organic content and low nutrient availability and only in certain cases like Mg2+ content in Anogia.

SitesAvailable K+ kg/haRecommended K+ kg/haAvailable Mg2+ kg/haRecommended Mg2+ kg/haAvailable Ca2+ kg/haRecommended Ca2+ kg/haAvailable P-PO4 kg/haRecommended P kg/haAvailable N-NO3 kg/haRecommended N kg/ha

O0.13 (0.06)0.17 (0.07)0.01 (0.01)0.003 (0.002)0.007 (0.004)
La0.30 (0.07)0.59 (0.13)0.07 (0.06)0.004 (0.002)0.008 (0.005)
U0.17 (0.14)3004.19 (0.77)20–340.01 (0.01)360–7140.001 (0.0002)9–160.020 (0.005)150 kg/ha
Ka0.16 (0.12)0.26 (0.06)0.02 (0.03)0.002 (0.001)0.008 (0.001)
Kb0.52 (0.21)0.13 (0.01)0.03 (0.03)0.002 (0.001)0.019 (0.026)
PL0.24 (0.09)0.38 (0.05)0.33 (0.49)0.003 (0.003)0.045 (0.010)

Calculations considered bulk value of 1.3 g/cm3 whereas all calculations were obtained for upper 20 cm of soil depth.

5. Conclusions

Conclusions from the results of the chemical and mineralogical analyses in undisturbed soils in Crete can be summarized to the following.(i)Primary mineralogical phases and bulk chemical analysis of soils reflect parent material lithology; however, PCA revealed that most of the soils showed identical macronutrient availability irrespectively of the parent rock lithology. Only the case of Mg2+ shows higher availability in limited samples from ultramafic parent rock.(ii)Most of the sampling sites show that micronutrients availability has reached a common stage and is low due to low organic content. Only few samples show higher micronutrient availability related possibly to local lithological differences without significantly statistically changing the overall arguments.(iii)PCA revealed that potassium is low and it is controlled from both the secondary minerals and the organic content in soils.(iv)Cation exchange capacity is low and it is connected to smectite presence, edges of minerals, and pH and no relation is identified to organic matter, with the exception of one sample from Lasithi Plateau.(v)Nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorous, Mn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ are not correlated with the parent material, and all soils exhibit common behaviour while the availability in those nutrients is low.(vi)Organic content in undisturbed soils in Mediterranean semiarid climatic conditions is low and it should be considered in future perspectives of soil modeling studies, soil management, and soil protection. Identically, macro- and micronutrients have been washed out in the undisturbed soils due to missing host sites like organic matter.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The project was cofunded by the European Social Fund and National Resources EPEAEK II-PYTHAGORAS. The authors are thankful for the economic support.


  1. P. Smith, M. F. Cotrufo, C. Rumpel et al., “Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils,” Soil, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 665–685, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Decock, J. Lee, M. Necpalova, E. I. Pereira, D. M. Tendall, and J. Six, “Mitigating N2O emissions from soil: from patching leaks to transformative action,” SOIL, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 687–694, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. D. Keesstra, V. Geissen, K. Mosse et al., “Soil as a filter for groundwater quality,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 507–516, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. C. Brevik, A. Cerdà, J. Mataix-Solera et al., “The interdisciplinary nature of SOIL,” SOIL, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 117–129, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Berendse, J. van Ruijven, E. Jongejans, and S. Keesstra, “Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance,” Ecosystems, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 881–888, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Pastor and J. G. Bockheim, “Distribution and cycling of nutrients in an aspen-mixed-hardwood-spodosol ecosystem in northern Wisconsin,” Ecology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 339–353, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Stutter, S. Langan, and M. Cresser, “Weathering and atmospheric deposition signatures of base cations in upland soils of NE Scotland: their application to critical load assessment,” Geoderma, vol. 116, no. 3-4, pp. 301–324, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. L. K. Vestin, K. Nambu, P. A. W. van Hees, D. Bylund, and U. S. Lundström, “The influence of alkaline and non-alkaline parent material on soil chemistry,” Geoderma, vol. 135, pp. 97–106, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. A. Wysocki, P. J. Schoeneberger, and H. E. Lagarry, “Soil surveys: a window to the subsurface,” Geoderma, vol. 126, no. 1-2, pp. 167–180, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. C. Graham, W. R. Guertal, and K. R. Tice, “The pedologic nature of weathered rock,” in Whole Regolith Pedology, D. L. Cremeens, R. B. Brown, and J. H. Huddleston, Eds., Special Publication no. 34, pp. 21–40, Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), Madison, Wis, USA, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. A. Roberts and J. Proctor, The Ecology of Areas with Serpentinized Rocks: A World View, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.
