Soil Fertility Status as Influenced by Slope Gradient and Land Use Types in Southern Ethiopia
Table 2
Mean value of selected soil physical properties under different land uses and slope gradients at Azit subwatershed.
Land use
Sand (%)
Silt (%)
Clay (%)
BD (g cm3)
TP (%)
Textural class
Cultivated
33.44
34.34
32.51b
1.11a
58.02b
Clay loam
Grazing
32.20
32.60
35.20a
0.82b
69.88a
Clay loam
Eucalyptus
34.40
33.30
32.30b
0.89b
66.44a
Clay loam
LSD (0.05)
NS
NS
2.50
0.12
4.50
CV (%)
10.79
9.35
7.69
12.59
7.02
Slope gradient
US (10–15%)
40.48a
32.23
27.29c
1.01a
62.40b
Clay loam
MS (5–10%)
34.04b
33.45
32.51b
0.97a
62.42b
Clay loam
LS (2–5%)
25.48c
34.29
40.23a
0.81b
69.50a
Clay loam
LSD (0.05)
3.73
NS
2.49
4.54
0.11
CV (%)
10.79
9.35
7.69
7.02
12.59
Means in the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance. LSD = least significant difference, CV = coefficient of variation, NS = nonsignificant, BD = bulk density, TP = total porosity.