Research Article

Soil Fertility Status as Influenced by Slope Gradient and Land Use Types in Southern Ethiopia

Table 5

Effect of land use types and slope gradient on selected soil chemical properties at Azit subwatershed.

Av. P (mg kg−1)pH (1 : 2.5 H2O)TN (%)C: NPBS (%)CEC (cmol (+) kg−1)

Land use
Cultivated4.14b5.70a0.17b8.35b59.45b25.67b
Grazing5.30a6.30a0.23a16.83a68.00a27.81a
Eucalyptus2.98c4.60b0.12c16.39a47.67c24.89b
LSD (0.05)0.560.660.033.685.061.11
CV (%)13.6311.878.756.598.673.90

Slope gradient
US (10–15%)3.52b4.88b0.14b14.6750.89c24.47b
MS (5–10%)4.07b5.80a0.15b14.1059.67b25.3b
LS (2–5%)4.83a5.90a0.22a12.8064.67a28.56a
LSD (0.05)0.560.650.03NS5.061.11
CV (%)13.6311.878.756.598.673.90

Means in the same column followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% level of significance, LSD = least significant difference, CV = coefficient variation, US = upper slope, MS = middle slope, LS = lower slope, OC = organic carbon, TN = total nitrogen, Av. P = available phosphorus, PBS = percentage base saturation.