  12. F. Caravaca, A. Lax, and J. Albaladejo, “Organic matter, nutrient contents and cation exchange capacity in fine fractions from semiarid calcareous soils,” Geoderma, vol. 93, no. 3-4, pp. 161–176, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. N. Hepper, D. E. Buschiazzo, G. G. Hevia, A. Urioste, and L. Antón, “Clay mineralogy, cation exchange capacity and specific surface area of loess soils with different volcanic ash contents,” Geoderma, vol. 135, pp. 216–223, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. R. Egli, Ecology of the valleys in the mountains of Crete (Griechenland) [Ph.D. thesis], ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, 1993 (German).
  15. G. Nakos, “Relationships of bio-climatic zones and lithology with various characteristics of forest soils in Greece,” Plant and Soil, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 101–121, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. U. F. Dornsiepen and E. Manutsoglu, “Zur gliederung der phyllit-decke kretas und des peloponnes,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 145, pp. 286–304, 1994 (German). View at: Google Scholar
  17. N. Fytrolakis, The geological structure of Crete [Ph.D. thesis], National Technical University of Athens, 1980.
  18. M. Manoutsoglou, E. Spyridonos, A. Soujon, and V. Jacobshagen, “Redesign of geological map and 3D simulation of the geological structure of Samaria gorge western Crete,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of the Geological Society of Greece, P. G. Marinos, G. C. Koukis, G. C. Tsiambaos, and G. C. Stournaras, Eds., pp. 29–36, Geological Society of Greece, Athens, Greece, September 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. Quade, N. Solounias, and T. E. Cerling, “Stable isotopic evidence from paleosol carbonates and fossil teeth in Greece for forest or woodlands over the past 11 Ma,” Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 41–53, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Tsakona and V. Gekas, “Desertification in Crete and the effect of global warming,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Environment, Ecosystems and Development (WSEAS '07), M. Otesteanu, S. Celikyay, N. Mastorakis, S. Lache, and F.-K. Benra, Eds., pp. 211–216, Tenerife, Spain, December 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  21. N. J. Yassoglou and C. Kosmas, “Desertification in the Mediterranean Europe. A case study in Greece,” RALA Report 200, Agricultural Research Institut, Reykjavik, Iceland, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. Banwart, “Save our soils,” Nature, vol. 474, no. 7350, pp. 151–152, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Cerdà, “Relationships between climate and soil hydrological and erosional characteristics along climatic gradients in Mediterranean limestone areas,” Geomorphology, vol. 25, no. 1-2, pp. 123–134, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Cerda and H. Lavee, “Runoff an erosion during the gradient climatic attitude effect caused by the pasture in the Judean Deserts,” Cuadernos Geograficos, no. 29, pp. 27–50, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. Cerdà, “Aggregate stability against water forces under different climates on agriculture land and scrubland in southern Bolivia,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 159–166, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. C. Campos, J. B. Etchevers, K. L. Oleschko, and C. M. Hidalgo, “Soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralization rates along an altitudinal gradient on the cofre de perote volcano (Mexico): the importance of landscape position and land use,” Land Degradation and Development, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 581–593, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. U. Choudhury, A. R. Fiyaz, K. P. Mohapatra, and S. Ngachan, “Impact of land uses, agrophysical variables and altitudinal gradient on soil organic carbon concentration of North-Eastern Himalayan Region of India,” Land Degradation and Development, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1163–1174, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Casana, “Mediterranean valleys revisited: linking soil erosion, land use and climate variability in the