Research Article
Analysis of the Soil Microbiome of a Los Angeles Urban Farm
Table 6
Status of hypotheses at the conclusion of the 16St and soil classification surveys.
| Hypothesis | Status | Supporting evidence | Limitations |
| Plant extracts can control resistant soil bacteria better than common antibiotics | Supported | High mean AOIs for eucalyptus, basil, and lavender oils | Lack quantifiable data for what constituents were responsible |
| Richness of bacterial CFUs at 10-4 dilution can be predicted by soil physical and chemical properties | Supported | High R2 value for multivariate regression, significant univariate models | Presence of antibiotic-producing bacteria should be considered as a factor to improve the model |
| Hydrocarbon-remediating bacteria will be present in Field 21 | Supported | Methylobacteria spp. Sequences were isolated from poplar root zone | Low number of reads overall for Methylobacteria spp. |
| Plant growth-promoting bacteria will be present in the Arboretum | Supported | Isolation of Streptomyces spp. and high proportion of reads for zeatin, mineral absorption, nitrogen metabolism, high relative abundance of Rhizobia | 16S sequencing data are for the field at large rather than strain-specific |
| Field 19 will have the highest proportion of reads related to antibiotic-resistant genes | Partially supported | High proportion of vancomycin resistance and terpene degradation genes attributed to Field 19 | Low amount of human disease and antimicrobial functions found in Field 19 |
|
|