Research Article

Soil Fertility Status as Influenced by Slope Gradient and Land Use Types in Southern Ethiopia

Table 2

Mean value of selected soil physical properties under different land uses and slope gradients at Azit subwatershed.

Land useSand (%)Silt (%)Clay (%)BD (g cm3)TP (%)Textural class

Cultivated33.4434.3432.51b1.11a58.02bClay loam
Grazing32.2032.6035.20a0.82b69.88aClay loam
Eucalyptus34.4033.3032.30b0.89b66.44aClay loam
LSD (0.05)NSNS2.500.124.50
CV (%)10.799.357.6912.597.02

Slope gradient
US (10–15%)40.48a32.2327.29c1.01a62.40bClay loam
MS (5–10%)34.04b33.4532.51b0.97a62.42bClay loam
LS (2–5%)25.48c34.2940.23a0.81b69.50aClay loam
LSD (0.05)3.73NS2.494.540.11
CV (%)10.799.357.697.0212.59

Means in the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance. LSD = least significant difference, CV = coefficient of variation, NS = nonsignificant, BD = bulk density, TP = total porosity.