Research Article
Nutrient Budget and Economic Assessment of Blended Fertilizer Use in Kenya Tea Industry
Table 3
Apparent nutrient budget of standard NPK in Timbilil and Kagochi.
| Site | NPK input as fertilizer (kg·ha−1) | Yield (kg·Mt·ha−1·yr−1) | Mean NPK content in 2L + B (%) | Gross NPK removed through harvest (kg·ha−1) | Nutrient budget (input as fertilizer and output as harvest) (kg·ha−1) | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P | K | N | P2O5 | K2O | N | P2O5 | K2O |
| Timbilil | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2132 | 4.67 | 0.466 | 2.15 | 100 | 23 | 55 | −100 | −23 | −55 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 2329 | 4.84 | 0.478 | 2.29 | 113 | 25 | 64 | −38 | −11 | −50 | 150 | 30 | 30 | 2679 | 4.97 | 0.48 | 2.31 | 133 | 30 | 75 | 17 | −1 | −46 | 225 | 45 | 45 | 3099 | 4.86 | 0.509 | 2.41 | 151 | 37 | 90 | 74 | 6 | −47 |
| Kagochi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1683 | 4.53 | 0.497 | 2.32 | 79 | 18 | 47 | −79 | −18 | −47 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 1781 | 4.44 | 0.482 | 2.36 | 86 | 21 | 51 | −11 | −7 | −37 | 150 | 30 | 30 | 1810 | 4.54 | 0.454 | 2.26 | 90 | 18 | 49 | 60 | 11 | −20 | 225 | 45 | 45 | 1800 | 4.61 | 0.457 | 2.27 | 87 | 18 | 49 | 138 | 25 | −6 |
|
|
“−” denotes a negative value.
|