Northern Levant,” Geomorphology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 429–442, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Kéfi, M. Rietkerk, C. L. Alados et al., “Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7159, pp. 213–217, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. F. E. Stamati, N. P. Nikolaidis, D. Venieri, E. Psillakis, and N. Kalogerakis, “Dissolved organic nitrogen as an indicator of livestock impacts on soil biochemical quality,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 26, pp. S340–S343, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. E. Stamati, N. P. Nikolaidis, and J. L. Schnoor, “Modeling topsoil carbon sequestration in two contrasting crop production to set-aside conversions with RothC—calibration issues and uncertainty analysis,” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 165, pp. 190–200, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Panagos, K. Christos, B. Cristiano, and G. Ioannis, “Seasonal monitoring of soil erosion at regional scale: an application of the G2 model in Crete focusing on agricultural land uses,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 27, pp. 147–155, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Krahl, G. Kauffmann, Η. Kozur, D. Richter, O. Förster, and F. Heinritzi, “New data on the biostratigraphie of Phyllite group and the Trypali group on the island of Crete (Greece),” Geologische Rundschau, vol. 72, pp. 1147–1166, 1983 (German). View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. Greiling and W. Skala, “The development of pre-neogenen tectonism in Phyllite-Quartzite series,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 127, pp. 429–433, 1976 (German). View at: Google Scholar
  35. E. Seidel, The petrology of phyllites-quartzites series crete [Ph.D. thesis], Habilitationsschrift TU Braunschweig, 1978 (German).
  36. G. J. Bouyoucos, “Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 464–465, 1962. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. W. Thomas, “Soil pH and soil acidity,” in Chemical Methods Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3, D. L. Sparks, Ed., vol. 3, pp. 487–489, ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wis, USA, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  38. C. A. Bower, R. F. Reitemeier, and M. Fireman, “Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils,” Soil Science, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 251–261, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. W. Thomas, “Exchangeable cations,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney, Eds., Agronomy Monograph 9, pp. 159–165, ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wis, USA, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  40. W. L. Lindsay and W. A. Norvell, “Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 421–428, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. R. Olsen, C. V. Cole, F. S. Watanabe, and L. A. Dean, Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate, USDA Circ, 1954.
  42. D. R. Keeney, D. W. Nelson et al., “Nitrogen-inorganic forms,” in Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, A. L. Page, D. R. Keeney, D. E. Baker, R. H. Miller, R. Ellis Jr., and J. D. Rhoades, Eds., Agronomy Monograph 9, pp. 643–698, ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wis, USA, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. Walkley and I. A. Black, “An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method,” Soil Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1934. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. E. Sumner and W. P. Miller, “Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients,” in Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3, D. L. Sparks, Ed., SSSA.1201-1229, pp. 1201–1229, Chemical Methods, Madison, Wis, USA, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. Dohrmann, “Problems in CEC determination of calcareous clayey sediments using the ammonium acetate method,” Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 330–334, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. G. Reading, Sedimentary Environment: Processes, Facies and Stratigraphy, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 3rd edition, 1996.
  47. S. Naoum and I. K. Tsanis, “Orographic precipitation modeling with multiple linear regression,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 79–102, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Naoum and I. K. Tsanis, “Temporal and spatial variation of annual rainfall on the island of Crete, Greece,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1899–1922, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. N. Kourgialas, G. P. Karatzas, and N. P. Nikolaidis, “Development of a thresholds approach for real-time flash flood prediction in complex geomorphological river basins,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1478–1494, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. D. H. Yaalon, “Saharan dust and desert loess: effect on surrounding soils,” Journal of African Earth Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 569–571, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. H. Yaalon, “Soils in the Mediterranean region: what makes them different?” Catena, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 157–169, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. R. Poonia and E. A. Niederbudde, “Exchange equilibria of potassium in soils, V. Effect of natural organic matter on K-Ca exchange,” Geoderma, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 233–242, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. W. L. Lindsay and F. R. Cox, “Micronutrient soil testing for the tropics,” in Micronutrients in Tropical Food Crop Production. Fertilizer Research, P. L. G. Vlek, Ed., pp. 169–200, Springer Netherlands, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  54. J. C. Katyal and B. D. Sharma, “DTPA-extractable and total Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe in Indian soils and their association with some soil properties,” Geoderma, vol. 49, no. 1-2, pp. 165–179, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. N. Yassoglou, C. Kosmas, and N. Moustakas, “The red soils, their origin, properties, use and management in Greece,” Catena, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 261–278, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. Dlapa, M. B. Bodí, J. Mataix-Solera, A. Cerdà, and S. H. Doerr, “Organic matter and wettability characteristics of wildfire ash from Mediterranean conifer forests,” CATENA, vol. 135, pp. 369–376, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. L. Costa, V. Aparicio, and A. Cerdà, “Soil physical quality changes under different management systems after 10 years in the Argentine humid pampa,” Solid Earth, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 361–371, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. N. Yazdanpanah, M. Mahmoodabadi, and A. Cerdà, “The impact of organic amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in semiarid lands,” Geoderma, vol. 266, pp. 58–65, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. A. López-Piñeiro, S. Murillo, C. Barreto et al., “Changes in organic matter and residual effect of amendment with two-phase olive-mill waste on degraded agricultural soils,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 378, no. 1-2, pp. 84–89, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. L. Tisdale, W. L. Nelson, J. D. Beaton, and J. L. Halvin, Soil Fertility and Fertilizers, Macmillan, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1993.
  61. D. Moraetis, D. Efstathiou, F. Stamati et al., “High-frequency monitoring for the identification of hydrological and bio-geochemical processes in a Mediterranean river basin,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 389, no. 1-2, pp. 127–136, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B. Turgut, “Comparison of wheat and safflower cultivation areas in terms of total carbon and some soil properties under semi-arid climate conditions,” Solid Earth, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 719–725, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Novara, J. Rühl, T. La Mantia, L. Gristina, S. La Bella, and T. Tuttolomondo, “Litter contribution to soil organic carbon in the processes of agriculture abandon,” Solid Earth, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 425–432, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Muñoz-Rojas, A. Jordán, L. M. Zavala, D. De la Rosa, S. K. Abd-Elmabod, and M. Anaya-Romero, “Impact of land use and land cover changes on organic carbon stocks in mediterranean soils (1956–2007),” Land Degradation and Development, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 168–179, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. L. Roa-Fuentes, C. Martínez-Garza, J. Etchevers, and J. Campo, “Recovery of soil C and N in a tropical pasture: passive and active restoration,” Land Degradation and Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 201–210, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. J.-M. Harmand, H. Ávila, R. Oliver, L. Saint-André, and E. Dambrine, “The impact of kaolinite and oxi-hydroxides on nitrate adsorption in deep layers of a Costarican Acrisol under coffee cultivation,” Geoderma, vol. 158, no. 3-4, pp. 216–224, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. I. E. Odom, “Smectite clay minerals: properties and uses,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, vol. 311, no. 1517, pp. 391–409, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. Wauters, A. Elsen, A. Cremers, A. V. Konoplev, A. A. Bulgakov, and R. N. J. Comans, “Prediction of solid/liquid distribution coefficients of radiocaesium in soils and sediments. Part one: a simplified procedure for the solid phase characterisation,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–594, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. G. R. C. Cooper, “Oxidation and toxicity of chromium in ultramafic soils in Zimbabwe,” Applied Geochemistry, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 981–986, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. E. Essington, Soil and Water Chemistry, An Integrative Approach, CRC Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
  71. F. Bergaya, G. Lagaly, and M. Vayer, “Cation and anion exchange,” in Handbook of Clay Science, Development in Clay Science, F. Bergaya, B. K. G. Theng, and M. Vayer, Eds., pp. 979–1001, Elsevier Science & Technology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  72. M. B. McBride, Environmental Chemistry of Soils, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  73. A. D'Annibale, M. Ricci, D. Quaratino, F. Federici, and M. Fenice, “Panus tigrinus efficiently removes phenols, color and organic load from olive-mill wastewater,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 596–603, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Daniel Moraetis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.